Search

Due to the intracellular expression of Foxp3 it is impossible to purify viable Foxp3+ cells on the basis of Foxp3 staining. Consequently CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in mice have mostly been characterized using CD4+CD25+ T cells or GFPFoxp3 reporter T cells. However, these two populations cannot faithfully represent Tregs as the expression of CD25 and Foxp3 does not completely overlap and GFP+Foxp3+ reporter T cells have been reported to be functionally altered. The aim of this study was to characterize normal Tregs without separating Foxp3+ and Foxp3-cells for the expression of themain functional molecules and proliferation behaviors by flow cytometry and to examine their gene expression characteristics through differential gene expression. Our data showed that the expressions of Foxp3, CD25, CTLA-4 (both intracellular and cell surface) and PD-1 wasmostly confined to CD4+ T cells and the expression of Foxp3 did not completely overlap with the expression of CD25, CTLA-4 or PD-1. Despite higher levels of expression of the T cell inhibitory molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1, Tregs maintained higher levels of Ki-67 expression in the homeostatic state and had greater proliferation in vivo after allo-activation than Tconv. Differential gene expression analysis revealed that resting Tregs exhibited immune activation markers characteristic of activated Tconv. This is consistent with the flow data that the T cell activation markers CD25, CTLA-4, PD-1, and Ki-67 were much more strongly expressed by Tregs than Tconv in the homeostatic state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The AMAZES randomized controlled trial demonstrated that long‐term low‐dose azithromycin treatment reduces exacerbations of poorly controlled asthma, but the therapeutic mechanisms remain unclear. Dysregulation of the inflammatory tumour necrosis factor (TNF) pathway is implicated in asthma and could be suppressed by azithromycin. We aimed to determine the inflammatory and clinical associations of soluble TNF signalling proteins (TNF receptors [TNFR] 1 and 2, TNF) in sputum and serum, and to test the effect of 48 weeks of azithromycin vs placebo on TNF markers. Methods: Sputum supernatant and serum TNFR1, TNFR2 (n = 142; 75 azithromycin‐treated, 67 placebo‐treated) and TNF (n = 48; 22 azithromycin‐treated, 26 placebo‐treated) were measured by ELISA in an AMAZES trial sub‐population at baseline and end of treatment. Baseline levels were compared between sputum inflammatory phenotypes, severe/non‐severe asthma and frequent/non‐frequent exacerbators. Effect of azithromycin on markers was tested using linear mixed models. Results: Baseline sputum TNFR1 and TNFR2 were significantly increased in neutrophilic vs non‐neutrophilic asthma phenotypes, while serum markers did not differ. Sputum TNFR1 and TNFR2 were increased in severe asthma and correlated with poorer lung function, worse asthma control and increasing age. Serum TNFR1 was also increased in severe asthma. Sputum and serum TNFR2 were increased in frequent exacerbators. Azithromycin treatment significantly reduced sputum TNFR2 and TNF relative to placebo, specifically in non‐eosinophilic participants. Conclusions: We demonstrate dysregulation of TNF markers, particularly in the airways, that relates to clinically important phenotypes of asthma including neutrophilic and severe asthma. Suppression of dysregulated TNF signalling by azithromycin could contribute to its therapeutic mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]