Search

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a rare malignancy that presents with metastatic disease and no identifiable site of origin. Most patients have unfavorable features and attempts to treat based on tissue-of-origin identification have not yielded a survival advantage compared with empiric chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing has revealed genomic alterations that can be targeted in selected cases, suggesting that CUP represents a unique malignancy in which the genomic aberrations may be integral to the diagnosis. Recent trials focusing on tailored combination therapy matched to the genomic alterations in each cancer are providing new avenues of clinical investigation. Here, we discuss recent findings on molecular aberrations in CUP and how the genomic and immune landscape can be leveraged to optimize therapy.

Purpose: Checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate salutary anticancer effects, including long-term remissions. PD-L1 expression/amplification, high mutational burden, and mismatch repair deficiency correlate with response. We have, however, observed a subset of patients who appear to be "hyperprogressors," with a greatly accelerated rate of tumor growth and clinical deterioration compared with pretherapy, which was also recently reported by Institut Gustave Roussy. The current study investigated potential genomic markers associated with "hyperprogression" after immunotherapy.Experimental Design: Consecutive stage IV cancer patients who received immunotherapies (CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or other [investigational] agents) and had their tumor evaluated by next-generation sequencing were analyzed (N = 155). We defined hyperprogression as time-to-treatment failure (TTF) 50% increase in tumor burden compared with preimmunotherapy imaging, and >2-fold increase in progression pace.Results: Amongst 155 patients, TTF

Benign lymphoid aggregates are seen in only a minority of bone marrow specimens, but their distinction from non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly B-cell lymphomas, can represent a diagnostic challenge. Although criteria have been proposed to help distinguish between benign and malignant aggregates, a detailed description of the distribution patterns of B and T lymphocytes within benign lymphoid aggregates has not been investigated. One hundred thirty-seven cases of bone marrow specimens containing benign aggregates were studied with a panel of immunostains. A subset of these cases was also examined for immunoglobulin gene rearrangements by polymerase chain reaction. The aggregates were categorized based on size, location (paratrabecular or random), presence of infiltrating edges, and distribution of lymphoid cell populations. In addition, we examined 40 cases of bone marrow biopsies with documented malignant lymphoid aggregates for comparison purposes. We report that the distribution of B and T lymphocytes within lymphoid aggregates may serve as a useful criterion to aid in the separation between benign and malignant aggregates. When aggregates exhibit a predominance of T cells, consist of a central core of T cells surrounded by a rim of B cells, or have a mixed distribution of B and T cells, they are more likely to be benign. On the other hand, an increased likelihood of malignancy occurs when aggregates exhibit a predominance of B cells or consist of a central core of B cells surrounded by a rim of T cells (excluding germinal center formation), and assessing other features worrisome of malignancy (large aggregate size, presence of infiltrative edges, cellular atypia, and paratrabecular location, among others) is warranted.

Benign lymphoid aggregates are seen in only a minority of bone marrow specimens, but their distinction from non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly B-cell lymphomas, can represent a diagnostic challenge. Although criteria have been proposed to help distinguish between benign and malignant aggregates, a detailed description of the distribution patterns of B and T lymphocytes within benign lymphoid aggregates has not been investigated. One hundred thirty-seven cases of bone marrow specimens containing benign aggregates were studied with a panel of immunostains. A subset of these cases was also examined for immunoglobulin gene rearrangements by polymerase chain reaction. The aggregates were categorized based on size, location (paratrabecular or random), presence of infiltrating edges, and distribution of lymphoid cell populations. In addition, we examined 40 cases of bone marrow biopsies with documented malignant lymphoid aggregates for comparison purposes. We report that the distribution of B and T lymphocytes within lymphoid aggregates may serve as a useful criterion to aid in the separation between benign and malignant aggregates. When aggregates exhibit a predominance of T cells, consist of a central core of T cells surrounded by a rim of B cells, or have a mixed distribution of B and T cells, they are more likely to be benign. On the other hand, an increased likelihood of malignancy occurs when aggregates exhibit a predominance of B cells or consist of a central core of B cells surrounded by a rim of T cells (excluding germinal center formation), and assessing other features worrisome of malignancy (large aggregate size, presence of infiltrative edges, cellular atypia, and paratrabecular location, among others) is warranted.