Search

Synthetic surrogate head models are used in biomechanical studies to investigate skull, brain, and cervical spine injury. To ensure appropriate biofidelity of these head models, the stiffness is often tuned so that the surrogate’s response approximates the cadaveric response corridor. Impact parameters such as energy, and loading direction and region, can influence injury prediction measures, such as impact force and head acceleration. An improved understanding of how impact parameters affect the head’s structural response is required for designing better surrogate head models. This study comprises a synthesis and review of all existingex vivohead stiffness data, and the primary factors that influence the force–deformation response are discussed. Eighteen studies from 1972 to 2019 were identified. Head stiffness statistically varied with age (pediatric vs. adult), loading region, and rate. The contact area of the impactor likely affects stiffness, whereas the impactor mass likely does not. The head’s response to frontal impacts was widely reported, but few studies have evaluated the response to other impact locations and directions. The findings from this review indicate that further work is required to assess the effect of head constraints, loading region, and impactor geometry, across a range of relevant scenarios.

ObjectiveIt is unclear if different factors influence osteoarthritis (OA) progression and the changes characterising OA disease in hip and knee. We investigated the difference between hip OA and knee OA at the subchondral bone tissue and cellular level, relative to the degree of cartilage degeneration.DesignBone samples were collected from 11 patients (aged 70±8 years) undergoing knee arthroplasty and 8 patients (aged 64±12 years) undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery. Bone microstructure, osteocyte-lacunar network and bone matrix vascularity were evaluated using synchrotron micro-CT imaging. Samples were additionally examined histologically to determine osteocyte density, viability, and connectivity.ResultsAfter adjustment for donor gender and age, associations between the extent of cartilage degeneration, bone volume fraction [8.7, 95% CI (3.4, 14.1)], trabecular number [1.5, 95% CI (0.8, 2.3)], osteocyte lacunar density [4714.9; 95% CI (2079.1, 7350.6)] and trabecular separation [-0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.1)] were found in both knee and hip OA.When compared to knee OA, hip OA was characterised by higher trabecular thickness [0.006, 95% CI (-4, 0.01)], larger but less spheric osteocyte lacunae [47.3; 95% CI (11.2, 83.4), -0.04; 95% CI (-0.6, -0.01), respectively], lower vascular canal density [-22.8; 95% CI (-35.4, -10.3)] lower osteocyte density [-84.9; 95% CI (-102.4, -67.4)], and less senescent but more apoptotic osteocytes [-2.4; 95% CI (-3.6, -1.2), 24.9; 95% CI (17.7, 32.1)], respectively.ConclusionSubchondral bone from hip OA and knee OA exhibits different characteristics at the tissue and cellular levels, suggesting different mechanisms of OA progression between the hip and knee joints.

During cervical spine trauma, complex intervertebral motions can cause a reduction in facet joint cartilage apposition area (CAA), leading to cervical facet dislocation (CFD). Intervertebral compression and distraction likely alter the magnitude and location of CAA, and may influence the risk of facet fracture. The aim of this study was to investigate facet joint CAA resulting from intervertebral distraction (2.5 mm) or compression (50, 300 N) superimposed on shear and bending motions. Intervertebral and facet joint kinematics were applied to multi rigid-body kinematic models of twelve C6/C7 motion segments (70 ± 13 year, nine male) with specimen-specific cartilage profiles. CAA was qualitatively and quantitatively compared between distraction and compression conditions for each motion; linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05) were applied. Distraction significantly decreased CAA throughout all motions, compared to the compressed conditions (p

Computational models of experimental data can provide a noninvasive method to estimate spinal facet joint biomechanics. Existing models typically consider each vertebra as one rigid-body and assume uniform facet cartilage thickness. However, facet deflection occurs during motion, and cervical facet cartilage is nonuniform. Multi rigid-body computational models were used to investigate the effect of specimen-specific cartilage profiles on facet contact area estimates. Twelve C6/C7 segments underwent non-destructive intervertebral motions. Kinematics and facet deflections were measured. Three-dimensional models of the vertebra and cartilage thickness estimates were obtained from pre-test CT data. Motion-capture data was applied to two model types (2RB: C6, C7 vertebrae each one rigid body; 3RB: left and right C6 posterior elements, and C7 vertebrae, each one rigid body) and maximum facet mesh penetration was compared. Constant thickness cartilage (CTC) and spatially-varying thickness cartilage (SVTC) profiles were applied to the facet surfaces of the 3RB model. Cartilage apposition area (CAA) was compared. Linear mixed-effects models were used for all quantitative comparisons. The 3RB model significantly reduced penetrating mesh elements by accounting for facet deflections (p = 0.001). The CTC profile resulted in incongruent facet articulation, whereas realistic congruence was observed for the SVTC profile. The SVTC profile demonstrated significantly larger CAA than the CTC model (p

Autologous pericranium is a promising dural graft material. An optimal graft should exhibit similar mechanical properties to the native dura, but the mechanical properties of human pericranium have not been characterized, and studies of the biomechanical performance of human spinal dura are limited. The primary aim of this study was to measure the tensile structural and material properties of the pericranium, in the longitudinal and circumferential directions, and of the dura in each spinal region (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) and in three directions (longitudinal anterior and posterior, and circumferential). The secondary aim was to determine corresponding constitutive stress–strain equations using a one-term Ogden model. A total of 146 specimens were tested from 7 cadavers. Linear regression models assessed the effect of tissue type, region, and orientation on the structural and material properties. Pericranium was isotropic, while spinal dura was anisotropic with higher stiffness and strength in the longitudinal than the circumferential direction. Pericranium had lower strength and modulus than spinal dura across all regions in the longitudinal direction but was stronger and stiffer than dura in the circumferential direction. Spinal dura and pericranium had similar strain at peak force, toe, and yield, across all regions and directions. Human pericranium exhibits isotropic mechanical behavior that lies between that of the longitudinal and circumferential spinal dura. Further studies are required to determine if pericranium grafts behave like native dura under in vivo loading conditions. The Ogden parameters reported may be used for computational modeling of the central nervous system.

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (December 2018) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy, The subaxial cervical facets are important load-bearing structures, yet little is known about their mechanical response during physiological or traumatic intervertebral motion. Facet loading likely increases when intervertebral motions are superimposed with axial compression forces, increasing the risk of facet fracture. The aim of this study was to measure the mechanical response of the facets when intervertebral axial compression or distraction is superimposed on constrained, non-destructive shear, bending and rotation motions. Twelve C6/C7 motion segments (70 ± 13 yr, nine male) were subjected to constrained quasi-static anterior shear (1 mm), axial rotation (4°), flexion (10°), and lateral bending (5°) motions. Each motion was superimposed with three axial conditions: (1) 50 N compression; (2) 300 N compression (simulating neck muscle contraction); and, (3) 2.5 mm distraction. Angular deflections, and principal and shear surface strains, of the bilateral C6 inferior facets were calculated from motion-capture data and rosette strain gauges, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05) assessed the effect of axial condition. Minimum principal and maximum shear strains were largest in the compressed condition for all motions except for maximum principal strains during axial rotation. For right axial rotation, maximum principal strains were larger for the contralateral facets, and minimum principal strains were larger for the left facets, regardless of axial condition. Sagittal deflections were largest in the compressed conditions during anterior shear and lateral bending motions, when adjusted for facet side.

Bilateral cervical facet dislocation (BFD) with facet fracture (Fx) often causes tetraplegia but is rarely recreated experimentally, possibly due to a lack of muscle replication. Intervertebral axial compression (due to muscle activation) or distraction (due to inertial loading), when combined with excessive anterior translation, may influence interfacet contact or separation and the subsequent production of BFD with or without Fx. This paper presents a methodology to produce C6/C7 BFD+Fx using anterior shear motion superimposed with 300 N compression or 2.5 mm distraction. The effect of these superimposed axial conditions on six-axis loads, and C6 inferior facet deflections and surface strains, was assessed. Twelve motion segments (70 ± 13 yr) achieved 2.19 mm of supraphysiologic anterior shear without embedding failure (supraphysiologic shear analysis point; SSP), and BFD+Fx was produced in all five specimens that reached 20 mm of shear. Linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05) assessed the effect of axial condition. At the SSP, the compressed specimens experienced higher axial forces, facet shear strains, and sagittal facet deflections, compared to the distracted group. Facet fractures had similar radiographic appearance to those that are observed clinically, suggesting that intervertebral anterior shear motion contributes to BFD+Fx.

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (March 2018) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy, Traumatic cervical facet dislocation (CFD) is often associated with devastating spinal cord injury. Facet fractures commonly occur during CFD, yet quantitative measures of facet deflection, strain, stiffness and failure load have not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanical response of the subaxial cervical facets when loaded in directions thought to be associated with traumatic bilateral CFD – anterior shear and flexion. Thirty-one functional spinal units (6 × C2/3, C3/4, C4/5, and C6/7, 7 × C5/6) were dissected from fourteen human cadaver cervical spines (mean donor age 69 years, range 48–92; eight male). Loading was applied to the inferior facets of the inferior vertebra to simulate the in vivo inter-facet loading experienced during supraphysiologic anterior shear and flexion motion. Specimens were subjected to three cycles of sub-failure loading (10–100 N, 1 mm/s) in each direction, before being failed in a randomly assigned direction (10 mm/s). Facet deflection, surface strains, stiffness, and failure load were measured. Linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05; random effect of cadaver) accounted for variations in specimen geometry and bone density. Specimen-specific parameters were significantly associated with most outcome measures. Facet stiffness and failure load were significantly greater in the simulated flexion loading direction, and deflection and surface strains were higher in anterior shear at the non-destructive analysis point (47 N applied load). The sub-failure strains and stiffness responses differed between the upper and lower subaxial cervical regions. Failure occurred through the facet tip during anterior shear loading, while failure through the pedicles was most common in flexion.