Search

Objectives: Bipolar disorder (BD) is highly heritable and associated with increased rates of metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, little is known about MetS in offspring of parents with BD. We therefore examined this topic in the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study cohort., Methods: Participants included 199 parents (n = 116 BD, diagnosed using DSM-IV ; n = 83 non-BD) and 330 offspring (mean age 19.9 ± 5.3 years), including 198 high-risk offspring of parents with BD (n = 80 affected with a mood disorder) and 132 control offspring. We defined MetS and its components using International Diabetes Federation (IDF) guidelines (primary) and National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines (secondary). Multivariable analyses controlled for age and socioeconomic status in offspring. Sensitivity analyses controlled for psychotropic medications., Results: There was higher prevalence of MetS in parents with BD as compared to controls. NCEP-defined MetS was significantly more prevalent among affected high-risk offspring (16.3%) and controls (15.2%) vs unaffected high-risk offspring (6.0%; χ 2 = 6.54, P = .04). There was greater mean number of MetS components (IDF: 1.7 ± 1.1; NCEP: 1.4 ± 1.0) among affected high-risk offspring vs unaffected high-risk offspring (IDF: 1.2 ± 1.0; NCEP: 1.0 ± 1.0) and controls (IDF: 1.3 ± 1.2; NCEP: 1.1 ± 1.1; IDF: H [2] = 10.26, P = .006; NCEP: H [2] = 9.18, P = .01). Most findings became nonsignificant in multivariable analyses. Some between-group results became nonsignificant after controlling for second-generation antipsychotics., Conclusions: This preliminary study found increased risk of MetS among affected high-risk offspring, which may be attributable to socioeconomic status. Prospective studies may determine timing of MetS onset in relation to mood disorder onset, and the role of socioeconomic status in moderating this association., (© Copyright 2024 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: Previous studies have explored the role of stressful life events in the development of mood disorders. We examined the frequency and nature of stressful life events as measured by the Stressful Life Events Schedule (SLES) among 3 groups of adolescent offspring of probands with bipolar (BD), with non-BD psychiatric disorders, and healthy controls. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between stressful life events and the presence of DSM-IV Axis I disorders in these offspring. Stressful life events were characterized as dependent, independent, or uncertain (neither dependent nor independent) and positive, negative, or neutral (neither positive nor negative)., Methods: Offspring of probands with BD aged 13-18 years (n = 269), demographically matched offspring of probands with non-BD Axis I disorders (n = 88), and offspring of healthy controls (n = 81) from the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study were assessed from 2002 to 2007 with standardized instruments at intake. Probands completed the SLES for their offspring for life events within the prior year. Life events were evaluated with regard to current Axis I diagnoses in offspring after adjusting for confounds., Results: After adjusting for demographic and clinical between-group differences (in probands and offspring), offspring of probands with BD had greater independent (χ² = 11.96, P < .04) and neutral (χ² = 17.99, P < .003) life events compared with offspring of healthy controls and greater number of more severe stressful life events than offspring of healthy controls, but not offspring of probands with non-BD. Offspring of BD probands with comorbid substance use disorder reported more independent stressful life events compared to those without comorbid substance use disorder (P = .024). Greater frequency and severity of stressful life events were associated with current Axis I disorder in offspring of both probands with BD and probands with other Axis I disorders regardless of dependency or valence. Greater frequency and severity of stressful life events were associated with greater current Axis I disorder in all offspring., Conclusions: Offspring of probands with BD have greater exposure to independent and neutral life events than offspring of healthy controls. Greater frequency and severity of stressful life events were associated with Axis I disorder in offspring of both BD and non-BD affected probands., (© Copyright 2017 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Accumulating evidence suggests cross-national differences in adults with bipolar disorder (BD), but also in the susceptibility of their offspring (bipolar offspring). This study aims to explore and clarify cross-national variation in the prevalence of categorical and dimensional psychopathology between bipolar offspring in the US and The Netherlands., Methods: We compared levels of psychopathology in offspring of the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study (n=224) and the Dutch Bipolar Offspring Study (n=136) (age 10-18). Categorical psychopathology was ascertained through interviews using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children (K-SADS-PL), dimensional psychopathology by parental reports using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)., Results: Higher rates of categorical psychopathology were observed in the US versus the Dutch samples (66% versus 44%). We found no differences in the overall prevalence of mood disorders, including BD-I or -II, but more comorbidity in mood disorders in US versus Dutch offspring (80% versus 34%). The strongest predictors of categorical psychopathology were maternal BD (OR: 1.72, p<.05), older age of the offspring (OR: 1.19, p<.05), and country of origin (US; OR: 2.17, p<.001). Regarding comorbidity, only country of origin (OR: 7.84, p<.001) was a significant predictor. In general, we found no differences in dimensional psychopathology based on CBCL reports., Limitations: Preliminary measure of inter-site reliability., Conclusions: We found cross-national differences in prevalence of categorical diagnoses of non-mood disorders in bipolar offspring, but not in mood disorder diagnoses nor in parent-reported dimensional psychopathology. Cross-national variation was only partially explained by between-sample differences. Cultural and methodological explanations for these findings warrant further study., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To study the longitudinal course of sleep timing and circadian preferences in individuals with bipolar disorder (BP) compared to individuals with non-BP psychopathology and healthy controls., Methods: Individuals with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder (n = 257), non-BP psychopathology (n = 105), and healthy controls (n = 55) (mean age 40.2 years, 21.3% male, 85.1% Caucasian) were followed on average every 27 months for a mean of four years. Sleep timing parameters and circadian preference were reported using the Sleep Timing Questionnaire and The Composite Scale for Morningness. Group comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons and between-group differences in demographic variables and psychopharmacological treatment., Results: Regardless of their current mood state, individuals with BP showed more sleep onset latency (SOL), wakening after sleep onset (WASO), and evening preference in comparison to both individuals with non-BP psychopathology and healthy controls. Individuals with BP also showed less stability of bed and awakening times in comparison to the other two groups, though these results were dependent on mood state. Non-BP individuals only showed more WASO and less stability in bed and awakening times before work/school days than healthy controls. Adjusting for comorbid disorders yielded similar results. Within-group analyses found little to no effect of time and BP subtype on sleep timing and circadian preference., Conclusions: Disturbances of sleep timing are prominent in individuals with BP. These disturbances are worse during mood episodes, but still apparent during euthymic periods. Evening preference was not associated with polarity type, or mood state in BP, suggesting that this characteristic may be a trait marker., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To compare the psychopathology and longitudinal course of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology and global functioning between the offspring with ADHD of parents with bipolar disorder and the offspring with ADHD of community control parents., Method: One hundred twenty-two offspring with ADHD of parents with bipolar disorder and 48 offspring with ADHD of control parents from the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study (BIOS) were included. DSM-IV lifetime psychiatric disorders were ascertained through the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL). The outcome measures of ADHD symptoms were ascertained at intake and every other year for a period of 6 years using the ADHD section of the K-SADS-PL and the Disruptive Behavior Disorder rating scale (DBD). Global functioning was assessed using the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)., Results: The offspring with ADHD of parents with bipolar disorder showed higher lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders relative to the offspring with ADHD of control parents (P values ≤ .03). For both groups of offspring with ADHD, the hyperactivity, impulsivity, and total K-SADS-PL ADHD scores decreased over time (P values < .001) without differences between the 2 groups. There were no between- or within-group differences in the inattention scores over time. The DBD ADHD scores decreased with age in both groups (P values < .002) without differences between the 2 groups. For both groups of offspring with ADHD, the global functioning did not improve over time., Conclusions: Offspring with ADHD of parents with bipolar disorder have more psychopathology relative to offspring with ADHD of control parents. However, there were no differences in the developmental courses of ADHD symptomatology between these 2 groups of ADHD youth., (© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objectives: Bipolar disorder (BP) has been associated with increased aggressive behaviors. However, all existing studies are cross-sectional and include forensic or inpatient populations and many do not take into account the effects of comorbid conditions. The goal of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal course of aggression among adult outpatients with BP compared with non-BP patients and healthy controls., Methods: Subjects with bipolar I disorder (BP-I)/bipolar II disorder (BP-II) (n = 255), those with non-BP psychopathology (n = 85), and healthy controls (n = 84) (average 38.9 years, 78.7% female, and 84.9% Caucasian) were evaluated at intake and after two and four years of follow-up. Aggression was self-rated using the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). Comparisons were adjusted for any significant demographic and clinical differences and for multiple comparisons. For subjects with BP, associations of AQ with subtype of BP, current versus past mood episodes, polarity and severity of the current episode, psychosis, and current pharmacological treatment were evaluated., Results: In comparison with subjects with non-BP psychiatric disorders and healthy controls, subjects with BP showed persistently higher total and subscale AQ scores (raw and T-scores) during the four-year follow-up. There were no effects of BP subtype, severity or polarity of the current episode, psychosis, and current pharmacological treatments. Subjects in an acute mood episode showed significantly higher AQ scores than euthymic subjects., Conclusions: BP, particularly during acute episodes, is associated with increased self-reported verbal and physical aggression, anger, and hostility. These results provide further evidence of the need for treatments to prevent mood recurrences and prompt treatment of acute mood episodes in subjects with BP., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)