Search

Purpose: To examine the competing risks of stillbirth versus infant death and to evaluate the optimal time of delivery in the population of small for gestational age (SGA) and non-SGA late preterm and term fetuses. Methods: This was a retrospective national cohort study of all singleton births between 34 0/7 and 42 6/7 weeks of gestation using the Korean vital statistics (n = 2,106,159). We compared the risk of infant mortality with a composite of fetal–infant mortality risk that would occur after expectant management for one additional week and evaluated the optimal time of delivery, in SGA and non-SGA pregnancies. Results: In the total population, the risk of expectant management became significantly higher than the risk of delivery, at 39 weeks and beyond, similar with non-SGA group. In the SGA group, the risk of stillbirth was significantly greater at all GAs than for non-SGA pregnancies, and the risk of infant death was significantly increased until 38 weeks (25.8 per 10,000 live births, 95% CI 20.11–32.47), and the risk of stillbirth was significantly increased at 41 weeks (11.65 per 10,000 ongoing pregnancies, 95% CI 6.95–18.09), compared to 39 weeks (12 per 10,000 live births, 95% CI 8.98–15.64 and 5.12 per 10,000 ongoing pregnancies, 95% CI 3.84–6.66, respectively). Conclusion: In Korean women, delivery between 39 and 41 weeks minimizes fetal/infant mortality, in non-SGA pregnancies. In uncomplicated SGA pregnancies, delivery between 39 and 40 weeks can be considered to decrease risk of infant death and stillbirths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study was conducted to analyze recent trends of multiple birth rates (MBR) and fetal/neonatal/infant mortalities according to the number of gestations in Korea. Methods: Data from 2009 to 2015 of live births, infant deaths and stillbirths were obtained from the Korean Vital Statistics. Neonatal mortality rate (NMR), infant mortality rate (IMR), and fetal mortality rate (FMR) in singleton, twin and triplet pregnancies were analyzed according to gestational period (GP; ≤ 23, 24–27, 28–31, and 32–36 weeks). Results: From 2009 to 2015, twin and triplet birth rates increased 34.5% and 154.3%, respectively. In twin births, NMR and FMR have been decreased significantly (from 10.92 to 8.62, p = 0.034 and from 41.00 to 30.55, p< 0.001, respectively), but IMR did not show significant decrease. There was no significant change of NMR, IMR, and FMR, in triplet births. Overall, in singleton, twin, and triplet births, NMR was 1.26 ± 0.09, 10.6 ± 1.12, and 34.32 ± 11.72, respectively, and IMR was 2.38 ± 0.26, 14.52 ± 1.38, and 41.13 ± 12.2, respectively. FMRs were 12 ± 1.73, 35.99 ± 3.55, and 88.85 ± 16.55, respectively, in singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. In spite of decreasing trends in overall mortalities, the odds ratios of NMRs and IMRs in 2015 were approximately 9-fold and 6-fold higher, respectively, in twin births, and approximately 37-fold and 20-fold higher, respectively, in triplet births, than those in singleton births. There were no significant differences in odds ratios of NMRs and IMRs at GP 32–36 among single, twin, and triplet births, although the odds ratios of FMR at GP 32–36 in triplet gestation was significantly higher than those in singleton and twin gestation. Conclusion: Neonatal/infant mortality in multiple births is still significantly high, which is mainly related with preterm birth. Close fetal monitoring is needed to prevent fetal death in triplet pregnancies, after 32 gestational weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) are intended for use among women in the United States. Little data are available on whether the 2009 IOM recommendations can be applied to Asian women. This study aimed to evaluate whether the recommendations are related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in Korean pregnant women. Methods and findings: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all singleton-pregnant women at a university hospital in Korea. After classifying the enrolled women into four Korean pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes were analyzed for women who gained inadequate or excessive GWG based on 2009 IOM recommendations. Of 7,843 pregnancies, 64.0% of women had normal pre-pregnancy BMI and 42.7% achieved optimal GWG. Across all BMI categories, adverse pregnancies outcomes such as small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), preterm birth, preeclampsia, and cesarean due to dystocia were significantly associated with GWG (all P ≤ 0.001).Women with normal BMI who gained inadequate weight were more likely to develop SGA and preterm birth and less likely to develop LGA (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.21, 1.33, and 0.54, respectively). Whereas, women with normal BMI who gained excessive weight were more likely to develop LGA, preterm birth, preeclampsia, and cesarean section due to dystocia (aOR 2.10, 1.33, 1.37, and 1.37, respectively) and less likely to develop SGA (aOR 0.60). Conclusions: It is tolerable for Korean women to follow recommended GWG from the 2009 IOM guidelines to decrease adverse pregnancy outcomes. This will be helpful for antenatal care on GWG not only for Korean pregnant women, but also other Asian women who have lower BMI criteria than Caucasian women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]