Search

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and health outcomes related to continuous support from a layperson during a woman's first two births in a theoretical population., Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis., Participants: A theoretical cohort of 1.2 million women based on an approximation of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States with the assumption that these women have second births. This reflects the average number of births per woman in the United States., Methods: We designed a cost-effectiveness model to compare outcomes in women with continuous support from relatives, friends, or community members with minimal to no training (excluding trained doulas) during labor and birth compared with outcomes for women with no continuous support. Outcomes included mode of birth, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, maternal death, cost, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We derived probabilities from the literature and set a cost-effectiveness threshold at $100,000/QALY., Results: In this theoretical model, continuous support by a layperson during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births, decreased costs, and increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Women with support from laypersons had 71,090 fewer cesarean births, 35 fewer uterine ruptures, 9 fewer hysterectomies, and 16 fewer maternal deaths, which saved $364 million with 2,673 increased QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that continuous support in the first birth was cost-effective even when varying the estimate of lost wages of the support person up to $708., Conclusion: Continuous labor support from a layperson leads to fewer cesarean births, improved outcomes, decreased costs, and increased QALYs. This highlights the need to increase women's access to continuous layperson support during labor and birth uninhibited by financial and institutional barriers., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of intrapartum doula care, including lower risk for cesarean birth and shortened labor time for nulliparous women. However, analyses investigating the cost-effectiveness of doula care are limited. This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of professional doula support during a woman's first birth in a theoretical population of US women, with all women having a second birth without doula care., Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was designed to compare outcomes in women with a professional doula versus no doula labor support. A theoretical cohort of 1.6 million women, the approximate number of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States, was used. Outcomes included mode of birth, maternal death, uterine rupture, cesarean hysterectomy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probability estimates used in the model were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the robustness of the results., Results: In this theoretical model, professional doula care during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births and improved QALYs. Additionally, doula support resulted in 202,538 fewer cesarean births, 46 fewer maternal deaths secondary to fewer cesarean births, 99 fewer uterine ruptures, and 26 fewer hysterectomies, with an additional cost of $185 million and 7617 increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a professional doula was potentially cost-saving up to $884 and cost-effective up to $1360 per doula., Discussion: Professional doula care during a woman's first birth may lead to improved outcomes and increased QALYs during her first and second births. Given the limitations of this analysis, the cost-effectiveness estimate is likely conservative, further supporting broader integration of professional doulas into the US maternity care system and highlighting the need for higher doula care reimbursement., (© 2019 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.)