Search

Introduction: Compared to low-volume hospitals, high-volume hospitals are associated with lower rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, access to high-volume hospitals is unequal. We investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities among patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary malignancies at high-volume hospitals.Material and Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database from 2004-2015 to identify patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, and nephrectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer, muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and kidney cancer, respectively. Hospitals were ranked based on their annual volume for the given procedure. The endpoint of our study was receipt of treatment at a high-volume hospital. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of treatment at a high-volume hospital.Results: Our final cohort consisted of 397,242 prostate cancer patients, 39,480 bladder cancer patients, and 292,095 kidney cancer patients. For prostate and bladder cancer, Black race was associated with lower odds of treatment at a high-volume hospital (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.87 and 0.71, 95%CI 0.58-0.87; reference: White). Higher education level and private insurance status were associated with greater odds of treatment across all 3 procedures (strongest effect for prostate cancer; higher education level: OR 1.63 [1.58-1.68]; private insurance 1.86 [1.77-1.97]). Moreover, an interaction was found between race and study period for all cancers examined (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that Black patients were more likely to undergo radical prostatectomy at high-volume hospitals in 2013-2015 (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.02) compared to 2004-2006 (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.79-0.87).Conclusion: Across all procedures, patients with lower education status and lack of insurance were less likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. For prostate cancer and bladder cancer, Black race was a negative predictor of treatment at high-volume hospitals. Further studies are needed to understand the root causes for this inequity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the use of in-hospital pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy between 2004 and 2014 and to assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) across the study period.Material and Methods: We identified 8322 patients without contraindications to PTP undergoing radical cystectomy in the US using the Premier Healthcare Database. Nonparametric Wilcoxon type test for trend was employed to examine the trend of PTP utilization across the study period. Ensuing, we employed multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear regression models to examine the odds of receiving PTP and the risk of being diagnosed with VTE, respectively.Results: Based on VTE risk-stratification, the majority of patients (87.8%) qualified as "high-risk." Across the study period the use of PTP increased (Odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.03, P = .044), but remained underutilized as the maximum percentage of patients receiving in-hospital PTP did not exceed 58.6%. The risk of VTE did not vary across the study period (risk ratio 0.97, 95%CI 0.92-1.02, P = .178).Conclusion: Utilization of PTP increased throughout the study period, while the risk of VTE did not change. Future studies are necessary to improve implementation of guideline-driven care, as PTP remained underutilized throughout the study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The prevalence of obesity is on the rise in the Unites States, and obesity has been associated with increased complications and costs in a variety of complex surgeries. However, the contribution of obesity to the overall costs of radical cystectomy has not been studied in detail using contemporary data. Our objective is to assess the variation in healthcare costs due to obesity on the index hospitalization for radical cystectomy in the United States between 2003 and 2015.Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study, using the Premier Healthcare Database, of 1,242 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and were either overweight (25  ≤  body mass index [BMI] < 30), obese (30  ≤  BMI < 40), or morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40). The primary outcome costs of the index hospitalization for each BMI category. Multivariable median regression was used to identify drivers of increased costs.Results: The cost of the index hospitalization for cystectomy was $24,596 (95% confidence interval [CI], $22,599-$26,592) for overweight patients. The costs for obese and morbidly obese patients were $2,158 (95% CI, -$80 to $4,395, P = 0.059) and $5,308 (95% CI, $2,652-$7,964, P < 0.001) higher compared to overweight patients, respectively. After adjustment for operative time or length of stay in the multivariable models, there were no longer any differences in cost. Operative time was prolonged as BMI increased (median operative time for overweight, obese, and morbidly obese: 346, 391, and 420 minutes, respectively P = 0.0001). Median length of stay was 1 day shorter for overweight vs. morbidly obese patients (P = 0.0030), with each additional day costing $1,738 (95% CI, $1,654 to $1,821, P < 0.0001) on multivariable analysis.Conclusions: The cost of radical cystectomy is greater for obese and morbidly obese patients compared to overweight patients. The increased financial cost is driven by increased operative times and longer length of stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]