Search

Background and Objectives: ICMR conducted a multicentric trial "PLACID" that allowed COVID convalescent plasma (CCP) as an experimental drug for the management of moderate COVID-19 disease and the authors' institute was one of the participating centers. The efficacy of CCP in COVID-19 is still debatable. However, unlike therapeutic efficacy, there is not enough literature on issues and challenges faced by health-care institutions in donor recruitment, and the entire vein-to-vein process and approach of CCP transfusion. The authors would like to share their experiences, challenges faced, and their mitigation during the course of donor recruitment, screening, testing, apheresis donation, storage, inventory management, and issue and transfusion of CCP including the regulatory provisions, as their evolution. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of 7 months at a large tertiary care hospital in north India. Based on ICMR guidelines, the study analyzed the screening process and donation from all consecutive potential CCP donors. The study also identified various issues and challenges faced by the institute and how they were resolved. Results: Prospective donors registered at the blood center were 843. Majority were males (96.6%), first-time CCP donors (93%), age interval 31-45 years (52.2%), who had a history of mild COVID-19 symptoms (86.9%), and were home-quarantined (83.8%). The most common blood group was B positive (50.6%). Only 6.3% of donors were deferred due to the absence of anti-COVID-19 antibodies. Of 843, 705 selected CCP donors donated 1488 CCP units and six donors (0.8%) experienced mild adverse reactions. Challenges faced by authors included donor recruitment, lack of regulatory approval for plasmapheresis, revisions of COVID-specific selection criteria, no "anti-COVID-19 antibody" kit, and CCP inventory management. Conclusion: This study provides real-world comprehensive data on process management of CCP donors and their donations. This understanding of the process, its challenges, and their mitigation could be a template for any possible future pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is important to detect Latent Iron Deficiency (LID) to prevent development of an overt iron deficiency anemia. Early detection is difficult by using conventional hematological and biochemical parameters. Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is presently the gold standard for diagnosing LID. We evaluated the utility of Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Equivalent (Ret‐He), a newer hematological parameter, to predict LID in blood donors as compared to sTfR. Methods: This was a randomized prospective study performed on 501 donor samples over a period of three‐months. All donors were included after administering medical history questionnaire and a brief physical examination in accordance with national guidelines (Hb ≥12.5). Additional samples were collected during donation according to the institutional standard operating procedure (SOP). All hemograms were performed on the Sysmex XE‐2100 analyzer which included Ret‐He. sTfR was measured in batch assays by ELISA (Biovendor, Czech Republic). Ret He <28 pg and sTfR≥3μg/ml were used to diagnose LID. Serum Iron, Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) and Serum Ferritin were also measured simultaneously. Results: Of the 501 blood donors, sTfR and Ret‐He detected LID in 148 and 135 donors respectively. In comparison to sTfR, Ret‐He had sensitivity of 92.7%, a specificity of 97.16%, PPV of 93.1% and NPV of 96.3%. Serum Ferritin, TIBC and serum Iron had comparatively lower sensitivity of 87.16%, 79.7% and 77.7% respectively. Conclusion: Ret‐He can be used as a routine screening test to detect LID in blood donors. This could provide an opportunity to make appropriate and timely interventions like dietary changes or drug supplementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Blood donor experiences both immediate adverse reactions (IAR) and delayed adverse reactions (DAR). With limited published data available on the incidence of DAR, a study was conducted to estimate incidence and profile of DAR through telephonic interview. Materials and methods Study was conducted over a 45-day period for consecutive volunteer whole blood donations at tertiary care hospital. Donors were divided into first-time, repeat and regular and were monitored for IAR. They were given written copy of post-donation advice. Donors were contacted telephonically three weeks post-donation and enquired about general wellbeing and specific DAR in accordance with a standard n international (International Society of Blood Transfusion) standard format. Results Donors participated in the study of which 1.6% donors experienced an IAR. Much larger number reported DAR (10.3% vs.1.6% p < 0.0001). Further, DAR was presented as a variegated profile with bruise, painful arms and fatigue being the commonest. DARs were more common in females than males (25% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.02). Localized DAR like bruise and painful arms were more common in younger donors (age <50 years) whereas systemic DAR like fatigue was common in older donors (>50 years). First time (12.3%) and repeat donors (13.5%) had similar frequency of DAR but were lower among regular donors (6.7%). Conclusion DARs are more common than IAR and are of different profile. Post-donation interview has provided an insight into donor experiences and can be used as a valuable tool in donor hemovigilance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In India variable rate of “NAT yield” has been demonstrated in several published reports. This study was performed with the objective to know the rate of “true NAT yield” in blood donors by confirmation with supplementary tests and follow up of initial “NAT yield” donors. Materials and Methods A total of 48,441 blood donors were tested for HIV, HBV and HCV with enhanced chemiluminescence and ID-NAT. To know the true NAT yield status confirmation of NAT yield donors was done as with an array of serological tests, repeat ID-NAT and alternate NAT. Results The cumulative initial “NAT yield” rate was 1:4404 (11/48,441). Seven of 11 initial “NAT yields” were for hepatitis B whereas two each were in HIV and HCV. Among the 11 “NAT-yield” donors, eight donors were followed-up for confirmation. Out of these eight donors only 4 were found to be true HBV NAT yields. Out of four true NAT yields two were window period donations while the other two were occult hepatitis B infection with anti-HBcore total positive. Conclusion Our findings suggest that all “initial NAT yields” may not be “true NAT yields”. We would also like to suggest that to demonstrate the true “NAT yield” status supplementary tests and donor follow up are important to differentiate true NAT yields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Since there is scarce data available on incidence and type of irregular antibodies in patients and donors in India, a study was undertaken to find the incidence of irregular antibodies in patients and irregular antibodies and a positive Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT) in blood donors. Materials and methods: Antibody screening was performed using commercial pooled “O” cells and three-cell panel for donors and patients respectively and an 11-cell panel for identification using Column Agglutination Technology (CAT) with Low-Ionic-Strength Saline–Indirect Antiglobulin Test (LISS–IAT) technique (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson & Johnson, USA). The cassettes used were Anti-human Globulin (AHG) type. DAT on donors was also performed using the AHG cassettes. Results: Cumulative incidence of irregular antibodies amongst patients (n =32,560) and donors (n =31,367) were 0.12–0.009%, respectively. In patients, the commonest antibodies were from Rh system with anti-D being the most common antibody type (14/40; 35%) while in donors it was the MNS system with anti M (2/3) being the most common. Incidence of a positive DAT amongst the healthy blood donors was 0.04% (n =13/32,560). Discussion: Incidence of irregular antibodies in patients at 0.12% was slightly lower than published reports and could be because of the fact that the patient population studied comprised largely of surgical patients many of whom have never received blood transfusion. This data could also be more representative since the number of patients studied was much higher as compared to the previous Indian studies (32,560 vs. 531–2026). The report on incidence of irregular antibodies and DAT (0.009–0.04%) in blood donors was first such attempt in India. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]