Search

Background: The present study aimed to identify the relationship between glycemic variability (GV) and the 10-y risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with good glycemic control., Methods: Two-hundred forty consecutive T2DM patients (HbA1c≤7.0%) without CVD were included to calculate the 10-y CVD risk by Framingham risk score (FRS), and divided into 3 groups: low-risk group (FRS≤10%), intermediate-risk group (>10%, ≤20%) and high-risk group (>20%). Inter-group differences of GV were determined by comparing the SD of blood glucose (SDBG), mean amplitudes of glycemic excursion (MAGE), and mean of daily differences (MODD) gathered from 72-h continuous glucose monitoring system., Results: The levels of SDBG and MAGE significantly increased along with the raises of 10-y CVD risk of T2DM patients (p<0.01). FRS was positively correlated with age, systolic blood pressure, SDBG and MAGE (r=0.717, 0.525, 0.509 and 0.485 respectively, p<0.01), while negatively correlated with the level of HDL-C (r=-0.348, p<0.01). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that increased MAGE [OR: 1.623(1.198-2.316), p<0.001] and patients with high urine albumin excretion rates [OR: 1.743(1.247-2.793), p<0.001] were independent predictors for high 10-y CVD risk., Conclusion: GV predicts independently the 10-y CVD risk of T2DM patients with well-controlled HbA1c., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: In newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, short-term insulin therapy might improve β-cell function and glycemic control. This study aimed to compare the effects of basal insulin monotherapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment., Methods: Fifty-nine cases of newly diagnosed T2DM patients with fasting plasma glucose of 9.0-16.7 mmol/L were recruited into this study. They were hospitalized and randomly assigned to a basal insulin monotherapy group (n=27) or a CSII group (n=32). Insulin dosage was titrated according to fasting capillary blood glucose levels, and treatment was stopped after 2 weeks. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests were performed, and blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and lipid profiles were measured before therapy and 2 days after therapy withdrawal., Results: Both treatments reduced fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels (after treatment vs. baseline, both P<0.05). Fasting glycemic control target was achieved in 52 cases (88.14%) with 2 weeks of insulin treatment, and there were no significant differences between the glargine and CSII groups (P=0.059). The time to achieve fasting glycemic target in the CSII group was shorter than that in the glargine group (P<0.01). Plasma lipid profiles such as triglycerides and total cholesterol also decreased significantly after the intervention. Overall β-cell function improved significantly after insulin intervention (P<0.01). Variation did not differ between two groups, nor did the effects on insulin and C-peptide secretion (P>0.05)., Conclusions: The effect of basal insulin monotherapy was similar to that of CSII, and thus basal insulin monotherapy might be a reasonable alternative to CSII for initial insulin therapy in newly diagnosed T2DM patients.

The aim of this study was to compare coefficient of variation of fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) between insulin glargine and NPH in T2DM with poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. The results demonstrated that insulin glargine was more potent in improving glycemic control than NPH with stable FBG., (2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)