Search

Aim: To evaluate the evolution of glycemic outcomes in patients living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after 1 year of use of the MiniMed 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study in 20 centers in France. The primary objective was to evaluate the improvement in glycemic control after 1-year use of AHCL. The primary endpoint was the variation of time in range (TIR) between pre-AHCL and after 1-year use of AHCL. Secondary objectives were to analyze the glycemic outcomes after 3, 6, and 12 months of AHCL use, the safety, and the long-term observance of AHCL. Results: Two hundred twenty patients were included, and 200 were analyzed for the primary endpoint. 92.7% of patients continued to use AHCL. After 1 year of use of AHCL, TIR was 72.5% ± 10.6% (+9.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.6-10.5] compared to pre-AHCL initiation, P  < 0.001), HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.7% (-0.5%; 95% CI [-0.6 to -0.4]; P  < 0.001), time below range 2.0% [1.0; 3.0] (0.0% [-2.0; 0.0], P  < 0.001), and time above range 24.8% ± 10.9% (-7.3%; 95% CI [-8.8 to -5.7]; P  < 0.001). More patients achieved the glycemic treatment goals of HbA1c <7.0% (45.1% vs. 18.1%, P  < 0.001) and TIR >70% (59.0% vs. 29.5% P  < 0.001) when compared with pre-AHCL. Five patients experienced severe hypoglycemia events and two patients experienced ketoacidosis. Conclusion: After 1 year of use of AHCL, people living with T1D safely improved their glucose control and a higher proportion of them achieved optimal glycemic control.

Background: The objective was to compare glycemic control between preprandial and postprandial bolus administration (15 min before [PRE] or immediately after the meal [POST]) in patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump and real-time continuous glucose monitoring., Methods: Between September 2015 and February 2016, a single-centre, open randomized, 2-way crossover study of patients on bolus insulin aspart administration was conducted during two 14-day periods and according to 2 administration regimen schedules (PRE/POST or POST/PRE). Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with type 1 diabetes, ≥18 and ≤ 65 years old, treated with insulin aspart using a Medtronic® insulin pump and trained on functional insulin therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either regimen schedule. At the beginning of each period, each patient was provided with a standardized high fat meal. Primary outcome was the area under the curve for interstitial glucose above 140 mg/dL per minute (AUC > 140 mg/dL/min) during each period. Secondary outcomes were time spent in hypo/eu/hyperglycemia, glycemic variability indices, and AUC during 4 hours after high fat meal calculated with continuous glucose monitoring data., Results: Twenty-two patients were included. Mean AUC > 140 mg/dL/min was statistically higher in patients on POST (43.70 mg/dL/min; 95%CI: 34.08 to 53.31) versus PRE insulin aspart regimen (37.24 mg/dL/min 95%CI: 27.63 to 46.85) (P = 0.03). Mean interstitial glycemia and glycemic variability indices were also increased (P < 0.05) on POST regimen. The mean AUC 4 hours after the high fat meal was higher on POST regimen but not statistically different (P = 0.06)., Conclusions: In our study, postprandial administration of insulin aspart appears to mildly increase glycemic excursion and glycemic variability., (Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Aim and Methods: The present study compared the clinical and metabolic characteristics of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) with type 2 diabetes, as well as the residual beta-cell function and progression to insulin treatment, over a 2-year follow-up period, of antibody (Ab)-positive and Ab-negative patients who achieved tight glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 7.0+/-0.8% and 6.5+/-0.9%, respectively, at the time of entry into the study)., Results: Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) and/or islet cell antibodies (ICA) were detected in 10% of patients presenting with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Around half of Ab-positive patients required insulin treatment during the follow-up. Ab-positive patients displayed lower stimulated C-peptide levels both at entry and during the follow-up compared with Ab-negative patients, although no significant decline in C-peptide levels was observed in either subgroup over two years. Nevertheless, Ab-positive patients progressed more frequently to insulin treatment, and stimulated C-peptide tended to decrease in LADA patients who subsequently required insulin, whereas it remained stable in those who were non-insulin-dependent. In those who progressed, the trend towards C-peptide decline persisted even after starting insulin treatment., Conclusion: LADA patients demonstrate lower residual beta-cell function than do type 2 diabetes patients. However, those who achieve tight metabolic control do not present with a rapid decline in beta-cell function. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy in such patients., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)