Search

ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT) has steadily become more widespread. However, the optimal immunosuppressive regimen for ABO-ILKT remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the longitudinal changes in the outcomes from ABO-ILKT compared with those from ABO-compatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-CLKT) over the last 25 years. Of 1195 patients who underwent living kidney transplantations (LKT) at our institute between 1989 and 2013, 1032-including 247 ABO-ILKT and 785 ABO-CLKT cases-were evaluated for graft survival, patient survival, infectious adverse events, and renal function. The patients were divided into four groups according to the transplantation era and ABO-compatibility. In the past decade, ABO-ILKT and ABO-CLKT recipients yielded almost equivalent outcomes with respect to the 9-year graft survival rates, which were 86.9% and 92.0%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-3.22, p = 0.455). The graft survival rate for ABO-ILKT conducted between 2005 and 2013 was better than that for ABO-ILKT conducted between 1998 and 2004 (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.72, p = 0.007). ABO-ILKT recipients showed substantial improvements in the graft survival rate over time. Graft survival was almost identical over the past decade, regardless of ABO-incompatibility. Currently, ABO-ILKT is an acceptable treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Purpose: A new protocol for ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation including rituximab was introduced in January 2005 in our institute. This study reviewed the results and evaluated the use of low-dose rituximab in ABO-i kidney transplantation., Material and Methods: Seventy-four de novo ABO-i kidney transplantations were performed at Tokyo Women's Medical University between January 2005 and August 2010. The immunosuppressive protocol was consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. All the patients received induction therapy with basiliximab. The pre-conditioning protocol included double-filtration plasmapheresis and a single dose of rituximab. A dose of 500 mg/body rituximab was initially employed and yielded excellent results (Group I, n = 24). Afterward, the dose of rituximab was reduced to 200 mg/body in January 2007 (Group II, n = 50)., Results: Seventy-four de novo ABO-i recipients were treated with this protocol, and all patients underwent kidney transplantation successfully. Effective elimination of the peripheral blood CD19 cells was observed in both groups. However, the peripheral blood CD19 levels were still low in both groups at 24 months after treatment., Conclusion: The patients in Group II showed excellent results similar to Group I. These results suggest that the low dose of rituximab (200 mg/body) is the sufficient dose in ABO-i kidney transplantation., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Background: Blood group O individuals are known to have larger amounts of anti-ABO blood group (anti-A/B) IgG antibodies than A or B individuals. Therefore, in ABO-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplantation (KTX), it is expected that blood group O recipients are more likely to suffer graft damage, because anti-A/B IgG antibodies are believed to be responsible for worse graft outcomes., Methods: This study assessed the graft outcomes between blood group O and non-O recipients in ABOI-KTX. A total of 164 consecutive recipients who underwent ABOI-KTX between 1990 and 2007 under three different immunosuppressive protocols were enrolled in this study. The study population was divided into two groups: (i) recipients with blood group O (n=87) and (ii) recipients with blood group A or B (non-O) (n=77)., Results: High anti-A/B IgG titers were predominant in the O group (P<0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed in the IgM titers. The overall graft survival rate did not differ between the two groups; however, the 6-month graft survival rate was significantly lower in the O group (86% vs. 97%, P=0.011). Among 14 recipients who suffered graft loss within 6 months after transplantation, 12 (86%) were O recipients. The cumulative incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was significantly higher in the O group (60 days, 31 vs. 14%, P=0.013)., Conclusion: Our results may indicate that being a blood group O recipient is at great risk for experiencing early allograft deterioration, probably caused by anti-A/B IgG antibodies in ABOI-KTX.

The impact of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) on the long-term outcome on ABO-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplantation is not well understood. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term impact of AAMR and risk factors for AAMR in 57 consecutive recipients performed between 1999 and 2004. Nineteen patients (33%) who developed AAMR within 3 months posttransplantation constituted of the AMR group. The graft survival rate was significantly lower in the AMR group (AMR vs. non-AMR, respectively; 5 years: 84% vs. 95%; 8 years: 45% vs. 95%; p = 0.009). The prevalence of transplant glomerulopathy at 1 year posttransplantation was significantly higher in the AMR group (AMR 64% vs. non-AMR 3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anti-blood group IgG antibody titers of 1:32 at the time of transplantation (OR, 9.52; p = 0.041) and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSHA) detected by Luminex single bead method (OR, 5.68; p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for AAMR regardless of baseline anti-blood group IgG antibody titers. Our results indicate that AAMR has a heavy impact on the long-term outcome and preoperative DSHA appears to have a more significant association with poor graft outcomes than anti-blood group antibodies, even in ABOI kidney transplantation.

Numerous studies have shown that protocol biopsies have predictive power. We retrospectively examined the histologic findings and C4d staining in 89 protocol biopsies from 48 ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) transplant recipients, and compared the results with those of 250 controls from 133 ABO-compatible (ABO-C) transplant recipients given equivalent maintenance immunosuppression. Others have shown that subclinical rejection (borderline and grade I) in ABO-C grafts decreased gradually after transplantation. In our study, however, subclinical rejection in the ABO-I grafts was detected in 10%, 14% and 28% at 1, 3 and 6-12 months, respectively. At 6-12 months, mild tubular atrophy was more common in the ABO-C grafts whereas the incidence of transplant glomerulopathy did not differ between the two groups (ABO-C: 7%; ABO-I: 15%; p = 0.57). In the ABO-I transplants, risk factors for transplant glomerulopathy in univariate analysis were positive panel reactivity (relative risk, 45.0; p < 0.01) and a prior history of antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk, 17.9; p = 0.01). Furthermore, C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries was detected in 94%, with diffuse staining in 66%. This deposition, however, was not linked to antibody-mediated rejection. We conclude that, in the ABO-I kidney transplantation setting, detection of C4d alone in protocol biopsies might not have any diagnostic or therapeutic relevance.

Several protocols allow the successful ABO incompatible living-related kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT), yet no single method has emerged as the best. We have made several substantial changes to our ABO-ILKT protocol over the past decade and a half and have attempted to determine whether the changes in immunosuppressive agents have resulted in a better outcome. We used methylprednisolone (MP), cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (AZ), antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) and deoxyspergualine (DSG) in the 105 cases of ABO-ILKT (group 1) between 1989 and 1999, and MP, tacrolimus (FK506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the 117 cases of ABO-ILKT (group 2) between 2000 and 2004. We compared the patient and graft survival rates as well as the incidence rate of acute rejection in these two eras, when different regimens were used. There were significant differences in the 1- and 5-year graft survival rates between groups 1 and 2 (1-year: 78% in group 1 vs. 94% in group 2; 5-year: 73% in group 1 vs. 90% in group 2, p = 0.008). Also, a higher incidence rate of acute rejection was significantly observed in group 1 (50/105, 48%) than in group 2 (18/117, 15%) (p < 0.001). We conclude that the FK/MMF combination regimen provides excellent graft survival results in ABO-ILKT.