Search

BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) episode related blood pressure (BP) surge may mediate the association of OSA with cardiovascular disease. However, BP is not measured during a clinical sleep study. METHOD We tested the feasibility of incorporating the Caretaker physiological monitor, which utilizes a novel continuous beat-to-beat (b-b) BP monitoring technology, into polysomnography (PSG) and aimed to characterize BP surges related to obstructive respiratory events. B-b BP was concurrently collected and merged with PSG data on a posthoc basis. We compared BP surge between mean respiratory (apnoea, hypopnea and desaturation-alone events) and nonrespiratory events (spontaneous or leg movement-related arousals). We examined the association of the degree of oxygen desaturation with BP surge in a given respiratory event combining all events. A total of 17 consecutive patients (12 men, mean 52 years old, nine diagnostic and eight split-night PSGs) undergoing clinically indicated PSG were included after excluding one patient with poor signal quality due to excessive movement. RESULTS Caretaker was well tolerated. Mean respiratory BP surge ranged from 5 to 19 mmHg [Median (IQR) = 13.9 (9.5--16.2)]. Mean BP surge between the respiratory and nonrespiratory events was similar [13.8 (4.5) vs. 14.9 (5.3) mmHg, P = 0.13]. Accounting for the count distribution of desaturation/BP surge data pair events, there was a linear correlation between the degree of oxygen desaturation and BP surge (R = 0.57, P

OBJECTIVE To determine whether serum urate reduction with allopurinol lowers blood pressure (BP) in young adults and the mechanisms mediating this hypothesized effect. METHODS We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial. Adults ages 18-40 years with baseline systolic BP ≥120 and

Resistant hypertension, defined as blood pressure levels above goal while taking ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication or ≥4 classes regardless of blood pressure level, is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. The 2018 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Resistant Hypertension recommends healthy lifestyle habits and thiazide-like diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for adults with resistant hypertension. The term apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is used when pseudoresistance cannot be excluded. We estimated the use of healthy lifestyle factors and recommended antihypertensive medication classes among US Black adults with aTRH. Data were pooled for Black participants in the JHS (Jackson Heart Study) in 2009 to 2013 (n=2496) and the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) in 2013 to 2016 (n=3786). Outcomes included lifestyle factors (not smoking, not consuming alcohol, ≥75 minutes of vigorous-intensity or ≥150 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week, and body mass index 2 ) and recommended antihypertensive medications (thiazide-like diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists). Overall, 28.3% of participants who reported taking antihypertensive medication had aTRH. Among participants with aTRH, 14.5% and 1.2% had ideal levels of 3 and 4 of the lifestyle factors, respectively. Also, 5.9% of participants with aTRH reported taking a thiazide-like diuretic, and 9.8% reported taking a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. In conclusion, evidence-based lifestyle factors and recommended pharmacological treatment are underutilized in Black adults with aTRH. Increased use of lifestyle recommendations and antihypertensive medication classes specifically recommended for aTRH may improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular disease–related morbidity and mortality among US Black adults. Graphic Abstract A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Background Primary aldosteronism is a nonsuppressible renin-independent aldosterone production that causes hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Objective To characterize the prevalence of nonsuppressible renin-independent aldosterone production, as well as biochemically overt primary aldosteronism, in relation to blood pressure. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting 4 U.S. academic medical centers. Participants Participants with normotension (n = 289), stage 1 hypertension (n = 115), stage 2 hypertension (n = 203), and resistant hypertension (n = 408). Measurements Participants completed an oral sodium suppression test, regardless of aldosterone or renin levels, as a confirmatory diagnostic for primary aldosteronism and to quantify the magnitude of renin-independent aldosterone production. Urinary aldosterone was measured in participants in high sodium balance with suppressed renin activity. Biochemically overt primary aldosteronism was diagnosed when urinary aldosterone levels were higher than 12 μg/24 h. Results Every blood pressure category had a continuum of renin-independent aldosterone production, where greater severity of production was associated with higher blood pressure, kaliuresis, and lower serum potassium levels. Mean adjusted levels of urinary aldosterone were 6.5 μg/24 h (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.7 μg/24 h) in normotension, 7.3 μg/24 h (CI, 5.6 to 8.9 μg/24 h) in stage 1 hypertension, 9.5 μg/24 h (CI, 8.2 to 10.8 μg/24 h) in stage 2 hypertension, and 14.6 μg/24 h (CI, 12.9 to 16.2 μg/24 h) in resistant hypertension; corresponding adjusted prevalence estimates for biochemically overt primary aldosteronism were 11.3% (CI, 5.9% to 16.8%), 15.7% (CI, 8.6% to 22.9%), 21.6% (CI, 16.1% to 27.0%), and 22.0% (CI, 17.2% to 26.8%). The aldosterone-renin ratio had poor sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting biochemically overt primary aldosteronism. Limitation Prevalence estimates rely on arbitrary and conventional thresholds, and the study population may not represent nationwide demographics. Conclusion The prevalence of primary aldosteronism is high and largely unrecognized. Beyond this categorical definition of primary aldosteronism, there is a prevalent continuum of renin-independent aldosterone production that parallels the severity of hypertension. These findings redefine the primary aldosteronism syndrome and implicate it in the pathogenesis of "essential" hypertension. Primary funding source National Institutes of Health.

BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), nocturnal hypertension, and nondipping systolic blood pressure (BP) are each highly prevalent among African Americans. However, few data are available on the association between OSA and nighttime BP in this population. METHODS We examined the association of OSA with nighttime BP among African Americans who completed 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at Exam 1 (2000–2004) of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) and subsequently participated in the JHS Sleep Study (2012–2016). Type 3 home sleep apnea testing was used to assess OSA measures, including respiratory event index (REI4%) and percent sleep time RESULTS Among 206 participants who completed ABPM and participated in the Jackson Heart Sleep Study, 50.5% had nocturnal hypertension and 26.2% had moderate to severe OSA (REI4% ≥15 events/hour). After multivariable adjustment, each SD (13.3 events/hour) increase in REI4% was associated with 1.75 mm Hg higher nighttime DBP (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38, 3.11) and a prevalence ratio of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.24) for nocturnal hypertension. Each SD (10.4%) increase in nocturnal hypoxemia was associated with a 1.91 mm Hg higher nighttime SBP (95% CI: 0.15, 3.66). CONCLUSIONS Severity of OSA and nocturnal hypoxemia were associated with high nighttime BP in African American participants in the JHS.

Hypertension is a highly common condition with well-established adverse consequences. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has repeatedly been shown to better predict cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, compared to single office visit blood pressure. Non-dipping of sleep-time blood pressure is an independent marker for increased cardiovascular risk. We review blood pressure variability and the challenges of blood pressure monitoring during sleep. Although pathological sleep such as obstructive sleep apnea has been associated with non-dipping of sleep-time blood pressure, blood pressure is not routinely measured during sleep due to lack of unobtrusive blood pressure monitoring technology. Second, we review existing noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring technologies. Lastly, we propose including sleep-time blood pressure monitoring during sleep studies and including sleep studies in patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is a phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure defined as uncontrolled BP despite the use of effective doses of ≥5 antihypertensive medications including a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone) and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. The degree of medication nonadherence is unknown among patients with RfHTN. In this prospective evaluation, 54 patients with apparent RfHTN were recruited from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hypertension Clinic after having uncontrolled BP at 3 or more clinic visits. All patients’ BP was evaluated by automated office BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (n=49). Antihypertensive medication adherence was determined by measuring 24-hour urine specimens for antihypertensive medications and their metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (n=45). Of the 45 patients who completed 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, 40 (88.9%) had confirmed RfHTN based on an elevated automated office BP (≥130/80 mm Hg), mean 24-hour ABP (≥125/75 mm Hg), and mean awake (day-time) ABP (≥130/80 mm Hg). Out of the 40 fully evaluated patients with RfHTN, 16 (40.0%) were fully adherent with all prescribed medications. Eighteen (45.0%) patients were partially adherent and 6 (15.0%) had none of the prescribed agents detected in their urine. Of 18 patients who were partially adherent, 5 (12.5%) were adherent with at least 5 medications, including chlorthalidone and the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, consistent with true RfHTN. Of patients identified as having apparent RfHTN, 52.5% were adherent with at least 5 antihypertensive medications, including chlorthalidone and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, confirming true RfTHN. These findings validate RfHTN as a rare, but true phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure.

The purpose of the current study was to determine whether aortic blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness are greater in patients with controlled resistant hypertension (RHTN) than controlled non‐resistant hypertension (non‐RHTN) despite similar clinic BP level. Participants were recruited from University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hypertension Clinic. Controlled hypertension was defined as automated office BP measurement with BP

Background Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with arterial hypertension. Resistant hypertension is often linked to hyperaldosteronism and associated with adverse outcomes. Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, has been shown to reduce both the arterial blood pressure (BP) and aortic stiffness in resistant hypertension. However, the mechanism of aortic stiffness reduction by spironolactone is not well understood. We hypothesized that spironolactone reduces aortic stiffness in resistant hypertension independently of BP change. Methods and Results Patients with uncontrolled BP (≥140/90 mm Hg) despite use of ≥3 antihypertensive medications (including diuretics) were prospectively recruited. Participants were started on spironolactone at 25 mg/d, and increased to 50 mg/d at 4 weeks while other antihypertensive medications were withdrawn to maintain constant mean BP. Phase‐contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of the ascending aorta was performed in 30 participants at baseline and after 6 months of spironolactone treatment to measure aortic pulsatility, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity. Pulse wave velocity decreased (6.3±2.3 m/s to 4.5±1.8 m/s, P P P Conclusions Our results suggest that spironolactone improves aortic properties in resistant hypertension independently of BP, which may support the hypothesis of an effect of aldosterone on the arterial wall. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm our findings.

Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite the use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a diuretic, usually thiazide-like, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, and a blocker of the renin- angiotensin system, either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker, at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. Antihypertensive medication non-adherence and the white coat effect, defined as elevated blood pressure when measured in clinic but controlled when measured outside of clinic, must be excluded to make the diagnosis. Resistant hypertension is a high risk phenotype, leading to increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. Healthy lifestyle habits are associated with reduced CV risk in patients with resistant hypertension. Aldosterone excess is common in patients with resistant hypertension, and addition of spironolactone or amiloride to the standard 3-drug antihypertensive regimen is effective at getting the blood pressure to goal in most of these patients. Refractory hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite use of 5 or more antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a long acting thiazide-like diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. Fluid retention, mediated largely by aldosterone excess, is the predominant mechanism underlying resistant hypertension, while patients with refractory hypertension typically exhibit increased sympathetic nervous system activity.

Background: Blacks have a high prevalence of hypertension and uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), each of which may be partially explained by untreated sleep apnea. We investigated the association of sleep apnea with uncontrolled BP and resistant hypertension in blacks. Methods: Between 2012 and 2016, Jackson Heart Sleep Study participants (N=913) underwent an in-home Type 3 sleep apnea study, clinic BP measurements, and anthropometry. Moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was defined as a respiratory event index ≥15, and nocturnal hypoxemia was quantified as percent sleep time with > 80mm Hg, use of antihypertensive medication, or self-report of a diagnosis of hypertension. Controlled BP was defined as systolic BP Results: The analytic sample with hypertension (N=664) had a mean age of 64.0 (SD,10.6) years, and were predominately female (69.1%), obese (58.6%), and college educated (51.3%). Among the sample, 25.7% had OSA, which was untreated in 94% of participants. Overall, 48% of participants had uncontrolled hypertension and 14% had resistant hypertension. After adjustment for confounders, participants with moderate or severe OSA had a 2.0 times higher odds of resistant hypertension (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–3.67). Each standard deviation higher than Conclusion: Untreated moderate or severe OSA is associated with increased odds of resistant hypertension. These results suggest that untreated OSA may contribute to inadequate BP control in blacks.

In 2015, the American Heart Association awarded 4-year funding for a Strategically Focused Research Network focused on hypertension composed of 4 Centers: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and University of Iowa. Each center proposed 3 integrated (basic, clinical, and population science) projects around a single area of focus relevant to hypertension. Along with scientific progress, the American Heart Association put a significant emphasis on training of next-generation hypertension researchers by sponsoring 3 postdoctoral fellows per center over 4 years. With the center projects being spread across the continuum of basic, clinical, and population sciences, postdoctoral fellows were expected to garner experience in various types of research methodologies. The American Heart Association also provided a number of leadership development opportunities for fellows and investigators in these centers. In addition, collaboration was highly encouraged among the centers (both within and outside the network) with the American Heart Association providing multiple opportunities for meeting and expanding associations. The area of focus for the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Center was hypertension and target organ damage in children utilizing ambulatory blood pressure measurements. The Medical College of Wisconsin Center focused on epigenetic modifications and their role in pathogenesis of hypertension using human and animal studies. The University of Alabama at Birmingham Center’s areas of research were diurnal blood pressure patterns and clock genes. The University of Iowa Center evaluated copeptin as a possible early biomarker for preeclampsia and vascular endothelial function during pregnancy. In this review, challenges faced and successes achieved by the investigators of each of the centers are presented.

Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) in treated patients is defined as controlled office blood pressure (BP) but uncontrolled out-of-clinic ambulatory BP. Previously, we have shown that patients with MUCH have evidence of heightened out-of-clinic sympathetic nervous system activity. The aim is to test the hypothesis that MUCH patients have higher aldosterone secretion compared with patients with true controlled hypertension. Two hundred twenty-two patients were recruited after having controlled office BP readings at ≥3 clinic visits. Patients taking MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) antagonists and epithelial sodium channel blockers were excluded. All patients were evaluated by clinic automated office BP and morning serum aldosterone and plasma renin activity. Out-of-clinic ambulatory BP monitoring and 24-hour urinary aldosterone, catecholamines, and metanephrines were also measured. Sixty-four patients had MUCH, and the remaining 48 patients had true controlled hypertension. MUCH patients had significantly higher out-of-clinic levels of 24-hour urinary aldosterone, catecholamines, and metanephrines compared with true controlled hypertension. The 2 groups did not differ in serum aldosterone, plasma renin activity, or aldosterone-renin ratio collected in clinic. In addition, 32.8% of MUCH patients had high out-of-clinic 24-hour urinary aldosterone (≥12 µg) but normal clinic serum aldosterone (

OBJECTIVES Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with treatment-resistant hypertension (RHTN) and may contribute to refractory hypertension (RfHTN). The objective of the current study was to test the hypothesis that patients with RfHTN have more severe OSA compared with patients with controlled RHTN. METHODS Patients (n = 187) referred to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hypertension Clinic for evaluation and treatment of RHTN, defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) (SBP ≥ 130 mmHg or DBP ≥ 80 mmHg) despite the use of at least three antihypertensive medications including a diuretic, were enrolled following completion of at least three follow-up clinic visits. RfHTN was defined as uncontrolled high BP despite treatment with five or more antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a long-acting thiazide-type diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Following enrollment, all patients (n = 130) completed 24-h ambulatory BP measurement and overnight diagnostic polysomnography during normal nightly use of continuous positive airway pressure. Analyses examined the severity of OSA and related sleep characteristics among patients with RfHTN versus controlled RHTN. RESULTS Of the 130 evaluated patients, 37 (28.5%) had RfHTN and 93 (71.5%) had controlled RHTN. In unadjusted analyses, there was not a significant difference in OSA severity, oxygen saturation, or hypoxemia time in patients with RfHTN versus controlled RHTN (P > 0.05). Men with RfHTN had more severe OSA compared with men with controlled RHTN (P = 0.044). In adjusted analyses, OSA severity was associated with sex (P

OBJECTIVES We compared the prevalence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) according to the seventh report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7) and the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline in an integrated healthcare delivery system. METHODS We identified individuals aged at least 18 years with hypertension from Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015. aTRH was defined as either blood pressure (BP) above goal (≥140/90 mmHg per JNC7, and ≥130/80 mmHg per 2017 ACC/AHA for most adults with hypertension) while taking at least 3 classes of antihypertensive medication or taking at least four classes regardless of BP level. A secondary analysis was conducted requiring use of a diuretic for the definition of aTRH. Patient clinical characteristics and antihypertensive medication use were described using electronic health records. RESULTS We included 469 509 patients with treated hypertension [mean (SD) age 65 years (12), 46% white, 26% Hispanic, 13% black, and 12% Asian]. The prevalence of aTRH was 16.9 and 21.8% according to the JNC 7 and the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, respectively [Δ = 4.9% (95% CI: 4.7--5.1%)]. By requiring a diuretic to be considered as aTRH, the prevalence of aTRH decreased to 13.4 and 17.2% according to the JNC 7 and the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, respectively. Among patients with aTRH, 1.9% received a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic, and 5.6% received a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker. CONCLUSION The prevalence of aTRH increased using the more stringent BP goals of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline. The use of recommended therapy for aTRH was suboptimal suggesting a potential area for improvement.

BACKGROUND Refractory hypertension (RfHTN), a phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure, is defined as uncontrolled automated office blood pressure (AOBP) ≥130/80 mm Hg and awake ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) ≥130/80 mm Hg on ≥5 antihypertensive medications, including chlorthalidone and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Previous studies suggest that RfHTN is attributable to heightened sympathetic tone. The current study tested whether reserpine, a potent sympatholytic agent, lowers blood pressure (BP) in patients with RfHTN. METHODS Twenty-one out of 45 consecutive patients with suspected RfHTN were determined to be fully adherent with their antihypertensive regimen. Seven patients agreed to participate in the current clinical trial with reserpine and 6 patients completed the study. Other sympatholytic medications, such as clonidine or guanfacine, were tapered and discontinued before starting reserpine. Reserpine 0.1 mg daily was administered in an open-label fashion for 4 weeks. All patients were evaluated by AOBP and 24-hour ABP at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS Reserpine lowered mean systolic and diastolic AOBP by 29.3 ± 22.2 and 22.0 ± 15.8 mm Hg, respectively. Mean 24-hour systolic and diastolic ABPs were reduced by 21.8 ± 13.4 and 15.3 ± 9.6 mm Hg, mean awake systolic and diastolic ABPs by 23.8 ± 11.8 and 17.8 ± 9.2 mm Hg, and mean asleep systolic and diastolic ABPs by 21.5 ± 11.4 and 13.7 ± 6.4 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Reserpine, a potent sympatholytic agent, lowers BP in patients whose BP remained uncontrolled on maximal antihypertensive therapy, lending support to the hypothesis that excess sympathetic output contributes importantly to the development of RfHTN.

Blacks have a high prevalence of hypertension and uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), each of which may be partially explained by untreated sleep apnea. We investigated the association of sleep apnea with uncontrolled BP and resistant hypertension in blacks.Between 2012 and 2016, Jackson Heart Sleep Study participants (N=913) underwent an in-home Type 3 sleep apnea study, clinic BP measurements, and anthropometry. Moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was defined as a respiratory event index ≥15, and nocturnal hypoxemia was quantified as percent sleep time with90% oxyhemoglobin saturation. Prevalent hypertension was defined as either a systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP80mm Hg, use of antihypertensive medication, or self-report of a diagnosis of hypertension. Controlled BP was defined as systolic BP130 mm Hg and diastolic BP80 mm Hg; uncontrolled BP as systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg with use of 1 to 2 classes of antihypertensive medication; and resistant BP as systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg with the use of ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication (including a diuretic) or use of ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication regardless of BP level. Multinomial logistic regression models were fit to determine the association between OSA severity and uncontrolled BP or resistant hypertension (versus controlled BP) after multivariable adjustment.The analytic sample with hypertension (N=664) had a mean age of 64.0 (SD,10.6) years, and were predominately female (69.1%), obese (58.6%), and college educated (51.3%). Among the sample, 25.7% had OSA, which was untreated in 94% of participants. Overall, 48% of participants had uncontrolled hypertension and 14% had resistant hypertension. After adjustment for confounders, participants with moderate or severe OSA had a 2.0 times higher odds of resistant hypertension (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.67). Each standard deviation higher than90% oxyhemoglobin saturation was associated with an adjusted odds ratio for resistant hypertension of 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.55). OSA and90% oxyhemoglobin saturation were not associated with uncontrolled BP.Untreated moderate or severe OSA is associated with increased odds of resistant hypertension. These results suggest that untreated OSA may contribute to inadequate BP control in blacks.

Background Sleep characteristics and disorders are associated with higher blood pressure ( BP ) when measured in the clinic setting. Methods and Results We tested whether self‐reported sleep characteristics and likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea ( OSA ) were associated with nocturnal hypertension and nondipping systolic BP ( SBP ) among participants in the CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study who completed 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring during the year 30 examination. Likelihood of OSA was determined using the STOP ‐Bang questionnaire. Global sleep quality, habitual sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and midsleep time were obtained from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Nocturnal hypertension was defined as mean asleep SBP ≥120 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥70 mm Hg. Nondipping SBP was defined as a decline in awake‐to‐asleep SBP SBP was 41.3% and 32.5%, respectively. After multivariable adjustment including cardiovascular risk factors, the prevalence ratios (PRs) for nocturnal hypertension and nondipping SBP associated with high versus low likelihood of OSA were 1.32 (95% CI, 1.00–1.75) and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.02–1.68), respectively. The association between likelihood of OSA and nocturnal hypertension was stronger for white participants (PR: 2.09; 95% CI, 1.23–3.48) compared with black participants (PR: 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79–1.56). The PR for nondipping SBP associated with a 1‐hour later midsleep time was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85–0.99). Global sleep quality, habitual sleep duration, and sleep efficiency were not associated with either nocturnal hypertension or nondipping SBP . Conclusions These findings suggest that addressing OSA risk and sleep timing in a clinical trial may improve BP during sleep.

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is an extreme phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure defined as lack of blood pressure control with ≥5 medications, including a long-acting thiazide and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. RfHTN is a subgroup of resistant hypertension (RHTN), which is defined as blood pressure >135/85 mm Hg with ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. RHTN is generally attributed to persistent intravascular fluid retention. It is unknown whether alternative mechanisms are operative in RfHTN. Our objective was to determine whether RfHTN is characterized by persistent fluid retention, indexed by greater intracardiac volumes determined by cardiac magnetic resonance when compared with controlled RHTN patients. Consecutive patients evaluated in our institution with RfHTN and controlled RHTN were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria included advanced chronic kidney disease and masked or white coat hypertension. All enrolled patients underwent biochemical testing and cardiac magnetic resonance. The RfHTN group (n=24) was younger (mean age, 51.7±8.9 versus 60.6±11.5 years; P =0.003) and had a greater proportion of women (75.0% versus 43%; P =0.02) compared with the controlled RHTN group (n=30). RfHTN patients had a greater left ventricular mass index (88.3±35.0 versus 54.6±12.5 g/m 2 ; P P =0.001), and septal wall thickness (14.5±3.8 versus 10.0±2.2 mm; P

A 78-year-old black man presented to the Hypertension Clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham for uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). His BP remained uncontrolled (automated office, ≥135/85 mm Hg) from August 2011 to August 2016 in spite of use of 6 antihypertensive agents in adequate doses (Figure 1). During this time period, his average systolic BP was 167.1 mm Hg and average diastolic BP was 68.7 mm Hg. Figure 1. Blood pressure (BP) and antihypertensive medications before and after surgery. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting. The patient was on 3 antihypertensive medications on initial presentation to University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2011, including an angiotensin receptor blocker (irbesartan), a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine), and a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone). Spironolactone was added as a fourth antihypertensive agent. Eventually, hydralazine—a vasodilator—and clonidine—a centrally acting sympatholytic—were added as the fifth and sixth antihypertensive agents. The patient’s BP remained uncontrolled on 6 different classes of antihypertensive medications (Figure 1). Comorbidities and secondary causes of hypertension were evaluated by biochemical analysis and imaging. ### Biochemical Analysis The patient was diagnosed with mild chronic kidney disease. Mean serum creatinine was 1.35 mg/dL with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 58 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Diabetes mellitus was excluded (HbA1c was 5.5%), primary aldosteronism was excluded as the plasma aldosterone–renin ratio was

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH), nocturnal hypertension, and nondipping blood pressure (BP) have shared risk factors. The authors studied the association between aTRH and nocturnal hypertension and aTRH and nondipping BP among 524 black Jackson Heart Study participants treated for hypertension. Nocturnal hypertension was defined by mean nighttime systolic BP ≥120 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥70 mm Hg. Nondipping BP was defined by mean nighttime to daytime systolic BP ratio >0.90. aTRH was defined by mean clinic systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg with three medication classes or treatment with four or more classes. The risk for developing aTRH associated with nondipping BP and nocturnal hypertension was estimated. After multivariable adjustment, participants with aTRH were more likely to have nocturnal hypertension (prevalence ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.39) and nondipping (prevalence ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.43). Over a median 7.3 years of follow-up, nocturnal hypertension and nondipping BP at baseline were not associated with developing aTRH after adjustment.

Background Glomerular hyperfiltration may contribute to the high incidence of renal disease in Obese African Americans essential hypertensive (ObAAEH) patients, but the precise mechanisms responsible for renal injury have not been elucidated. Mitochondria are important determinants of renal injury in hypertension, and increased levels of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in the urine may indicate renal mitochondrial injury. We hypothesized that urine mtDNA copy numbers would be higher in ObAAEH compared to Caucasian essential hypertensive (CEH) patients. Methods We prospectively measured systemic, renal vein (RV), inferior vena cava (IVC), and urinary copy number of the mtDNA genes COX3 and ND1 by quantitative-PCR in CEH and ObAAEH patients during constant sodium intake and antihypertensive regimens, and compared them with healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 23 each). Results Blood pressure was similarly elevated in CEH and ObAAEH, while glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was higher and age lower in ObAAEH. Urinary (but not plasma) COX3 and ND1 were higher in CEH compared to HV, and further elevated in ObAAEH patients. COX3 and ND1 renal gradients (RV-IVC) were higher in ObAAEH vs. CEH, and their urinary levels directly correlated with GFR. In multivariate analysis, GFR remained the only predictor of elevated urinary COX3 and ND1 levels. Conclusions Urinary fragments of the mitochondrial genome are elevated in ObAAEH patients and correlate with glomerular hyperfiltration. A positive gradient across the kidney in ObAAEH suggests selective renal release. These results are consistent with mitochondrial injury that may aggravate renal damage and accelerate hypertension-related morbidity/mortality rates in ObAAEH.

Resistant hypertension, defined as blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg despite using ≥3 antihypertensive medications, is a well-recognized clinical entity. Patients with resistant hypertension are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared with those with more easily controlled hypertension. Coronary heart disease mortality rates of younger adults are stagnating or on the rise. The purpose of our study was to characterize the phenotype and risk factors of younger patients with resistant hypertension, given the dearth of data on cardiovascular risk profile in this cohort. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with predefined age groups of a large, ethnically diverse cohort of 2170 patients referred to the Hypertension Clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Patients (n=2068) met the inclusion criteria and were classified by age groups, that is, ≤40 years (12.7% of total cohort), 41 to 55 years (32.1%), 56 to 70 years (36.1%), and ≥71 years (19.1%). Patients aged ≤40 years compared with those aged ≥71 years had significantly earlier onset of hypertension (24.7±7.4 versus 55.0±14.1 years; P P P =0.005), plasma renin activity (4.9±10.2 versus 2.5±5.0 ng/mL per hour; P =0.001), 24-hour urinary aldosterone (13.4±10.0 versus 8.2±6.2 µg/24 h; P P

Refractory hypertension is a recently proposed phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure. As such it represents an extreme subtype of resistant or difficult-to-treat hypertension. Resistant hypertension is relatively common with an estimated prevalence of 10-20% of treated hypertensive patients. It is typically defined as having an uncontrolled blood pressure on three or more antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Refractory hypertension is rare with a prevalence of approximately 5% of patients with uncontrolled resistant hypertension. It is defined as an uncontrolled blood pressure with the use of five or more antihypertensive medications, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic, such as chlorthalidone, and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist such as spironolactone.Persistent excess fluid retention is thought to commonly underlie development of resistant hypertension, recent studies suggest that refractory may be more likely attributable to heightened sympathetic output as opposed to inappropriate fluid retention.Treatment recommendations for resistant hypertension are generally based on intensification of diuretic therapy, especially with combined use of chlorthalidone and spironolactone. Although fuller elucidation is needed, such an approach may not be appropriate for refractory hypertension, which instead, may require effective sympathetic inhibition, either with medications or device-based approaches.

See related article, pp 585–591 A growing body of literature associates primary aldosteronism (PA) with increased risk of cardiovascular complications, including cardiovascular attributable death, left ventricular hypertrophy, stroke, proteinuria, and atrial fibrillation. This increased cardiovascular risk is in no doubt related in large part to aldosterone-induced increases in blood pressure (BP), which are often resistant and severe. Additional mechanisms that are seemingly independent of increases in BP that likely contribute to the development and progression of cardiovascular disease in PA patients include aldosterone-induced inflammation, fibrosis, cellular hypertrophy, and oxidative stress.1 Further, in line with classical physiological effects, aldosterone and high dietary sodium exposure promotes intravascular fluid retention with associated increases in intracardiac heart volumes, including the left atrium, which would be anticipated to contribute to increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation.2 Demonstration of the increased risk of PA in relation to cardiovascular outcomes, including atrial fibrillation, has been largely based on retrospective or cross-sectional analyses. For example, in one of the earliest reports, Milliez et al3 retrospectively compared the history of specific cardiovascular events in 124 patients with confirmed PA and 465 control patients with primary hypertension. In spite of seemingly similar levels of BP control, the PA patients were significantly more likely to have had a history of stroke and myocardial infarction and were >12 times as likely to have been previously diagnosed with an episode of atrial fibrillation. Reincke et al4 conducted a longitudinal assessment of patients included in a German registry of PA who had been treated with adrenalectomy and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Although the 10-year all-cause mortality was similar to PA patients to that of matched hypertensive controls, the PA patients were significantly more likely to have died from cardiovascular complications than the control patients without PA. Combined, these 2 …

Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) in treated hypertensive patients is defined as controlled automated office blood pressure (BP; P =0.403). Measurement of urinary drug and drug metabolite levels demonstrates a similarly high level of antihypertensive medication adherence in both MUCH and truly controlled hypertensive patients. These findings indicate that MUCH is not attributable to antihypertensive medication nonadherence.

Purpose of Review: To compare European and American guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of resistant hypertension. Recent Findings: Resistant hypertension is defined as high blood pressure that remains above goal with the use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents, commonly a renin-angiotensin blocker (either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker), a long-acting calcium channel blocker, and thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic. Resistant hypertension is common, with a recent analysis indicating that it affects approximately 17–19% of adult Americans with hypertension. Pseudocauses of apparent resistant hypertension, including inaccurate blood pressure measurement, white coat effect, undertreatment, and poor medication adherence, must be excluded in order to confirm true resistant hypertension. Evaluation of resistant hypertension requires identifying and treating secondary causes of hypertension, including obstructive sleep apnea, primary aldosteronism, and renal artery stenosis. Treatment of resistant hypertension includes a combined use of lifestyle modification and prescription of effective multiple-drug combinations. Preferential use of a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic, either chlorthalidone or indapamide, and a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, most commonly spironolactone, is recommended if needed to achieve blood pressure control. Summary: Aside for small exceptions, European and American guidelines agree in terms of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating resistant hypertension.

Background The association between serum urate and hypertension continues to be controversial. Animal models and studies in adolescents provided strong support of urate- lowering therapy (ULT) efficacy to improve early hypertension (1), while one recent randomized-controlled study in adults failed to find benefit (2). Objectives To test the hypothesis that serum urate reduction with allopurinol would lead to blood pressure reductions in young adults with pre-hypertension. Methods Single center, double-blinded, crossover trial in which participants were randomly assigned to allopurinol (300 daily mg) or placebo for a period of one month each. Adults ages 18-40, with baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 120 and 297.4 µmol/L) or ≥ 4.0 mg/dL (237.9 µmol/L) (men or women, respectively) were enrolled. Main exclusion criteria included chronic kidney disease, gout, or use of ULTs. The primary outcome was change from baseline in SBP assessed by 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Safety assessments were also conducted. Results 99 participants were randomized, and 82 completed study participation (Table 1). Serum urate decreased by -1.33 ± 1.21 mg/dL (-79.1 ± 72.0 µmol/L) during the allopurinol period (p 6.5 mg/dL (> 386.7 µmol/L) at baseline visit. No allopurinol hypersensitivity events or other serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion In the intention-to-treat analysis, urate -lowering therapy with allopurinol in young adults did not lead to reductions in blood pressure when compared with placebo. Blood pressure reductions with allopurinol may be limited only to participants with higher baseline serum urate levels. References [1] Feig DI, Soletsky B, Johnson RJ. JAMA. 2008;300:924-32. [2] McMullan CJ, Borgi L, Fisher N, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:807-16. Disclosure of Interests Angelo Gaffo: None declared, David Calhoun: None declared, Elizabeth Rahn: None declared, Suzanne Oparil: None declared, Paul Muntner Grant/research support from: Dr. Muntner declares research grant from Amgen, Peng Li: None declared, David Redden: None declared, Tanja Dudenbostel: None declared, Jeff Foster: None declared, Stephanie Biggers: None declared, Daniel Feig: None declared, Kenneth Saag Grant/research support from: Amgen, Ironwood/AstraZeneca, Horizon, SOBI, Takeda, Consultant for: Abbvie, Amgen, Ironwood/AstraZeneca, Bayer, Gilead, Horizon, Kowa, Radius, Roche/Genentech, SOBI, Takeda, Teijin

Objectives Refractory hypertension has been defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (at or above 140/90 mmHg) when on five or more classes of antihypertensive medication, inclusive of a diuretic. Because unbiased estimates of the prevalence of refractory hypertension in the United States are lacking, we aim to provide such estimates using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Methods Refractory hypertension was assessed across multiple NHANES cycles using the aforementioned definition. Eight cycles of NHANES surveys (1999-2014) representing 41 552 patients are the subject of this study. Prevalence of refractory hypertension across these surveys was estimated in the drug-treated hypertensive population after adjusting for the complex survey design and standardizing for age. Results Across all surveys, refractory hypertension prevalence was 0.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.5, 0.7)] amongst drug-treated hypertensive adults; 6.2% [95% CI (5.1, 7.6)] of individuals with treatment-resistant hypertension actually had refractory hypertension. Although the prevalence of refractory hypertension ranged from 0.3% [95% CI (0.1, 1.0)] to 0.9% [95% CI (0.6, 1.2)] over the eight cycles considered, there was no significant trend in prevalence over time. Refractory hypertension prevalence amongst those prescribed five or more drugs was 34.5% [95% CI (27.9, 41.9)]. Refractory hypertension was associated with advancing age, lower household income, black race, and also chronic kidney disease, albuminuria, diabetes, prior stroke, and coronary heart disease. Conclusions We provided the first nationally representative estimate of refractory hypertension prevalence in US adults.

Spanish Sleep Network., [Rationale] Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can significantly reduce blood pressure (BP) levels in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea (OSA); however, the effect on patients with refractory hypertension (RfH) is not known. This study seeks to evaluate the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in patients with OSA and RfH, compared with those with OSA and resistant hypertension., [Methods] Post-hoc analysis of the HIPARCO randomized clinical trial on the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in patients with resistant hypertension. Those patients with uncontrolled 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring readings (>130 and/or >80 mmHg) in SBP or DBP were considered to have resistant hypertension (if they were taking three or four antihypertensive drugs) or RfH (if they were taking at least five drugs). OSA patients were randomized to receive CPAP or usual care for 3 months. They underwent a second 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring study to establish the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in both groups., [Results] A total of 98 patients were randomized to CPAP (19 RfH/79 resistant hypertension) and 96 to usual care (21 RfH/75 resistant hypertension). BP readings dropped more marked in patients with RfH than resistant hypertension, in both 24-h SBP (−9 vs. −1.6 mmHg, P = 0.021) and 24-h DBP (−7.3 vs. −2.3 mmHg, P = 0.074), especially at night (−11.3 vs. −3.8, P = 0.121 and −8.8 vs. −2.2, P = 0.054) respectively. Adjusted difference between groups was statistically significant in 24-h SBP levels (−7.4 mmHg, P = 0.021)., [Conclusion] CPAP lowers BP levels in both resistant hypertension and RfH patients although the degree of this reduction is higher in those with RfH especially during the night.

Background Multiple studies indicate that primary aldosteronism (PA) is common in patients with resistant hypertension, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 20%. Additional studies suggest that beyond this 20% of patients with classical PA, there is a larger proportion of patients with lesser degrees of hyperaldosteronism which contributes even more broadly to antihypertensive treatment resistance. Given these observations, it is intuitive that use of aldosterone antagonists will provide antihypertensive benefit in patients with resistant hypertension and evidence of aldosterone excess. Intriguingly, however, are clinical findings demonstrating substantive benefit of aldosterone antagonists in patients with resistant hypertension, but without demonstrative evidence of hyperaldosteronism, that is, with seemingly normal or even low aldosterone levels. Conclusion Spironolactone is clearly established as the most effective fourth agent for treatment of uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Emerging observations suggest a further role of spironolactone for counteracting the effects of diet high in sodium, particularly in obese, hypertensive patients.

The association between hyperuricemia and hypertension is controversial. Animal models, epidemiological data, and small clinical trials have favored a causative role for hyperuricemia in hypertension but more studies are necessary to elucidate putative mechanisms, population susceptibility, and potential for urate-lowering therapies (ULT) to decrease blood pressure (BP).To describe the background and design of the Serum Urate Reduction to Prevent Hypertension (SURPHER) study.SURPHER is a single center, double-blinded, crossover trial in which participants are randomly assigned to allopurinol (300mg) or placebo. Enrollment focused on adults 18-40years old with baseline systolic blood pressure≥120 and160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure≥80 and100mmHg, and serum urate ≥5.0mg/dL or ≥4.0mg/dL for men or women, respectively. SURPHER recruitment targets participants without chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate60mL/min/1.73m2), and without prior diagnosis of gout or use of ULT to treat gout. The primary outcome is change from baseline in blood pressure assessed by 24hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and mechanistic outcomes include changes in endothelial function as measured by flow-mediated dilation, as well as C-reactive protein levels.Since June 16, 2014 until present, SURPHER is recruiting participants in the city of Birmingham, Alabama.The study aims to enroll otherwise healthy young adults for a pharmacological intervention study with multiple study-related procedures. Challenges related to recruitment are anticipated and multiple strategies for increasing recruitment and retention are planned if necessary.

The prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension (HTN) due to inaccurate BP measurement remains unknown. Triage BP measurements and measurements obtained at the same clinic visit by trained physicians were compared in consecutive adult patients referred for uncontrolled resistant HTN (RHTN). Triage BP measurements were taken by the clinic staff during normal intake procedures. BP measurements were obtained by trained physicians using the BpTRU (VSM Med Tech Ltd. Coquitlam, Canada) device. The prevalence of uncontrolled RHTN and differences in BP measurements were compared. Of 130 patients with uncontrolled RHTN, 33.1% (n = 43) were falsely identified as having uncontrolled RHTN based on triage BP measurements. The median (inter-quartile range) of differences in systolic BP between pseudoresistant and true resistant groups were 23 (17-33) mm Hg and 13 (6-21) mm Hg, respectively (P = .0001). The median (inter-quartile range) of differences in diastolic BP between the two groups were 12 (7-18) mm Hg and 8 (4-11) mm Hg, respectively (P = .001). Triage BP technique overestimated the prevalence of uncontrolled RHTN in approximately 33% of the patients emphasizing the importance of obtaining accurate BP measurements.

The term resistant hypertension has been used since the early 1960s to identify patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension, meaning mostly, resistance to pharmacological therapy.1 In the 5 decades since the term was seemingly first applied, resistant hypertension has been consistently defined as failure to control high blood pressure despite of use of ≥3 antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a diuretic.2–5 The 2008 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on resistant hypertension included in its definition patients whose blood pressure had been uncontrolled with 3 medications, but controlled with ≥4 medications.4 Although the number of medications required to satisfy the definition is arbitrary, the purpose of creating a category of resistant hypertension is to identify patients who, because of the difficulty in controlling their blood pressure, may benefit from special diagnostic and therapeutic considerations, including referral to a hypertension specialist. Having an agreed on definition that can be reliably applied to different cohorts has also facilitated research for this subgroup of patients, including identification of risk factors and underlying mechanisms, assessing outcomes and developing targeted treatments. The term refractory hypertension has often been used interchangeably with resistant hypertension to also refer to patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension.1–3,5 However, based on the number of respective PubMed citations resistant hypertension has been used much more often than refractory hypertension to indicate patients with hypertension resistant to pharmacological treatment. Recently, the term refractory hypertension has been applied to a small group of patients who are truly refractory to treatment, that is, patients who fail to achieve target blood pressure on maximal antihypertensive therapy.6 Determining whether such patients simply represent extreme cases of resistant hypertension or a novel phenotype in terms of risk and cause has been the focus of initial attempts to define and characterize …

Resistant or difficult to treat hypertension is defined as high blood pressure that remains uncontrolled with 3 or more different antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Recent definitions also include controlled blood pressure with use of 4 or more medications as also being resistant to treatment. Recently, refractory hypertension, an extreme phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure has been defined as hypertension uncontrolled with use of 5 or more antihypertensive agents, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Patients with resistant vs refractory hypertension share similar characteristics and comorbidities, including obesity, African American race, female sex, diabetes, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Patients with refractory vs resistant hypertension tend to be younger and are more likely to have been diagnosed with congestive heart failure. Refractory hypertension might also differ from resistant hypertension in terms of underlying cause. Preliminary evidence suggests that refractory hypertension is more likely to be neurogenic in etiology (ie, heightened sympathetic tone), vs a volume-dependent hypertension that is more characteristic of resistant hypertension in general.

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN), a phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure, is defined as uncontrolled automated office BP [AOBP] ≥ 130/80 mmHg & 24-hr ambulatory BP [ABP] ≥ 125/75 mmHg on ≥5 antihypertensive medications, including chlorthalidone & a mineralocorticoid receptor

Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is defined as controlled automated office blood pressure (BP; AOBP

Introduction: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is defined as controlled automated office blood pressure (AOBP) in clinic, but uncontrolled out-of-clinic BP by 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Prior studies indicate that the prevalence of masked hypertension in patients with newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is nearly 30%. In addition, patients with OSA have a higher prevalence of masked hypertension than patients without OSA. Aim: Prospective determination of the prevalence and severity of OSA in patients with MUCH. Methods: In this prospective evaluation, 167 treated hypertensive patients were recruited from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hypertension Clinic after having controlled BP at three or more clinic visits. All patients were evaluated by AOBP with the BpTRU device, ABPM, and diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) to determine the presence and severity of OSA based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Out of 153 who completed ABPM, 58 patients were controlled by AOBP and by ABPM, indicating true controlled hypertension and the remaining 95 patients were controlled by AOBP, but uncontrolled by ABPM, indicative of MUCH. 49 true controlled hypertensive and 69 MUCH patients completed PSG. Results: MUCH patients had a mean AHI of 10.3±13.3 compared to 4.5±10.2 events/hr in true controlled hypertension (p =0.045). Overall, the prevalence of OSA was 48.5% in patients with MUCH compared to 26.5% in true controlled hypertension (p = 0.01). Conclusion: MUCH has significant higher prevalence and severity of OSA compared to true controlled hypertension. These findings suggest that untreated OSA may contribute to the development of MUCH.

Background: 24-hr Blood pressure (BP) variability and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) have been found to be independently associated with increased cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Studies have shown a positive association between hs-CRP and BP variability in hypertensive population. In particular, nocturnal BP variability is associated with increased risk for CVD. However, the relationship between inflammation and nocturnal BP variability has not been examined in hypertensive patients. Methods: In this prospective study, 237 hypertensive patients were recruited from University of Alabama at Birmingham Hypertension clinic. As part of the study protocol, hs-CRP and 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed at same visit. Patients with chronic kidney disease and those who did not have complete ABPM and hs-CRP values were excluded. Nocturnal BP variability was assessed using standard deviation. Results: Out of 202 patients who were included, 49.0% were women and 55.9% were African American. The mean age was 58.2 ± 10.9 years, mean nighttime BP (Systolic BP 132.4 ± 22.9 mmHg and diastolic BP 71.9 ± 14.0 mmHg), mean nighttime BP variability (systolic BP 13.4 ± 5.3 and diastolic BP 9.9 ± 4.2) and mean hs-CRP was 5.9 ± 7.0 mg/L. Regression analysis showed significant positive association (p-value = 0.033) between nocturnal BP variability and hs-CRP. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated that hs-CRP is strongly correlated with nocturnal BP variability in hypertensive patients, suggesting a likely mechanistic role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of nocturnal BP variability and a possible additive role in adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Prior studies suggest benefits of blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular risk may be attenuated in patients with resistant hypertension compared with the general hypertensive population, but prospective data are lacking.We assessed intensive (120 mm Hg) versus standard (140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure targets on adverse outcome risk according to baseline resistant hypertension status, using Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) patient-level data. Patients were categorized as having baseline apparent resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg while using 3 antihypertensive drugs or use of ≥4 drugs regardless of blood pressure) or non-resistant hypertension (all others). Cox regression was used to assess effects of treatment assignment, resistant hypertension status, their interaction, and other covariates, on first occurrence of 2 outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death ± heart failure, and the same outcomes plus all-cause death, individually.Among 14,094 patients, 2710 (19.2%) had baseline apparent resistant hypertension. In adjusted models, an intensive target reduced risk of both outcomes (myocardial infarction/stroke/cardiovascular death: hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.93; myocardial infarction/stroke/heart failure/cardiovascular death: HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88) as well as stroke (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94) and heart failure (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). An intensive target also appeared to reduce myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death risk. Benefits were observed irrespective of baseline resistant hypertension status.Our findings provide the first evidence to support guidance to treat resistant hypertension to the same blood pressure goal as non-resistant hypertension.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) has historically been defined as high blood pressure (BP) that remains uncontrolled despite use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents from different classes, including ideally, a diuretic. In 2008, the first American Heart Association Scientific Statement on RHTN included a new category of “controlled RHTN” as high BP controlled on 4 or more antihypertensive agents (1).

Background Blacks have higher blood pressure levels compared with whites beginning in childhood. Few data are available on racial differences in the incidence of hypertension from young adulthood through middle age. Methods and Results We calculated the cumulative incidence of hypertension from age 18 to 55 years among participants in the CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study. Incident hypertension was defined by the first visit with mean systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg, mean diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg, or self‐reported use of antihypertensive medication. Among 3890 participants without hypertension at baseline (aged 18–30 years), cumulative incidence of hypertension by age 55 years was 75.5%, 75.7%, 54.5%, and 40.0% in black men, black women, white men, and white women, respectively. Among participants with systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure Conclusions Regardless of blood pressure level in young adulthood, blacks have a substantially higher risk for hypertension compared with whites through 55 years of age.

Refractory hypertension is an extreme phenotype of treatment failure defined as uncontrolled blood pressure in spite of ≥5 classes of antihypertensive agents, including chlorthalidone and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. A prospective evaluation of possible mechanisms of refractory hypertension has not been done. The goal of this study was to test for evidence of heightened sympathetic tone as indicated by 24-hour urinary normetanephrine levels, clinic and ambulatory heart rate (HR), HR variability, arterial stiffness as indexed by pulse wave velocity, and systemic vascular resistance compared with patients with controlled resistant hypertension. Forty-four consecutive patients, 15 with refractory and 29 with controlled resistant hypertension, were evaluated prospectively. Refractory hypertensive patients were younger (48±13.3 versus 56.5±14.1 years; P =0.038) and more likely women (80.0 versus 51.9%; P =0.047) compared with patients with controlled resistant hypertension. They also had higher urinary normetanephrine levels (464.4±250.2 versus 309.8±147.6 µg per 24 hours; P =0.03), higher clinic HR (77.8±7.7 versus 68.8±7.6 bpm; P =0.001) and 24-hour ambulatory HR (77.8±7.7 versus 68.8±7.6; P =0.0018), higher pulse wave velocity (11.8±2.2 versus 9.4±1.5 m/s; P =0.009), reduced HR variability (4.48 versus 6.11; P =0.03), and higher systemic vascular resistance (3795±1753 versus 2382±349 dyne·s·cm 5 ·m 2 ; P =0.008). These findings are consistent with heightened sympathetic tone being a major contributor to antihypertensive treatment failure and highlight the need for effective sympatholytic therapies in patients with refractory hypertension.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent episodes of partial (hypopnea) or complete interruption (apnea) in breathing during sleep due to airway collapse in the pharyngeal region. OSA and its cardiovascular consequences have been widely explored in observational and prospective studies. Most evidence verifies the positive relationship between OSA and hypertension, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, stroke and heart failure. However, more studies are needed to better assess the impact of OSA, and possible benefit of treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular mortality. The leading pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the changes triggered by OSA, include intermittent hypoxemia and re-oxygenation, arousals and changes in intrathoracic pressure. Hypertension is strongly related with activation of the sympathetic nervous system, stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and impairment of endothelial function. The high prevalence of OSA in the general population, hypertensive patients and especially obese individuals and patients resistant to antihypertensive therapy, highlights the need for effective screening, diagnosis and treatment of OSA to decrease cardiovascular risk.