Search

Objective: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an established treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity. The study objective was to establish RYGB's effects on glycemic variability (GV) and hypoglycemia.Research Design and Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 10 participants with obesity and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes who underwent RYGB. Patients were studied before RYGB (Pre) and 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years postsurgery with continuous glucose measurement (CGM). A mixed-meal test (MMT) was conducted at Pre, 1 month, and 1 year.Results: After RYGB, mean CGM decreased (at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years), and GV increased (at 1 year and 2 years). Five of the 10 participants had a percent time in range (%TIR) <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) greater than the international consensus target of 1% at 1 or 2 years. Peak glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon area under the curve during MMT were positively and negatively associated, respectively, with contemporaneous %TIR <3.0 mmol/L.Conclusions: Patients undergoing RYGB are at risk for development of postbariatric hypoglycemia due to a combination of reduced mean glucose, increased GV, and increased GLP-1 response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physical exercise is an important component in the management of type 1 diabetes across the lifespan. Yet, acute exercise increases the risk of dysglycaemia, and the direction of glycaemic excursions depends, to some extent, on the intensity and duration of the type of exercise. Understandably, fear of hypoglycaemia is one of the strongest barriers to incorporating exercise into daily life. Risk of hypoglycaemia during and after exercise can be lowered when insulin‐dose adjustments are made and/or additional carbohydrates are consumed. Glycaemic management during exercise has been made easier with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) systems; however, because of the complexity of CGM and isCGM systems, both individuals with type 1 diabetes and their healthcare professionals may struggle with the interpretation of given information to maximise the technological potential for effective use around exercise (ie, before, during and after). This position statement highlights the recent advancements in CGM and isCGM technology, with a focus on the evidence base for their efficacy to sense glucose around exercise and adaptations in the use of these emerging tools, and updates the guidance for exercise in adults, children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A Continuing Professional Development (CPD) from the Great Britain Diabetes Online Community (GBDOC) on diagnosing diabetic ketoacidosis in adults is presented.

Background and Aims: The recent increase in wearable devices for diabetes care, and in particular the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), generates large data sets and associated cybersecurity challenges. In this study, we demonstrate that it is possible to identify CGM data at an individual level by using standard machine learning techniques. Methods: The publicly available REPLACE-BG data set (NCT02258373) containing 226 adult participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) wearing CGM over 6 months was used. A support vector machine (SVM) binary classifier aiming to determine if a CGM data stream belongs to an individual participant was trained and tested for each of the subjects in the data set. To generate the feature vector used for classification, 12 standard glycemic metrics were selected and evaluated at different time periods of the day (24 h, day, night, breakfast, lunch, and dinner). Different window lengths of CGM data (3, 7, 15, and 30 days) were chosen to evaluate their impact on the classification performance. A recursive feature selection method was employed to select the minimum subset of features that did not significantly degrade performance. Results: A total of 40 features were generated as a result of evaluating the glycemic metrics over the selected time periods (24 h, day, night, breakfast, lunch, and dinner). A window length of 15 days was found to perform the best in terms of accuracy (86.8% ± 12.8%) and F1 score (0.86 ± 0.16). The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% ± 19.5% and 87.9% ± 17.5%, respectively. Through recursive feature selection, a subset of 9 features was shown to perform similarly to the 40 features. Conclusion: It is possible to determine with a relatively high accuracy if a CGM data stream belongs to an individual. The proposed approach can be used as a digital CGM "fingerprint" or for detecting glycemic changes within an individual, for example during intercurrent illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic variability (GV) indices, factors predictive of change, and to correlate variability with conventional markers of glycemia.Methods: Data from the JDRF study of CGM in participants with type 1 diabetes were used. Participants were randomized to CGM or self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). GV indices at baseline, at 26 weeks in both groups, and at 52 weeks in the control group were analyzed. The associations of demographic and clinical factors with change in GV indices from baseline to 26 weeks were evaluated.Results: Baseline data were available for 448 subjects. GV indices were all outside normative ranges (P < 0.001). Intercorrelation between GV indices was common and, apart from coefficient of variation (CV), low blood glucose index (LBGI), and percentage of glycemic risk assessment diabetes equation score attributable to hypoglycemia (%GRADEhypoglycemia), all indices correlate positively with HbA1c. There was strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia, and CV, LBGI, and %GRADEhypoglycemia, but not with HbA1c. A significant reduction in all GV indices, except lability index and mean absolute glucose change per unit time (MAG), was demonstrated in the intervention group at 26 weeks compared with the control group. Baseline factors predicting a change in GV with CGM include baseline HbA1c, baseline GV, frequency of daily SMBG, and insulin pump use.Conclusions: CGM reduces most GV indices compared with SMBG in people with type 1 diabetes. The strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia and CV, LBGI, and %GRADEhypoglycemia highlights the value of these metrics in assessing hypoglycemia as an adjunct to HbA1c in the overall assessment of glycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]