Search

Accurate measures of body composition (BC) are essential for performance and health. In addition to accuracy, BC measures should be practical and be minimally invasive to maximize their utility. The purpose of the present study was to compare the day-to-day variability and validity of four common laboratory-based body composition assessments to a criterion four-compartment model. Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (BP), multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance (MF-BIA) and underwater weighing (UWW) were performed twice in a sample of 32 young men and women. Participants were assessed in a fasted, euhydrated state 2-7 days apart. All methods were compared to a criterion four-compartment model using BP-derived body volume, DXA-derived bone mineral content and MF-BIA-derived total body water (4C BP ). Additional four-compartment models using UWW- and DXA-derived body volume were also examined (4C UWW ) and (4C DXA ). Validity results were conducted with paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlations (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV) and standard error of the measurement (SEM). Validity analysis revealed that all methods overestimated per cent body fat and fat mass, and underestimated fat-free mass when compared with 4C BP , but only DXA and BP were significantly different (P<0·008). All measures were highly reliable across days (ICCs > 0·9, CVs < 12%). Results of the present study indicate that typical laboratory-based methods of body composition are valid and reliable. However, we caution that results should not be translated between methods and assessments should be performed with the same instrument when the goal is to monitor changes in body composition over time., (© 2018 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and substrate oxidation (respiratory exchange ratio; RER) are important indicators of health. The effects of interval training on RMR have not been thoroughly investigated, which was the purpose of the present study. Thirty men and women (mean ± SD age and maximal oxygen uptake: 28.8 ± 7.6 years and 33.0 ± 8.3 mL·kg−1·min−1) completed 4 weeks of Wingate-based sprint interval training (SIT), repeated 1-min high-intensity intervals (HIIT), or served as controls. Before and after training, RMR, resting RER, maximal oxygen uptake, body composition, physical activity, and energy intake were recorded. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA. RMR increased in response to 4 weeks of SIT training (1789 ± 293 to 1855 ± 320 kcal·day−1; p = 0.003) but did not increase after HIIT (1670 ± 324 to 1704 ± 329 kcal·day−1; p = 0.06). While SIT increased RMR by ∼2× the magnitude of HIIT, the difference was not significant ( p = 0.5). Fasting substrate oxidation and RER did not change ( p > 0.05). Maximal oxygen uptake increased, and small changes were also observed in percent body fat and fat mass ( p < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, SIT provided a time-efficient stimulus to increase RMR after 4 weeks in healthy adults. However, the clinical relevance of the changes observed in this study remains to be determined. Further studies should be conducted in obese individuals and those with diabetes or insulin resistance to examine if interval training (≥4 weeks) influences resting metabolic rate in magnitudes similar to that reported here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]