Search

Background & Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis of available evidence was conducted to obtain a conclusive result on the effects of glutamine supplementation on athletes., Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data related to body mass, lean body mass, body fat percentage, Vo2 max, lymphocytes, leukocytes and neutrophil counts were extracted to determine the effects of GLN on performance outcomes., Data Sources: The literature search was conducted across the databases Pubmed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, SID (Scientific Information Database) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, covering a period up to January 2017., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Clinical trials evaluating glutamine supplementation outcomes on athletes aged over 18 were included., Results: A total of 47 studies were included in the systematic review, and 25 trials matched the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. According to the meta-analysis, glutamine has a significant effect on weight reduction (WMD = -1.36 [95% CI: -2.55 to -0.16], p = 0.02). Moreover, neutrophil numbers were reduced following glutamine intake at doses greater than 200 mg/kg body weight (WMD = -605.77 [95% CI: -1200.0 to 52.1]; P = 0.03). Also, supplementation by glutamine dipeptide resulted in higher blood glucose after exercise (WMD = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.83] mmol/l; P = 0.002). There was no association between glutamine ingestion and other outcomes investigated., Conclusion: According to this meta-analysis, generally, glutamine supplementation has no effect on athletics immune system, aerobic performance, and body composition. However, the current study showed that glutamine resulted in greater weight reduction. In addition, the present study suggests that the efficacy of glutamine supplementation on neutrophil numbers could be affected by supplement type and dose., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combined use of empagliflozin (EMPA) and topiramate (TPM) versus a placebo in overweight/obese individuals without diabetes on a calorie-restricted diet. Methods: In this study, 44 non-diabetic and overweight/obese subjects who were on a calorie restricted diet were randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) Participants received a 10 mg EMPA tablet daily plus TPM tablet (at the 1st week 25 mg once a day and from the second week 25 mg twice a day); (2) Participants received an empagliflozin placebo (daily) plus a topiramate placebo (as mentioned for topiramate tablet in group 1), for 12 weeks. At baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body composition were evaluated. Before and after the intervention, blood pressure, C reactive protein, and glucose and lipid profile parameters were measured. Results: The EMPA/TPM group, compared to placebo, had a greater percent change of weight at week 12 (− 8.92 ± 1.80 vs. − 4.93 ± 1.17). The intervention group had a greater percent change of fat mass and fat percent at week 12 (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in the percent of change in fat-free percent between the two groups at week 12 (P = 0.577). Within-group analysis found a significant reduction in SBP, DBP, FBS, insulin, HOMA-IR, TC, LDL, HDL, TG, and CRP in both groups (P < 0.05). At week 12, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in any of mentioned variables (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In non-diabetic overweight/obese individuals, the combination of EMPA/TPM and calorie restriction led to a notable decrease in body weight and was generally well-tolerated. Further research is required to evaluate the potential advantages of utilizing this combination for sustained weight management in the long run. Level I : Randomized clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]