Search

We compared the accuracy of body-composition estimation for 2 commercial single-frequency bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) devices in 200 healthy Chinese adults using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as criterion methods. We evaluated the fat mass percentage (%FM), skeletal muscle mass percentage (%SM), or total-body bone-free lean mass percentage (%TBBLM), and level of visceral fat mass (VF(level)) using the Omron HBF-359 (SF-BIA8) and Tanita BC-532 (SF-BIA4) BIA devices, MRI, and DXA. Both devices showed a similarly high correlation with DXA for %FM prediction (r=0.89 for SF-BIA8 and 0.90 for SF-BIA4) and with MRI and DXA for %SM and %TBBLM prediction (r=0.85 for SF-BIA8 and 0.89 for SF-BIA4). There were small but significant biases in all body-composition parameter evaluations except for %SM assessed by the SF-BIA8. Both the SF-BIA8 and SF-BIA4 provided small, insignificant mean biases but wide limits of agreement with MRI for VF(level) assessments. Both BIA devices can relatively accurately predict %FM and %SM in healthy Chinese adults. The SF-BIA8 is suitable for individual prediction of %SM, whereas the SF-BIA8 is required to eliminate systematic errors in this population by improving population-specific prediction equations from height, weight, and age to increase estimation accuracy.

We compared a 4-limb bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) system, HBF 359 (Omron), and a 2-limb foot-to-foot device, BC 532 (Tanita), with the standard dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods for the measurement of body fat percentage (BF), skeletal muscle mass percentage (SMM, or fat-free mass [FFM] for BC 532), and visceral fat level (VF). Body composition was measured in 200 healthy volunteers (100 men and 100 women, mean age 48 years) by HBF 359 and BC 532 and by DXA and MRI. The agreement was assessed by correlation analysis and paired t-test. The correlation coefficients between BIA and DXA or MRI ranged from 0.71 to 0.89 for BF, SMM, and VF by HBF 359 and from 0.77 to 0.90 for BF, FFM, and VF by BC 532 in all subjects and in men and women separately (p0.001 for all). Compared with DXA, HBF 359 significantly (p0.001) underestimated BF by -5.8% in men and -9.6% in women. Compared with MRI, the corresponding underestimatons (negative) or overestimations (positive) by HBF 359 in men and women were, respectively, +1.9% (p = 0.02) and +1.7% (p = 0.10) for SMM, and +13.3% (p0.001) and -8.5% (p = 0.006), for VF. The corresponding values by BC 532 in men and women were -10.7 and -6.2% for BF, -1.4 and -2.5% for FFM, and +20.4 and -18.0% for VF. The BIA devices are accurate in the estimation of body composition, especially skeletal muscle mass or FFM.