Search

Study Objective: Enoxaparin is standard of care for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in adult trauma patients, but fixed‐dose protocols are suboptimal. Dosing based on body mass index (BMI) or total body weight (TBW) improves target prophylactic anti‐Xa level attainment and reduces VTE rates. A novel strategy using estimated blood volume (EBV) may be more effective based on results of a single‐center study. This study compared BMI‐, TBW‐, EBV‐based, and hybrid enoxaparin dosing strategies at achieving target prophylactic anti‐Factor Xa (anti‐Xa) levels in trauma patients. Design: Multicenter, retrospective review. Data Source: Electronic health records from participating institutions. Patients: Adult trauma patients who received enoxaparin twice daily for VTE prophylaxis and had at least one appropriately timed anti‐Xa level (collected 3 to 6 hours after the previous dose after three consecutive doses) from January 2017 through December 2020. Patients were excluded if the hospital‐specific dosing protocol was not followed or if they had thermal burns with > 20% body surface area involvement. Intervention: Dosing strategy used to determine initial prophylactic dose of enoxaparin. Measurements: The primary end point was percentage of patients with peak anti‐Xa levels within the target prophylactic range (0.2‐0.4 units/mL). Main Results: Nine hospitals enrolled 742 unique patients. The most common dosing strategy was based on BMI (43.0%), followed by EBV (29.0%). Patients dosed using EBV had the highest percentage of target anti‐Xa levels (72.1%). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated EBV‐based dosing was significantly more likely to yield anti‐Xa levels at or above target compared to BMI‐based dosing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.29‐5.62, p < 0.001). EBV‐based dosing was also more likely than hybrid dosing to yield an anti‐Xa level at or above target (aOR 2.30, 95% CI 1.33‐3.98, p = 0.003). Other pairwise comparisons between dosing strategy groups were nonsignificant. Conclusions: An EBV‐based dosing strategy was associated with higher odds of achieving anti‐Xa level within target range for enoxaparin VTE prophylaxis compared to BMI‐based dosing and may be a preferred method for VTE prophylaxis in adult trauma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal dosing for enoxaparin venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in low-weight trauma patients is unknown. Estimated blood volume (EBV) has shown promise as a dose modifier. Objective: To characterize the association of enoxaparin dose per EBV with the prevalence of VTE and bleeding in low-weight trauma patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of trauma patients admitted over a 4-year period. Included patients were adults weighing <60 kg who received a minimum of 3 consecutive doses of enoxaparin. The primary endpoint was a comparison of enoxaparin dose per EBV in patients experiencing bleeding and VTE. Secondary endpoints included comparisons of dose per body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW) and the ability of dose per EBV to predict clinical endpoints. Subgroup analyses for patients weighing <50 kg were performed for all endpoints. Results: A total of 189 patients were included. Statistical comparisons for VTE were not performed because of low prevalence. The dose of enoxaparin per EBV was not statistically different between patients who did and did not bleed in all analyses. Doses per BMI and TBW were also not statistically different between the groups. In patients weighing <50 kg, numerically higher doses per EBV, BMI, and TBW were noted in patients that bled versus those that did not. Enoxaparin dose per EBV was not a statistically significant predictor of bleeding in logistic regression models. Conclusion and Relevance: No significant associations between enoxaparin dose per EBV, BMI, or TBW and bleeding were noted in the study. Future analyses of EBV and other dose modifiers should consider inclusion of patients weighing <50 kg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Fixed-dose and body mass index (BMI)–based enoxaparin regimens provide inadequate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for many trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel blood volume (BV)–based enoxaparin guideline vs a historical BMI-based guideline for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. Methods This was a retrospective pre/post study completed at a large academic level 1 trauma center. All adult trauma patients admitted from October through December 2019 and August through October 2020 who received prophylactic enoxaparin per guideline were included. The BV dosing was as follows: patients with a BV of 3 to 4.9 L received enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours, those with a BV of 5 to 6.9 L received 40 mg every 12 hours, and those with a BV of ≥7 L received 60 mg every 12 hours. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who attained a target anti–factor Xa (anti-Xa) postdosing level at the first steady-state assessment (0.2 to 0.5 IU/mL). Results A total of 241 patients (99 for the BMI group and 142 for the BV group) were included. The study groups had a median age of 38 vs 42 years, a mean BMI of 27.4 vs 27.7 kg/m2, and a mean BV of 5.1 vs 5.1 L, respectively. A total of 63 patients (62.6%) in the BMI group attained target anti-Xa levels compared to 115 patients (81%) in the BV group (P = 0.008). In multivariate regression, the BV-based guideline was the only variable associated with attainment of target anti-Xa levels (adjusted odds ratio, 2.02; P = 0.01). Clinically relevant bleeding and VTE rates were similar between the groups. Conclusion Dosing prophylactic enoxaparin using a BV-based dosing guideline significantly increased attainment of target anti-Xa levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a body mass index (BMI)‐based enoxaparin prophylaxis dosing protocol at achieving target anti‐factor Xa (anti‐Xa) concentrations in the trauma population. Methods: This retrospective chart review evaluated anti‐Xa concentrations in adult trauma patients who received prophylactic enoxaparin over a three‐month period. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients that achieved target anti‐Xa concentrations after ≥3 doses of enoxaparin. Secondary outcomes included correlations of anti‐Xa concentrations with enoxaparin dose per BMI, total body weight (TBW), and estimated blood volume (EBV). The prevalence of clinically relevant bleeding and venous thromboembolism was also recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associated variables for target anti‐Xa concentration attainment. Results: Ninety‐nine consecutive patients were included in the study. Included patients were predominately male (69.7%) and Black (50.5%) with a mean age of 44.1 years. Target anti‐Xa concentrations were achieved in 62.6% of patients. Anti‐Xa concentrations were moderately correlated with enoxaparin dose per EBV (ρ = 0.57), followed by dose per TBW (ρ = 0.46), and dose per BMI (ρ = 0.20). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that categorization of enoxaparin dose per EBV and per TBW were the only statistically significant predictors of reaching target anti‐Xa concentrations (p = <0.001). Conclusions: In adult trauma patients, the rate of achieving target anti‐Xa concentrations remains suboptimal and provides room for further improvement. Enoxaparin dose per EBV was more closely correlated with anti‐Xa concentrations when compared to TBW and BMI. Dosing per EBV and TBW was the only variables associated with reaching target anti‐Xa concentrations within the study. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate optimal EBV‐ and TBW‐based dosing regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]