Search

Objective: Bone marrow aspiration and concentration (BMAC) is becoming a more common regenerative therapy for musculoskeletal pathology. In our current pilot study, we studied patients with mild-to-moderate bilateral knee osteoarthritis, compared pain at 12-month follow-up between BMAC-injected and saline-injected knees, and examined cartilage appearance measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 quantitative mapping., Design: Twenty-five patients with mild-to-moderate bilateral osteoarthritic knee pain were randomized to receive BMAC into one knee and saline placebo into the other. Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crests, concentrated in an automated centrifuge, combined with platelet-poor plasma for knee injection, and compared with saline injection into the contralateral knee. Primary outcome measures were T2 MRI cartilage mapping at 6-month and Visual Analog Scale and Osteoarthritis Research Society International Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain scores and radiographs at 12-month follow-up., Results: Constant, intermittent, and overall knee pain remained significantly decreased from baseline at 12-month follow-up (all P ⩽ 0.01), with no apparent difference between BMAC- and saline-treated knees (all P ⩾ 0.54). A similar significant increase from baseline to 12-month follow-up regarding quality of life was observed for both BMAC- and saline-treated knees (all P ⩽ 0.04). T2 quantitative MRI mapping showed no significant changes as a result of treatment., Conclusions: BMAC is safe to perform and relieves pain from knee arthritis but showed no superiority to saline injection at 12-month follow-up. MRI cartilage sequences failed to show regenerative benefit with single BMAC injection. The mechanisms of action that led to pain relief remain unclear and warrant further studies.

Background: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is increasingly used as a regenerative therapy for musculoskeletal pathological conditions despite limited evidence-based support., Hypothesis: BMAC will prove feasible, safe, and efficacious for the treatment of pain due to mild to moderate degenerative joint disease of the knee., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2., Methods: In this prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 25 patients with bilateral knee pain from bilateral osteoarthritis were randomized to receive BMAC into one knee and saline placebo into the other. Fifty-two milliliters of bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crests and concentrated in an automated centrifuge. The resulting BMAC was combined with platelet-poor plasma for an injection into the arthritic knee and was compared with a saline injection into the contralateral knee, thereby utilizing each patient as his or her own control. Safety outcomes, pain relief, and function as measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) measures and the visual analog scale (VAS) score were tracked initially at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure., Results: There were no serious adverse events from the BMAC procedure. OARSI Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain and VAS pain scores in both knees decreased significantly from baseline at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months ( P ≤ .019 for all). Pain relief, although dramatic, did not differ significantly between treated knees ( P > .09 for all)., Conclusion: Early results show that BMAC is safe to use and is a reliable and viable cellular product. Study patients experienced a similar relief of pain in both BMAC- and saline-treated arthritic knees. Further study is required to determine the mechanisms of action, duration of efficacy, optimal frequency of treatments, and regenerative potential. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov record 12-004459.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that relatively immature hematopoietic stem cells, including CD34(+) CD38(-) and CD34(+) HLA-DR(-) subsets, correlate with short-term hematopoietic reconstruction (SHR) after transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these immature CD34(+) subsets also correlate with long-term hematopoietic reconstitution (LHR) in recipients of ABMT., Methods: We examined stem cell grafts from 58 patients with B-cell lymphoma or CLL who underwent ABMT after myeloablative conditioning. We determined whether total mononuclear cell dose (MNC), colony-forming unit-granulocyte-monocyte (CFU-GM), CD34(+) cell dose and CD34(+) cell subsets (CD34(+) CD38(-) and CD34(+) HLA-DR(-) were associated with SHR and/or LHR. Time to neutrophil engraftment (TNE) and time to platelet engraftment (TPE) were used to measure SHR, while platelet counts at day 100 and 1 year post-ABMT were used as indicators for LHR., Results and Discussion: CD34(+) cell dose and CD34(+) cell subsets were significantly associated with SHR. However, at day 100 and 1 year post-transplant only total CD34(+) cell dose was associated with LHR. The association of total CD34(+) cell dose with LHR persisted after adjusting for age, sex and disease. None of the CD34(+) cell subsets analyzed showed evidence of significant association with LHR.