Search

Background: Bone metastasis is a significant concern in advanced solid tumors, contributing to diminished patient survival and quality of life due to skeletal-related events (SREs). Denosumab (DMAB), a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), is used to prevent SREs in such cases. The RANK/RANKL axis, crucial in immunological processes, has garnered attention, especially with the expanding use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology. Objective: Our study aims to explore the potential synergistic antitumor effects of combining immunotherapy with denosumab, as suggested by anecdotal evidence, small cohort studies, and preclinical research. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the IMMUCARE database, encompassing patients receiving ICI treatment since 2014 and diagnosed with bone metastases. We examined overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and switch of treatment line based on denosumab usage. Patients were stratified into groups: without denosumab, ICI followed by denosumab, and denosumab followed by ICI. Survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: Among the 268 patients with bone metastases, 154 received treatment with ICI alone, while 114 received ICI in combination with denosumab at some point during their oncological history. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving ICI monotherapy and those receiving ICI with denosumab (p = 0.29 and p = 0.79, respectively). However, upon analyzing patients who received denosumab following ICI initiation (17 patients), a notable difference emerged. The group receiving ICI followed by denosumab exhibited a significant advantage compared to those without denosumab (154 patients) or those receiving denosumab before ICI initiation (72 patients) (p = 0.022). Conclusion: This retrospective investigation supports the notion of potential benefits associated with sequential administration of ICI and denosumab, although statistical significance was not achieved. Future studies, including prospective trials or updated retrospective analyses, focusing on cancers treated with first-line immunotherapy, could provide further insights into this therapeutic approach.

Bone metastases frequently occur in breast cancer patients and lack appropriate treatment options. Hence, understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the multistep process of breast cancer bone metastasis and tumor-induced osteolysis is of paramount interest. The serine/threonine kinase AKT plays a crucial role in breast cancer bone metastasis but the effect of individual AKT isoforms remains unclear. Therefore, AKT isoform-specific knockdowns were generated on the bone-seeking MDA-MB-231 BO subline and the effect on proliferation, migration, invasion, and chemotaxis was analyzed by live-cell imaging. Kinome profiling and Western blot analysis of the TGFβ/CTGF axis were conducted and metastasis was evaluated by intracardiac inoculation of tumor cells into NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice. MDA-MB-231 BO cells exhibited an elevated AKT3 kinase activity in vitro and responded to combined treatment with AKT- and mTOR-inhibitors. Knockdown of AKT3 significantly increased migration, invasion, and chemotaxis in vitro and metastasis to bone but did not significantly enhance osteolysis. Furthermore, knockdown of AKT3 increased the activity and phosphorylation of pro-metastatic HER2 and DDR1/2 but lowered protein levels of CTGF after TGFβ-stimulation, an axis involved in tumor-induced osteolysis. We demonstrated that AKT3 plays a crucial role in bone-seeking breast cancer cells by promoting metastatic potential without facilitating tumor-induced osteolysis.

• Bone metastasis significantly affects patient survival and quality of life in advanced solid tumors, and denosumab is used to prevent skeletal-related events in these cases. • The study investigates the potential synergistic effects of combining immunotherapy with denosumab, leveraging anecdotal evidence and preliminary research. • A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with bone metastases receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) from the IMMUCARE database. • Results indicated no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between ICI monotherapy and combined ICI-denosumab treatment. • Notably, patients who received denosumab after starting ICI treatment showed a significant survival advantage, suggesting potential benefits from this sequential therapy approach. Bone metastasis is a significant concern in advanced solid tumors, contributing to diminished patient survival and quality of life due to skeletal-related events (SREs). Denosumab (DMAB), a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), is used to prevent SREs in such cases. The RANK/RANKL axis, crucial in immunological processes, has garnered attention, especially with the expanding use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology. Our study aims to explore the potential synergistic antitumor effects of combining immunotherapy with denosumab, as suggested by anecdotal evidence, small cohort studies, and preclinical research. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the IMMUCARE database, encompassing patients receiving ICI treatment since 2014 and diagnosed with bone metastases. We examined overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and switch of treatment line based on denosumab usage. Patients were stratified into groups: without denosumab, ICI followed by denosumab, and denosumab followed by ICI. Survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Among the 268 patients with bone metastases, 154 received treatment with ICI alone, while 114 received ICI in combination with denosumab at some point during their oncological history. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving ICI monotherapy and those receiving ICI with denosumab (p = 0.29 and p = 0.79, respectively). However, upon analyzing patients who received denosumab following ICI initiation (17 patients), a notable difference emerged. The group receiving ICI followed by denosumab exhibited a significant advantage compared to those without denosumab (154 patients) or those receiving denosumab before ICI initiation (72 patients) (p = 0.022). This retrospective investigation supports the notion of potential benefits associated with sequential administration of ICI and denosumab, although statistical significance was not achieved. Future studies, including prospective trials or updated retrospective analyses, focusing on cancers treated with first-line immunotherapy, could provide further insights into this therapeutic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Solitary metastases have been reported in up to 30% of cases in imaging series. Local treatment aims at consolidating the injured bone and to prevent neurologic complications. Since the prognosis of bony metastatic disease is about 30months and includes some long survivors, the multisdisciplinary committee in charge of the patient should ask the question and decide on the type of radical/ablative intervention in case of oligometastases. A literature search was performed using MESH terms (bone, metastases, radiotherapy, radiology, cement, radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolisation). Local ablative treatments can yield symptomatic relief and local control rates of about 90%. Stereotactic hypofractionated irradiation and cementoplasty are increasingly used. In conclusion, local ablative treatment of bony oligometastases is an efficient treatment. Its potential impact on survival remains to be demonstrated prospectively in clinical trials. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]