Search

Pins constructed from cortical bone may provide a reasonable alternative to other fracture-fixation devices by circumventing some of the complications associated with stainless steel and synthetic biodegradable implants. However, it is unknown whether cortical bone pins provide comparable strength compared to conventional pins. Using four-point bending, we compared the mechanical characteristics of 1.2-mm allogeneic cortical bone pins milled from specific regions of human tibiae and femora to commercially available 1.1-mm diameter stainless steel pins and 1.3-mm diameter polydioxanone pins. We used impact testing to identify mechanical differences in cortical bone pins between gender and harvest site. Cortical bone pins had better mechanical properties in four-point bending compared with polydioxanone pins, but not stainless steel pins. Pins milled from the right tibiae of males had the best bending characteristics. The mechanical performance of 1.2-mm cortical bone pins was comparable to those of stainless steel and polydioxanone pins regardless of site, bone, and gender. The clinical investigation of cortical bone pins as an implant for fracture fixation is warranted based on mechanical testing and comparison to commercially available polydioxanone and stainless steel pins.

Objective: To compare surgical and oncologic outcome in dogs with osteosarcoma (OSA) of the distal aspect of the radius treated with limb-sparing surgery, using either a cortical allograft or endoprosthesis, and postoperative chemotherapy; and to evaluate predictive factors for outcome., Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Animals: Dogs (n = 20) with spontaneous, non-metastatic OSA of the distal aspect of the radius., Methods: Dogs were prospectively randomized for limb-sparing surgery with either a cortical allograft (n = 10) or endoprosthesis (10) and full-course adjuvant chemotherapy using single or dual agent protocols of cisplatin, carboplatin, and/or doxorubicin. Surgical (intraoperative findings, postoperative infection, construct failure) and oncologic (local tumor recurrence, metastasis, survival) outcomes were compared. The influence of intraoperative and postoperative variables on surgical and oncologic outcome were evaluated., Results: No clinically significant differences in surgical and oncologic outcome were detected between groups. The percentage of radius replaced by the implant was significantly greater in the endoprosthesis group (60.9% compared with 48.6%, P = .008). Median survival time (MST) for dogs with construct failure, regardless of implant type, was 685 days and significantly greater than MST of dogs without construct failure (322 days, P = .042; hazard ratio [HR] 16.82). Median metastasis-free interval and MST (685 days versus 289 days; P = .034, HR 24.58) were significantly greater in dogs with postoperative infection. Disease-free and overall limb-salvage rates were 70% and 85%, respectively. Overall MST was 430 days., Conclusions: For dogs with OSA of the distal aspect of the radius, a cortical allograft or endoprosthesis can be used for limb-sparing surgery. Construct failure and postoperative infection significantly improve survival time regardless of implant type., Clinical Relevance: An endoprosthesis is an attractive alternative to cortical allografts for limb-salvage of the distal aspect of the radius in dogs because surgical and oncologic outcomes are similar, but the endoprosthesis is an immediately available off-the-shelf implant which is not complicated by the bone harvesting and banking requirements associated with cortical allografts. Mechanisms whereby postoperative infection improves survival time requires further investigation and, if elucidated, may provide the opportunity to improve the outcome of dogs and humans with OSA.

Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of cortical bone and surgical steel endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery of the distal radius in dogs and evaluate the role of the ulna in providing stability to the reconstructed limb., Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study., Animals: Twelve pairs of normal canine thoracic limbs., Methods: Paired limbs were divided into 4 groups: endoprosthesis and cortical bone graft, with and without preservation of the ulna. In each limb pair, the distal segment of the radius resected from the limb to be reconstructed with an endoprosthesis was used as the cortical bone graft in the contralateral limb. The ulna was resected en bloc with the radius and at the same level as the radial osteotomy in limbs where the ulna was not preserved. Limbs were tested in axial loading until failure. The load-deformation curve was used to acquire the biomechanical properties of each construct, which were compared using 2-way ANOVA. Failure modes were compared descriptively., Results: Limbs reconstructed with the endoprosthesis had significantly greater yield load, energy at yield, and ultimate load compared with limbs reconstructed with a cortical bone graft. There were no significant differences in either energy to failure or stiffness between the 2 constructs. Preservation of the ulna did not significantly improve any of the biomechanical properties tested with either endoprosthesis or cortical bone graft constructs. The modes of failure in all 4 groups were variable and inconsistent., Conclusions: Limbs reconstructed with an endoprosthesis were biomechanically superior to limbs reconstructed with a cortical bone graft in axial loading to failure. Preservation of the ulna is not required to improve the stability in axial compression after limb-sparing surgery of the distal radius., Clinical Relevance: The endoprosthesis may provide another option for limb-sparing surgery of the distal radius in dogs. It has potential advantages when compared with cortical bone grafts, including better biomechanical performance and resistance to implant failure in axial compression, immediate availability, and no requirement for bone banking facilities. The ulna can be resected en bloc with the radius without having a negative impact on construct stability. En bloc resection of the ulna and radius may decrease the risk of local tumor recurrence after limb-sparing surgery.

Objective: To report successful limb-sparing surgery in a dog with a proximal femoral osteosarcoma (OSA) using a composite allograft-prosthetic technique., Study Design: Case report., Animal: Client-owned dog., Methods: A stage IIB OSA of the proximal aspect of the femur was resected in accordance with oncologic and limb-sparing principles. The osseous defect was reconstructed with a proximal femoral allograft and cemented, long-stemmed femoral prosthesis. Soft tissue reconstruction was achieved by suturing host tendons to their respective allogeneic tendons on the allograft. Coxofemoral joint function was preserved using standard total hip arthroplasty techniques., Results: Limb-sparing surgery of the proximal aspect of the femur using a composite allograft-prosthetic technique resulted in excellent limb function. Postoperative complications included aseptic loosening of the femoral composite graft and allograft nonunion, which required revision, traumatic implant luxation, and local tumor recurrence. Limb function was excellent after surgical stabilization of the allograft nonunion but deteriorated after implant luxation 270 days postlimb-sparing surgery. Pulmonary and skeletal metastases were diagnosed and local tumor recurrence suspected 596 and 650 days postoperatively, respectively. The dog was euthanatized 688 days after limb-sparing surgery as a result of progressive local and metastatic disease., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Limb-sparing surgery for dogs with primary bone tumors of the proximal aspect of the femur is feasible with good functional results.

Objective: To evaluate postoperative complications, limb function, and tumor control after intercalary resection and reconstruction for preservation of limb and joint function in dogs with high-grade malignant tumors of diaphyseal bone., Study Design: Retrospective study., Animals: Seventeen client-owned dogs., Methods: The bone tumor database and medical records were reviewed (1986-2002) for dogs with diaphyseal tumors treated with intercalary resection and reconstruction with either an allograft or irradiated autograft. Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, surgical management, and outcome were determined from medical records and telephone interviews with veterinarians and owners. Statistical analyses included chi2 to test associations between intra- and postoperative variables with complications, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for disease-free interval, metastasis-free interval (MFI), and median survival time., Results: Intercalary limb-sparing surgery was performed in 17 dogs with diaphyseal tumors: osteosarcoma (OSA) (15), histiocytic sarcoma (1), and solitary metastasis from a pulmonary adenocarcinoma (1). One dog was excluded from further analysis when the spared limb was amputated 4 days postoperatively because of incomplete tumor resection. In 16 dogs, limb function was good to excellent. Complications occurred in 5 dogs (31.3%) and included superficial infection in 2 dogs (12.5%) and implant failure in 4 dogs (25%). All implant failures occurred in the ulna and there was a significant association between implant failure and non-cemented allografts (P=.042). Non-union of 1 or both osteotomies was diagnosed in 10 dogs (83.3%) and, despite lack of clinical signs in all cases, was significantly associated with the use of intracavitary locally released cisplatin (P=.046) and cemented intercalary grafts (P=.046). Local tumor recurrence was diagnosed in 1 dog (6.3%) and metastatic disease in 12 dogs (75.0%), including 10 dogs with OSA. The median MFI was 137 days. The local disease-free and overall limb-salvage rate was 94% and 100%, respectively. Overall median survival time was 393 days and the median survival time for dogs with OSA was 449 days., Conclusion: Intercalary limb-sparing surgery results in better postoperative limb function with fewer and less severe complications than historical reports of dogs treated with non-intercalary limb-sparing surgery., Clinical Relevance: In dogs with diaphyseal tumors, intercalary limb-sparing surgery preserves normal joint function and results in good to excellent limb use with few complications and good local tumor control.

Objective: To evaluate extracorporeal intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a treatment method for limb and joint sparing in dogs with appendicular sarcomas in sites other than the distal aspect of the radius., Study Design: Retrospective study., Animals: Thirteen client-owned dogs., Methods: The bone tumor database and medical records (1998-2002) were reviewed for dogs with primary appendicular bone tumors treated with IORT limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The segment of bone containing the tumor was isolated from adjacent soft tissue and an osteotomy performed distant to the tumor. The bone segment was exteriorized, irradiated (70 Gy single fraction), and then stabilized with internal fixation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered. Lameness was graded and local and distant tumor control was determined. Associations between intra- and postoperative variables with complications and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for median disease-free interval and survival time were calculated., Results: Limb function was good or excellent in 10 dogs (77%). Postoperative complications (9 dogs, 69%) included deep infection, fracture of the irradiated bone, and implant failure. Surgical failure was more likely if a single implant was used to stabilize the osteotomized bone and if deep infection developed postoperatively. In 3 dogs, tumors recurred locally within bone in the radiation field. The disease-free and overall success rates of extracorporeal IORT for limb and joint preservation were 46% and 54%, respectively., Conclusions: Extracorporeal IORT provides a novel alternative to traditional techniques for preservation of joint and limb function in dogs with primary appendicular sarcomas. A minimum of 2 implants and intramedullary bone cement should be used to stabilize the osteotomized bone to minimize postoperative complications. Extracorporeal IORT should be used with caution in dogs with tumors of the distal tibia because of a high complication rate. Dogs with tumors in areas of good soft-tissue coverage, such as the humerus and femur, may be good candidates for limb and joint-sparing surgery using extracorporeal IORT., Clinical Relevance: Extracorporeal IORT is a surgical technique that can be used for limb and joint salvage in dogs with primary appendicular sarcomas in sites usually not amenable to traditional limb-sparing techniques.