Search

Background: We evaluated the prevalence of archived proviral drug resistance mutations (DRMs) associated with resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) shortly before Botswana transitioned in 2016 to using dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral treatment in first-line regimens. Methods: We used the Stanford University HIV drug resistance database to analyze INSTI-resistance associated mutations (RAMs) in a large representative population-based cohort of adults recruited in 30 geographically dispersed communities as part of the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP) cohort from 2013 to 2018. A total of 5,144 HIV-1 proviral DNA sequences were included in our analysis; 1,281 sequences were from antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve individuals and 3,863 sequences were from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) ART-experienced individuals. None of the sequences were from DTG-ART experienced participants. Results: The overall prevalence of major INSTIs DRMs was 1.11% (95% CI 0.82–1.39%). The prevalence of INSTI DRMs in ART-naïve individuals was 1.64% (21/1,281) and 0.93% (36/3,863) in ART-experienced individuals. Major INSTI-RAMs detected in ART-naïve individuals were E138K (2/1,281; 0.16%), G140R (8/1,281;0.62%), E92G (2/1,281;0.16%), R263K (5/1,281; 0.4%), N155H (1/1,281; 0.08%), P145S (1/1,281;0.008%). Among the ART-experienced individuals, major INSTI RAMs detected were E138K (4/3,863; 0.10%), G140R (25/3,863;0.65%), G118R (2/3,863, 0.05%), R263K (4/3,863, 0.10%), T66I (1/3,863;0.03%), E138K + G140R (1/3,863, 0.03%|), G140R + R263K (1/3,863, 0.03%). High-level resistance to cabotegravir (CAB), elvitegravir (EVG), and raltegravir (RAL) was detected in 0.70, 0.16 and 0.06% of the individuals, respectively. Notably, bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG) showed no high-level resistance. Conclusion: The overall prevalence of archived INSTI RAMs in Botswana was low prior to transitioning to first-line DTG-based ART regimens, and did not differ between ART-naïve and ART-experienced individuals. Ongoing surveillance of INSTI DRMs in Botswana will allow for re-assessment of INSTI resistance risk following nationwide DTG rollout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately 15–20 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis delta virus (HDV), which is approximately 5 % of people with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Sub-Saharan Africa has high HDV prevalence, leading to worse clinical outcomes among people who are HIV/HBV/HDV tri-infected. There are limited data on HDV prevalence among people with HIV (PWH) who are HBV-infected and uninfected in Botswana. We, therefore, determined HDV prevalence among PWH in Botswana. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing archived plasma samples from PWH with results for HBV markers such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), immunoglobulin M antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (IgM anti-HBc) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Samples were categorized according to their HBsAg status and screened for anti-HDV antibodies. Total nucleic acid was extracted from samples with a single positive anti-HDV result, and HDV ribonucleic acid (RNA) load was quantified using the Altona Diagnostic RealStar® HDV RT-PCR kit. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 14.0 where p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study cohort (n = 478) included both HBsAg positive (44 %) and negative (56 %) participants, with a median age of 42 [IQR; 41–43]. Anti-HDV prevalence of (15/211) [7.1 %, 95 % CI: 4.4 – 11.4] was recorded among HBsAg positive participants, all of whom were IgM anti-HBc negative, while 5/6 participants were HBeAg negative. HDV RNA load was detected in 11/12 (92 %) anti-HDV-positive participants. No HDV prevalence was recorded among participants who were HBsAg negative, therefore, the overall HDV prevalence was (15/478) [3.1 %, 95 % CI: 1.9 – 5.1]. HIV viral load suppression was statistically insignificant, irrespective of HDV status. We report high HDV prevalence among HBsAg-positive PWH in Botswana. Most HDV-positive participants had active HDV infection, therefore, we recommend HDV screening in this cohort to guide their clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We aimed to determine the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) in rural and periurban communities in Botswana. Methods PWH from a previous population-based study, the Botswana Prevention Combination Project, which enrolled adults in 30 communities across Botswana (2013–2018), were screened for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV core antibody (anti-HBc). HBsAg-positive (HBsAg+) samples were further screened for HBV core immunoglobulin M antibodies (anti-HBc immunoglobulin M [IgM]) and HBV e antigen (HBeAg). We quantified HBV viral load on participants who tested positive (n = 148) and negative for HBsAg (n = 381). Results Of 3304 participants tested, 271 (8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 7%–9%]) were HBsAg+ while 1788 (56% [95% CI, 54%–57%]) of 3218 PWH whom we tested had positive anti-HBc. Approximately 88% of HBsAg+ participants were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), 40% and 56% of whom were receiving lamivudine- and tenofovir-containing ART, respectively. Male sex (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2–2.7]) and the northern geographic region (RRR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.4–4.7]) were independent predictors of HBV infection (HBsAg+). Of 381 persons with negative HBsAg who were tested for occult HBV, 126 (33% [95% CI, 29%–38%]) had positive HBV DNA. Eleven participants were highly viremic with high HBV viral load while on a lamivudine- or tenofovir-containing regimen. Ten (91%) of these participants also had positive HBeAg serology, while 4 (36%) had positive anti-HBc IgM serology. Conclusions The prevalence of HBV was high among PWH in Botswana while on ART regimens with activity against HBV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Botswana is close to reaching the UNAIDS “90-90-90” HIV testing, antiretroviral treatment (ART), and viral suppression goals. We sought to determine HIV incidence in this setting with both high HIV prevalence and high ART coverage. Methods: We used a cross-sectional approach to assessing HIV incidence. A random, population-based sample of adults age 16–64 years was enrolled in 30 rural and peri-urban communities as part of the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP), from October 2013 –November 2015. Data and samples from the baseline household survey were used to estimate cross-sectional HIV incidence, following an algorithm that combined Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA), ART status (documented or by testing ARV drugs in plasma) and HIV-1 RNA load. The LAg-Avidity EIA cut-off normalized optical density (ODn) was set at 1.5. The HIV-1 RNA cut-off was set at 400 copies/mL. For estimation purposes, the Mean Duration of Recent Infection was 130 days and the False Recent Rate (FRR) was evaluated at values of either 0 or 0.39%. Results: Among 12,610 individuals participating in the baseline household survey, HIV status was available for 12,570 participants and 3,596 of them were HIV positive. LAg-Avidity EIA data was generated for 3,581 (99.6%) of HIV-positive participants. Of 326 participants with ODn ≤1.5, 278 individuals were receiving ART verified through documentation and were considered to represent longstanding HIV infections. Among the remaining 48 participants who reported no use of ART, 14 had an HIV-1 RNA load ≤400 copies/mL (including 3 participants with ARVs in plasma) and were excluded, as potential elite/viremic controllers or undisclosed ART. Thus, 34 LAg-Avidity-EIA-recent, ARV-naïve individuals with detectable HIV-1 RNA (>400 copies/mL) were classified as individuals with recent HIV infections. The annualized HIV incidence among 16–64 year old adults was estimated at 1.06% (95% CI 0.68–1.45%) with zero FRR, and at 0.64% (95% CI 0.24–1.04%) using a previously defined FRR of 0.39%. Within a subset of younger individuals 16–49 years old, the annualized HIV incidence was estimated at 1.29% (95% CI 0.82–1.77%) with zero FRR, and at 0.90% (95% CI 0.42–1.38%) with FRR set to 0.39%. Conclusions: Using a cross-sectional estimate of HIV incidence from 2013–2015, we found that at the time of near achievement of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets, ~1% of adults (age 16–64 years) in Botswana’s rural and peri-urban communities became HIV infected annually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]