Search

Background Pneumatic dilatation is the first line therapy in achalasia, but half of patients relapse within 5 years of therapy and require further dilatations. Aim To assess whether botulinum toxin injection before pneumatic dilatation is superior to pneumatic dilatation alone in achalasia patients. Methods Newly diagnosed achalasia patients were randomly assigned to receive botulinum toxin 1 month before pneumatic dilatation (botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 38) or to undergo pneumatic dilatation alone (pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 30). Response to therapy was assessed by clinical and objective methods at various intervals. Results One-year remission rate of patients in botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group was 77% compared with 62% in pneumatic dilatation group ( P = 0.1). In pneumatic dilatation group, the oesophageal barium volume significantly ( P < 0.001) decreased at 1 month, but this reduction did not persist over 1-year follow-up. Botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group showed a significant ( P < 0.001) reduction in barium volume at the various times intervals post-treatment. In the botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group, 10/11 (91%) patients over 40 were in remission at 1 year, comparing with only five of nine (55%) cases in pneumatic dilatation group ( P = 0.07). Conclusion Injection of botulinum toxin before pneumatic dilatation does not significantly enhance the efficacy of pneumatic dilatation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graded pneumatic dilatation (PD) is an appropriate long-term therapy and botulinum toxin injection (BT) is a relatively short-term therapy in idiopathic achalasia. Their combination has not been previously scrutinized. This study aimed to evaluate the role of BT in enhancing the efficacy of PD with 30 mm balloons. Patients who underwent PD with 30 mm balloons after botulinum toxin injections and a group of age- and sex-matched controls who were treated only with PD were enrolled in the study. Symptom scores were taken before, 1 month after and then every 3 months after PD. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, duration or severity of symptoms. One of the 12 patients in the case group relapsed 30 months after PD but the others were in remission for an average of 25.6 months. In the control group, all the patients relapsed after a mean of 12.6 months and needed a 35-mm PD. The cumulative remission rate was significantly higher in the case group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). The mean symptom score decreased by 76% in the case group (P < 0.00 1) and 53% in the controls (P < 0.01) at the end of the first month. Neither age, sex, nor duration or severity of symptoms were predictive of patients' responses to treatment. It seems that BT may be a meaningful enhancing factor in long-term efficacy of PD. PD with a 30 mm balloon after a BT session may resolve the need for the future higher grade PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Therapeutic options for achalasia include pharmacological therapy, surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection. Aim: To compare botulinum toxin injection with pneumatic dilatation in a randomized trial. Patients/methods: Forty adults with newly diagnosed achalasia were randomized to receive botulinum toxin (n=20) or pneumatic dilatation (n=20). Symptom scores were evaluated at 1, 6 and 12 months. Clinical relapse was defined as a symptom score greater than 50% of baseline. Relapsers received a second botulinum toxin injection or pneumatic dilatation. Results: The cumulative 12-month remission rate was significantly higher after a single pneumatic dilatation (53%) compared to a single botulinum toxin injection (15%)(P < 0.01). The 12-month estimated adjusted hazard for relapse and need for retreatment for the botulinum toxin group was 2.69 times that of the pneumatic dilatation group (95% confidence interval; 1.18–6.14). When a second treatment was administered to the relapsers in each group, the cumulative remission rate 1 year after initial treatment was significantly higher in the pneumatic dilatation group (100%) compared to the botulinum toxin group (60%) (P < 0.01). There were no major complications in either group. Conclusions: Pneumatic dilatation is more efficacious than botulinum toxin in providing sustained symptomatic relief in patients with achalasia. The efficacy of a single pneumatic dilatation is similar to that of two botulinum toxin injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]