Search

Purpose: To compare the quality of life (QoL) in the same patients first treated with botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and then with bladder augmentation (BA)., Method: Retrospective study of patients who had BA after BTA treatment between January 2012 and December 2022. Qualiveen Short Form questionnaires and a 7-level Likert/PGI-I scale to answer the question "How would you describe your quality of life after surgery compared to when you felt your best with BTA injections?" were collated and analyzed., Results: Fifty-two BAs for neurogenic bladder (NDO or low compliance) were performed in patients with a median age of 43years [33; 52] previously treated with BTA. After a median follow-up of 33.5 [13.8; 54.3] months, the median Qualiveen-SF global score after BA was significantly higher than that obtained at best BTA efficacy (1.63 [1; 2.63] vs. 2.63 [1.88; 3], P=0.012), as were the scores for the fear, constraints/restrictions and limitations/inconvenience domains. The median PGI-I score was +3 [2; 3] (truly better QoL) and 85.4% of patients reported a QoL after BA superior to the best QoL under BTA., Conclusion: BA provides a greater range of QoL improvement than BTA injection for patients who have experienced both treatments. Long-lasting effects and absence of need to perform iterative retreatment were the main reasons., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: During idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), lower urinary tract symptoms and dysfunctions are frequent, dominated by overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity (OAB, DO). Intradetrusor Injection (IDI) of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) is recommended as second-line treatment for neurogenic urinary incontinence related to DO in multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury patients. However, there is little data on BTA IDI to treat incontinence owing to OAB and DO during idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of BTA IDI in patients suffering IPD., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in IPD patients treated with BTA IDI from 2012 to 2018. For each patient we compared patient clinical and urodynamic data at baseline before the first injection and 8 weeks following the injection. We defined 3 levels of effects (perfect, improved, failure), corresponding to 3-dimension composite criteria: clinical, quality of life (Likert scale), urodynamics., Results: Sixteen patients were included from 2012 to 2018. The median age was 73 (70-78.25). The median number of micturition/day before and after TBA was 13 (10-16) and 9 (6.75-13.25) (p=0.022). The median number of pad used/day before and after BTA was 5.4 (2-5) and 1 (0-5) (p=0.035). Median USP scores for OAB was 15.5 (11.75-20) and 14 (6.75-15.25). Median score on the Likert scale was 1 (0-1.5) meaning "slight improvement" felt by the patient. The median maximum cystometric capacity raised from 130cm 3 (41.25-187.75) to 217cm 3 (165-376.75) (p=0,013). Among the patients, 20% had a perfect result, 40% were significantly improved and in 40% TBA injections failed. After TBA 4/14 patients (28%) needed intermittent self-catheterization. No severe side effect was observed., Conclusion: In this retrospective study we observe some short-term efficacy of TBA IDI to treat urinary incontinence owing to OAB/DO in patients with IPD in 60% of patients. These results are consistent with findings from previous retrospective studies. Prospective data coming from larger cohorts are now tremendously needed to clarify the best patient responders profiles, the actual TBA dose, and eventually to define TBA IDI place in the therapeutic algorithm of IPD patients' incontinence., Level of Evidence: 4., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, urodynamic effect and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTXA) injections after failure of augmentation enterocystoplasty (AE) performed for neurogenic detrusor overactivity., Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study that included patients who had AE and at least one injection of BTXA after AE in 15 GENULF (French Speaking Neuro-Urology Study Group) centers. Clinical and urodynamic data were collected from medical files according to a standardized questionnaire and colligated in an anonymous database., Results: Thirty-three patients with an injection of BTXA after AC in 9 out of 15 centers were included. Mean age at the time of AE was 24 ± 15 years. Overall efficacy (defined by clinical efficacy associated with a request by the patient for reinjection) was observed in 58% of the patients. Mean maximum cystomanometric capacity increased by 28% (333 ± 145 vs 426 ± 131 mL; P = .007) and maximum detrusor pressure (P d et max ) decreased by 43% (44 ± 37 vs 25 ± 18 cm H 2 O; P = .02) after BTXA. Only one side effect was recorded out of the 152 procedures (transient generalized muscle weakness without respiratory distress)., Conclusion: In patients with failure after AE performed for neurogenic detrusor overactivity, injection of BTXA in the enlarged bladder was effective in over half of the cases with low morbidity. If this therapeutic approach were confirmed, it could be proposed as an alternative to AE surgical revision., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: To assess the outcomes of switching to a different brand of botulinum toxin A (BTA, from Botox® to Dysport®) in case of failure of intradetrusor injections (IDI) of Botox® in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO)., Methods: The charts of all patients who underwent a switch to IDI of Dysport® after failure of an IDI of Botox® at six departments of neurourology were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcomes of interest were the bladder diary data and four urodynamic parameters: maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), maximum detrusor pressure (PDET max), and volume at first uninhibited detrusor contraction (UDC)., Results: Fifty-seven patients were included. After the first injection of Dysport®, no adverse events were reported. A significant decrease in number of urinary incontinence episodes per day was observed in 52.63% of patients (P < 0.001) and all patients experienced a reduction in PDET Max (-8.1 cmH20 on average; P = 0.003). MCC significantly increased by a mean of 41.2 (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with no UDC increased significantly at week 6 after ATA injections (from 15.79% to 43.9%; P = 0.0002). Hence, 32 patients draw clinical and/or urodynamic benefits from the botulinum toxin switch from (56.14%). After a median follow up of 21 months, 87% of responders to BTA switch were still treated successfully with BTA., Conclusion: Most patients refractory to Botox® (56.14%) draw benefits from the switch to Dysport®., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: The aim of this work was to follow prospectively a cohort of patients suffering from neurogenic overactive bladder, treated by botulinum toxin A, study the efficiency of this treatment, analyse the primary failures, secondary and surrender., Patients and Methods: Thirty-one patients suffering from neurogenic OAB received a detrusor injection of 300 units of Botox™ (ALLERGAN, Irvine, CA) and were followed prospectively (median 5 years). They were evaluated by voiding diary, Qualiveen™ questionnary and urodynamics before treatment, 2 months after the first injection and the last re-injection., Results: Five years after the beginning of the treatment, 17 patients of 31 (54.8%) were still injected, it means 60.7% of the primary responders. Eleven patients had left up the treatment, after at least one effective injection. We identified three reasons of surrender: echapment of treatment for two patients of 11 (7.1%); cessation of self catheterize for six patients of 11 (54.6%) and the surrender of the treatment without clinical or urodynamical failure, for three patients of 11 (27.3%). Although the cessation of self catheterize was more frequent for patients suffering from multiple sclerosis, no predictive factor of surrender was statically significant., Conclusion: In this series, bladder BTA injections was efficient at middle term to treat neurogenic OAB. The echapment was a rare event (7%). The major cause of surrender was the increase difficulty to self catheterize, due to progression of disability, more frequent for patients suffering of multiple sclerosis., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)