Search

Although depression and cardiovascular diseases are related, the role of antidepressants such as fluoxetine (increasing serotonin levels) within cardiac regulation remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether fluoxetine modifies the pharmacological profile of serotonergic influence on vagal cardiac outflow. Rats were treated with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg per day; p.o.) for 14 days or equivalent volumes of drinking water (control group); then, they were pithed and prepared for vagal stimulation. Bradycardic responses were obtained by electrical stimulation of the vagal fibers (3, 6, and 9 Hz) or i.v. acetylcholine (ACh; 1, 5, and 10 μg/kg). The i.v. administration of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 10 and 50 μg/kg) inhibited the vagally induced bradycardia. 5-CT (5-HT 1/7 agonist) and L-694,247 (5-HT 1D agonist) mimicked the serotonin inhibitory effect while α-methyl-5-HT (5-HT 2 agonist) was devoid of any action. SB269970 (5-HT 7 antagonist) did not abolish 5-CT inhibitory action on the electrically induced bradycardia. Pretreatment with LY310762 (5-HT 1D antagonist) blocked the effects induced by L-694,247 and 5-CT. 5-HT and 5-CT failed to modify the bradycardia induced by exogenous ACh. Our outcomes suggest that fluoxetine treatment modifies 5-HT modulation on heart parasympathetic neurotransmission in rats, evoking inhibition of the bradycardia via prejunctional 5-HT 1D in pithed rats.

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) modulates the cardiac parasympathetic neurotransmission, inhibiting the bradyarrhythmia by 5-HT2 receptor activation. We aimed to determine whether the chronic selective 5-HT2 blockade (sarpogrelate) could modify the serotonergic modulation on vagal cardiac outflow in pithed rat. Bradycardic responses in rats treated with sarpogrelate (30 mg·kg·d; orally) were obtained by electrical stimulation of the vagal fibers (3, 6, and 9 Hz) or intravenous (IV) injections of acetylcholine (1, 5, and 10 μg/kg). 5-HT7 receptor expression was quantified by Western blot in vagus nerve and right atrium. The IV administration of 5-HT (10-200 μg/kg) dose dependently decreased the vagally induced bradycardia, and agonists 5-CT (5-HT1/7), 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A), or AS-19 (5-HT7) (50 μg/kg each) mimicked the 5-HT-induced inhibitory effect. Neither agonists CGS-12066B (5-HT1B), L-694,247 (5-HT1D), nor 1-phenylbiguanide (5-HT3) modified the electrically-induced bradycardic responses. Moreover, SB-258719 (5-HT7 antagonist) abolished the 5-HT-, 5-CT-, 8-OH-DPAT-, and AS-19-induced bradycardia inhibition; 5-HT or AS-19 did not modify the bradycardia induced by IV acetylcholine; and 5-HT7 receptor was expressed in both the vagus nerve and the right atrium. Our outcomes suggest that blocking chronically 5-HT2 receptors modifies the serotonergic influence on cardiac vagal neurotransmission exhibiting 5-HT as an exclusively inhibitory agent via prejunctional 5-HT7 receptor.

Comorbid diabetes and depression constitutes a major health problem, worsening associated cardiovascular diseases. Fluoxetine's (antidepressant) role on cardiac diabetic complications remains unknown. We determined whether fluoxetine modifies cardiac vagal input and its serotonergic modulation in male Wistar diabetic rats. Diabetes was induced by alloxan and maintained for 28 days. Fluoxetine was administered the last 14 days (10 mg/kg/day; p.o). Bradycardia was obtained by vagal stimulation (3, 6 and 9 Hz) or i.v. acetylcholine administrations (1, 5 and 10 μg/kg). Fluoxetine treatment diminished vagally-induced bradycardia. Administration of 5-HT originated a dual action on the bradycardia, augmenting it at low doses and diminishing it at high doses, reproduced by 5-CT (5-HT1/7 agonist). 5-CT did not alter the bradycardia induced by exogenous acetylcholine. Decrease of the vagally-induced bradycardia evoked by high doses of 5-HT and 5-CT was reproduced by L-694,247 (5-HT1D agonist) and blocked by prior administration of LY310762 (5-HT1D antagonist). Enhancement of the electrical-induced bradycardia by 5-CT (10 μg/kg) was abolished by pretreatment with SB269970 (5-HT7 receptor antagonist). Thus, oral fluoxetine treatment originates a decrease in cardiac cholinergic activity and changes 5-HT modulation of bradycardic responses in diabetes: prejunctional 5-HT7 receptors augment cholinergic-evoked bradycardic responses, whereas prejunctional 5-HT1D receptors inhibit vagally-induced bradycardia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dopaminergic system influences the heart rhythm by inhibiting the rat cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic neurotransmissions through activation of D2-like receptors (encompassing the D2, D3, and D4 subtypes). Whereas D2 receptor subtype activation results in cardiac sympatho-inhibition, the dopamine receptor subtypes involved in rat cardiac vago-inhibition remain unknown. Hence, this study investigated the specific functional role of the D2-like receptor subtypes (D2, D3, and/or D4) inhibiting the rat heart cholinergic drive. For this purpose, male Wistar rats were pithed and prepared for cardiac vagal stimulation. Bradycardic responses were obtained by electrical stimulation of vagal fibres (3, 6, 9 Hz; n = 100) or i.v. acetylcholine (ACh; 1, 5, 10 μg/kg; n = 15). Expression of D2, D3, and D4 receptors was studied in left and right atrium samples by PCR (n = 4). Intravenous injections of quinpirole (D2-like agonist; 1–30 μg/kg), but not of SFK-38393 (D1-like agonist; 1–30 μg/kg), dose-dependently inhibited the vagally induced bradycardia. The vago-inhibition induced by quinpirole (which failed to affect the bradycardia to i.v. ACh) was unchanged after i.v. injections of the antagonists L-741,626 (D2; 100 μg/kg) or SB-277011-A (D3; 100 μg/kg), but it was abolished by L-745,870 (D4; 100 μg/kg). mRNA levels of D2, D3, and D4 receptor subtype were detected in the left and right rat atria. Our results suggest that the quinpirole-induced vagolytic effect involves prejunctional D4 receptor subtypes, located in the left and right atria. This provides new evidence on the relevance of D4 receptor modulating the heart parasympathetic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)