Search

1. Antiretroviral concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are used as surrogate for brain tissue, although sparse data support this. We quantified antiretrovirals in brain tissue across preclinical models, compared them to CSF, and calculated 90% inhibitory quotients (IQ 90 ) for nonhuman primate (NHP) brain tissue. Spatial distribution of efavirenz was performed by mass-spectrometry imaging (MSI). 2. HIV or RT-SHIV-infected and uninfected animals from two humanized mouse models (hemopoietic-stem cell/RAG2-, n  = 36; bone marrow-liver-thymus/BLT, n  =13) and an NHP model (rhesus macaque, n  =18) were dosed with six antiretrovirals. Brain tissue, CSF (NHPs), and plasma were collected at necropsy. Drug concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Rapid equilibrium dialysis determined protein binding in NHP brain. 3. Brain tissue penetration of most antiretrovirals were >10-fold lower ( p  < 0.02) in humanized mice than NHPs. NHP CSF concentrations were >13-fold lower ( p  <0.02) than brain tissue with poor agreement except for efavirenz ( r  = 0.91, p  = 0.001). Despite 97% brain tissue protein binding, efavirenz achieved IQ 90 >1 in all animals and 2-fold greater white versus gray matter concentration. 4. Brain tissue penetration varied across animal models for all antiretrovirals except raltegravir, and extrapolating brain tissue concentrations between models should be avoided. With the exception of efavirenz, CSF is not a surrogate for brain tissue concentrations.

Sparse data exist on the penetration of antiretrovirals into brain tissue. In this work, we present a framework to use efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetic (PK) data in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain tissue of eight rhesus macaques to predict brain tissue concentrations in HIV-infected individuals. We then perform exposure-response analysis with the model-predicted EFV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and neurocognitive scores collected from a group of 24 HIV-infected participants. Adult rhesus macaques were dosed daily with 200 mg EFV (as part of a four-drug regimen) for 10 days. Plasma was collected at 8 time points over 10 days and at necropsy, whereas CSF and brain tissue were collected at necropsy. In the clinical study, data were obtained from one paired plasma and CSF sample of participants prescribed EFV, and neuropsychological test evaluations were administered across 15 domains. PK modeling was performed using ADAPT version 5.0 Biomedical Simulation Resource, Los Angeles, CA) with the iterative two-stage estimation method. An eight-compartment model best described EFV distribution across the plasma, CSF, and brain tissue of rhesus macaques and humans. Model-predicted median brain tissue concentrations in humans were 31 and 8,000 ng/mL, respectively. Model-predicted brain tissue AUC was highly correlated with plasma AUC (γ = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not CSF AUC (γ = 0.34, P = 0.1) and did not show any relationship with neurocognitive scores (γ < 0.05, P > 0.05). This analysis provides an approach to estimate PK the brain tissue in order to perform PK/pharmacodynamic analyses at the target site., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)