Search

Objective: Oxidative stress contributes to secondary damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Hypothermia decreases endogenous antioxidant consumption and lipid peroxidation after experimental cerebral injury. Our objective was to determine the effect of therapeutic hypothermia on oxidative damage after severe TBI in infants and children randomized to moderate hypothermia vs. normothermia., Design: Prospective randomized controlled study., Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit of Pittsburgh Children's Hospital., Patients: The study included 28 patients., Measurements and Main Results: We compared the effects of hypothermia (32 degrees C-33 degrees C) vs. normothermia in patients treated in a single center involved in a multicentered randomized controlled trial of hypothermia in severe pediatric TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) are widely used clinical scoring systems to measure the severity of neurologic injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but have recognized limitations in infants and small children. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B show promise as markers of brain injury. We hypothesized that the initial GCS and 6-month GOS scores would be inversely associated with CSF NSE and/or S100B concentrations after severe pediatric TBI. Using banked CSF obtained during ongoing studies of pediatric TBI, NSE and S100B were determined in CSF collected within 24 h of trauma from 88 infants and children with severe TBI (GCS < or = 8) versus 20 non-injured controls. Victims of inflicted (iTBI) and non-inflicted TBI (nTBI) showed similar (>10-fold) increases in both NSE and S100B versus control. Both markers showed overall significant, inverse correlation with GCS and GOS scores. In subgroup analysis, both markers correlated significantly with GCS and GOS scores only in older (>4 years) victims of nTBI; no correlation was found for patients < or =4 years old or victims of iTBI. While confirming the overall correlations between GCS/GOS score and CSF NSE and S100B seen in prior studies, we conclude that these clinical and CSF biomarkers of brain injury do not correlate in children < or =4 years of age and/or victims of iTBI. Although further, prospective study is warranted, these findings suggest important limitations in our current ability to assess injury severity in this important population.

Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Pediatric Intensity Level of Therapy (PILOT) scale, a novel measure of overall therapeutic effort directed at controlling intracranial pressure (ICP) in the setting of severe (Glasgow Coma Scale of

Hypoperfusion after traumatic brain injury may exacerbate damage. Adenosine, a vasodilator, regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF). Treatment with adenosine receptor agonists has shown benefit in experimental CNS trauma; however, their effects on CBF after injury remain undefined. We used magnetic resonance imaging to assess CBF in uninjured rats both early and at 24 h after intrahippocampal administration of either the nonselective adenosine receptor agonist 2-chloroadenosine (2-CA, 12 nmol) or the A(2A)-receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarbox-amidoadenosine (CGS 21680, 6 nmol). We also assessed the effects of these agents on cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRglu). We then assessed the effect of 2-CA on CBF at 3.5 to 5 h after controlled cortical impact (CCI). Injection of 2-CA into uninjured rat brain produced marked increases in CBF in ipsilateral hippocampus and cortex versus vehicle (P<0.05); CBF increases persisted even at 24 h. Measurement of hippocampal levels of 2-CA showed persistent increases to 24 h. CGS 21680 produced even more marked global increases in CBF than seen with 2-CA (2-6-fold versus vehicle, P<0.05 in 10/12 regions of interest (ROIs)). Neither agonist altered CMRglu versus vehicle. After CCI, 2-CA increased CBF in ipsilateral hippocampal and hemispheric ROIs (P<0.05 versus vehicle), but the response was attenuated at severe injury levels. We report marked increases in CBF after injection of adenosine receptor agonists into uninjured rat brain despite unaltered CMRglu. 2-Chloroadenosine produced enduring increases in CBF in uninjured brain and attenuated posttraumatic hypoperfusion. Future studies of adenosine-related therapies in CNS injury should address the role of CBF.

Drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely used in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), either continuously or intermittently in response to increases in intracranial pressure (ICP). There has been little study of the effect of CSF drainage method on the biochemistry, pathophysiology or outcome of TBI in adults or children. Having previously reported that a variety of markers of injury or repair increase in CSF after severe TBI, we chose to evaluate directly the effect of CSF drainage method on the biochemistry and volume of CSF drained as well as ICP. We hypothesized that concentrations of these markers would be similar in CSF drained continuously vs intermittently. We compared CSF levels of markers of neuronal injury (neuron specific enolase, [NSE]), glial injury (s100B), inflammation (interleukin-6 [IL-6]), and regeneration (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) (measured by ELISA) in 80 CSF samples from 19 severely injured children whose CSF was drained continuously (n = 13) versus intermittently (n = 6) as part of standard care in two institutions. Compared to continuous CSF drainage, intermittent drainage of CSF was associated with twofold greater CSF concentrations of NSE, s100B, IL-6 and VEGF (p < 0.05) and with about half the volume of CSF removal than continuous drainage (p = 0.002). The resulting elimination (concentration x volume) of these biochemicals, however, was not influenced by drainage method. Patients treated with continuous drainage had lower mean ICPs than those with intermittent drainage (13.6 +/- 0.69 vs. 21.8 +/- 0.95 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). We conclude that the method of CSF drainage greatly affects concentrations of CSF markers after TBI and may influence ICP. The influence of method on CSF marker concentration must be kept in mind when interpreting studies of CSF biomarkers. The striking difference in biomarker concentration, CSF volume drained, and ICP suggests the need for a randomized trial directly comparing these two approaches in infants and children with severe TBI.

Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important regulator of angiogenesis, the formation of which is triggered by hypoxia, cytokines, and growth factors and is also induced by activation of the adenosine 2B receptor. VEGF is neuroprotective in several models of experimental brain injury and is increased in brain after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans and experimental animals. Adenosine is a neuroprotective purine metabolite that increases in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after clinical TBI in children. We hypothesized that VEGF levels would 1). be increased in CSF after TBI in infants and children, and 2). be preceded by increases in CSF adenosine. To test this hypothesis, we designed a case-control study to compare the CSF of infants and children after severe TBI with that of uninjured children., Methods: Using an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, we compared CSF concentrations of VEGF (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and adenosine (by high-performance liquid chromatography) in 73 samples from 14 infants and children with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score