Search

Objective: Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), also known as olfactory neuroblastoma, is a rare, malignant tumor of neuroectodermal origin that arises from the olfactory neuroepithelium. In this study the authors present the first series in the literature on distant brain metastases (BMs) secondary to ENB that were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SRS for this indication., Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with ENB who underwent CyberKnife (CK) SRS at a single center was conducted. The clinical and radiological outcomes of patients, including progression-free survival, overall survival, and local tumor control (LTC) were reported., Results: Between 2003 and 2022, 32 distant BMs in 8 patients were treated with CK SRS at Stanford University. The median patient age at BM diagnosis was 62 years (range 47-75 years). Among 32 lesions, 2 (6%) had previously been treated with surgery, whereas for all other lesions (30 [94%]), CK SRS was used as their primary treatment modality. The median target volume was 1.5 cm3 (range 0.09-21.54 cm3). CK SRS was delivered by a median marginal dose of 23 Gy (range 15-30 Gy) and a median of 3 fractions (range 1-5 fractions) to a median isodose line of 77% (range 70%-88%). The median biologically effective dose was 48 Gy (range 21-99.9 Gy) and the median follow-up was 30 months (range 3-95 months). The LTC at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up was 86%, 65%, and 50%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 29 months (range 11-79 months) and 51 months (range 15-79 months), respectively. None of the patients presented adverse radiation effects., Conclusions: In the authors' experience, SRS provided excellent LTC without any adverse radiation effects for BMs secondary to ENB.

Objective: Brain metastases (BMs) secondary to sarcoma are rare, and their incidence ranges from 1% to 8% of all bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used for BMs, only a few papers have reported on SRS for sarcoma metastasizing to the brain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SRS for sarcoma BM., Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with BM secondary to histopathologically confirmed sarcoma treated with SRS, either as primary treatment or as adjuvant therapy after surgery, at their institution between January 2005 and September 2022. They also compared the outcomes of patients with hemorrhagic lesions and of those without., Results: Twenty-three patients (9 females) with 150 BMs secondary to sarcoma were treated with CyberKnife SRS. Median age at the time of treatment was 48.22 years (range 4-76 years). The most common primary tumor sites were the heart, lungs, uterus, upper extremities, chest wall, and head and neck. The median Karnofsky Performance Status on presentation was 73.28 (range 40-100). Eight patients underwent SRS as a primary treatment and 15 as adjuvant therapy to the resection cavity. The median tumor volume was 24.1 cm3 (range 0.1-150.3 cm3), the median marginal dose was 24 Gy (range 18-30 Gy) delivered in a median of 1 fraction (range 1-5) to a median isodose line of 76%. The median follow-up was 8 months (range 2-40 months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 months (range 0.4-32 months) and 8.2 months (range 0.1-40), respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month local tumor control (LTC) rates for all lesions were respectively 78%, 52%, and 30%. There were no radiation-induced adverse effects. LTC at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups was better in patients without hemorrhagic lesions (100%, 70%, and 40%, respectively) than in those with hemorrhagic lesions (68%, 38%, and 23%, respectively)., Conclusions: SRS, both as a primary treatment and as adjuvant therapy to the resection cavity after surgery, is a safe and relatively effective treatment modality for sarcoma BMs. Nonhemorrhagic lesions show better LTC than hemorrhagic lesions. Larger studies aiming to validate these results are encouraged.

Objective: Recurrence of brain tumors in children after the initial course of treatment remains a problem. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of reirradiation using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with recurrent pediatric primary brain tumors., Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective review included pediatric patients with recurrent primary brain tumors treated at Stanford University from 2000 to 2019 using frameless SRS. Time to local failure (LF) and distant intracranial failure (DIF) were measured from the date of SRS and analyzed using competing risk analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: In total, 37 patients aged 2-24 years (median age 11 years at recurrence) were treated for 48 intracranial tumors. Ependymoma (38%) and medulloblastoma (22%) were the most common tumor types. The median (range) single fraction equivalent dose of SRS was 16.4 (12-24) Gy. The median (range) follow-up time was 22.9 (1.5-190) months. The median OS of all patients was 36.8 months. Eight of 40 (20%) lesions with follow-up imaging locally recurred. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF after reirradiation with SRS was 12.8% (95% CI 4.6%-25.4%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of DIF was 25.3% (95% CI 12.9%-39.8%). The median PFS was 18 months (95% CI 8.9-44). Five (10.4%) patients developed toxicities potentially attributed to SRS, including cognitive effects and necrosis., Conclusions: Reirradiation using SRS for recurrent pediatric brain tumors appears safe with good local control. Innovations that improve overall disease control should continue because survival outcomes after relapse remain poor.

Purpose: Although osimertinib has excellent intracranial activity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with exon 19 deletion or L858R EGFR alterations, measures of local control of brain metastases are less well-reported. We describe lesion-level outcomes of brain metastases treated with osimertinib alone., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with untreated brain metastasis measuring ≥ 5 mm at the time of initiating osimertinib. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence in brain (LRiB) was calculated with death as a competing risk, and univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with LRiB., Results: We included 284 brain metastases from 37 patients. Median follow-up was 20.1 months. On initial MRI after starting osimertinib, patient-level response was complete response (CR) in 11 (15%), partial response (PR) in 33 (45%), stable disease (SD) in 18 (25%) and progressive disease (PD) in 11 (15%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB was 14% (95% CI 9.9-17.9) and was significantly different in patients with a CR (0%), PR (4%), and SD (11%; p = 0.02). Uncontrolled primary tumor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.78, 95% CI 1.87-7.66; p < 0.001), increasing number of prior systemic therapies (aHR 2.12, 95% CI 1.49-3.04; p < 0.001), and higher ECOG score (aHR 7.8, 95% CI 1.99-31.81; p = 0.003) were associated with LRiB., Conclusions: Although 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is < 4% with a CR or PR, 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is over 10% for patients with less than a PR to osimertinib on initial MRI. These patients should be followed closely for need for additional treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the standard of care for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. Despite the fact that the seminal studies regarding SRS for brain metastases were largely tissue agnostic, several current national guidelines do not uniformly recommend SRS in thyroid cancer. We therefore investigated oncological outcomes in a cohort of patients with brain metastases from thyroid cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) at our institution as well as those in a nationally representative cancer cohort, the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Materials and Methods: We identified patients with thyroid cancer and brain metastases treated with RT at our institution from 2002 through 2020. For the NCDB cohort, the national database of patients with thyroid cancer was screened on the basis of brain-directed RT or brain metastases. For the institutional cohort, the cumulative risk of local failure (LF), distant intracranial failure, and radiation necrosis were calculated, adjusted for the competing risk of death. Overall survival (OS) in both cohorts was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was accomplished via clustered competing risks regression. Results: For the institutional cohort, we identified 33 patients with 212 treated brain metastases. OS was 6.6 months. The 1-year cumulative incidences of LF and distant intracranial failures were 7.0% and 38%, respectively. The 1-year risk of radiation necrosis was 3.3%. In the NCDB cohort, there were 289 patients, and the median survival was 10.2 months. NCDB national practice patterns analysis showed an increasing use of SRS over time in both the entire cohort and the subset of anaplastic patients. Univariate analysis was performed for OS, risk of LF, risk of regional intracranial failure, and risk of radiation necrosis. Conclusions: SRS is a safe, effective, and increasingly utilized treatment for thyroid cancer brain metastases of any histology and should be the standard of care treatment.

Background and Purpose: Differentiation between tumor and radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery is challenging. We hypothesized that MR perfusion and metabolic metrics can differentiate radiation necrosis from progressive tumor in this setting., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated MRIs comprising DSC, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging in subjects with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. For each lesion, we obtained the mean normalized and standardized relative CBV and fractional tumor burden, volume transfer constant, and normalized maximum CBF, as well as the maximum standardized uptake value in a subset of subjects who underwent FDG-PET. Relative CBV thresholds of 1 and 1.75 were used to define low and high fractional tumor burden., Results: Thirty subjects with 37 lesions (20 radiation necrosis, 17 tumor) were included. Compared with radiation necrosis, tumor had increased mean normalized and standardized relative CBV ( P  = .002) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized, P  = .005; standardized, P  = .003) and decreased low fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .03; standardized, P = .01). The area under the curve showed that relative CBV (normalized = 0.80; standardized = 0.79) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized = 0.77; standardized = 0.78) performed the best to discriminate tumor and radiation necrosis. For tumor prediction, the normalized relative CBV cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 70.0%, while the standardized cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 41.2% and specificity of 95.0%. No significance was found with the volume transfer constant, normalized CBF, and standardized uptake value., Conclusions: Increased relative CBV and high fractional tumor burden (defined by a threshold relative CBV of ≥1.75) best differentiated tumor from radiation necrosis in subjects with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Performance of normalized and standardized approaches was similar., (© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background: Historically, it is stated that large intracranial tumors, herein defined as a maximum dimension of ≥3 cm or tumor volume ≥14.2 cm 3 , are not candidates for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We report outcomes of patients with large benign intracranial tumors treated with SRS., Methods: With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively identified 74 patients with large benign intracranial tumors (59 meningiomas, 9 vestibular schwannomas, and 6 glomus jugulare tumors) treated with robotic SRS (2007-2018). Patients received definitive SRS in 47.3% of the cases, adjuvant to surgical resection in 44.6%, and salvage after past radiation treatment in 8.1%. A median tumor volume of 16.0 cm 3 (range, 10.1-65.5 cm 3 ) received a median dose of 24.0 Gy (range, 14.0-30.0 Gy) in a median of 3 fractions (range, 1-5), for a median single fraction equivalent dose (with alpha/beta of 3) of 14.8 Gy (range, 11.3-18.0 Gy). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of tumor local control (LC) was calculated from date of SRS., Results: With a median clinical follow-up of 32.8 months (range, 0.6-125.9 months) and median radiologic follow-up of 28.5 months (range, 0.6-121.4 months), LC was 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 92.4%-100%) at 3 years and 91.7% (95% confidence interval, 87.6%-95.7%) at 5 years. Adverse radiation effect (ARE) was seen in 10 patients (13.5%) at a median of 13.5 months (range, 7.8-34.5 months). ARE occurred in 9% of those with prior treatment compared with 5% who were radiation-naïve (P = 0.23). With 236.4 person-years of follow-up, no secondary malignancies were seen., Conclusions: Despite the historical adage, we find that SRS provides high rates of LC for these large tumors, with rates of ARE similar to historical reports of SRS for smaller benign tumors., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of less than 2 years despite the standard of care treatment of 6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. We review the data investigating hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM., Recent Findings: Investigators have explored alternative radiotherapy strategies that shorten treatment duration with the goal of similar or improved survival while minimizing toxicity. HFRT over 1-3 weeks is already a standard of care for patients with advanced age or poor performance status. For young patients with good performance status, HFRT holds the promise of radiobiologically escalating the dose and potentially improving local control while maintaining quality of life. Through the use of shorter radiotherapy fractionation regimens coupled with novel systemic agents, improved outcomes for patients with GBM may be achieved.