Search

Purpose: Patients with IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3 IDHmt/Codel ) benefit from adding alkylating agent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT). However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen between procarbazine, 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) and temozolomide (TMZ) remains unclear given the lack of randomized trial data comparing both regimens., Methods: The objective was to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) associated with first-line PCV/RT versus TMZ/RT in patients newly diagnosed with O3 IDHmt/Codel . We included patients with histologically proven O3 IDHmt/Codel (according to WHO criteria) from the French national prospective cohort Prise en charge des OLigodendrogliomes Anaplasiques (POLA). All tumors underwent central pathologic review. OS and PFS from surgery were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model., Results: 305 newly diagnosed patients with O3 IDHmt/Codel treated with RT and chemotherapy between 2008 and 2022 were included, of which 67.9% of patients (n = 207) were treated with PCV/RT and 32.1% with TMZ/RT (n = 98). The median follow-up was 78.4 months (IQR, 44.3-102.7). The median OS was not reached (95% CI, Not reached [NR] to NR) in the PCV/RT group and was 140 months (95% CI, 110 to NR) in the TMZ/RT group (log-rank P = .0033). On univariable analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of PCV/RT in both 5-year (PCV/RT: 89%, 95% CI, 85 to 94; TMZ/RT: 75%, 95% CI, 66 to 84) and 10-year OS (PCV/RT: 72%, 95% CI, 61 to 85; TMZ/RT: 60%, 95% CI, 49 to 73), which was confirmed using the multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, type of surgery, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and CDKN2A homozygous deletion (hazard ratio, 0.53 for PCV/RT, 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.92, P = .025)., Conclusion: In patients with newly diagnosed O3 IDHmt/Codel from the POLA cohort, first-line PCV/RT was associated with better OS outcomes compared with TMZ/RT. Our data suggest that the improved safety profile associated with TMZ comes at the cost of inferior efficacy in this population. Further investigation using prospective randomized studies is warranted.

Background: Pseudoprogression in gliomas has been extensively described after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, but not after chemotherapy alone. Here we describe the occurrence of pseudoprogression in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas treated with postoperative procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy alone., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical and radiological files of patients with 1p/19q codeleted, IDH-mutant anaplastic oligodendrogliomas treated with PCV chemotherapy alone who presented magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modifications suggestive of tumour progression and in whom the final diagnosis was a pseudoprogression., Results: We identified six patients. All patients underwent a surgical resection and were treated with PCV chemotherapy without radiotherapy. After a median of 11 months following the initiation of chemotherapy (range: 3-49 months), the patients developed asymptomatic white matter MRI modifications around the surgical cavity leading to the suspicion of a tumour progression. These modifications appeared as hyperintense on T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence, hypointense on T1 sequence, and lacked mass effect (0/6), contrast enhancement (0/6), restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (0/4), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) increase on perfusion MRI (0/4), and hypermetabolism on 18 F-fluoro-L-dopa positron emission tomography ( 18 F-DOPA PET) scan (0/3). One patient underwent a surgical resection demonstrating no tumour recurrence; the five other patients were considered as having post-therapeutic modifications based on imaging characteristics. After a median follow-up of 4 years all patients were progression-free., Conclusions: Anaplastic oligodendroglioma patients treated with postoperative PCV chemotherapy alone occasionally develop T2/FLAIR hyperintensities around the surgical cavity that can wrongly suggest tumour progression. Multimodal imaging and close follow-up should be considered in this situation., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Recent studies showed that patients with glioma can safely participate in early phase clinical trials; however, clinical benefits in this population were limited. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials for patients with recurrent glioma., Methods: Records of patients enrolled in early phase trials of cytotoxic therapies, small molecule inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed for clinico-pathological characteristics, toxicity, response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). The primary objective was to evaluate response rates in molecularly-oriented versus non-molecularly-oriented patients., Results: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 45 (51.1%) patients were molecularly-oriented. Targets included IDH1/2 (n = 15), BRAF (n = 11), and FGFR1 (n = 3) mutations, FGFR2-3 fusions (n = 9), and mismatch repair deficiency (n = 7). Among patients with high-grade glioma (n = 74), the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 25.7% in molecularly-oriented versus 5.1% in non-molecularly-oriented patients (p = 0.02). Upon multivariable adjustment, baseline steroid use ≥20 mg prednisone equivalent per day was associated with shorter OS (OR 3.15 [95% CI 1.62-6.13], p = 0.0008), while molecular enrichment strategy was associated with longer OS (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.22-0.73], p = 0.003). Nine (10.2%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity and no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in both cohorts., Conclusion: The use of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials is feasible and might provide benefits to selected patients with glioma. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results in larger randomised settings and identify the patients most likely to benefit from this approach., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement CB reports personal fees from BMS, Sanofi, Abbvie, Roche, Astra Zeneca. As a subinvestigator at the DITEP: Abbvie, Aduro biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Arno Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Aeneca, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, Bioalliance Pharma, Biontech Ag, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingel-heim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb Inter-national Corporation, Ca, Celgene Corpo-ration, Cephalon, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm S.a, Eisai, Eli lilly, Exelixis, Forma, Gamamabs, Genentech, Inc, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Glaxosmithkline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, H3 Biomedicine, Inc, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Incyte Corpora-tion, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recher-che Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev., Inc, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Kgaa, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Mil-lennium Pharmaceuticals, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Onco-logy Nv, Oncoethix, Oncomed, Oncopep-tides, Onyx Therapeutics, Orion Pharma, Oryzon Genomics, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Plexxikon, Rigontec Gmbh, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sierra Oncology, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Tioma Therapeutics, Wyeth Pharma-ceuticals France, Xencor, Y's Therapeutics. JCS is an employee of Amgen and former employee of AstraZeneca. FB reports research funding from Abbvie and Sanofi; employment from Celgene (I); stocks from Crossject (I); travel, accommodations, expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb for travel expenses, outside the submitted work. KHX reports consulting fees and research grant from BTG, outside the submitted work. AI reports grants and other from Carthera (September 2019); research grants from Transgene; grants from Sanofi, and Air Liquide; and travel funding from Leo Pharma, outside the submitted work. MT reports research funding from Sanofi; consulting or advisory role from Agios Pharmaceutical, Integragen, Taiho Oncology, and Servier, outside the submitted work; travel, accommodations, expenses from Merck Sharp & Dome and Servier, outside the submitted work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess whether RAF and MEK inhibitors (RAFi/MEKi) can provide long-term clinical benefit in adult patients with BRAF V600-mutant glial and glioneuronal tumors (GGNTs), we analyzed tumor response and long-term outcome in a retrospective cohort., Methods: We performed a retrospective search in the institutional databases of 6 neuro-oncology departments for adult patients with recurrent or disseminated BRAF V600-mutant GGNTs treated with RAFi/MEKi., Results: Twenty-eight adults with recurrent or disseminated BRAF V600-mutant gangliogliomas (n = 9), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (n = 9), and diffuse gliomas (n = 10) were included in the study. At the time that treatment with RAFi/MEKi was started, all tumors displayed radiologic features of high-grade neoplasms. Thirteen patients received RAFi as single agents (vemurafenib [n = 11], dabrafenib [n = 2]), and 15 received combinations of RAFi/MEKi (vemurafenib + cobimetinib [n = 5], dabrafenib + trametinib [n = 10]). Eleven patients achieved a partial or complete response (11 of 28, 39%), with a median reduction of -78% in their tumor burden. Responders experienced a median increase of 10 points in their Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and a median progression-free survival of 18 months, which was longer than achieved with first-line treatment (i.e., 7 months, p = 0.047). Responders had better KPS score ( p = 0.018) and tended to be younger ( p = 0.061) and to be treated earlier ( p = 0.099) compared to nonresponders. Five patients were rechallenged with RAFi/MEKi at progression, with novel tumor responses in 2. On univariate and multivariate analyses, response to RAFi/MEKi was an independent predictor of overall survival., Conclusions: Our study highlights the long-term clinical benefits of RAFi/MEKi in adult patients with BRAF V600-mutant GGNTs and encourages rechallenge in responders., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that, for adult patients with BRAF V600-mutant GGNT, RAFi/MEKi can reduce tumor burden and provide clinical benefit., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Leptomeningeal spread (LMS) is a severe complication of GBM, raising diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical routine., Methods: We performed a review of the literature focused on LMS in GBM. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were queried from 1989 to 2019 for articles describing diagnosis and therapeutic options in GBM LMS, as well as risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms., Results: We retrieved 155 articles, including retrospective series, case reports, and early phase clinical trials, as well as preclinical studies. These articles confirmed that LMS in GBM remains (a) a diagnostic challenge with cytological proof of LMS obtained in only 35% of cases and (b) a therapeutic challenge with a median overall survival below 2 months with best supportive care alone. For patients faced with suggestive clinical symptoms, whole neuroaxis magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis are both recommended. Liquid biopsies are under investigation and may help prompt a reliable diagnosis. Based on the literature, a multimodal and personalized therapeutic approach of LMS, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapies, may provide benefits to selected patients. Interestingly, molecular targeted therapies appear promising in case of actionable molecular target and should be considered., Conclusion: As the prognosis of glioblastoma is improving over time, LMS becomes a more common complication. Our review highlights the need for translational studies and clinical trials dedicated to this challenging condition in order to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies., Implications for Practice: This review summarizes the diagnostic tools and applied treatments for leptomeningeal spread, a complication of glioblastoma, as well as their outcomes. The importance of exhaustive molecular testing for molecular targeted therapies is discussed. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are outlined, and the need for translational studies and clinical trials dedicated to this challenging condition is highlighted., (© AlphaMed Press 2020.)

A high tumour mutational burden (hypermutation) is observed in some gliomas 1-5 ; however, the mechanisms by which hypermutation develops and whether it predicts the response to immunotherapy are poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyse the molecular determinants of mutational burden and signatures in 10,294 gliomas. We delineate two main pathways to hypermutation: a de novo pathway associated with constitutional defects in DNA polymerase and mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and a more common post-treatment pathway, associated with acquired resistance driven by MMR defects in chemotherapy-sensitive gliomas that recur after treatment with the chemotherapy drug temozolomide. Experimentally, the mutational signature of post-treatment hypermutated gliomas was recapitulated by temozolomide-induced damage in cells with MMR deficiency. MMR-deficient gliomas were characterized by a lack of prominent T cell infiltrates, extensive intratumoral heterogeneity, poor patient survival and a low rate of response to PD-1 blockade. Moreover, although bulk analyses did not detect microsatellite instability in MMR-deficient gliomas, single-cell whole-genome sequencing analysis of post-treatment hypermutated glioma cells identified microsatellite mutations. These results show that chemotherapy can drive the acquisition of hypermutated populations without promoting a response to PD-1 blockade and supports the diagnostic use of mutational burden and signatures in cancer.