Search

In this paper we discuss optimality-based domain reductions for Global Optimization problems both from the theoretical and from the computational point of view. When applying an optimality-based domain reduction we can easily define a lower limit for the reduction which can be attained, but we can hardly guarantee that such limit is reached. Here, we theoretically prove that, for a nontrivial class of problems, appropriate strategies exist that are always able to reach this lower limit. On the other hand, we will also show that the same strategies lose this property as soon as we slightly enlarge the class of problems. Next, we perform computational experiments with a standard B&B approach applied to Linear Multiplicative Programming problems. We aim at establishing a good trade off between the quality of the domain reduction (the higher the quality, the lower the number of nodes in the B&B tree), and the computational cost of the domain reduction, and, thus, the effort per node of the B&B tree. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The focus of this paper is on the analysis and evaluation of a type of parallel strategies applied to the algorithm Advanced Multidimensional Interval analysis Global Optimization (AMIGO). We investigate two parallel versions of AMIGO, called Parallel AMIGO (PAMIGO) algorithm, Global-PAMIGO and Local-PAMIGO. The idea behind our study is that in order to exploit the potential parallelism of algorithms, researchers need to adapt them to the target computer architectures. Our PAMIGO algorithms have been designed for shared memory architectures and are based on a threaded programming model, which is suitable to be run on current personal computers with multicore processors. Our first experimental results show a promising speed-up up to four process units. We analyse the loss of efficiency when the number of process units is greater than four by obtaining a profile of the algorithm executions. Secondly we experiment with the use of a local memory allocator per thread. This increases the efficiency by reducing the number of lock conflicts given by the standard system memory allocator. Our experimental results for both PAMIGO versions, using up to 15 process units, obtain a good performance for hard to solve problems on unicore and multicore processors. It is noteworthy that both versions of PAMIGO obtain a similar performance. Our experiments may be useful for researchers who use parallel B&B algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systems reliability plays an important role in systems design, operation and management. Systems reliability can be improved by adding redundant components or increasing the reliability levels of subsystems. Determination of the optimal amount of redundancy and reliability levels among various subsystems under limited resource constraints leads to a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem. The continuous relaxation of this problem in a complex system is a nonconvex nonseparable optimization problem with certain monotone properties. In this paper, we propose a convexification method to solve this class of continuous relaxation problems. Combined with a branch-and-bound method, our solution scheme provides an efficient way to find an exact optimal solution to integer reliability optimization in complex systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In this paper, by solving the relaxed quasiconcave programming problem in outcome space, a new global optimization algorithm for convex multiplicative programming is presented. Two kinds of techniques are employed to establish the algorithm. The first one is outer approximation technique which is applied to shrink relaxation area of quasiconcave programming problem and to compute appropriate feasible points and to raise the capacity of bounding. And the other one is branch and bound technique which is used to guarantee global optimization. Some numerical results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We introduce a new interval global optimization method for solving bound constrained problems. The method originates from a small standalone software and is implemented in the COCONUT Environment, a framework designed for the development of complex algorithms, containing numerous state-of-the-art methods in a common software platform. The original algorithm is enhanced by various new methods implemented in COCONUT, regarding both interval function evaluations (such as first and second order derivatives with backward automatic differentiation, slopes, slopes of derivatives, bicentered forms, evaluations on the Karush-John conditions, etc.) and algorithmic elements (inclusion/exclusion boxes, local search, constraint propagation). This resulted in a substantial performance increase as compared to the original code. During the selection of the best combination of options, we performed comparison tests that gave empirical answers to long-lasting algorithmic questions (such as whether to use interval gradients or use slopes instead), that have never been studied numerically in such detail before. The new algorithm, called coco_gop_ex, was tested against the prestigious BARON software on an extensive set of bound constrained problems. We found that in addition to accepting a wider class of bound constrained problems and providing more output information (by locating all global minimizers), coco_gop_ex is competitive with BARON in terms of the solution success rates (with the exception of a set of nonlinear least squares problems), and it often outperforms BARON in running time. In particular, coco_gop_ex was around 21 % faster on average over the set of problems solved by both software systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]