Search

Aims: To evaluate aspects of the current practice of sentinel lymph node (SLN) pathology in breast cancer via a questionnaire based survey, to recognise major issues that the European guidelines for mammography screening should address in the next revision. Methods: A questionnaire was circulated by mail or electronically by the authors in their respective countries. Replies from pathology units dealing with SIN specimens were evaluated further. Results: Of the 382 respondents, 240 European pathology units were dealing with SLN specimens. Sixty per cent of these units carried out intraoperative assessment, most commonly consisting of frozen sections. Most units slice larger SINs into pieces and only 12% assess these slices on a single haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slide. Seventy one per cent of the units routinely use immunohistochemistry in all cases negative by HE. The terms micrometastasis, submicrometastasis, and isolated tumour cells (ITCs) are used in 93%, 22%, and 71% of units, respectively, but have a rather heterogeneous interpretation. Molecular SLN staging was reported by only 10 units (4%). Most institutions have their own guidelines for SLN processing, but some countries also have well recognised national guidelines. Conclusions: Pathological examination of SINs throughout Europe varies considerably and is not standardised. The European guidelines should focus on standardising examination. They should recommend techniques that identify metastases > 2 mm as a minimum standard. Uniform reporting of additional findings may also be important, because micrometastases and ITCs may in the future be shown to have clinical relevance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma Aims: Neuroendocrine differentiation has been detected, and its prognostic value studied, in a number of common human carcinomas. To date there are few detailed studies examining its relevance in breast carcinoma. In this study we evaluate the frequency and prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in breast adenocarcinoma. Methods and results: The presence of neuroendocrine differentiation, defined as positive reactivity for three markers, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin, has been evaluated in 99 patients with primary operable breast cancer using standard immunocytochemical techniques. A consecutive cohort of patients were selected from the Nottingham/Tenovus series. Comprehensive patient and tumour records have been maintained, and patients were followed up according to a defined protocol. Eighteen cases were positive for NSE, 10 for chromogranin A and 13 for synaptophysin. Eleven percent were positive with more than one neuroendocrine marker. No significant association was found between neuroendocrine differentiation and tumour size, grade, stage or the prevalence of vascular invasion. There was no significant difference in either overall or disease-free survival between patients with or without neuroendocrine differentiation. Conclusions: In this study we confirm that neuroendocrine differentiation can be identified in a subset (10–18%) of human breast carcinomas. This phenomenon appears to have no relationship to established prognostic factors or patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathological and morphological features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) within and surrounding invasive ductal carcinoma, and to investigate its relationship with clinical outcome and established prognostic variables. Methods: One hundred and seven patients with primary operable invasive breast carcinoma and associated DCIS treated by simple or subcutaneous mastectomy or wide local excision with radiotherapy were assessed. Those with pure DCIS and insufficient tumour available for examination were excluded. The most representative haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from the remaining 91 samples were selected and examined at × 100 magnification using a 45-point, 2-mm grid graticule. The entire section was assessed and the cell under each point of the graticule was classed as either normal (a), DCIS surrounded by normal tissue (b), invasive tumour (c) or DCIS surrounded by invasive malignancy (d). The volume ratio of DCIS in the normal (b/(a + b)) and invasive (d/(c + d)) tissue was then calculated. Results: The DCIS volume within invasive tumour was not associated with outcome. The DCIS volume within adjacent normal tissue, however, was associated with local recurrence (P = 0·025), disease-free interval (P = 0·048), the occurrence of distant metastases (P = 0·019), death (P = 0·049) and disease-free survival (P = 0·048). Volume ratios of DCIS in normal and invasive tissue were not related to known prognostic factors including lymph node stage, grade, tumour size, vascular invasion or patient age. Conclusion: There is a significant prognostic effect relating to the extent of DCIS associated with an invasive cancer, particularly with respect to local recurrence of tumour. This effect is restricted to the volume of DCIS in the tissue surrounding the invasive lesion rather than the intratumoral component. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented concerning fibroadenoma occurring in supernumerary breast tissue.

Comments on an article regarding pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer, published in a previous issues of 'Histopathology.' Value of histological grade in breast cancer; Validation three methods for evaluating prognostic factors including tubule formation, nuclear polymorphism and mitotic counting.

Discusses risk assessment methods for malignant breast disease. Survival benefits of screening mammography; Cytomorphology of borderline breast lesions; Value of ductal lavage in risk assessment; Clinical and research applications of ductal lavage; Familial invasive breast cancer related to BRCA1 and BRCA2.