Search

A nurse practitioner educator and a physician educator, experts in teaching clinical breast examination techniques, review the essential steps of the procedure and emphasize breast cancer detection. Photographs show each step of the procedure.

Background: This study compared the efficacies of two methods of teaching breast cancer screening to primary care trainees., Methods: Fifty-one nurse-practitioner students were assigned by class section and 47 medical residents by practice site to receive a lecture-demonstration class or individual/small-group instruction from a standardized patient. Prior to instruction and one year later, participants took a written test to assess knowledge and standardized patients evaluated their skills., Results: Overall, the participants improved their breast cancer screening skills., Conclusion: The standardized patient teaching method was of greater benefit to the nurse-practitioner students.

Background: Nurse practitioner students, along with all primary care trainees, need breast cancer screening education. The purpose of the study was to compare the performances of nurse practitioner students and medical residents before and after receiving training., Methods and Results: In a pretest/posttest design, 51 nurse practitioner students and 47 medical residents received training either from a standardized patient or from a lecture/demonstration class. Before training and 1 year after, participants took the written test and had their skills evaluated by a standardized patient. There were no significant differences between the nurse practitioner students and the medical residents in the mean scores on the written pretest or on the written posttest with both groups improving their scores. The nurse practitioner students had significantly higher scores on the practicum posttest (P <.05)., Conclusions: Nurse practitioner students perform well in learning breast cancer screening. More than one method of teaching is effective.

Breast cancer mortality is decreasing for elderly white women but increasing for elderly black women. National surveys were used to study racial differences in breast cancer screening and effects of Medicare funding for mammography and to examine explanatory fac- tors. A total of 13,545 women, aged 65-74, from the Health Care Finance Administration's Master Beneficiary File participated. After Medicare funding for screening mammography, the percent reporting a mammogram increased for white women, but not for black women. Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination decreased. Physician's recommendation, geographic area, education level and health status were the variables significantly affecting mammography usage for both races. Physicians recommended mammography more often if women were white, married, educated beyond high school and had an annual income greater than $20,000. These results support the need to design and test strategies specifically for black women and interventions to emphasize physician recommendations for breast cancer screening.

Background: The 1995-1998 Delta Project was designed to increase breast cancer screening among disadvantaged African American women with limited literacy skills by educating their health care professionals about breast health. The research team intended to provide onsite training and appropriate educational materials; however, they found no suitable materials. This article presents the results of an assessment of available materials and defines the need for suitable materials., Methods: Nineteen organizations that develop cancer-related publications submitted materials intended for African American audiences. Sixty-one documents were examined for readability and cultural sensitivity. The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid (F-K), and Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tools (CSAT) were used in testing., Results: The mean FRE score of 65 yielded a F-K mean grade level of 7.5 (desired level: 3.5). Using CSAT, 16 documents (26%) were eliminated because they had no visuals. Twenty-two publications (37%) were culturally sensitive for all audiences and 19 (31%) were for white audiences. Four (6%) pieces specifically addressed African American women., Conclusions: Printed educational materials on breast cancer do not adequately provide information to undereducated, economically disadvantaged African American women.

Following clinical trial evidence of mammography screening's efficacy and effectiveness, data are needed from organized population-based programmes to determine whether screening in these programmes results in breast cancer mortality reductions comparable to those demonstrated in controlled settings. The International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) conducted two international programme assessments: in 1990 among nine countries and in 1995 among 22 countries, obtaining information on the organization and process for screening within breast cancer screening programmes. This manuscript describes procedures for recruitment, service delivery, interpretation and communication of results, case ascertainment, and quality assurance. Practices in more established programmes are compared with pilot programmes. Each IBSN country defined a unique programme of population-based breast cancer screening. Some programmes were sub-national rather than national in scope, while others were in pilot stages of development. Screening took place in dedicated centres in established programmes and in both dedicated and general radiology centres in pilot programmes. Although most countries used personal invitation systems to recruit women to screening, other recruitment mechanisms were used. Most countries used two-view mammography in their screening programmes. About half had implemented independent double reading of mammograms, considering it a key component of high-quality mammography screening. In conclusion, diversity exists in the organization and delivery of screening mammography internationally. Quality assurance activities are a priority and are being evaluated in the IBSN.

Background: Currently there are at least 22 countries worldwide where national, regional or pilot population-based breast cancer screening programmes have been established. A collaborative effort has been undertaken by the International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN), an international voluntary collaborative effort administered from the National Cancer Institute in the US for the purposes of producing international data on the policies, funding and administration, and results of population-based breast cancer screening., Methods: Two surveys conducted by the IBSN in 1990 and 1995 describe the status of population-based breast cancer screening in countries which had or planned to establish breast cancer screening programmes in their countries. The 1990 survey was sent to ten countries in the IBSN and was completed by nine countries. The 1995 survey was sent to and completed by the 13 countries in the organization at that time and an additional nine countries in the European Network., Results: The programmes vary in how they have been organized and have changed from 1990 to 1995. The most notable change is the increase in the number of countries that have established or plan to establish organized breast cancer screening programmes. A second major change is in guidelines for the lower age limit for mammography screening and the use of the clinical breast examination and breast self-examination as additional detection methods., Conclusion: As high quality population-based breast cancer screening programmes are implemented in more countries, they will offer an unprecedented opportunity to assess the level of coverage of the population for initial and repeat screening, evaluation of performance, and, in the longer term, outcome of screening in terms of reduction in the incidence of late-stage disease and in mortality.

Purpose/objectives: To describe the impact of silicone implants on the lives of women with breast cancer., Design: Qualitative analysis of telephone interview data., Sample: 120 women from across the United States who have reported to the Food and Drug Administration problems with breast implants following mastectomies., Methods: Telephone interviews were used to gather responses to 110 questions. Qualitative analysis of narrative data was linked with quantitative data., Main Research Variables: Concerns and feelings about breast implants; potential problems with silicone implants; source of information about problems; how they coped with the silicone implant controversy; problems related to their breast implants; the effect of health problems on day-to-day activities, relationships with significant others, work, and any other important aspects of their lives; and advice they would give other women regarding breast implant surgery. By linking the qualitative analysis of narrative data with quantitative data, the investigators sought to answer the following research question: Do the patterns of responses differ based on specific systemic physical problems, reported localized breast problems, or implant problems?, Findings: The women reported poorer quality of life and feelings of worry and anger because of health problems. They perceived they had received incomplete information and often had complaints dismissed by their healthcare providers. Most of them would not recommend silicone implants for patients undergoing mastectomy. The women's levels of satisfaction were directly associated with their feelings of being informed and the type of health problems they experienced., Conclusions: Women need reconstruction options following mastectomy, however, use of silicone implants can result in additional health problems and decreased quality of life as a result of those problems., Implications for Nursing Practice: Nurses can assume the role of breast health educator, which includes counseling women with breast cancer about breast implants and other reconstructive options. Study results will help health providers care both for those patients considering treatment options and those coping with the problems and concerns related to their breast implants. Women should be told the inherent risks and complications associated with breast implants and also told when "we don't know."

The cause of breast cancer remains unknown. Because prevention is not an option, early detection is the most viable alternative for decreasing the mortality rates from breast cancer. To promote early detection, the Arkansas Division of the American Cancer Society implemented a project aimed at increasing public awareness. The project used a three-pronged approach: the life-saving benefits of mammography, regular breast examination by a health-care professional, and the importance of regular breast self-examination (BSE). This article focuses on the third prong, BSE. Project members recruited and trained 408 BSE instructors in the MammaCare method of BSE and contacted a total of 87,141 Arkansas women about breast cancer and the importance of early detection. In a follow-up survey of 1,300 women, of the 198 (15%) who returned the surveys, two women reported finding lumps that were diagnosed as cancer.

Objective: To compare breast cancer screening rates from the 1991 survey with data from 1987-88 for women aged 65 to 74., Design: Surveys of women from five communities., Settings: Five control communities of the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Screening Consortium., Participants: White, non-Hispanic women, ages 65 to 74; 499 in 1987-88 and 2156 in 1991. Response rates for the first survey wave ranged by area from 65% to 77% and for the second survey wave, from 62% to 85%., Main Outcome Measure: Mammogram and clinical breast examination during the past year and performance of monthly breast self examination, with the screening rates in wave 2 directly standardized to the income and education distribution of wave 1 in each area., Results: Mammography use between waves increased significantly (P < 0.05 after adjusting for education, income, and age) in all but one area (from 19% to 33% in wave 1 to 35% to 59% in wave 2). Among women who had a mammogram, the percent who also had a clinical breast examination decreased between waves from 95% to 85% (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Mammography in older women increased dramatically over 3 years, although the use of clinical breast examination may be decreasing.