Search

Purpose: Our goal was to determine whether tumour radiosensitivity is associated with activation of the immune system across all tumour types as measured by two gene expression signatures (GESs)., Methods: We identified 10,240 genomically profiled distinct solid primary tumours with gene expression analysis available from an institutional de-identified database. Two separate GESs were included in the analysis, the radiosensitivity index (RSI) GES (a 10-gene GES as a measure of radiosensitivity) and the 12-chemokine (12-CK) signature (a 12-gene GES as a measure of immune activation). We tested whether the RSI and 12-CK were associated with each other across all tumour samples and, in an exploratory analysis, their prognostic significance in predicting distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) among a well-characterised, independent cohort of 282 early-stage breast cancer cases treated with surgery and post-operative radiation alone without systemic therapy. The lower the RSI score, the higher the tumour radiosensitivity; whereas, the higher the 12-CK score the higher the immune activation., Results: Using an RSI cut-point of ≤0.3745, RSI-low tumours (n = 4,291, 41.9%) had a significantly higher median 12-CK GES value (0.54 [-0.136, 1.095]) compared with RSI-high tumours (-0.17 [-0.82, 0.42]; p < 0.001) across all tumour samples, indicating that radiosensitivity is associated with immune activation. In an exploratory analysis of early-stage breast cancer cases, a multivariable model with patient age, RSI and 12-CK provided a strong composite model for DMFS (p = 0.02), with RSI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.36, 1.09]) and 12-CK (HR 0.66 [0.41, 1.04]) each providing comparable contributions., Conclusions: Tumour radiosensitivity is associated with immune activation as measured by the two GESs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eligibility criteria for intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for breast cancer are being established. Impact of age, one criterion, on short-term complications/outcomes was evaluated., Methods: Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery and IORT from January 2011 to June 2013 were reviewed. Data collected were demographics, comorbidities, histopathology, intraoperative data, adjuvant treatment, and outcomes. Local recurrence (LR), re-excision rates, and complications were evaluated by age group using descriptive statistics., Results: The total number of patients was 100 (43 patients <70, 57 patients ≥70). No significant differences existed between groups in tumor size, operative time, estrogen receptor status, nodal status, tumor grade, or margin excision. Wound infection rates were low for both groups (P = .21). Two LR occurred (both patients ≥70). Median follow-up time was 24 months., Conclusion: IORT with its low rate of LR and wound complications may be a reasonable alternative to whole breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer, regardless of age., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adjuvant treatment for early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive invasive breast cancer has been based on prognosticators such as menopausal status. The recurrence score (RS) from the 21-gene assay Oncotype DX (ODX) is predictive of a 10-y distant recurrence in this population but is rarely applied to premenopausal patients. The relationship between menopausal status and RS was evaluated., Materials and Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted of invasive breast cancer patients with known RS. ODX eligibility was based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines or physician discretion. Perimenopausal women were classified as premenopausal for statistical analyses. Comparisons of menopausal status and RS were made using general linear regression model and the exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test., Results: Menopausal status was available for 575 patients (142 premenopausal, 433 postmenopausal). Median age was 46 y for premenopausal and 62 y for postmenopausal. Median invasive tumor size was 1.5 cm for both cohorts. Mastectomy rate was higher in the premenopausal group (54.8%) than postmenopausal (42%; P = 0.0001). Premenopausal women had a higher local-regional recurrence rate (2.8% versus 0%; P = 0.0384) but distant recurrence and overall survival were not statistically different (P = 0.6808). Median ER H-score was lower in premenopausal (H-score = 270) than postmenopausal women (H-score = 280; P < 0.0001). Median RS was 16 for both premenopausal (range, 0-54) and postmenopausal (range, 0-63) women. Menopausal status as a categorical variable was not predictive of RS (P-value = 0.6780)., Conclusions: Menopausal status has limited predictive power for distant recurrence. Therefore, menopausal status alone should not preclude performance of ODX in ER-positive, early stage breast cancer., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemoprevention is an option for women who are at increased risk of breast cancer (five year risk ≥1.7%). It is uncertain, however, how often women accept and complete five years of therapy and whether clinical or demographic factors predict completion., Methods: Medical records were abstracted for 219 women whose five year risk of breast cancer was ≥1.7% and who were offered chemoprevention while attending a high risk breast clinic at the Moffitt Cancer Center. We examined the likelihood of accepting chemoprevention and completing five years of therapy, and potential clinical and demographic predictors of these outcomes, using multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis models., Results: There were 118/219 women (54.4%) who accepted a recommendation for chemoprevention and began therapy. The likelihood of accepting chemoprevention was associated with lifetime breast cancer risk and was higher for women with specific high risk conditions (lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Women with osteoporosis and those that consumed alcohol were also more likely to accept medication. There were 58/118 (49.2%) women who stopped medication at least temporarily after starting therapy. Based on survival curves, an estimated 60% of women who begin chemoprevention will complete five years of therapy., Conclusions: A substantial percentage of women at increased risk of breast cancer will decline chemoprevention and among those that accept therapy, approximately 40% will not be able to complete five years of therapy because of side effects., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Identifying and addressing psychosocial concerns is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of cancer care that needs to be improved. As part of the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care, medical record reviews were conducted to evaluate cancer care, including psychosocial care, at oncology practices in Florida in 2006. Results were subsequently disseminated to the practices, and performance was reassessed at the same practices in 2009., Methods: Data were available for patients with colorectal, breast, and non-small-cell lung cancer first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 (n = 1,609) and 2009 (n = 1,720) at the same 10 practice sites. Performance on each psychosocial indicator was evaluated for overall change over time and for variability in change based on practice site and cancer type., Results: The percentage of patients identified as having a problem in emotional well-being increased significantly over time, from 24% to 31% among those assessed (P = .002) and from 13% to 16% overall (P = .026). In contrast, there no significant changes over time in assessment of emotional well-being (53% to 51%, P = .661) or in action taken to address problems (57% to 45%, P = .098)., Conclusion: Findings suggest more intensive efforts than audit and feedback will be required to improve the quality of psychosocial care and that greater recognition of problems with emotional well-being may tax the ability of practices to link patients with appropriate services. Systematic research is needed to identify and disseminate effective strategies for implementing routine assessment of well-being and addressing the increased demands for care this will generate., (Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate a patient navigation (PN) program that attempts to reduce the time between a breast cancer screening abnormality and definitive diagnosis among medically underserved populations of Tampa Bay, Florida., Methods: The Moffitt Patient Navigation Research Program conducted a cluster randomized design with 10 primary care clinics. Patients were navigated from time of a breast screening abnormality to diagnostic resolution. This paper examined the length of time between breast abnormality and definitive diagnosis, using a shared frailty Cox proportional hazard model to assess PN program effect., Results: 1,039 patients were eligible for the study because of an abnormal breast cancer screening/clinical abnormality (494 navigated; 545 control). Analysis of PN effect by two time periods of resolution (0-3 months and > 3 months) showed a lagged effect of PN. For patients resolving in the first three months, the adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) was 0.85 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.64-1.13) suggesting that PN had no effect on resolution time during this period. Beyond three months, however, navigated patients resolved more quickly to diagnostic resolution compared with the control group (aHR 2.8, 95%CI: 1.30-6.13). The predicted aHR at 3 months was 1.2, which was not statistically significant, while PN had a significant positive effect beyond 4.7 months., Conclusions: PN programs may increase the timeliness of diagnostic resolution for patients with a breast cancer-related abnormality. PN did not speed diagnostic resolution during the initial three months of follow up but started to reduce time to diagnostic resolution after three months and showed a significant effect after 4.7 months., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375024.

We recently developed a malignancy-risk gene signature that was shown to identify histologically-normal tissues with a cancer-like profile. Because the signature was rich with proliferative genes, we postulated it might also be prognostic for existing breast cancers. We evaluated the malignancy risk gene signature to see its clinical association with cancer relapse/progression, and cancer prognosis using six independent external datasets. Six independent external breast cancer datasets were collected and analyzed using the malignancy risk gene signature designed to assess normal breast tissues. Evaluation of the signature in external datasets suggested a strong clinical association with cancer relapse/progression, and prognosis with minimal overlap of signature gene sets. These results suggest a prognostic role for the malignancy risk gene signature in the assessment of existing cancer. Proliferative biology dominates not only the earliest stages of tumor development but also later stages of tumor progression and metastasis.

Historical data have indicated the potential for the histologically-normal breast to harbor pre-malignant changes at the molecular level. We postulated that a histologically-normal tissue with "tumor-like" gene expression pattern might harbor substantial risk for future cancer development. Genes associated with these high-risk tissues were considered to be "malignancy-risk genes". From a total of 90 breast cancer patients, we collected a set of 143 histologically-normal breast tissues derived from patients harboring breast cancer who underwent curative mastectomy, as well as a set of 42 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of various histologic grades. All samples were assessed for global gene expression differences using microarray analysis. For the purpose of this study we defined normal breast tissue to include histologically normal and benign lesions. Here we report the discovery of a "malignancy-risk" gene signature that may portend risk of breast cancer development in benign, but molecularly-abnormal, breast tissue. Pathway analysis showed that the malignancy-risk signature had a dramatic enrichment for genes with proliferative function, but appears to be independent of ER, PR, and HER2 status. The signature was validated by RT-PCR, with a high correlation (Pearson correlation = 0.95 with P < 0.0001) with microarray data. These results suggest a predictive role for the malignancy-risk signature in normal breast tissue. Proliferative biology dominates the earliest stages of tumor development.