Search

Background: Since it was first reported in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly across the globe resulting in a pandemic. As of August 2022, seven outbreak peaks have been confirmed in Tokyo, and the numbers of new cases in the fifth and later outbreak periods have been far greater than in the preceding periods. This retrospective study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer., Methods: Patients with breast cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were divided into 2 groups: 120 and 384 patients who started chemotherapy before and during the pandemic, respectively. The incidence of critical events that had potential detrimental effects on the prognosis, such as start of adjuvant chemotherapy ≥91 days after surgery and relative dose intensity of chemotherapy <85% were compared between groups., Results: No significant difference in the incidence of critical events was found. When stratified by outbreak period, the incidence of critical events was positively correlated with the increasing number of new cases of COVID-19 (r = 0.83, p = 0.04). Moreover, 25/173 patients (14%) who started perioperative chemotherapy during the fifth and sixth outbreak periods developed COVID-19 infection, 80% of whom (20/25) had a delay or interruption to their surgery or other perioperative treatments., Conclusions: Although the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy on whole groups of patients was not evident when comparing periods before and after the pandemic, the impact is becoming prominent in parallel with increasing numbers of new COVID-19 cases., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the standard treatment for advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Although interstitial lung disease is a rare (1-3.3%) but serious adverse event associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, the incidence of interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients in the real world and the risk factors of interstitial lung disease are not clear., Methods: We retrospectively investigated the incidence of interstitial lung disease in 224 patients with advanced breast cancer who received CDK4/6 inhibitors at our hospital between 31 January 2017 and 31 January 2021. The correlation of age (>50 vs ≤50 years), presence or absence of previous history of interstitial lung disease, lung metastasis, smoking history and chest radiation with the development of interstitial lung disease was evaluated., Results: In total, 177 cases received palbociclib, 39 cases received abemaciclib and 8 cases received both palbociclib and abemaciclib, constituting a palbociclib group (n = 185) and an abemaciclib group (n = 47). At a median observation period of 607 days, 8.0% (18/224) cases (13 definite and 5 probable cases) had interstitial lung disease; 6.5% (12/185) of palbociclib-treated and 13% (6/47) of abemaciclib-treated cases. The median time to interstitial lung disease onset was 178 (range, 14-750) days. There was no significant correlation between the background factors studied and the development of interstitial lung disease., Conclusion: The frequency of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease was higher than that reported in clinical trials. We did not identify any risk factors for the development of interstitial lung disease in this study, and thus, larger studies that include patient predisposition are required., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background/aim: Although clinicians are expected to set a higher threshold for administering adjuvant chemotherapy to older than younger patients with breast cancer, the extent to which older patients are less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy and the medico-social factors that influence decision-making are unclear., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the correlations of clinicopathological factors, including age (≥75 years vs. <75 years), for all candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, and of additional medico-social factors, including the number of family members living together, for older patients, with the rate of referral from breast surgeons to medical oncologists., Results: Among 872 candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, age ≥75 years was significantly correlated with a lower referral rate (24 % vs. 44%, p<0.001). In the analysis by age group, we did not identify specific medicosocial factors that were differentially emphasized, but older patients who lived with ≥2 other family members tended not to be referred to a medical oncologist compared to those who lived alone or with one family member (1/23 vs. 15/47). Although 5 of 22 older patients (23%) who were referred to a medical oncologist actually received adjuvant chemotherapy (vs. 60% of younger patients), all needed treatment modifications., Conclusion: Breast surgeons regard age ≥75 years as a key factor for avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy but they also consider similar medico-social factors irrespective of the patient's age regarding the decision to refer patients to medical oncologists., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The previous second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1); however, its activity is decreased in tumors with heterogenous, reduced, or loss of HER2 expression. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has recently been developed as a novel antibody-drug conjugate to overcome resistance to T-DM1. However, clinical evidence on its ability to overcome this resistance is limited., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received T-DXd at our institution from April 2020 to March 2021. We evaluated the associations between clinicopathological and molecular biomarkers and the efficacy of T-DXd., Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-not reached [NR]), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 61.9%. The ORR and PFS were comparable between patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry scores of 3+ and 2+/1+ at initial diagnosis (ORR: 50.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.39; median PFS, 9.7 months [95%CI, 2.6-NR] vs. 8.3 months [95%CI, 7.1-NR]; hazard ratio, 1.86 [95%CI, 0.53-6.57], p = 0.34). Two patients with heterogenous HER2 expression had a partial response or long stable disease (≥6 months). Three of four patients with re-biopsy samples after anti-HER2 targeted therapy and with latest HER2 immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ experienced partial responses (75.0%) to T-DXd, but none had responded to prior T-DM1., Conclusions: T-DXd demonstrated favorable activity in clinical practice. Moreover, T-DXd showed meaningful benefit in patients with heterogeneity, reduction, or loss of HER2 expression., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: To maximize the effect of perioperative chemotherapy in breast cancer, it is critical to keep the relative dose intensity (RDI) high. While bi-weekly doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, dose-dense AC (ddAC), instead of tri-weekly conventional AC (cAC) followed by a taxane has been adopted as standard perioperative chemotherapy, postponement or discontinuation are sometimes experienced during ddAC or subsequent taxane phase. This study aimed at evaluating whether ddAC, compared to cAC, was associated with reduced RDI., Patients and Methods: We compared ddAC and cAC, both followed by a taxane, for perioperative breast cancer regarding the proportion of completion of planned treatment (%completion), defined as an RDI ≥85% for both AC and taxane phases., Results: There was no remarkable difference between the groups in patient characteristics after propensity score matching (n=46 in ddAC, and n=86 in cAC). The %completion was similar between the groups (67.4% vs. 65.1%). Most other endpoints related to RDI were similar between groups. The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the ddAC group (13% vs. 3%) including one Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia., Conclusion: ddAC followed by a taxane can be considered with sufficient supportive measures and precautions for pneumonia., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is defined as severe organ dysfunction requiring rapidly efficacious therapy. Although weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (wPTX + BV) achieves a high response rate in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC, the efficacy and safety of wPTX + BV for visceral crisis is unclear., Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients with MBC with visceral crisis who received wPTX + BV. Visceral crisis was defined as follows: liver dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase >200 U/L or total bilirubin >1.5 mg/dl), respiratory dysfunction (carcinomatous lymphangiomatosis, SpO 2 <93% in ambient air or required thoracentesis), superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, or bone marrow carcinomatosis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks. We also investigated time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events., Results: A total of 44 patients with respiratory dysfunction (n = 29), liver dysfunction (n = 10), bone marrow carcinomatosis (n = 7), and SVC syndrome (n = 2) were eligible for this investigation. The proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks was 63% (30/44), and the other patients discontinued wPTX + BV because of adverse events (n = 5) and disease progression (n = 9). Median TTF and OS, and the ORR were 131 days and 323 days, and 41%, respectively. No treatment-related death occurred., Conclusion: wPTX + BV achieved favorable efficacy and safety for treating patients with visceral crisis and may therefore be considered an option for the treatment of this acutely severe clinical condition., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Somatic mutations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are present in approximately 3% of breast cancers. Some HER2 mutations are activating, and they represent a mechanism of resistance to conventional anti-HER2 therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib. Consistently, in patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer, these mutations are predominantly observed in metastatic tumors obtained after exposure to anti-HER2 systemic therapies, possibly after clonal selection. Therefore, it is rare to find coexistent HER2 mutation and amplification in the early clinical course, and thus, the clinical relevance of HER2 mutation to the sensitivity to HER2-targeted drugs, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and the recently approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), remains unclear. In this article, we describe a patient with de novo metastatic breast cancer who exhibited both HER2 amplification and the L755S mutation in the untreated primary breast tumor obtained at the initial diagnosis, and the lesion responded to T-DM1 and T-DXd after exhibiting clinical resistance to other HER2-targeted drugs. Our current case findings suggested that anti-HER2 ADCs should be prioritized over conventional trastuzumab- or lapatinib-based therapies for patients with HER2-amplified and comutated tumors. KEY POINTS: Although HER2 mutations were implicated in resistance to anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in preclinical studies, their clinical impact on sensitivity to anti-HER2 drugs is unclear owing to the rarity of concomitant HER2 mutation and HER2 amplification. A case of de novo metastatic breast cancer harboring both HER2 amplification and the L755S mutation in an untreated breast primary tumor displayed clinical resistance to standard trastuzumab- or lapatinib-based therapies but good responses to ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates such as T-DM1 and T-DXd may be prioritized over conventional trastuzumab- or lapatinib-containing therapies for patients with HER2-amplified and comutated tumors., (© 2021 AlphaMed Press.)