Search

Although the oncogenic role of PPFIA1 (liprin-α1) in breast cancer has been reported, whether its dysregulation is associated with metastasis risk or survival outcomes in breast cancer patients is not clear. Our primary data showed that PPFIA1 expression was significantly higher in liver metastatic breast tumors than in the primary tumors. Then, we tried to pool previous annotated genomic data to assess the prognostic value of PPFIA1 in distant metastasis-free survival, the risk of metastatic relapse, and metastatic relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients by data mining in two large databases, Kaplan-Meier plotter and bc-GenExMiner 4.0. Results from Kaplan-Meier plotter showed that although high PPFIA1 expression was generally associated with decreased distant metastasis-free survival in estrogen receptor+ patients, subgroup analysis only confirmed significant association in estrogen receptor+/N- (nodal negative) group (median survival, high PPFIA1 group vs low PPFIA1 cohort: 191.21 vs 236.22 months; hazard ratio: 2.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-3.5, p < 0.001), but not in estrogen receptor+/N+ (nodal positive) group (hazard ratio: 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-3.03, p = 0.12). In estrogen receptor- patients, there was no association between PPFIA1 expression and distant metastasis-free survival, no matter in Nm (nodal status mixed), N-, or N+ subgroups. In bc-GenExMiner 4.0, Nottingham Prognostic Index- and Adjuvant! Online-adjusted analysis validated the independent prognostic value of PPFIA1 in metastatic risks in estrogen receptor+/N- patients. Based on these findings, we infer that high PPFIA1 expression might be an independent prognostic indicator of increased metastatic relapse risk in patients with estrogen receptor+/N- breast cancer, but not in estrogen receptor+/N+ or estrogen receptor- patients.

Background/methods: We analyzed an unselected, consecutive cohort of young breast cancer (BC) patients (≤40 years, n = 100) with regard to the contraceptive methods used at the time of diagnosis. Based on this data, we assessed the individual need for contraceptive counseling before cancer therapy. Secondly, in a study-specific self-report questionnaire, we surveyed 101 medical oncologists with the aim of evaluating attitudes towards contraception and how young patients are being counseled in the practical clinical setting., Results: In 62% of our cohort of young BC patients, we identified situations in which contraceptive counseling was necessary at the time of BC diagnosis. The patients did not use contraception or used an ineffective method (TIER III/IV, 42%), or were using hormonal methods (12%) or IUDs (8%). Almost all respondents of the survey (99%) stated that contraception is an important aspect in the surveillance of young BC patients and the vast majority (90%) discussed this item before starting therapy. Only 20% of the respondents reported that they a) inform the patients that reliable contraception is necessary before starting therapy, b) ask whether contraceptive methods are used during ongoing therapy, and c) regularly refer their patients to specialist counseling by a gynecologist., Conclusions: A large proportion of young women require contraceptive counseling after newly diagnosed BC. Oncologists should be aware that the use of reliable contraceptive methods should not only be discussed before starting therapy, but also during ongoing therapy. Oncologists should consider actively referring their young patients to gynecologists to ensure proper contraceptive counseling., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Young women experience high levels of anxiety and distress during cancer diagnosis and therapy, and it can be devastating to become pregnant in this vulnerable state. Pregnancy during cancer treatment is strongly discouraged, as radiotherapy and chemotherapy administered during the first trimester of pregnancy result in increased congenital malformations., Methods: In this study, we analysed an unselected, consecutive cohort of young breast cancer (BC) patients with regard to unintended pregnancy during the first year after BC diagnosis. We analysed all patients who were ≤40 years of age at initial BC diagnosis (n = 100, mean age at diagnosis: 35.9 years), according to data from the Basel Breast Cancer Database. The frequency of unintended pregnancy was assessed, and particular attention was given to patients' obstetric and reproductive history., Results: Forty-two percent of the cohort (mean age 36.5 years) were identified as not at risk of unintended pregnancy during the first year after BC diagnosis. However, 58% of the cohort (mean age 35.6 years) were using an ineffective contraceptive method and thus were at risk of unintended pregnancy. The rate of unintended pregnancy was 3.5% in this group (two patients). Oncologists should be aware that the use of reliable contraception should be discussed before starting, and also during, adjuvant therapy., Conclusions: Oncologists should consider actively referring young BC patients to a gynaecologist to ensure proper contraceptive counselling.

Background: This study provides real-world clinical evidence regarding palliative endocrine therapy (ET) in breast cancer (BC). The main questions to be answered were: how often and how long did patients receive ET? A particular aspect was the analysis of compliance and persistence with ET., Methods: An analysis of a nonselected/consecutive cohort of women with distant metastatic hormone receptor-positive BC (n = 205) was conducted., Results: In all, 165 patients (80.5%) received ET during the palliative disease course. The noncompliance rate was 1.5%. Sixty-seven patients (40.6%) had ET as the only antineoplastic therapy. The median number of therapy lines was 2, and the median duration was 18 months. The median metastatic disease survival (MDS) was 34 months. In patients who had an MDS of ≥9 months (n = 145; 87.9%), during 70.6% of the MDS time only ET had been administered. Patients who were naïve to ET more often had a good response to and a longer duration of palliative ET than those who were not. The nonpersistence rate was 4.3%., Conclusions: Excluding the few patients who had a rapidly progressive course, the disease was controlled for about 70% of the entire palliative disease course with ET alone. Only very few patients were nonpersistent with ET and consciously stopped a still effective, ongoing ET., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: This study assessed the interaction of "family ties" in a cohort of young breast cancer patients., Methods: Based on the Basel Breast Cancer Database, we analysed an unselected, consecutive cohort of patients who were ≤40 years at breast cancer diagnosis (n = 100)., Results: Sixty patients had children at the time of diagnosis (mean number of children: 1.03). Only four patients had desired children after BC therapy. The average age of the children at breast cancer diagnosis of their mother was 7.7 years. The mean age of the children whose mothers died of breast cancer at the time of their mother's death was 13.1 years; these children (n = 37) lived an average of 84.7 months with the illness of their mother. Parity status was not a significant factor for compliance/persistence to adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 1.00). Patients who had children were more likely to be compliant/persistent to endocrine therapy (p = 0.021). Out of these patients, 41.2% rejected or discontinued endocrine therapy with the explicit intention to get pregnant., Conclusions: Desire for children was an important factor in refusing endocrine therapy. This clearly highlights the enormous pressure that many young women face in this situation. About a third of the children whose mothers were diagnosed with breast cancer experienced the palliative situation and the death of their mother. Since many of these children are confronted with a cancerous disease of their mothers during half of their childhood, special attention should be paid to age-appropriate support of a child in all phases of the mother's disease.

Purpose: A woman's risk of developing breast cancer (BC) is increased if she has a personal history (PH) or family history (FH) of the disease. We compared the impact of the two risk factors PH and FH on tumor detection and tumor size at diagnosis in a cohort of BC patients., Methods: The study cohort comprised 1,037 invasive BC patients (≤70 years at diagnosis). From these, 92 patients (8.5%) had a positive PH and 151 patients (13.7%) had a positive first-degree FH., Results: Compared to the tumors of patients without PH or FH, the lesions of patients who had a positive PH or a positive FH were more often found by radiologic breast examinations (RBE) (PH: 49.4%, FH: 43.4%, no PH/FH: 26.2%; both comparisons p < 0.001). In patients with a positive FH, the tumors were slightly less often found by RBE as in patients with a positive PH (p = 0.468). Patients with a positive PH or FH had smaller tumors compared with those without such a history (PH: 19.7 mm, FH: 19.6 mm, no PH/FH: 26.7 mm; p = 0.015/p < 0.001). The tumor sizes of patients with a positive PH were almost identical to those of patients with a positive FH (p = 0.999)., Conclusions: In women with a positive FH or PH of BC, the increased awareness of BC risk led to the detection of smaller tumors compared to women who have not had this experience. However, comparison of the two risk factors showed that they had a similar impact on the RBE detection rate of BC lesions and that the tumor sizes were nearly identical.

Unlabelled: This is the first comprehensive analysis comparing specific aspects of tumor detection between the two "traditional" breast cancer detection methods self-detection (SD) and clinical breast examination (CBE). a) Which method is better in detecting smaller tumors? Both methods showed similar mean tumor diameters (SD: 22.1 mm vs. CBE: 21.9 mm; p = 0.991). b) Different frequency distributions of tumor locations would indicate that certain locations in the breast are more difficult to palpate: comparison of both methods showed comparable results (p = 0.835). c) General differences in tumor sizes with regard to certain locations would be of importance because the patients and/or the physicians could be educated to pay particular attention to certain locations during physical examination, where larger tumors tend to be found: tumors located in the central region were with 25.0 mm significantly larger than those in the peripheral regions of the breast (superior: 21.6 mm, p = 0.001; inferior: 21.6 mm, p = 0.015; lateral: 21.9 mm, p = 0.002; medial (20.9 mm, p = 0.001). Tumor sizes within the four peripheral regions did not differ significantly. d) Patients whose tumors were found by CBE were older than those whose tumors were found by SD (67 years vs. 60 years, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: annual CBE should be an integral part of general medical care in older women., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The study evaluates frequency of and indications for disease-related radiotherapy in the palliative breast cancer (BC) situation and analyzes in which phase of the palliative disease course radiotherapy was applied., Patients & Methods: 340 patients who developed distant metastatic disease (DMD) and died (i.e. patients with completed disease courses) were analyzed., Results: 165 patients (48.5%) received palliative radiotherapy (255 series, 337 planning target volumes) as a part of palliative care. The most common sites for radiotherapy were the bone (217 volumes, 64.4% of all radiated volumes) and the brain (57 volumes, 16.9%). 127 series (49.8%) were performed in the first third of the metastatic disease survival (MDS) period; 84 series (32.8%) were performed in the last third. The median survival after radiotherapy was 10 months. Patients who had received radiation were younger compared to those who had no radiation (61 vs. 68 years, p < 0.001) and had an improved MDS (26 vs. 14 months, p < 0.001). Compared to rapidly progressive disease courses with short survival times, in cases where effective systemic therapy achieved a longer MDS (≥24 months), radiotherapy was significantly more often a part of the multimodal palliative therapy (52.1% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.006)., Conclusions: In a cohort of BC patients with DMD, nearly one half of the patients received radiotherapy during the palliative disease course. In a palliative therapy approach, which increasingly allows for treatment according to the principles of a chronic disease, radiotherapy has a clearly established role in the therapy concept.

This study evaluated the impact of family history (FH) on tumor detection, the patient's age and tumor size at diagnosis in breast cancer (BC). Furthermore, we investigated whether the impact of FH on these features was dependent on degree of relationship, number of relatives with a BC history, or the age of the affected relative at the time that her BC was diagnosed. Out of the entire cohort (n = 1,037), 244 patients (23.5%) had a positive FH; 159 (15.3%) had first-degree relatives affected with BC and 85 patients (8.2%) had second-degree affected relatives. Compared to women who had no BC-affected relatives, the tumors of women who had positive FH were more often found by radiological breast examination (RBE: 31.7%/27.2%, p = 0.008), and they were smaller (general tumor size: 21.8 mm/26.4 mm, p = 0.003; size of tumors found by breast self-examination (BSE): 26.1 mm/30.6 mm, p = 0.041). However, this positive effect of increased use of BC screening and smaller tumor sizes was only observed in patients whose first-degree relatives were affected (comparison with second-degree affected relatives: RBE: 43.8%/24.7%; odds ratio 2.38, p = 0.007; general tumor size: 19.3 mm/26.3 mm; mean difference (MD) -6.9, p = 0.025; tumor size found by BSE: 22.5 mm/31.0 mm; MD -8.5, p = 0.044). When more second-degree relatives or older relatives were diagnosed with BC, the tumors of these patients were similarly often detected by RBE (relationship: 24.7%/27.2%, p = 0.641; age: 33.7 %/27.2 %, p = 0.177) and had similar tumor sizes (general size: 26.3 mm/26.4 mm, p = 0.960; BSE: 31.0 mm/30.6 mm, p = 0.902) as those of women without a FH. Women with a positive FH generally use mammography screening more often and perceive changes in the breast earlier than women without such history. The increased awareness of BC risk decreases if the relationship is more distant.

Objectives: This study evaluated the differences between breast cancer (BC) patients who present with primary distant metastatic disease (PMD) and those who develop distant metastases during the course of their illness (secondary metastatic disease [SMD]) with regard to clinicopathological characteristics, patterns of metastatic sites, palliative therapy and survival., Patients & Methods: Based on a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed BC (n = 1459), we analyzed all patients who had PMD (n = 92, 6.3%) and those who developed SMD (n = 277, 20.3%)., Results: There were no significant differences with regard to the patient's age in which metastatic disease had been diagnosed (PMD/SMD: 64 years/66 years, p = 0.19). The SMD group had more often triple-negative carcinomas (25.5%/7.3%, p = 0.019); there were no significant differences with regard to grading (p = 0.61), HER2 status (p = 0.67) and hormonal receptor status (p = 1.00). The mean number of metastatic locations was similar (2.3/2.3, p = 0.91). While patients with PMD usually initiated systemic therapy, patients with SMD received systemic therapy after diagnosis of metastatic disease less often (16.4%/2.6%, p < 0.001). Both groups received palliative chemotherapy similarly often (PMD/SMD: 62.8%/63.3%, p = 1.00). The mean number of palliative therapy lines was similar (PMD/SMD: 2.8/3.2, p = 0.39). Compared to patients with SMD, patients who had PMD had a significantly improved metastatic disease survival (p < 0.001). The one-year, two-year and five-year survival rates were as follows: 76.9%/60.3%, 58.2%/43.0%, 23.1%/10.6%. The median survival times were 18.5 months and 32 months., Conclusion: The poorer prognosis of patients with SMD may be explained by differences in clinicopathological features of the tumor, metastatic patterns, the use palliative therapy and drug resistance of the tumor cells which occurs in therapy-naïve PMD patients at a later phase of the disease course., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This study evaluates the frequency of and indications for disease-related surgical procedures in the palliative breast cancer (BC) situation., Patients & Methods: Based on a cohort of women who were treated for newly diagnosed BC during a 20-year period (1990-2009), we analyzed 340 patients who developed distant metastatic disease (DMD) until 2011 and died (i.e. still ongoing palliative disease courses were not included)., Results: One hundred and twenty-seven surgical procedures were performed in 100 patients (29.4% of all patients with metastatic disease). The most common site for surgery was breast (n = 60, 47.2%). The primary tumor was removed at first diagnosis of DMD in 43 patients (33.9%); sixteen operations (12.6%) were performed for local recurrence. In 37 patients, 50 surgical procedures (39.4%) were necessary to stabilize osseous structures due to metastases. Procedures were rarely performed on other common metastatic sites: lung: n = 1 (0.8%); liver: n = 1 (0.8%), brain: n = 4 (3.1%). When excluding surgery for primary breast tumors at initial diagnosis of DMD from analysis, 34 of 84 surgeries (40.4%) were performed in the first third of survival follow-up (i.e. period of metastatic disease survival); operations in the last two-thirds each totaled 29.8% (n = 25). The median survival after surgery was 16 months (range: 0.5-89 months)., Conclusions: In a cohort of BC patients who had primary or developed secondary DMD, nearly one third of the patients received disease-related surgical procedures during their palliative disease course. This high rate of operations shows that surgery has a clearly established role in the palliative therapy concept., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 10% of breast cancer (BC) patients are over the age of 80. We present the first comprehensive review on this particular group of patients., Patients and Methods: The treatments and disease courses of an unselected cohort of patients, whose age at first diagnosis was ≥ 80 years (n = 151), were compared to those of a group of women, who were aged 56-66 years (n = 372)., Results: The group of elderly patients had larger tumors at first diagnosis (25 mm vs. 18 mm, p < 0.001) and higher disease stages (I: 31.1% vs. 44.1%, IV: 11.9% vs. 5.4%; each p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of histologic subtype, grading, hormonal receptor status and HER2 status. The tumors of older patients were more often detected by clinical examination (38.9% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001) and less often by mammography/sonography (10.4% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of patients who died of BC were similar in both groups (21.2% vs. 21.5%, p = 1.00). In the patients who had no evidence of metastases and who opted for primary non-surgical management (n = 21), the tumor could be stabilized without considerable morbidity in only 42.9%. Persistence to adjuvant endocrine therapy was comparable (83.0% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.357). In the adjuvant as well as in the palliative settings, elderly patients received less chemotherapy than younger ones (adjuvant: 1.6% vs. 23.3%; palliative: 32.3% vs. 68.4%; each p < 0.001). For palliative treatments only, elderly patients received fewer treatment regimens (≥ 3 therapy lines: 16.0% vs. 54.9%, p < 0.001). In those patients who died of BC, elderly women had inferior overall (25 vs. 54.5 months, p < 0.001) as well as metastatic-disease survival (11.5 vs. 19 months, p = 0.062)., Conclusion: It must be ensured that appropriate standard therapies should not be routinely withheld in older patients based on erroneous perceptions regarding the biological nature of BC in the elderly and lack of knowledge about available therapy regimens. Physicians should consider that preservation of current life circumstances and maintenance of quality of life are frequently more important than "classical" hard medical facts such as survival times.

Purpose: Greater body fatness has been identified as a risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer. For countries with low overweight/obesity rates, data on prevalence and time course of overweight/obesity in women with breast cancer in comparison to women in the general population is limited. The Swiss female population is distinctive for two reasons: (a) low rates of overweight/obesity compared with other western countries, and (b) no obesity epidemic, i.e. stable rates of overweight/obesity for more than 10 years., Methods: Overweight and obesity were analyzed in 51 to 80-year-old breast cancer patients initially diagnosed between 1990 and 2009. Patient data was derived from the Basel Breast Cancer Database (BBCD). This data was compared with the data of women of the same age from the four Swiss Health Surveys (SHS) conducted between 1992 and 2007. Differences between measured (BBCD) and self-reported (SHS) data were corrected using equations approved for the Swiss population., Results: Of 958 postmenopausal BBCD patients, 32% were overweight and 20% were obese. Of the 14,476 women of the SHS, 38% were overweight and 17% were obese. In the BBCD, there was no change in the prevalence of overweight/obesity over the last 20 years. The four SHS show a convex curvature for obesity, i.e. a transient increase. No significant differences were observed between BBCD and corrected SHS data for overweight and obesity during this period., Conclusions: In this Swiss study group with a comparably low prevalence of overweight and obesity, no association between body fatness and postmenopausal breast cancer was observed.

We evaluated 166 breast cancer cases with non-inflammatory skin involvement (NISI), which were classified in the TNM classification as T4b. The distribution of tumour sizes and stages was: < or =3 cm:24.1%, 3.1-5 cm:21.7%, 5.1-10 cm:33.1%, >10 cm:21.1%; stages:I/II:21.0%, III:43.4%, IV:35.6%. To assess the impact of NISI on axillary lymph node involvement (ALNI), we analyzed a sub-group of 50 patients with tumours < or =5 cm and compared them with a matched control group. NISI was found to be associated with increased ALNI (HR, 2.66; 95%CI, 1.59-4.63; p<0.0001). According to the inherent rules of tumour classification, only tumours with similar morphologic extent and prognostic significance should be combined. Since there is a high grade of heterogeneity, this basic tenet is clearly violated regarding breast cancer with NISI. Our proposal is to eliminate these tumours from the T4 category and to classify them simply by size (T1-3). Due to its prognostic significance, NISI should be indicated by an optional descriptor (e.g. S1)., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Maximal tumor diameter (MD) is traditionally an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. It must be questioned, however, how well a one-dimensional parameter alone can represent the actual morphologic condition of a three-dimensional body. Along with the pathologically assessed MD and two perpendicular diameters (PDs) of a lesion, eccentricity (EF) and the three-dimensional parameters tumor volume (TV) and surface area (TSA) of 395 ductal invasive breast carcinomas of limited size (10-40 mm) were calculated. The dependent prognostic variable was axillary lymph node involvement (ALNI). MD, TV and TSA area were highly significant predictors of ALNI; these variables had similar levels of prediction accuracy (univariate analyses: MD: P = 0.0003, TV: P = 0.0009, TSA: P < 0.0001; multivariate analyses: MD: P = 0.0018, TV: P = 0.0109, TSA: P = 0.0009; pseudo R-squared values: MD: 0.42, TV: 0.39, TSA: 0.39). Despite certain variations in tumor shape, TV and TSA with similar MD, there is no evidence that three-dimensional pathologic measurements (TV/TSA) are more precise prognostic predictors of ALNI compared to the one-dimensional measurement alone.

Purpose: Published reports provide level-III evidence in support of the hypothesis that distant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) might be curable in up to 3% of cases through a multidisciplinary approach including combination chemotherapy regimens in selected patients, usually young, and with limited metastases. Our study evaluates the rate and characteristics of long-term survivors based on a nonselective study cohort., Patients and Methods: We analyzed the data from 149 patients in whom distant MBC was diagnosed from 1990 to 1999., Results: Five patients (3.4%) were long-term survivors (9-14 years after initial diagnosis of MBC) without any clinical evidence of disease. They had a 2-peaked distribution of age: 3 were 41-57 years old at the diagnosis of MBC and 2 were much older (76, 79 years). Median survival time after diagnosis of MBC was 152 (range, 109-172) months. Three patients had isolated metastatic lesions, although 1 patient had multiple organ metastases and another extensive bone metastases. In 4 of 5 cases, long-term survival was achieved without the administration of chemotherapy., Discussion: Long-term survivors in MBC comprise a relatively heterogeneous group, and the factors which lead to the quite rare situation of long-term survival can hardly be evaluated systematically. Aggressive chemotherapy regimens appear not to be a key factor for survival. Furthermore, in a nonselective study cohort, some patients clearly are not only alive but also disease-free more than 12 years after initial relapse. This fraction may be small, but the chance for survival, and even for cure, truly exists.

Objective: To depict a clear and coherent picture of the overall course of palliative treatment in an unselected study cohort over the course of time., Methods: We compared therapy type and course of 242 women whose distant metastatic disease was diagnosed from 1990 to 2006 and who ultimately died of the disease. We divided the patients into two subgroups depending on the year of diagnosis of metastases (group A: 1998-2006 vs. group B: 1990-1997)., Results: In both subgroups, there were no significant differences in the general type of treatment and the number of administered therapy lines (no systemic therapy: 12.9 vs.13.7%, p = 0.848; endocrine therapy only: 20.4 vs. 25.2%, p = 0.430; chemotherapy only: 18.4 vs.16.9%, p = 0.735; sequential combination regimen including endocrine therapy/chemotherapy/trastuzumab: 46.9 vs. 44.2%, p = 0.694; median: 2 lines). In the cases where chemotherapy was administered, there were no differences between the number of lines among older and younger patients (median: two lines; >or=70 years vs. <70 years: p = 0.269). The median metastatic disease-specific survival increased from 16 months in the period from 1990 to 1997, to 21 months in the period from 1998 to 2000 (p = 0.062)., Conclusion: The number of patients who died from metastatic breast cancer without receiving any antineoplastic therapy was surprisingly high. The use of newer agents and regimens in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was associated with an improved survival over time. Chemotherapy is a feasible option also among older patients., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Previous research evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy among postmenopausal breast cancer patients showed with 15-50% wide ranges of non-adherence rates. We evaluated this issue by analysing an unselected study group comprising of 325 postmenopausal women, diagnosed from 1997 to 2003 with hormonal receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. The different clinical situations that led to the discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy were clearly defined and differentiated: non-adherence was not simply the act of stopping medication, but rather the manifestation of an intentional behaviour of the patient. Of the 287 patients who initiated endocrine therapy, 191 (66.6%) fully completed this treatment. Thirty-one patients (10.8%) showed non-adherence to therapy. Patients who had follow-up with a general practitioner, rather than in an oncologic unit, were more likely to be non-adherent (P=0.0088). Of 25 patients who changed medication due to therapy-related adverse effects, 20 (80%) patients fully completed the therapy after drug change. In adjuvant endocrine therapy, a lowering of the non-adherence rate to 10.8%, the lowest reported in the literature, is realistic when patients are cared for by a specialised oncologic unit focusing on the individual needs of the patients.

Background: This study investigates to what extent tumor detection methods in breast cancer have changed and how this has influenced tumor size at initial diagnosis., Methods: 1054 breast carcinomas < or =5 cm, newly diagnosed between 1990 and 2006, were evaluated for the tumor detection methods used, namely self-detection (SD, n=568), clinical breast examination (CBE, n=212), and radiological breast examination (RBE, n=237), and their corresponding tumor sizes., Results: During the study period, the proportion of cases found by RBE increased (p<0.001), while median tumor size decreased (1990-1992: 22 mm; 2005/2006: 17 mm. Spearman rho=-0.12, p<0.001). Nevertheless, SD remained the most frequent method of tumor identification (2005/2006: 48.9%). Carcinomas found by RBE were smaller (median size: 12 mm) than those found by the other two detection forms (SD: 21 mm, CBE: 21 mm; p<0.001). Within the different methods, only in RBE was an appreciable decrease in the size of the detected tumors observed during the study period (Spearman rho=-0.14, p<0.001; SD: Spearman rho=-0.05, p=0.19; CBE: Spearman rho=-0.05, p=0.43)., Conclusion: Despite educational campaigns and high media coverage, the possibilities for improving the "classical" methods of tumor detection in breast cancer, self-detection and clinical breast examination, seem to be at their limit. The significant decrease in tumor size at time of detection observed in the last years is primarily only due to the increased use of breast imaging. Improved detection of smaller tumors may presumably be reached only by an increased use of radiological procedures.