1. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study in India for Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and PK of ZRC-3277 (Pertuzumab Biosimilar) With Perjeta® in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Kothari R, Doshi M, Chaithanya PK, Ct S, Kumar A, Mallavarapu KM, Nagarkar R, Mahobia V, Bhatt N, Priyadarshini KL, Gogia A, Maksud T, Prasad S, Velavan K, L K R, Ss P, Talreja V, Kalra K, Nemade B, Dastidar AG, Gupta T, Patil T, Bondarde S, Patel P, Gupta S, Biswas G, Vaghela M, Mahato P, Parekh H, Kalloli M, Shetty R, Prakash G, Goel A, Mandal S, Choudhury T, Jain M, Goswami C, H M YK, Mukherjee KK, Shrivastava R, and Parmar D
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Double-Blind Method, India, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological pharmacokinetics, Treatment Outcome, Trastuzumab therapeutic use, Trastuzumab administration & dosage, Docetaxel therapeutic use, Docetaxel administration & dosage, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals therapeutic use, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals administration & dosage, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized pharmacokinetics, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
- Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of ZRC-3277 (pertuzumab biosimilar) with Perjeta® (pertuzumab) in previously untreated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Patients and Methods: This phase III, multicenter, double-blind study across 38 sites in India randomized (1:1) patients with HER2-positive MBC in either the ZRC-3277 or Perjeta® group. Both groups also received trastuzumab and docetaxel. Of 268 enrolled patients, mITT population had 243 patients (119 and 124 in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively). The primary objective was to compare the between-group objective response rate (ORR) after 6 cycles of treatment. ORR was determined by evaluating scans of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging following Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1). Two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference in ORR was determined to evaluate the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. The secondary outcomes included the assessment of PK, immunogenicity, and safety between the 2 groups., Results: In the mITT population, 104 (87.39%) and 114 (91.94%) participants achieved the ORR in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively. For predefined -15% noninferiority margin, obtained 2-sided 95% CIs (-12.19%, 3.11%) for the difference in ORR (-4.55%) between the 2 groups demonstrated the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. PK, immunogenicity, and safety were not significantly different between the 2 groups., Conclusion: Efficacy, PK, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of ZRC-3277 was found to be similar to those of Perjeta®., Competing Interests: Disclosure Deven Parmar is an employee of Zydus Therapeutics Inc, USA, whereas Maulik Doshi and Rahul Shrivastava are employees of Zydus Lifesciences Ltd. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF