Search

Purpose: Positive surgical margins adversely influence local tumor control in breast conservation therapy (BCT). However, reports have conflicted regarding whether an increased radiation dose can overcome this poor prognostic factor. In this study, we evaluated the influence of an increased radiation dose on tumor control in women with positive surgical margins undergoing BCT., Methods and Materials: Between 1978 and 1994, 733 women with pathologic Stage I-II breast cancer and known surgical margin status were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital with BCT. Of these 733 patients, 641 women had a minimal tumor bed dose of 60 Gy and had documentation of their margin status; 509 had negative surgical margins, and 132 had positive surgical margins before definitive radiotherapy. Complete gross excision of the tumor and axillary lymph node sampling was obtained in all patients. The median radiation dose to the primary site was 65.0 Gy (range 60-76). Of the women with positive margins (n = 132), the influence of higher doses of radiotherapy was evaluated. The median follow-up time was 52 months., Results: The local tumor control rate for patients with negative margins at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 88%, respectively, compared with 85% and 67%, respectively, for those women with positive margins (p = 0.001). The disease-free survival rate for the negative margin group at 5 and 10 years was 91% and 82%, respectively, compared with 76% and 71%, respectively, for the positive margin group (p = 0.001). The overall survival rate of women with negative margins at 5 and 10 years was 95% and 90%, respectively. By comparison, for women with positive surgical margins, the overall survival rate at 5 and 10 years was 86% and 79%, respectively (p = 0.008). A comparison of the positive and negative margin groups revealed that an increased radiation dose (whether entered as a dichotomous or a continuous variable) >65.0 Gy did not improve local tumor control (p = 0.776). On Cox multivariate analysis, margin status and menopausal status had prognostic significance for local tumor control and DFS., Conclusion: Patients with positive surgical margins have a higher risk of local tumor recurrence and worse survival when undergoing BCT. Higher doses of radiation are unable to provide an adequate level of local control in patients with positive margins.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of bilateral breast carcinoma (BBC) patients with those of patients who had unilateral disease., Methods: From 1960 to 1995, 1465 Stage 0-III patients with primary breast carcinoma were treated with either mastectomy or breast conservation therapy at the Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. There were 1315 (89.9%) unilateral, 103 (7.1%) metachronous, and 47 (3.0%) synchronous breast carcinoma patients. Patients with synchronous breast carcinoma were defined as having a contralateral cancer diagnosed within 1 year of initial diagnosis. The percentage of patients with Stage 0-I disease at initial diagnosis was 49.4%, whereas 68% had Stage 0-I disease at subsequent diagnosis. For patients with metachronous breast carcinomas, the median interval between the first and second diagnosis was 44 months (range, 13-287 months). The median follow-up time was 58 months (range, 12-229 months) for patients with synchronous cancers and 87 months (range, 0.25-414 months) for those with metachronous cancers. Rates of overall survival and survival with no evidence of disease (NED survival), local control, and distant metastasis from the time of the second diagnosis were calculated for patients with synchronous and metachronous disease. These figures were then compared with each other and also with those for unilateral breast carcinoma patients., Results: Patients with synchronous and metachronous breast carcinoma had worse 5- and 8-year NED survival rates compared with unilateral breast carcinoma patients, as well as an increased risk of distant metastasis. In multivariate analysis, differences in local control and overall survival were not statistically significant for patients who had bilateral disease compared with those who had unilateral disease. There was no difference when patients with metachronous and unilateral breast carcinoma were compared with respect to local control and overall survival., Conclusions: Patients with bilateral breast carcinoma who present with synchronous disease are at greater risk for distant metastasis than women with unilateral or metachronous breast tumors. There was a trend toward decreased overall survival and local control for patients with synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma compared with patients who had either metachronous or unilateral disease., (Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.)

Background: There are conflicting reports regarding whether focally positive surgical margins influence tumor control in breast-conservation therapy. The authors have evaluated the relation between positive surgical margins on tumor control and whether the number of positive margins affects tumor control in patients undergoing reexcision lumpectomy., Methods: From 1978 to 1994, 453 American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I/II breast carcinoma patients were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital with breast conservation therapy. Patients underwent excisional biopsy and margin sampling with shaved biopsies of the tumor cavity. The entire breast received 45 grays (Gy) with a 20-Gy iridium-192 implant or an electron boost. Eighty-six patients had microscopically positive margins (19%), and the remainder had confirmed negative margins. The median follow-up time was 45 months., Results: Local tumor control rates for patients with negative margins at 5 and 10 years were 94% and 87%, respectively, compared with 86% and 69%, respectively, for those patients with positive margins (P=0.005). The disease free survival rates for the negative margin group at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 82%, respectively, compared with 76% and 71%, respectively, for the positive margin group (P=0.001). Overall survival rates for patients with negative margins at 5 and 10 years were 95% and 84%, respectively, compared with 87% and 78%, respectively, for those with positive margins (P=0.047). When comparing the negative margin group with the one positive margin group, there was no significant difference in local tumor control (P=0.12). However, women with two or more positive margins had an inferior local tumor control compared with those women with negative margins (P=0.002)., Conclusions: Patients with positive margins have a higher risk for local failure and worse survival when undergoing breast conservation therapy. Inferior local tumor control was noted in those patients with two or more positive margins.

Purpose: 192Ir interstitial breast implants performed at the time of lumpectomy present a unique problem because they cannot be preplanned, and yet they are expected to produce a treatment dose rate (TDR) from 0.3 to 0.5 Gy/h using sources already procured. The purpose of this work is to describe a system of dosimetry that works within these constraints and has been used to perform more than 600 such implants., Methods and Materials: The underlying principle is to fix the ribbon spacing, the interplaner separation, and the linear activity (1 mCi/cm) so that the TDR will depend only on the area (L x W) implanted. The ribbons are spaced 1.5 cm and 2.0 cm apart in single plane and double implants, respectively. Idealized implants were used to study the TDR as a function of the implant dimensions, and to study the effects of varying the ribbon spacing and interplanar separation. Volume-dose histograms were generated to study the homogeneity of dose., Results: The TDRs of single plane implants range from 0.3 Gy/h for small 4 x 4 cm2 implants to 0.4 Gy/h for large 10 x 10 cm2 implants. The TDRs for double plane implants are similar for the same range of dimensions., Conclusions: Implants with a TDR between 0.3 and 0.5 Gy/h can be performed for a wide range of geometries without preplanning using fixed ribbons spacings of 1.5 and 2.0 cm for single and double plane implants, respectively, and a linear activity of 1 mCi/cm.

DNA index (ploidy) and S-phase fraction (SPF) were measured by flow cytometry in 131 invasive stage I and II breast carcinomas. Ploidy showed a strong correlation with SPF (p = 0.0001), with aneuploid tumors having a high SPF. Both cytometric parameters correlated with tumor size and hormonal receptor status. Smaller tumors tended to be diploid and have low SPF. Nodal status did not demonstrate an association with cytometric findings. There was a highly significant connection between tumor grade, especially nuclear grade, and SPF (p = 0.0001). The study demonstrates the relationship between conventional prognostic factors, DNA content, and proliferative activity of breast tumors.

Background: One thousand seventy patients treated conservatively for Stages I and II breast cancer between the years 1982 and 1994 were reviewed. The median follow-up was 40 months with a maximum follow-up of 152 months., Methods: All patients had a wide local excision and lower lymph axillary node dissection followed by radiation therapy. The entire breast received an external beam dose of 4500 cGy at 180 cGy/5 days/week. An additional boost dose of 2000 cGy to the tumor bed was given at the time of lumpectomy (perioperative) with an Ir-192 implant or with electron beam therapy after the external beam therapy., Results: The 5- and 10-year disease specific survival results were 97 and 90%, respectively for Stage I and 87 and 69% for patients with Stage II disease. The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 93 and 85% for Stage I and 92 and 87% for Stage II, respectively. The risk factors for local failure were premenopausal status and estrogen receptor-negative status at the univariate level but at the multivariate level the premenopausal and margins status were significant., Conclusion: These 10-year results were at least equivalent to reported series of similarly staged patients treated by mastectomy. This should encourage more surgeons to offer conservative treatment as an alternative to mastectomy to patients with Stage I and II breast cancer.

Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the breast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and complications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping fields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 2900 cm2 in area with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm deep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia applicator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz microwaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia applicator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a particular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields to a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 and 50 Gy. The equivalent dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hyperthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days. Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tumour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once. Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator fields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treatments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (range of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The tumour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nevertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemic tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermoradiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcinoma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the chest wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork thermoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermia fields.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of perioperative implantation of iridium-192 for stage I and II breast cancer., Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed findings from 655 patients with stage I and II cancer treated with conservative surgery and Ir-192 implantation between 1982 and 1992. Hollow plastic tubes were placed in the tumor bed as a single- or double-plane implant at lumpectomy. Ribbons with Ir-192 seeds were inserted into the tubes 4-6 hours later. The Ir-192 was left in place for approximately 50 hours. External-beam irradiation was given to the whole breast 10-14 days later., Results: Follow-up ranged from 2 to 146 months. The local control at 10 years for stage I and II disease was 93% and 87%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial survival rate was 92% +/- 1 for stage I disease and 72% +/- 4 for stage II disease. The rate of survival with no evidence of disease for stage I and II disease combined was 82% +/- 1 at 5 years and 75% +/- 3 at 10 years., Conclusion: Perioperative implantation produced excellent local control equal to that with electron-beam therapy.

Background: Few women with locally advanced breast cancer remain disease-free, even for 2 years. Response to induction chemotherapy may be associated with longer disease-free and overall survival rates. The role of breast conservation in selected patients with response to induction chemotherapy was evaluated., Methods: Since 1979, patients with Stages IIB and III breast cancer have undergone induction chemotherapy; patients with response continued chemotherapy until a plateau of regression was achieved. Before 1983, all patients having a response to chemotherapy underwent mastectomy; since 1983, selected patients have undergone breast conservation. Outcomes were tallied comparing these two groups of patients., Results: The study group included 189 women, who were followed up for 12-159 months (median, 46 months) after diagnosis. Of the patients, 85% had a response to induction chemotherapy. Patients with no response were excluded from additional consideration in this study. One hundred three (64%) women underwent mastectomy; 55 (36%) were treated with breast conservation. The disease-free 5-year survival rate was 61% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy; 56% for those having mastectomy and 77% for those having breast conservation. The overall 5-year survival rate was 69% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy, 67% for those undergoing mastectomy and 80% for those having breast conservation., Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy achieves significant tumor regression in most women with locally advanced breast cancer, permitting subsequent breast conservation or mastectomy with a greater expectation of long-term success. Breast conservation is used more frequently with the same expectation of success as mastectomy, presuming careful selection based on response to chemotherapy.

Between 1982 and 1993, 620 of 938 patients with pathologically staged I-II breast cancer were treated at the time of reexcision (perioperatively), with an iridium-192 (Ir-192) implant to the tumor bed to give 2000 cGy to the 30 to 40 cGy/ph isodose line. This was followed by 4500 cGy to the entire breast at 180 cGy/d for 25 fractions. The local control for the 620 patients at 5 and 10 years was 93 and 89%, respectively. The actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years was 92 and 81%. The cosmetic results were good to excellent for 87% of the patients. Chemotherapy had no impact on local control in this study. Ir-192 implant is especially useful for deep tumors, making possible more flexibility in the techniques used to boost the tumor volume. Perioperative implantation has increased the accuracy of placing the boost dose, shortened the overall treatment time, and, for some patients, eliminated the need for rehospitalization and anesthesia.

Chest wall lesions of advanced breast carcinoma in 23 patients were treated with thermoradiotherapy with clinical intent between January 1987 and March 1992. Treatment consisted of external 915 MHz microwave hyperthermia with commercially available applicators and radiation therapy to doses between 32-58 Gy. Twenty-three large, diffuse lesions were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm depth. All lesions had failed previous therapy. The mean number of hyperthermia fields per patient was 3.2 +/- 0.4 (range of 2-7). The complete response rate was 91% in this group of extensive, diffuse lesions treated by the patchwork technique. Mean total radiation dose administered concurrently with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia was 42 +/- 1 Gy. The recurrence rate was 5%. The mean survival in patients who had a complete response was 9.0 +/- 1.3 months. The reduced survival among patchwork treated patients was due to the extensive tumor burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. The skin reactions were minor, causing minimal discomfort. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin, or of tumor recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that extensive, diffuse lesions of chest wall recurrence of advanced carcinoma of the breast can be treated effectively with multiple field patchwork thermotherapy.

Background: Between 1980-1990, 126 patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) and hyperthermia using 915-MHz external microwave applicators. All but 11 patients had failed to respond to previous therapy., Methods: The mean tumor volume was 73 +/- 13 cm3, and the mean radiation dose delivered was 45 +/- 1 Gy. Hyperthermia was administered biweekly in 83% of the fields in 5.5 +/- 0.2 sessions. Lesions were stratified by depth. The predictive influence of pretreatment or treatment parameters was analyzed for the probability of response by logistic regression and for the duration of local control by proportional hazards., Results: In tumors considered potentially heatable (i.e., < or = 3-cm deep), the complete response (CR) rate was 70%, whereas the CR rate for patients with tumors deeper than 3 cm was 18% (P < 0.0001). Among superficial lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth that exhibited a CR, 14 recurred (26%, 8.7 +/- 1.6 months), while 39 lesions were recurrence-free at last follow-up of 17.8 +/- 1.4 months. The 50% tumor-effective dose was 44 Gy. For superficial lesions that received between 30-60 Gy, the CR rate was 55% when the fraction size was less than 3 Gy, whereas it was 77% when the fraction size was 3-4 Gy (P = 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the model best correlating with CR included concurrent radiation dose (P = 0.006) and tumor volume (P = 0.02; model P = 0.0001). Multivariate proportional hazard analysis indicated that the model best correlating with duration of local control included tumor histology (P = 0.004; model P = 0.0007). The overall survival rate of patients with lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth who were treated with thermoradiation therapy was 16.1 +/- 1.2 months. For patients with lesions more than 3-cm deep, survival was 8.7 +/- 1.1 months (P < 0.001). Forty-two fields were treated without any skin reactions (33%), 59 exhibited erythema (47%), and 25 experienced thermal blistering (20%)., Conclusions: Treatment of superficial malignant tumors can benefit from the adjuvant use of hyperthermia delivered with external 915-MHz applicators provided tumors are less than 3 cm from the surface and the lateral margins are within the 50% specific absorption rate (SAR) on the surface.

Two hundred forty-five women (250 breasts) with early-stage breast cancer were treated between June 1982 and June 1990 with lumpectomy, immediate (boost) interstitial iridium-192 to 15-20 Gy, and external-beam irradiation to the entire breast to 45-50 Gy. There were 123 stage I cancers (T1N0M0), 123 stage II cancers (36 T1N1, 50 T2N0, 33 T2N1, four T3N0), and four stage III cancers (two T2N2, two T3N1). At a median follow-up of 69 months (range, 26-122 months), there were 14 recurrences in the treated breasts. Four were at the site of primary disease, eight were in other quadrants, and two were in both. With immediate interstitial boost, the 11-year actuarial recurrence rate in the breast is 7.7% and the recurrence rate at the site of primary disease is 3.2%.

It is important that physicians be aware of the current theories on the etiology of breast cancer. This article reviews some of the more probable etiologic factors of breast cancer.

Irradiation has been used to treat cancer of the breast since 1895. Over the period between 1895 to the present, the therapeutic use of irradiation has evolved from a cauterizing agent to a sophisticated use of theory and practice to cause tumor cell death while at the same time producing maximum normal tissue sparing. The use of radiation has made it possible for the surgeon to use conservative breast sparing surgery to obtain excellent cosmetic results, while at the same time producing a local control equal to that of mastectomy. For the patient, conservative surgery becomes a better option than mastectomy because it not only produces local control equal to that of mastectomy, but gives the wonderful added benefit of a more superior and pleasing cosmetic result.

Treatment planning of the electron boost in breast irradiation at this institution is performed by using information from CT scanning and from surgical clips used to define the tumor bed. A refinement of this technique, taking into account the surgical axis of approach, using computer-CT planning is now implemented. The location of the scar and the clips are digitized using a computer to define the tumor bed dimensions. With 3-D computer software a line, simulating the surgical axis and the central ray of the electron beam, is drawn between the deepest clip and the surgical scar. This beam's eye view along the surgical axis is projected onto a screen as a starting point. Appropriate gantry angle, treatment table position, beam energy, and precise shaping of the electron field borders with a 2 cm margin around the clips and the scar are determined. Simulation films comparing clinically set-up fields and computer-CT planned fields were reviewed. In only 5 of 17 patients did the clinically set-up field have adequate inclusion of the tumor bed within the treatment volume. Computer-CT planned fields ensured adequate inclusion of the tumor bed in all, including the remaining 12. In 7 patients obvious increased sparing of normal breast tissue was seen with computer-CT planned fields. This technique enables accurate placement of a shaped electron field and further refinement of electron boost treatment planning. This is especially true in situations in which the tumor bed is located at a site distant from the lumpectomy scar rather than directly beneath it and in cases where the tumor bed lies deep within the breast.

Patients with early breast cancer (T1-2 N0-1) can be treated by lumpectomy and irradiation with a local control and survival equal to more radical surgery. Between 1982 and 1988, 323 patients with early breast cancer were treated, when possible, with Ir-192 implants at the time of lumpectomy to a local dose of 2000 cGy in 40-50 hours. Ten to 14 days later, the whole breast was treated to 4500 cGy at 180 per fraction in 5 weeks. The 6-year actuarial survival for stages I and II disease was 98% and 91%, respectively, and the recurrence-free survival was 96% and 98%, respectively. When these 323 patients were evaluated by T status, a local control of 97% was the same for T1 and T2 lesions. The cosmetic results were good to excellent in 95% of the patients. This approach has improved our ability to accurately place the boost dose in the breast.

The preponderance of evidence indicates that lumpectomy plus radiation therapy produces the same survival as modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer and further suggests that the local failure rate may be lower in the patients who undergo irradiation. In this series, patients were treated with immediate implantation of the tumor bed with iridium Ir 192. There have been two recurrences in the breast from 110 breast cancers (44% had a clinical stage greater than T1, and 41% had axillary-node involvement) in 107 patients followed up for four to 52 months (25.8 +/- 13.3 months [mean +/- SD]). These preliminary data suggest that local treatment failure can be minimized by aggressive, immediate intraoperative implantation of the tumor bed with iridium Ir 192.

Conservation of the breast in early breast cancer with limited resection and radiation is proving to be as effective as modified radical mastectomy in survival and in loco-regional control. Management at the University of Kansas Medical Center consists of an interstitial implant at the time of lumpectomy to facilitate perioperative irradiation with Iridium-192 to the tumor bed. An axillary node dissection is also performed at that time. Two to 3 weeks later external beam irradiation is delivered to the entire breast. One hundred and twenty-three breasts in 120 patients have been treated between June 1982 and June 1986. There were 49 pathological Stage I, 63 Stage II, 8 Stage III carcinomas, and 3 carcinomas in situ, consisting of 72 T1, 43 T2, 5 T3, and 3 TIS lesions. Patients have been followed for a median of 30 months. One patient had a "true" recurrence in the breast. Another patient developed recurrence in a different quadrant. Ninety percent of the patients had good to excellent cosmetic results, 7% were considered fair, and 3% had poor results. Seven patients developed mild arm edema, 4 were found to have moderate edema, and 1 had severe arm edema. Our preliminary results indicate that interstitial irradiation immediately after excision results in excellent local control, with very satisfactory cosmesis and no morbidity due to the simultaneous excision and irradiation.

Limited resection of the breast combined with radiation has proved to be as effective as more radical surgery in treating early breast cancer. At the University of Kansas Medical Center, the radiotherapy consists of an interstitial implant at the time of lumpectomy to deliver an interstitial boost dose to the tumor bed with iridium-192 immediately following the surgical procedure. An axillary node dissection is also performed at the time of lumpectomy. A dose of 2,000 cGy is delivered to the tumor bed between 40 and 60 h. Two to three weeks later, 4,500-5,000 cGy is delivered to the entire breast with external beam radiation over 5-5.5 weeks. One hundred breasts in 98 patients were so treated between June 1982 and February 1986, with 2 carcinomas in situ, 40 stage I, 51 stage II, and 7 stage III cancers, consisting of 2 TIS, 54 T1, 39 T2, and 5 T3 lesions. Locoregional control with a median follow-up of 31 months was 98%. One recurrence was in a different quadrant, and the other revealed predominantly the in situ component. Immediate implant did not compromise wound healing or cosmesis. The cosmetic result was graded as good to excellent in 88% of the breasts. Our preliminary results appear to suggest a better local control with immediate interstitial irradiation.

Intraoperative interstitial implantation of iridium 192 during a lumpectomy for carcinoma of the breast has been well tolerated by the patient. This procedure has decreased the need for anesthesia and repeat hospitalization.

There is growing evidence in the world literature that radiation therapy plus lumpectomy produces survival rates equal to those of mastectomy for stage I and stage II breast cancer. The technique of using an interstitial implant at the time of lumpectomy could improve local control by increasing the accuracy of the interstitial implantation. It will certainly decrease hospital stay, anesthesia, and cost to the patient.

Preliminary results indicate that film dosimetry is a simple and precise method of determining volume dose distributions. Calculated dose distributions using computers or estimations of surface dose using TLD dosimeters are within 5% of the measured dose. Initial attempts to find suitable alternate techniques tailored to each clinical situation are encouraging.

Treatment of early breast cancer by lumpectomy and irradiation is well accepted. The five- and ten-year results of preservative treatment are comparable to more radical procedures. The technique of perioperative interstitial radiation has several advantages: (1) more accurate placement of the tubes in the tumor bed at the time of surgery; (2) implant volume is kept to a minimum, which improves cosmetic results; and (3) elimination of second general anesthesia for patients considered for implant boost therapy.Modified external radiation to regional lymphatics by combining electron and photon therapy at the 50 percent level can reduce side effects, such as skin reaction and esophagitis, and the dose to the heart, lungs, and opposite breast.

The effect of a silicone gel breast prosthesis on the absorbed dose distribution of 9-20 MeV electron beams and 1.25-15 MV photon beams was studied. Compared to water measurements, at depths smaller than the practical range of the electron beams, the central axis depth dose values below the prosthesis were lower for all energies by as much as 3.5%. However, at depths near the practical range, the central axis depth dose values for the prosthesis were greater than that of water by as much as 33%. Since this occurs near the end of the electron range, the resultant difference may not be clinically significant. Results of the effect of breast prosthesis on photon depth dose distributions reveal that no clinically significant perturbation is produced by the breast prosthesis using Co-60, 6- and 15-MV radiations.

Conservative management of early breast cancer with limited surgical excision and radiotherapy is now being accepted as a viable alternative to mutilating surgical procedures. In this paper, the major steps in the historical development of conservative management are traced, and the results of the current randomized trials are summarized. An innovative method used at the University of Kansas Medical Center delivers a "boost" dose to the tumor bed with interstitial Ir-192 immediately following resection of the primary tumor mass. The results obtained in terms of local control and cosmesis with this technique are presented, and the current state of the art is discussed.

One hundred-twelve females with stage I-III breast carcinoma were treated primarily with radical megavoltage irradiation. The loco-regional area received 50 Gy/5 weeks with a boost to the primary site of 10 Gy/1 week to 20 Gy/2 weeks. Local control rates were as follows: 94 per cent in stage I, 86 per cent in stage II and 69 per cent in stage III. Survival rates were comparable to those reported by other authors. Complications correlated with disease stage and extent of radiation fields.

Patients with operable breast cancer were treated at the University of Kansas Medical Center with lumpectomy, peri-operative interstitial Iridium, and external beam radiotherapy, and concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy in a majority of node positive cases. Examination of the cosmetic results in 85 breasts followed for at least 2 years, at a median of 41 months revealed 20% to be excellent, 44% to be very good, 24% good, 9% fair, and 4% to have poor results. In this paper cosmesis is analyzed with reference to the size of the primary, its location, age of the patient, whether the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy, and whether the regional nodes were treated. In this group of patients, the size and the site of the primary, patient's age, and whether adjuvant chemotherapy was administered or not, did not adversely affect the aesthetic outcome. Treatment of the regional nodes gave a worse mean cosmetic score compared to the group in whom only the breast was treated (37.51 vs. 58.98 respectively, p less than 0.001). Among the 11 patients with fair/poor cosmesis, all had regional nodal treatment, 7/11 had inner quadrant lesions, and 7/11 had lesions greater than T1. Further follow-up and accrual would be needed to confirm our results and affirm if other factors would change.

Between July 1, 1979 and March 1, 1984, we treated 154 women by irradiation as an alternative to mastectomy. Excision of the primary tumor without the sacrifice of a large volume of contiguous normal breast (lumpectomy) was performed, and all but ten women also underwent concomitant level I axillary node dissection. The mean node count in the level I dissection was 27 nodes, indicating that this dissection offered accurate information about axillary node status, so that the extent of radiation therapy and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy could be planned appropriately. Subdivision of the level I nodes into anatomic groups and their separate histologic analysis suggested that less than a complete level I dissection might miss involved nodes in almost one-half the patients with clinically negative axillae but histologically positive nodes. Postoperative complications occurred in 13% of patients, not an insignificant number, most of them being either infections or the persistent accumulation of lymph in the axillary wound. Later complications, such as infection or arm edema, also occurred, just as after mastectomy. The median follow-up of these 154 patients has been only 12 months, the maximum being not quite 5 years, so that any long-term speculations are not justified. We believe that the continued use of this combination therapy is warranted preceding irradiation by lumpectomy and level I axillary dissection as described, with careful follow-up to assess the long-term results of this option.

Radiation therapy will continue to play a major role in the curative management of patients with mammary carcinoma. For this reason, a comparison was made of the dose distributions and techniques used by several leading institutions in the treatment of the chest wall and internal mammary nodes. The dose distributions within the treatment volumes were similar. However, some unique differences within the treatment volume, as well as in the skin and superficial tissues were found.

This report describes 150 patients with clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the breast treated at four institutions--Yale University School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School-Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Hahnemann Medical College, Jefferson Medical College--with radiotherapy only following excisional biopsy. Closely similar treatment policies were followed at all four centers, 4500-5000 rads minimum tumor dose being delivered to the entire breast and axillary, supraclavicular and internal mammary nodes. Forty-six of 49 stage I patients treated are alive without disease, the actuarial relapse-free survival being 91% at 5 years. Of the 101 stage II patients, 75 are alive without disease with a relapse-free actuarial survival of 60% at 5 years. Local failure has occurred in 10 patients (9 stage II and 1 stage I, 6.6%) 5 of whom are disease-free following mastectomy. The results obtained in this study are comparable to those of conventional surgery. It is our conclusion that mastectomy is not a necessary part of the treatment of small breast cancers, that radiation without mastectomy is an acceptable alternative with far superior cosmetic and functional results. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered particularly in stage II patients in view of their 40% relapse rate.