Search

Purpose: To compare two doses of letrozole and megestrol acetate (MA) as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens., Patients and Methods: Five hundred fifty-one patients with locally advanced, locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 174), letrozole 0.5 mg (n = 188), or MA 160 mg (n = 189) once daily in a double-blind, multicenter trial. Data were analyzed for tumor response and safety variables up to 33 months of follow-up evaluation and for survival up to 45 months., Results: Letrozole 2.5 mg produced a significantly higher overall objective response rate (24%) compared with MA (16%; logistic regression, P = .04) or letrozole 0.5 mg (13%; P = .004). Duration of objective response was significantly longer for letrozole 2.5 mg compared with MA (Cox regression, P = .02). Letrozole 2.5 mg was significantly superior to MA and letrozole 0.5 mg in time to treatment failure (P = .04 and P = .002, respectively). For time to progression, letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to letrozole 0.5 mg (P = .02), but not to MA (P = .07). There was a significant dose effect in overall survival in favor of letrozole 2.5 mg (P = .03) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg. Letrozole was significantly better tolerated than MA with respect to serious adverse experiences, discontinuation due to poor tolerability, cardiovascular side effects, and weight gain., Conclusion: The data show letrozole 2.5 mg once daily to be more effective and better tolerated than MA in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens.

The effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on total dose and dose intensity of standard oral adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy were studied in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Treatment consisted of standard CMF and locoregional radiotherapy (on indication). G-CSF was administered if the leukocyte count recovery was insufficient. Fifty-one patients required no G-CSF ("no cytopenia'), and 50 patients received G-CSF ("G-CSF). Twenty-two patients, however, received no G-CSF support despite insufficient leukocyte recovery ("control'). Following G-CSF, leukocyte recovery was adequate in 83% of the chemotherapy cycles. The proportion of the patients who had a dose intensity > or = 85% was 90% in the "no cytopenia' group, 74% in the "G-CSF' group, and 45% in "control' group (p < 0.05). Leukocyte recovery was adequate in 87% of the chemotherapy cycles in the patients who received radiotherapy as compared with 92% of those in the patients without radiotherapy (p < 0.05). In conclusion an adequate leukocyte recovery after G-CSF was found in 83% of all chemotherapy cycles. The dose intensity of the G-CSF group was higher as compared with controls. The impact of radiotherapy on hematological recovery was significant, but not dependent on G-CSF.

A simple cytological scoring system was evaluated as a method of predicting histological grade and disease-free survival in 79 patients with primary breast cancer. The mitotic activity index and oestrogen receptor status were also assessed for their predictive value. The concordance between cytological scores and histological grades was good (80%) for low-grade lesions, but poor (45%) for high-grade lesions. Similar results were found using the mitotic activity index as a prognostic indicator. Cytological grading was not found to be an independent prognostic indicator after a median follow up of 8 years.

The efficacy and side-effects of megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were compared in a prospectively randomized study. The dosage of MA was 2 X 80 mg p.o. or MPA 2 X 500 mg p.o. daily, given as a secondary hormonal treatment, mostly after previous treatment with tamoxifen. Ninety-eight patients entered the study and 92 were evaluable for effect, 48 patients on MA and 44 on MPA. Age, main tumor site and prior treatment were not different, but there was a preponderance of ER-negative tumors in the MA group. Responses appeared to be more frequent in the MPA-treated group (25% vs. 43%), predominantly in bone lesions, 12% for MA and 45% for MPA. Median progression-free survival was comparable, 15 vs. 10 months, and overall survival was not different (20 vs. 16 months). Toxicity was frequent, occurring in 83% vs. 74% of patients: increased appetite, nausea and dizziness in more than 20%, and a preponderance of pyrosis and breathlessness on MA and hot flashes, sweating and tremors on MPA. Cushingoid symptoms were present in about a quarter of the patients treated for more than 3 months. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic episodes and cardiovascular events was evenly distributed. Patients on MPA had more often increase in body weight, systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine than those treated with MA. It is concluded that MPA may be more effective for treatment of bone metastases, at the expense of more progestational side-effects. The occurrence of Cushingoid effects is frequent but similar in both arms, while the incidence of cardiovascular or thrombo-embolic events cannot be related to the use of either compound.

In a prospective randomized multicenter study in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, the response to treatment with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 300 mg three times daily was compared with tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg twice daily. Of 61 patients treated with MPA, 27 (44%) had a partial or complete remission, 6 showed no change, and 28 had progressive disease. Of 68 patients treated with TAM, 24 (35%) showed a remission, 15 no change, and 29 progression. The difference in response rate is not significant. However, 11 of 25 patients with osseous metastases as predominant site, responded to MPA and 7 of 31 to TAM (P = 0.05). Moreover, in patients older than age 70 years, 13 of 26 responded to MPA and 6 of 31 to TAM (P less than 0.05). Median duration of remission of all patients in the MPA arm was 17 months and in the TAM arm, 23 months (not significant). Median survival was 20 months for MPA and 26 months for TAM (not significant). After cross-over from TAM to MPA 8 of 31 patients responded and after cross-over from MPA to TAM, no response was seen in 27 patients. These data indicate that the response rate and duration to MPA and TAM are comparable, except in patients with osseous metastases and in patients older than age 70 years. MPA has more side effects, but seems to be more effective after cross-over, and may thus be reserved for second-line treatment.