Search

Patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD who have a positive interim FDG-PET (iPET) have a poor prognosis. Escalation to BEACOPP has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS). However, randomized trials are lacking to determine the best strategy for intensification. We report on A-AVD escalation treatment outcomes for 15 iPET-positive patients post-ABVD. Overall response and complete response rates were 80% and 60%, respectively. Four patients underwent salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. At a median 17-month follow-up, all patients are alive, 87% in complete remission, and 1-year PFS was 57.8%. For patients ineligible for BEACOPP due to age, comorbidities, or preference, A-AVD escalation may be a viable alternative., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD30 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with chemotherapy in children with refractory or relapsed classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R cHL). Methods: Clinical data (including age, gender, B symptoms, clinical stage, previous treatment, etc.) of the 10 R/R cHL children diagnosed and treated at Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from October 2021 to August 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different intensity of chemotherapy drugs, the dose of BV applied in the same course of treatment was 1.8 mg/kg for BV applied once every 3 weeks, and 1.2 mg/kg for BV applied once every 2 weeks. All 10 patients received at least 2 cycles of BV combined with chemotherapy and were evaluated every 2 cycles. The patients were followed up until May 31, 2024. The infusion reactions and adverse reactions after treatment were recorded. Results: In all 10 patients, there were 7 males and 3 females, the age ranged from 5.3-16.9 years, and there were 6 cases of refractory and 4 cases of relapsed. There were 6 cases of nodular sclerosis type, 2 cases of mixed cell type, 1 case of lymphocyte-rich type, and 1 case of lymphodepletion type. There were 5 cases of stage Ⅳ and 5 cases of stage Ⅲ. Previous treatment was mainly chemotherapy, 4 cases received radiotherapy and 1 case received programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody therapy. The follow-up time ranged from 9 to 27 months. A total of 43 courses with 49 doses of BV alone or combined with chemotherapy were recorded, and the number of courses was 2 to 10 times. All 10 children responded to the treatment, and 9 achieved complete remission. BV infusion was successfully completed in all cases. A total of 28 cases of grade 3 or above adverse events were recorded, mainly myelosuppression, all of which were related to chemotherapy and did not affect sequential treatment. Conclusion: Brentuximab vedotin has demonstrated efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in the treatment of refractory and relapsed CD30-positive Hodgkin's lymphoma in children.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV), a conjugate of anti-CD30 antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, has emerged as a promising treatment option for refractory CD30+ mycosis fungoides (MF) and primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (pcALCL). BV has been shown to be safe and effective in treating Hodgkin's lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. This multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase I/II study evaluated the efficacy of BV in Japanese patients with CD30+ cutaneous lymphomas, namely CD30+ cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Participants were divided into two groups: those with CD30+ MF or pcALCL (cohort 1, n = 13) and those with CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders other than those in cohort 1 (cohort 2, n = 3). The studied population included the full analysis set (FAS), modified FAS (mFAS), and safety analysis set (SAF). These sets were identified in cohorts 1 and 1 + 2 and labeled FAS1 and FAS2, mFAS1 and mFAS2, and SAF1 and SAF2, respectively. Each treatment cycle lasted 3 weeks, and BV was continued for up to 16 cycles after the third cycle based on treatment response. The primary endpoint was the 4-month objective response rate (ORR4) determined by the Independent Review Forum (IRF). ORR4 was 69.2% for FAS1 and 62.5% for FAS2 (P < 0.0001). Secondary endpoints of ORR, assessed using the global response score (53.8% in FAS1) and modified severity-weighted assessment tool (62.5% in FAS1), using the IRF, provided results comparable to the primary findings. The incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse events (≥15%) in SAF1 was peripheral neuropathy in three patients (23%) and fever and eosinophilia in two patients (15%). In conclusion, BV showed favorable efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, Japan (protocol ID: UMIN000034205)., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has obtained approval for the therapeutic management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma as well as systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Given the inherent constraints of conventional clinical trials, the correlation between BV and cardiac adverse events (AEs) remains enigmatic. The objective of this investigation is to comprehensively assess cardiac AEs attributed to BV by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The indices for the assessment of disproportionality encompass the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio, the information component, and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean. Employing these sophisticated metrics, we gauged the extent of disproportionate occurrences. The dataset was sourced from the FAERS from the first quarter of 2012 to first quarter of 2023, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the potential correlation between BV and cardiac AEs. This scrutiny encompassed a comparative analysis of both cardiac and non-cardiac AEs. A total of 495 cases of BV's cardiac AEs were discerned, with the identification of 31 preferred terms (PTs). Among these, 8 PTs emerged as conspicuous signals of cardiac AEs, notably encompassing ventricular hypokinesia (ROR 7.59), tachyarrhythmia (ROR 7.06), sinus tachycardia (ROR 6.18), cardiopulmonary failure (ROR 4.44), pericardial effusion (ROR 4.32), acute coronary syndrome (ROR 4.02), cardiomyopathy (ROR 3.30), and tachycardia (ROR 2.76). The manifestation of severe outcomes demonstrates a discernible correlation with the cardiac AEs (P < 0.001). Our investigation furnishes invaluable insights for healthcare practitioners to proactively mitigate the incidence of BV-associated cardiac AEs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a common secondary malignancy after transplantation, which has been recognized as a life-threatening complication. Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)-type PTLD is the rarest of four subtypes of PTLD, which has no treatment guideline due to its rarity. HL-type PTLD includes classical HL-type PTLD (cHL-PTLD) and HL-like PTLD. In our study, we reported the case of successful treatment using brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus sirolimus for a patient with classical HL-type PTLD in detail. Lymph node biopsy showed a picture of classical HL with mixed cellularity subtype, and immunophenotyping suggested CD30 strong positivity. Due to his impaired physical condition, we decided against intensive chemotherapy and started BV treatment with immunosuppressive agents switched to sirolimus. The 66-year-old patient with cHL-PTLD had achieved a durable complete remission for over a 1-year follow-up period. Additionally, we analyzed the clinical profile and outcomes in PTLD patients who used BV monotherapy or combined therapy by literature review. In summary, this case-based review might provide clues that treatment of cHL-PTLD with new modalities such as BV monotherapy or combination therapy, together with improvements in the immunosuppressive regimens like sirolimus, might be a feasible and chemotherapy-free approach, but warrants further evaluation in a larger patient cohort., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Purpose: Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent complication of brentuximab vedotin (BV), used in CD30+ lymphoma treatment. Classic BV-induced neuropathy (BV-CN) is a mild distal sensory axonal polyneuropathy. Severe BV-induced inflammatory neuropathies (BV-IN) have been described. BV-IN contribute to lymphoma-associated morbidity but might be immunotherapy-responsive. Our primary objective was to evaluate the rate of BV-IN. Our secondary objectives were to determine risk factors and warning signs., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients treated with BV at our center between April 2014 and September 2021. Clinical, biological, and electrophysiological data were collected. BV-induced neuropathy was defined as the occurrence of neuropathy up to 3 months after BV discontinuation. BV-IN was defined with criteria adapted from European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society 2021 electrodiagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Other neuropathies were classified as BV-CN., Results: Among 83 patients, 41 (49%) developed neuropathy: 35 BV-CN and 6 BV-IN. Thus, the rate of BV-IN was 7.2%. Compared to patients with BV-CN, no predisposing factor was identified. However, patients with BV-IN more frequently presented muscle weakness (67% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.05), gait disorders (83% vs. 20%, p < 0.05), or acute or subacute onset (67% vs. 14%, p < 0.05). BV-IN was frequently more severe (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3; 50% vs. 0%, p < 0.05). Four patients were treated with immunotherapy., Conclusions: Brentuximab vedotin-induced neuropathy is an overlooked complication. Based on four easily identifiable "red flags", we provide an algorithm to help non-neurologist physicians that care for BV-treated patients to detect BV-IN. The aim of the algorithm is to decrease the diagnostic and management delay of this disabling neuropathy., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

This report presents a case involving a woman aged >65 years who had been diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma 3 years prior. The patient was hospitalized with enlarged inguinal lymph nodes, and pathological examination revealed that the lymphoma had transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After two cycles of brentuximab vedotin in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (BV-R-CHP) chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete remission. This treatment was followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance therapy. At the last follow-up, the patient had been in continuous remission for 24 months. This case study suggests that the utilization of BV and R-CHP in conjunction can result in rapid remission, and it can be followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. This treatment approach exhibits potential as a viable option for older individuals with transformed lymphoma.

The standard management for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This strategy allows almost 50% of patients to be cured. Post-ASCT maintenance treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) confers improved progression-free survival (PFS) to cHL patients at high risk of relapse. We investigated the outcome of 105 cHL patients receiving post-ASCT BV maintenance in the real-life setting of 23 Italian hematology centers. This population included naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV. Median follow-up was 20 months. Patients presented a median of two lines of treatment pre-ASCT, with 51% receiving BV. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least two high-risk factors (refractory disease, complete response [CR] less than 12 months, extranodal disease at relapse), while 16% presented none. At PET-CT, a Deauville score (DS) of 1-3 was reported in 75% and 78% of pre- and post-ASCT evaluations, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), mainly peripheral neuropathy, were observed in 16% of patients. Three-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 62% and 86%, respectively. According to BV exposure, 3-year PFS and OS were 54% and 71%, respectively, for naïve and 77% and 96%, respectively, for previously exposed patients. Refractory disease (hazard ratio [HR] 4.46; p = 0.003) and post-ASCT DS 4-5 (HR 3.14; p = 0.005) were the only two factors significantly associated with PFS reduction in multivariable analysis. Post-ASCT BV maintenance is an effective, safe treatment option for cHL naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV., (© 2021 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: It has been reported that levels of soluble CD30 in serum and joint fluid are significantly elevated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to investigate whether CD30 could be a therapeutic target for RA., Methods: The expression and localization of CD30 were examined by immunohistochemical and double immunofluorescence staining on synovial tissue samples obtained from patients with RA or osteoarthritis (OA) during surgery. Changes in CD30 expression of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) from RA patients with or without TNFα and IL-1β stimulation were examined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and flow cytometry. Collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) was created in DBA/1 mice, and the therapeutic effect of brentuximab vedotin (BV) was examined by clinical score, histological findings and measurement of serum levels of SAA, IL-6, and TNFα., Results: CD30 expression was significantly higher in samples from patients with RA than from those with OA. Double immunofluorescence showed a low rate of co-localization of CD30 with CD20 or CD90, but a high rate of co-localization of CD30 and CD138. CD30 mRNA expression was upregulated 11.7-fold in FLS following stimulation by inflammatory cytokines. The clinical scores of CAIA mice were significantly lower following both BV treatments, however, the histological scores of CAIA mice were significantly lower only following treatment with high dose BV (70 mg/kg)., Conclusions: CD30 was expressed on immunocompetent cells in synovial tissue from RA patients and in cytokine-stimulated FLS in vitro. High dose BV (70 mg/kg) showed significant therapeutic effects in ameliorating inflammation and joint destruction in CAIA mice, but low dose BV (30 mg/kg) was insufficient., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Aims: To support reimbursement requests in Canada, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A + CHP) compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) as frontline treatment for CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) using results from the ECHELON-2 clinical trial. The PTCL subtypes included were systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL)., Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival [PFS], post-progression survival [PPS], and death) was constructed from the perspective of the Canadian publicly funded healthcare system over a lifetime horizon. Efficacy, safety, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data were obtained from ECHELON-2. Medical resource use and costs were derived from Canadian literature and standard sources. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty in key parameters. All costs are reported in Canadian dollars., Results: A + CHP, when compared with CHOP, was associated with an estimated mean gain of 2.90 LYs and 2.38 QALYs and a mean incremental cost of $76,491. The ICER for A + CHP compared with CHOP was estimated at $26,340 per LY gained and $32,177 per QALY gained. In sensitivity analyses, the ICERs remained below $60,000 per QALY gained. Time horizon, patient starting age, and discount rate affected the results, as the ICER was driven by long-term survival gains observed with A + CHP compared with CHOP., Limitations: Real-world downstream treatments (such as stem cell transplantation) may differ from the treatment protocol followed in the ECHELON-2 trial., Conclusions: A + CHP compared with CHOP provides a cost-effective treatment option with improved clinical outcomes that are clinically relevant and a comparable safety profile for adults with previously untreated CD30-expressing sALCL, PTCL-NOS, or AITL in Canada.

Background CD-30 is highly expressed in some patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed to CD-30. We report a phase 2 trial of brentuximab vedotin in patients with chemo-refractory GCT. Patients and methods This is a single arm, two cohort phase 2 trial investigating brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicities in patients with relapsed GCT who have no curative options. Patients with mGCT who progressed after first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy and after at least 1 salvage regimen (high-dose or standard-dose chemotherapy) were eligible. CD30 expression was assessed and two cohorts defined: CD30 positive and CD30 negative/unknown. Results 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 34.7 (range, 23-56). All patients had non-seminoma. Median AFP 4.9 (range, 1-219,345) and hCG 282 (range, 0.6-172,064). Five patients had late relapse (> 2 years). Median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range, 2-7). Ten patients received prior high-dose chemotherapy. Seven patients had positive CD30 staining. There were two grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. No partial or complete responses were observed. 6 patients achieved radiographic stable disease (range, 9-14.9 weeks), 5 had elevated AFP or hCG at trial entry and all 5 had transient > 50% decline in baseline AFP/hCG: 4 had CD30 -ve and 2 had CD30 + ve staining; 10 patients had progression of disease as their best response; 2 were not evaluable for response. Conclusion Brentuximab vedotin does not appear to have clinically meaningful single-agent activity in patients with refractory GCT., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The AETHERA trial reported an increased progression-free survival (PFS) when brentuximab vedotin (BV) was used as maintenance therapy in high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Thus, we aimed to determine the impact and safety of BV as maintenance after ASCT in real-world patients. Seventy-five patients with relapsed/refractory HL started on BV consolidation therapy after ASCT due to high risk of relapse, between January 2016 and July 2019, from 25 institutions, were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 26 months. The most common high-risk features were primary refractory or relapsed disease <12 months (n = 61), lack of complete response (CR) to the last salvage regimen (n = 51), and having had at least two salvage regimens (n = 29). At the time of analysis, 42 patients completed consolidation courses, and BV was discontinued in 33 patients. Fifty patients had an ongoing response (CR in 41, PR in 6, and SD in 3 patients), 25 had progressed. Ten died in the follow-up, eight with progressive disease and two due to infection while in CR. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 67.75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.77) and 87.61% (95% CI: 0.76-0.94), respectively. Seventeen patients (23%) received BV in the pre-ASCT treatment lines, and there was no survival difference between the BV-naïve and BV-exposed groups. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (27%) and peripheral neuropathy (21%). Sixteen patients (21.3%) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. BV was discontinued due to adverse event in 12 patients. Consolidation with BV after ASCT can achieve a 2-year PFS of 67.75% (95% CI: 0.55-0.75) with an acceptable toxicity profile., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, can lead to disfiguring lesions, debilitating pruritus and frequent skin infections. This study assessed response to brentuximab vedotin in patients with MF in the phase III ALCANZA study., Methods: Baseline CD30 levels and large-cell transformation (LCT) status were centrally reviewed in patients with previously-treated CD30-positive MF using ≥2 skin biopsies obtained at screening; eligible patients required ≥1 biopsy with ≥10% CD30 expression. Patients were categorised as CD30 min  < 10% (≥1 biopsy with <10% CD30 expression), or CD30 min  ≥ 10% (all biopsies with ≥10% CD30 expression) and baseline LCT present or absent. Efficacy analyses were the proportion of patients with objective response lasting ≥4 months (ORR4) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Clinical activity with brentuximab vedotin was observed across all CD30 expression levels in patients with ≥1 biopsy showing ≥10% CD30 expression. Superior ORR4 was observed with brentuximab vedotin versus physician's choice in patients: with CD30 min  < 10% (40.9% versus 9.5%), with CD30 min  ≥ 10% (57.1% versus 10.3%), with LCT (64.7% versus 17.6%) and without LCT (38.7% versus 6.5%). Brentuximab vedotin improved median PFS versus physician's choice in patients: with CD30 min  < 10% (16.7 versus 2.3 months), with CD30 min  ≥ 10% (15.5 versus 3.9 months), with LCT (15.5 versus 2.8 months) and without LCT (16.1 versus 3.5 months). Safety profiles were generally comparable across subgroups., Conclusion: These exploratory analyses demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin improved rates of ORR4 and PFS versus physician's choice in patients with CD30-positive MF and ≥1 biopsy showing ≥10% CD30 expression, regardless of LCT status., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01578499., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Y.H.K. reports advisory roles for Seagen and Takeda. H.M.P. reports advisory board for and grants or funds from Takeda. D.F. reports advisory roles for Kyowa Kirin. S.M.H. reports consulting fees from ADC Therapeutics, C4 Therapeutics, Celgene, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Myeloid Therapeutics, Seagen, Takeda, Verastem and Vividion Therapeutics, and research grants or funds from ADC Therapeutics, Aileron, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Forty Seven, Inc., Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium/Takeda, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Seagen, Trillium Therapeutics and Verastem. M.D. reports research funding from Takeda and Millennium for this study, Seagen for a physician IST, and institutional funding from Solenginex, miragene, Rhizen and Eisai. O.B. reports consulting fees from Novartis, BMS, Sanofi, Pierre, Fabre and MSD. J.A.S. reports speaker’s bureau, and consultancy/advisory roles for Takeda (Brazil). J.S. reports consulting fees from/Clinical Expert for Takeda. P.Q. reports advisory boards and speaker fee for Takeda, Kiowa, Therakos, Miragen, Helsinn-Recordati, Innate Pharma, 4SC and Actelion. P.L.Z. reports advisory roles for and honoraria from Merck, BMS, Servier, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead, Eusapharma, Roche, Debiopharm and Novartis. H.E. reports advisory roles for Abbvie and Genentech, honoraria from Abbvie, Genentech, Takeda and Pharmacyclics, grants or funds from Abbvie, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Acerta, Celgene and Astrazeneca. L.C.P-B. reports advisory roles for and honoraria from Seagen. P.L.O-R. reports advisory roles for Takeda, Helsinn, 4SC, Actelion, Innate Pharma, Recordati Rare Diseases, Kyowa and miRagen, grants or funds from MEDA, and PLCG1 mutation patent. O.E.A. reports advisory roles for Trillium Therapeutics, Bioniz, Kyowa Kirin and Meivir, and research grants or funds from Actelion, Adaptive Biotechnology, Trillium Therapeutics, Pfizer and Kyowa Kirin. J.T. reports research funding from Takeda, Celgene, Roche, Beigene, Janssen and PCYC. M.W. reports honoraria from Takeda and Kyowa Kirin, and research grants or funds from Millennium. J.W. reports advisory roles for Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, BMS, Abbvie, Novartis and Gilead, honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, Abbvie, Gilead and Novartis, grants or funds from Roche, GSK/Novartis, Takeda and Janssen-Cilag, and conference travel support from Roche. A.A.G. reports advisory roles for Seagen, Innate Pharma and StemLine Therapeutics, honoraria and grants or funds from StemLine Therapeutics, and consultancy fees from Innate Pharma and StemLine. L.B. reports employment for Zymeworks. M.C.P-W., J.L. and M.O. report employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Seagen. V.B. reports employment for Takeda Pharmaceuticals. M.L. reports employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. W.L.T. reports employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. R.D. reports intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dhome (MSD), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron and Alligator. S.W., R.S., P.W., K.T., and M.M. have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Approximately one-third of patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with Stage IV disease do not survive past 5 years. We present updated efficacy and safety analyses in high-risk patient subgroups, defined by Stage IV disease or International Prognostic Score (IPS) of 4-7, enrolled in the ECHELON-1 study that compared brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as first-line therapy after a median follow-up of 37.1 months. Among patients treated with A + AVD (n = 664) or ABVD (n = 670), 64% had Stage IV disease and 26% had an IPS of 4-7. Patients with Stage IV disease treated with A + AVD showed consistent improvements in PFS at 3 years as assessed by investigator (hazard ratio [HR], 0.723; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.537-0.973; p = 0.032). Similar improvements were seen in the subgroup of patients with IPS of 4-7 (HR, 0.588; 95% CI, 0.386-0.894; p = 0.012). The most common adverse events (AEs) in A + AVD-treated versus ABVD-treated patients with Stage IV disease were peripheral neuropathy (67% vs. 40%) and neutropenia (71% vs. 55%); in patients with IPS of 4-7, the most common AEs were peripheral neuropathy (69% vs. 45%), neutropenia (66% vs. 55%), and febrile neutropenia (23% vs. 9%), respectively. Patients in high-risk subgroups did not experience greater AE incidence or severity than patients in the total population. This updated analysis of ECHELON-1 shows a favorable benefit-risk balance in high-risk patients., (© 2021 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Standard treatment for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is poorly tolerated in older patients and results disappointing. We assessed safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin (BV), in previously untreated patients with cHL unfit for standard treatment due to age, frailty or comorbidity. The primary outcome was complete metabolic response (CMR) by positron emission tomography/computed tomography after four BV cycles (PET4). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In all, 35 patients with a median age of 77 years and median total Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score of 6 were evaluable for toxicity and 31 for response. A median of four cycles were given (range one-16). In all, 14 patients required dose reduction due to toxicity and 11 patients stopped treatment due to adverse events (AEs). A total of 716 AEs were reported, of which 626 (88%) were Grade 1/2 and 27 (77%) patients had at least one AE Grade ≥3. At PET4, CMR was 25·8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13·7-42.2%] and objective response rate 83·9% (95% CI 63·7-90·8%). Median PFS was 7·3 months (95% CI 5·2-9·0), and OS 19·5 months. Our results suggest that BV monotherapy is tolerable but suboptimal in the front-line therapy of elderly or comorbid patients with cHL. Combining BV with other agents may be more effective. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02567851., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was initially approved in Japan for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD30-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). As requested by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, we conducted a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study to assess the safety of BV in Japanese patients with R/R HL or sALCL. PMS forms were collected from 284 patients (182 with HL, 101 with sALCL and one with another lymphoma) treated between April and September 2014. The median age was 62 (range 14-93) years and the median number of treatment cycles was 5.5 for HL and 4 for sALCL. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 74.3% of patients. The most commonly observed ADRs included peripheral sensory neuropathy (39.1%; grade ≥ 3, 6.3%), neutropenia (34.5%; grade ≥ 3, 22.2%) and lymphopenia (7.0%; grade ≥ 3, 5.3%). Ten patients had fatal ADRs including interstitial lung disease (n = 3). This study showed that BV has an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients with R/R HL and R/R sALCL in the clinical practice setting. However, close monitoring rare, but potentially fatal, ADRs such as pulmonary toxicity may be warranted, especially in patients with prior or ongoing pulmonary disorders.

Purpose of Review: The standard of care for relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients is autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients in a first or second relapse. However, a significant number of patients with r/r HL are either medically ineligible for ASCT or relapse post-ASCT. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of r/r HL with the introduction of the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Nonetheless, despite excellent tolerability and high response rates, the large majority of patients will ultimately progress on these agents. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) has offered a potentially curative option for these patients, but high rates of morbidity and mortality have limited its application, and disease relapse is also common post-alloHCT. Thus, effective therapy for HL patients who fail BV and CPI therapy remains an unmet need. This review will cover different treatment strategies for HL patients in this setting with a focus on emerging new therapies., Recent Findings: Investigators have explored methods with the potential to restore sensitivity to BV and CPIs in patients who develop resistance. Additionally, promising new therapeutics are emerging, such as CD25-directed ADC therapy and CD30-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. While no consensus guidelines exist for the management of HL patients refractory to BV and checkpoint blockade, potential novel strategies and therapeutics are currently under investigation in hopes of expanding the treatment landscape for this challenging patient population.

Background: Treatment with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) is a well-established therapy for advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). However, the recently completed ECHELON-1 trial showed potential net clinical benefit for brentuximab vedotin (BREN+AVD) compared to ABVD as frontline therapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma. The objective of this analysis is to determine whether, on current evidence, BREN+AVD is cost-effective relative to ABVD as frontline therapy in patients with advanced HL., Methods: We constructed a probabilistic Markov model with two arms and six mutually exclusive health states, using six-month cycle lengths, and a 15-year time horizon. Time-dependent transition probabilities were calculated from 'real-world' data collected by the BC Cancer's Centre for Lymphoid Cancer database or from the literature for ABVD. Time-dependent transition probabilities for BREN+AVD were taken from the ECHELON-1 trial. We estimated the incremental cost and effects per patient of each therapy and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs were measured in 2018 Canadian dollars and effects measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A probabilistic analysis was used to generate a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC)., Results: The incremental cost between standard therapy with ABVD and therapy with BREN+AVD was estimated to be $192,336. The regimen of BREN+AVD resulted in a small benefit in terms of QALYs (0.46 QALYs). The estimated ICER was $418,122 per QALY gained. The probabilistic analysis suggests very few (8%) simulations fall below $100,000 per QALY. Even at a threshold of $200,000 per QALY gained, there was only a 24% chance that BREN+AVD would be considered cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses evaluating price reductions for brentuximab showed that these reductions needed to be in excess of 70% for this regimen to be cost-effective at a threshold of $100,000 per QALY., Conclusions: There may be a clinical benefit associated with BREN+AVD, but on current evidence the benefit is not adequately substantive compared to ABVD therapy given the cost of brentuximab vedotin. Agencies responsible for making decisions about BREN+AVD as frontline therapy for patients with advanced HL should consider whether they are willing to implement this treatment given the current uncertainty and cost-benefit profile, or negotiate substantial price-reductions from the manufacturer should they choose to reimburse.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV), a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, is US FDA approved for treatment of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after progression or relapse of at least two prior lines of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation, as consolidation therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk patients and as a front-line therapy for previously untreated, advanced-stage cHL in combination with chemotherapy. BV is a well-tolerated treatment in previously heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory cHL and in treatment-naive patients. BV use, in combination with other antineoplastic agents for cHL, is under investigation in multiple prospective clinical trials.

Background: Brentuximab vedotin was approved for adult patients with CD30-expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with prior systemic therapy based on improved response rates and progression-free survival with brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks; ≤16 cycles) versus physician's choice (methotrexate/bexarotene; ≤48 weeks) in the phase III ALCANZA study. Quality of life (QoL) in ALCANZA patients was also examined., Methods: QoL measures in ALCANZA were based on the Skindex-29, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and European QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires., Results: Mean maximum reduction from the baseline Skindex-29 symptom domain score (key secondary end-point) was greater with brentuximab vedotin than physician's choice (-27.96 versus -8.62); the difference, -18.9 (95% confidence interval -26.6, -11.2; adjusted p < 0.001), exceeded the study-defined minimally important difference (9.0-12.3). Mean changes from baseline to end-of-treatment visit total FACT-G scores were similar with brentuximab vedotin and physician's choice (0.15 versus -2.29). EQ-5D changes were also comparable between arms. Among brentuximab vedotin-treated patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN), mean maximum reduction in Skindex-29 symptom domain was -35.54 versus -11.11 in patients without PN. PN had no meaningful effect on FACT-G and EQ-5D QoL scores., Conclusions: In summary, brentuximab vedotin produced superior reductions in symptom burden compared with physician's choice, without adversely impacting QoL. QoL was unaffected by the presence of PN in brentuximab vedotin-treated patients., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01578499., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement S.W., P.W., J.A.S. and L.G. declare no conflicts of interest. R.D. reports intermittent, project-focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma and Sanofi. H.M.P. reports consultancy, advisory roles or honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Celgene and Eisai, and research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. S.M.H. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Affimed, Aileron Therapeutics, Merck Sharp and Dome, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Celgene, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Millennium, Innate Pharma, Verastem, Miragen Therapeutics, Inc. and Seattle Genetics, and research funding from ADCT Therapeutics, Aileron, Forty-Seven, Infinity/Verastem, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Celgene and Trillium. M.D. reports research funding and consultancy from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and Seattle Genetics, Inc. J.S. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Helsinn, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Innate Pharma, 4SC and Mallinckrodt. P.Q. reports advisory roles from 4SC, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Therakos, Innate Pharma and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. P.L.Z. reports consultancy, advisory and/or speakers bureau roles from Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, Sandoz, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Immune Design, Celgene, Portola, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Sanofi. H.E. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie and Pharmacyclics, honoraria from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and research funding from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, ATARA and Celgene. L.P.B. reports consultancy fees and honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. P.L.O.R. reports travel support from Janssen and Almirall, research support from MEDA, advisory roles from Takeda, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Actelion, 4SC, Innate Pharma and MiRagen, and a patent on the clinical use of PLCG1 mutation detection. O.E.A. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Trillium Therapeutics and Bioniz, and research funding from Trillium Therapeutics and Pfizer. A.H. reports advisory board participation from Precision Oncology. J.W. reports an advisory role for Roche, Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte and Abbvie, research funding from Roche, GSK/Novartis, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Janssen-Cilag, honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Janssen-Cilag and Servier, and conference travel support from Roche. Y.W., J.L., A.R. and J.F. report employment and stock ownership from Seattle Genetics, Inc. Y.Z., V.B., M.L., E.Z. and M.R.D. report employment from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Y.H.K. reports honoraria from Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Seattle Genetics, Inc., Medivir, Innate Pharma, Portola and Corvus, and research funding from Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Horizon, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Soligenix, MiRagen, Forty-Seven, Neumedicine, Innate Pharma, Portola, Trillium, Galderma and Elorac., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Methotrexate (MTX)-associated classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is unlikely to regress following discontinuation of MTX, and its treatment usually requires chemotherapy. Standard chemotherapy for CHL is the ABVD regimen, which contains pneumotoxic bleomycin. This can be problematic in MTX-CHL patients suffering from an autoimmune disease (AID), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as they frequently have pulmonary complications. However, brentuximab vedotin (BV)-containing chemotherapy without bleomycin (A + AVD regimen) was recently reported to show favorable efficacy for CHL, and could therefore be beneficial in MTX-CHL. We treated three cases of MTX-CHL using the A + AVD regimen. All were female and had received MTX for more than 15 years. Underlying AIDs in these patients were RA in two patients, and overlap syndrome with systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis in one patient. The A + AVD regimen resulted in a complete response in all patients. Peripheral neuropathy developed in two patients, necessitating reduction of the BV dose. All three patients experienced hematological toxicity necessitating dose reduction; however, no severe adverse effects, including infection or pulmonary complication, were documented. RA was well-controlled without additional immunosuppressants. The A + AVD regimen is a promising chemotherapy for MTX-CHL with favorable efficacy and tolerable toxicity profiles.

Data on the treatment of pediatric patients with brentuximab vedotin are limited. The aims of the present study were to assess the safety and tolerability of brentuximab vedotin in Japanese children with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) or systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (sALCL). Pediatric patients, aged 2-17 years, with relapsed or refractory HL or sALCL were recruited. Brentuximab vedotin were administered at 1.8 mg/kg via intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity and safety. Between September 2016, and March 2018, six patients (median age 11.5, range 5-14 years), four with relapsed or refractory HL and two with relapsed or refractory sALCL were enrolled. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed in any of the six patients. Although three of six patients (50%) experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 adverse event, no patient experienced a serious adverse event. The pharmacokinetic profile of brentuximab vedotin in pediatric patients was comparable to that reported in adults. The proportion of patients who achieved overall response was 60% (95% confidence interval 14.7-94.7). Brentuximab vedotin at 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks was considered tolerable in children with relapsed or refractory HL or sALCL.

Objectives : To assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) associated with brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients. Methods : Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials Databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing brentuximab vedotin with non-brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients. Results : A total of 2225 patients from 4 RCTs were included. Compared with the non-brentuximab vedotin group, the brentuximab vedotin group significantly increased the risk of all-grade AEs (RR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10), and high-grade AEs (risk ratio [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.01-1.58). The brentuximab vedotin group significantly increased the risk of all-grade peripheral sensory neuropathy (RR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.23-4.26), pyrexia (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), nausea (RR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.18), vomiting (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08-2.19), diarrhea (RR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.44-1.98), and alopecia (RR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39), respectively. The brentuximab vedotin group significantly increased the risk of high-grade sensory neuropathy (RR 4.79, 95% CI: 1.46-15.75), neutropenia (RR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01-2.18), nausea (RR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.37-5.12), vomiting (RR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.17-4.12), and diarrhea (RR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.21-2.85). Conclusion : Brentuximab vedotin increased the risk of certain AEs in lymphoma patients.

Purpose: The treatment outcome of brentuximab vedotin (BV) has not been related with CD30 expression in previous studies enrolling patients with a wide range of CD30 expression level. Thus, this study explored the efficacy of BV in high-CD30-expressing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients most likely to benefit., Materials and Methods: This phase II study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02280785) enrolled relapsed or refractory high-CD30-expressing NHL, with BV administered intravenously at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was > 40% disease control rate, consisting of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease. We defined high CD30 expression as ≥ 30% tumor cells positive for CD30 by immunohistochemistry., Results: High-CD30-expressing NHL patients (n=33) were enrolled except anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The disease control rate was 48.5% (16/33) including six CR and six PR; six patients (4CR, 2PR) maintained their response over 16 completed cycles. Response to BV and survival were not associated with CD30 expression levels. Over a median of 29.2 months of follow-up, the median progression-free and overall survival rates were 1.9 months and 6.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were fever (39%), neutropenia (30%), fatigue (24%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (27%). In a post-hoc analysis for the association of multiple myeloma oncogene 1 (MUM1) on treatment outcome, MUM1- negative patients showed a higher response (55.6%, 5/9) than MUM1-positive patients (13.3%, 2/15)., Conclusion: BV performance as a single agent was acceptable in terms of disease control rates and toxicity profiles, especially MUM1-negative patients.

Background: Outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remain poor. Novel therapies specifically targeting AML are of high interest. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that is specific for human CD30. In this phase 1 dose escalation study, the authors evaluated the safety of BV combined with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) re-induction chemotherapy for patients with CD30-expressing R/R AML., Methods: Using a standard dose escalation design, the authors evaluated 3 dose levels of BV (0.9 mg/kg, 1.2 mg/kg, and 1.8 mg/kg) administered once on day 1 followed by MEC on days 3 through 7., Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities noted and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose of BV was determined to be 1.8 mg/kg when combined with MEC. The side effect profile was similar to that expected from MEC chemotherapy alone, with the most common grade ≥3 toxicities being febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia (toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Among the 22 patients enrolled on the trial, the composite response rate was 36%, with a composite response rate of 42% noted among those who received the highest dose of BV. The median overall survival was 9.5 months, with a median disease-free survival of 6.8 months observed among responders. Approximately 55% of patients were able to proceed with either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or donor lymphocyte infusion., Conclusions: The combination of BV with MEC was found to be safe in patients with CD30-expressing R/R AML and warrants further study comparing this combination with the use of MEC alone in this population (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01830777)., Lay Summary: The outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) are exceptionally poor. New and emerging treatment combinations are actively being studied in an effort to improve outcomes. The authors examined the combination of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody product that recognizes a marker called CD30, with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC), a common chemotherapy regimen, in patients with R/R AML that expressed the CD30 marker. The authors found that the combination was safe and well tolerated. Future studies comparing this new combination with the use of MEC alone can help to inform its effectiveness for this patient population., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is the first approved novel agent for salvage treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In this study, a literature-based analysis was undertaken to assess, via an indirect treatment comparison, the comparative efficacy of BV to salvage chemotherapy as treatment for R/R cHL patients following ASCT. This comparative effectiveness research was undertaken to support a reimbursement submission for BV to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Retrospective analysis of individual patient data from four data sources demonstrated that the use of BV as first salvage treatment in cHL patients relapsing or progressing post-ASCT achieved improvements in both clinical response and overall survival. More specifically, BV was associated with an incremental improvement of 22% in overall response rate compared to salvage chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 92·2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 85·5-99·3%] and 32·2% (95% CI: 19·1-54·6%) respectively for BV, compared to 30·5% (95% CI: 22·2-42·0%) and 3·2% (95% CI: 1·1-8·9%) respectively for salvage chemotherapy. The encouraging results from this conservative analysis have the potential to support informed clinical management and funding decisions for the first salvage of cHL patients demonstrating recurrence after ASCT., (© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is considered a curable disease; however, approximately one-third of responders experience disease relapse following first-line therapy. Several studies have shown the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients with relapsed/refractory HL. We present a retrospective analysis of 58 patients with relapsed/refractory HL treated with BV in a named patient program from 11 centers. The median follow-up duration was 20 (range, 4-84) months. The best overall response rate was 64% (complete response [CR], 31%; partial response [PR], 33%). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.22) and 26% (95% CI, 0.16-0.38), respectively. Among patients who achieved CR, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS rates were 32% (95% CI, 0.13-0.54) and 60% (95% CI, 0.33-0.78), respectively. A total of 26 patients underwent subsequent stem cell transplantation. The 5-year PFS and OS rates for 10 patients who had consolidative stem cell transplantation were 28% and 30%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients required further therapy following BV. At the time of the analysis, 12 patients (21%) were alive. Five patients (9%) had long-term remission after achieving CR with BV monotherapy, with a median PFS of 76 months. Three of them (5%) did not receive any other treatment following BV and their median PFS was 75 months. Our long-term results showed that a small subset of patients with relapsed/refractory cHL may benefit from and even be cured with BV monotherapy.

Purpose of Review: The recent development of brentuximab vedotin (BV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD30-positive cells, has led to therapeutic advances in the treatment of T cell lymphomas. In this review, we discuss key studies of BV in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) and highlight important questions for further investigation., Recent Findings: Monotherapy with BV has proven to be effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD30-positive CTCL. BV has shown significant activity in R/R PTCL as well, with particularly durable responses in patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). In a landmark phase III study (ECHELON-2), BV + CHP demonstrated superior progression-free and overall survival relative to CHOP as frontline therapy for patients with CD30-expressing PTCL, representing the first randomized trial demonstrating an overall survival benefit in PTCL. Though BV is overall well tolerated, peripheral neuropathy remains a clinically significant adverse effect. BV is a major therapeutic advance in the treatment of patients with R/R CTCL and of those with PTCL in both the R/R and frontline settings. Key ongoing areas of investigation include optimization of CD30 expression as a predictive biomarker as well as the role of BV in consolidation therapy.

Although Hodgkin lymphoma is now among the most curable of the lymphomas, the relapse rate after the first-line treatment remains at 20-30%. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been developed for the treatment of newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), relapsed/refractory cHL, or consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation. Notably, BV treatment combined with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine treatment has been established as standard treatment for newly diagnosed advanced-stage cHL. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors represent another class of promising cancer immunotherapies that may be used to treat advanced cancers, including cHL. Anti-programmed death-1-blocking antibodies have been used to enhance immunity in cases of several malignancies and obtain durable responses, most notably in patients who have been administered heavy treatment for relapsed/refractory cHL. Several clinical trials, including single agents or combination therapies for cHL, have been developed or are currently under investigation. The results of the ongoing and future clinical trials may establish new paradigms for the treatment of cHL.

We present a patient with a 33-year history of poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides (MF) who subsequently developed CD30-positive large cell transformation. After 6 years of conventional MF treatment, side effects of therapy and/or concomitant diseases prevented the previously applied treatment modalities. The CD30-directed antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate (brentuximab vedotin) was introduced and followed by quick and excellent therapeutic response., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable hematologic malignancy. Relapsed/refractory (R/R) HL is an important clinical challenge, despite advances in treatment. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is highly effective in R/R HL in the western world. However, there are no real-world data on the use of BV in the Asian population. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV as salvage therapy in R/R HL patients in Taiwan. We recruited 20 R/R HL patients who received BV at National Taiwan University Hospital. BV was administered at 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The median number of systemic treatment received before BV was three. The overall response rate was 73.7% with a complete remission rate of 21.1% in R/R HL. Overall survival was not reached and progression-free survival was 6.8 months. BV could strengthen disease control before transplantation and improve post-transplant outcomes, even among those heavily pretreated patients, without significant overlapping toxicities with prior therapies. Our data suggest that BV is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of Asian patients with R/R HL. BV may offer long-term disease control in selected patients., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction : Outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma are excellent, and the intent of frontline therapy for even advanced-stage disease has been curative. This review summarizes the role of brentuximab vedotin in the upfront treatment of advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the context of reducing therapy-related toxicity without compromising the high cure rate. Areas covered : Strategies to reduce bleomycin-induced lung toxicity include a response-adapted approach investigated in the RATHL study and a replacement of bleomycin with brentuximab vedotin in frontline chemotherapy regimens. In both studies, omission of bleomycin in the non-standard arms decreased the rate of pulmonary toxicity while maintaining high progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Expert opinion : The approval of A+AVD in North America offers a new bleomycin-free regimen for the treatment of advanced-stage HL, but it must be balanced against a risk-adapted approach. Recently presented subset analyses raise a question about which patients benefit most from this therapy.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated effectiveness as a monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma via several clinical trials. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been performed as a second- or later-line regimen for improving the survival of patients with lymphoma. In particular, the effectiveness of autologous HSCT and the importance of achieving a complete response prior to autologous HSCT are established in Hodgkin lymphoma. Several clinical trials have reported that salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous HSCT showed high response rates, although significant treatment-related hematological toxicity was observed. In the present article, we review clinical reports for assessing the efficacy and safety of relatively less toxic BV as a bridging therapy before HSCT or as a consolidation therapy post-HSCT in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma or systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Generally, the reported BV regimens seem to be effective and well tolerated in such patients, and no significant influence of BV treatment is noted on hematopoietic stem cell harvest before HSCT. Large-scale clinical studies and long-term follow-up are expected to establish the safety and efficacy of these regimens.Funding: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

ECHELON-1 study is a randomized open-labeled controlled trial investigating whether addition of brentuximab vedotin to chemotherapy offers benefit over the standard chemotherapy regimen in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, it has met its primary endpoint the reduction of modified progression-free survival being 23 percent. However, the beneficial effects have not been seen across all subgroups leading to further questions. The main aim of this review is to tackle these questions to provide the reader with in-depth insight of pros and cons of this novel, promising but ultimately controversial regimen., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A 67-year-old man with an 11-year history of composite lymphoma was admitted with fevers in the context of neutropenia and acute liver injury, 4 months after the commencement of single-agent brentuximab vedotin. Fevers resolved with intravenous antibiotics, however, his liver function tests remained abnormal and he continued to be deeply jaundiced over the course of his 3-week illness. A liver screen failed to indicate a cause for his liver function test abnormalities and two separate liver biopsies were suggestive of drug-induced liver injury. There was no evidence on biopsy of lymphoma. After consultation with two hepatologists, trials of steroids and ursodeoxycholic acid were unsuccessful. Twenty-five days into admission, he became septic with a normal peripheral blood count and deteriorated rapidly. After discussion with the family, he was deemed not to be for further escalation of care, and he died within several hours. This report summarizes the evidence in relation to hepatotoxicity of brentuximab vedotin.

Purpose Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate used in the treatment of several types of lymphomas. Expression of the target antigen has also been reported on a variety of malignant tumors of nonlymphoid origin. This phase 2, open-label study evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of BV in patients with CD30-expressing nonlymphomatous malignancies. Methods Patients were dosed with 1.8 or 2.4 mg/kg BV once every three weeks. Antitumor activity was assessed at Cycles 2, 4, and every 4 cycles thereafter. Patients with stable disease or better were eligible to continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure. Results Of the 2693 patients screened, 3.8% had solid tumors with CD30 expression and 63 eligible patients with solid tumors enrolled in this study. The most common CD30 positive solid tumors were testicular cancer and mesothelioma. Both subtypes had more than one patient with an objective response. The median duration of BV exposure was 6.1 weeks. The disease control rate, defined as achieving stable disease or better at any point during the study, was 55%. The objective response rate was 11%, with a median duration of response of 2.92 months. The most common adverse events reported were fatigue (57%), nausea (33%), and decreased appetite (32%). Conclusion The safety profile of BV in patients with solid tumors was similar to the known safety profile of BV. In solid tumors, BV had modest activity as a single agent, which was similar to other second-line treatments already available to patients.

Post-marketing data regarding brentuximab vedotin (BV) are sparse. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and nature of significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients treated with BV in a real-world setting. We conducted a systematic retrospective study of patients treated with BV in a French university hospital. Significant ADRs were collected using the electronic patient records. Between January 2009 and December 2016, 39 patients received BV. Median age was 43.2 and 53.8% were males. Overall, 20 patients (51.3%) experienced at least one significant ADR and 24 reactions were reported in total. Twelve (50%) out of 24 ADRs were severe. The most frequently observed significant ADRs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and CMV reactivation. ADRs led to drug discontinuation for 4 patients and dose reduction for 6 patients. Only 29.2% of the events were spontaneously reported. Prospective monitoring is needed to better assess BV safety., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

In November 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brentuximab vedotin (BV) for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and PTCL not otherwise specified, in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP). Approval was based on ECHELON-2, a randomized, double-blind, actively controlled trial that compared BV+CHP with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in 452 patients with newly diagnosed, CD30-expressing PTCL. Efficacy was based on independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 48.2 months with BV+CHP versus 20.8 months with CHOP, resulting in a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.93). The trial also demonstrated improvement in overall survival (HR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46-0.95), complete response rate (68% vs. 56%), and overall response rate (83% vs. 72%) with BV+CHP. The most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) observed ≥2% more with BV+CHP were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue or asthenia, mucositis, pyrexia, vomiting, and anemia. Peripheral neuropathy rates were similar (52% with BV+CHP, 55% with CHOP). Through the Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program, which allows FDA early access to key data, FDA granted this approval less than 2 weeks after official submission of the application. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL). Improvement in progression-free and overall survival over cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy, which has been the standard of care for decades, is unprecedented. The new regimen represents a major advance for the frontline treatment of patients with CD30-expressing PTCL., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is associated with deep microenvironment re-shaping and myeloid dysfunction. Given that only limited data are available regarding the role of Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) as single agent in transplant-naive relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients and its off-target effects on immune system, we evaluated the amount of regulatory T-cells (T-regs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) subpopulations, and their functional marker, serum arginase-1 (s-Arg-1), in peripheral blood of 15 consecutive R/R HL patients. After a median of four BV cycles, the overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 47%, with 4 (27%) complete metabolic remissions. BV reduced the absolute number of three MDSC subtypes and s-Arg-1 levels. Patients with baseline s-Arg-1 ≥200 ng/ml had inferior progression-free survival at 36 months compared to those with low s-Arg-1. T-regs dysfunction was recovered by BV: absolute T-regs count was increased after treatment with BV, independently of metabolic response achieved, with a significant reduction of CD30 + T-regs. Our data disclose off-target effects of BV in the microenvironment that could explain its deep and durable clinical efficacy., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: In this work, we assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) as second-line therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL) to improve the results before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT)., Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II trial of patients with RRHL after first-line chemotherapy. Treatment had three 21-day cycles of etoposide, solumedrol, high-dose AraC, and cisplatin. BV was administered at three dose levels (0.9, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg) intravenous on day ‒1 to 3 + 3 cohorts of patients. Final BV dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Responding patients proceeded to ASCT, followed by three BV courses (1.8 mg/kg, every 21 days). Main end points for evaluation were maximum tolerable dose and overall and complete response (CR) before ASCT., Results: A total of 66 patients were recruited (median age 36 years; range 18-66): 40 were primary refractory, 16 early relapse and 10 late relapse. There were 39 severe adverse events were reported in 22 patients, most frequently fever (n = 25, 35% neutropenic), including 3 deaths. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity presented in 28 cases: neutropenia (n = 21), thrombocytopenia (n = 14), and anemia (n = 7). Grade ≥3-4 extrahematological adverse events (≥5%) were non-neutropenic fever (n = 13) and hypomagnesaemia (n = 3). Sixty-four patients underwent stem-cell mobilization; all collected >2×10e6/kg CD34+ cells (median 5.75; range 2.12-33.4). Overall response before transplant was 91% (CI 84% to 98%), including 70% (CRs 95% CI 59% to 81%). 60 patients were transplanted with no failure engraftments. Post-transplant response was CR in 49 patients (82% CI 73% to 91%) and partial responses in six (10% CI 5% to 15%). After a mean follow-up of 27 months, the 30-month time to treatment to failure was 74% (95% CI 68% to 80%), progression-free survival 71% (95% CI 65% to 77%), and overall survival 91% (CI 84% to 98%)., Conclusion: BRESHAP looks a safe and effective pre-transplant induction regimen, does not jeopardize transplant and allows long-term remissions and survival., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Taçyıldız N, Tanyıldız HG, Ünal E, Dinçaslan H, Asarcıklı F, Adaklı Aksoy B, Vatansever G, Yavuz G. A targeted salvage therapy with Brentuximab vedotin in heavily treated refractory or relapsed pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients before and after stem cell transplantation. Turk J Pediatr 2019; 61: 671-676. Hodgkin`s lymphoma (HL) is highly curable disease in its early stages, but in advanced stages, it presents a dilemma when it becomes refractory or relapses after several rounds of chemotherapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets the tumor necrosis receptor family protein member CD30 positive malignancies via an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody linked to monomethyl auristatin-E. In adult and pediatric studies, it has been shown to be an effective salvage therapy for primary refractory HL or relapse after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Between July 2012 and August 2017, we administered BV (1.8 mg/m2 every three weeks; 12 cycles totally) with doxorubucin, vinblastin, dacarbazine (AVD), rituximab + ifosfamide + carboplatin + etoposide (RICE), or bendamustine combination treatment in pediatric HL patients, who were previosuly treated for refractory or relapsed advanced stage HL before (seven patients) or after (one patient) ASCT in our center. After eight BV courses, one patient was able to undergo match unrelated donor (MUD) SCT. Another seven pediatric HL patients, who were not able to go into remission with any other classical HL chemotherapy protocols, received 4-6 courses of BV-AVD and/or RICE/bendamustine. All were able to undergo ASCT after negative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging results. After ASCT, we switched to BV as consolidation therapy until a total of 12 cycles was completed. Patients went into remission after a median 34 (range: 12-42) months from the start of BV treatment. BV is an encouraging, well- tolerated, and effective targeted therapy especially when combined with AVD or when alternated with another targeted therapy combination, including RICE, when needed.

Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate, which combines a CD30 monoclonal antibody with the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethylauristatin E. The utility of brentuximab vedotin has been explored in a number of diseases, with a recent focus on T-cell lymphoma, particularly systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (sALCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), as well as other peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) histologies. Areas covered: This review surveys current data on the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in T-cell lymphoma, as well as embedding it in a therapeutic context by reviewing potential competitor agents in the clinic. Data are drawn from published literature, with a focus on clinical trial data rather than preclinical studies or case reports. Expert opinion: Brentuximab vedotin has a clear clinical benefit in CTCL and sALCL, and can achieve durable responses in a number of patients. Toxicities, particularly peripheral neuropathy, may limit treatment in some patients; however, the agent is generally well tolerated. In this context, brentuximab vedotin has been globally approved for use in sALCL and certain CTCL subtypes, however, further information is required to enhance our understanding of when and in whom to best employ this agent, as well as exploring rational combinations to augment responses.