Search

The term 'governance' is popular but imprecise. It has at least six uses, referring to: the minimal state; corporate governance; the new public management; 'good governance'; socio-cybernetic systems; and self-organizing networks. I stipulate that governance refers to 'self-organizing, interorganizational networks' and argue these networks complement markets and hierarchies as governing structures for authoritatively allocating resources and exercising control and co-ordination. I defend this definition, arguing that it throws new light on recent changes in British government, most notably: hollowing out the state, the new public management, and intergovernmental manage-ment. 1 conclude that networks are now a pervasive feature of service delivery in Britain; that such networks are characterized by trust and mutual adjustment and undermine management reforms rooted in competition; and that they are a challenge to governability because they become autonomous and resist central guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents an essay which examined the legacy of `Thatcherism,' and its construction by the dominant traditions of British government. Discussion of several narratives on the issue; Definition of the traditions in the context of Thatcherism; How Thatcherism brought change in the British government.

Analyzes the effect of the European Economic Community membership on the administrative structure of local governments in Great Britain. Background on the Community's directives on public works contracts; Participation of local government in community decision-making.