Search

Background/objective: To demonstrate therapeutic equivalence of terbutaline via two different Turbuhaler ® devices by evaluating its protective effect against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in stable asthma., Methods: In this double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, single-dose, 4-way crossover study, patients with stable mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV 1 ≥80% predicted) were randomised to 0.5 or 1.5 mg terbutaline via either Turbuhaler ® M2 or Turbuhaler ® M3 followed by a methacholine challenge test. The primary outcome variable was the concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV 1 (PC 20 ). Patients had a PC 20 methacholine <8 mg/mL that was reproducible after 2 weeks, and a stable baseline FEV 1 at all visits (90-110% of enrolment value)., Results: 60 patients (mean age 31.1 years [range:18-64]; mean FEV 1 92.1% predicted normal [78.4-120.6%]) were randomised to treatment; all completed the study. There was a clear dose-response for both devices. The within-device ratios (1.5 mg:0.5 mg) were 1.79 and 1.87 for Turbuhaler ® M3 and M2, respectively (both p < 0.001). The between-device ratios (M3:M2) were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.75-1.13) for 0.5 mg and 0.88 (95% CI 0.72-1.08) for 1.5 mg. Both confidence intervals lie inside the interval 0.67-1.50, which was the pre-specified condition for equivalent effect., Conclusions: Bronchoprotection using a standardised methacholine challenge model proved to be an effective design to elucidate therapeutic equivalence between devices in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. The findings indicate that patients may switch from one type of Turbuhaler ® to the other without adjustment of therapy. Moreover, they show the robustness and utility of this study design and its suitability for investigating therapeutic equivalence., Eudract Number: 2014-001457-16. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02322788., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often experience symptoms and problems with activities early in the morning. This is the first study to compare the effect of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone on lung function, symptoms and activities early in the morning., Methods: Lung function (peak expiratory flow [PEF] and forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV( 1)]) and symptoms were measured at bedside and activities were measured during the morning using a six-item questionnaire concerning basic morning routines. In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, cross-over study, 442 patients with COPD aged >or=40 years (pre-bronchodilator FEV(1)

Background: Budesonide/formoterol is an effective treatment for both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a novel hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide/formoterol with that of budesonide pMDI and budesonide/formoterol dry-powder inhaler (DPI; Turbuhaler)., Methods: This was a 12-week, multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy study involving patients aged > or = 12 years with asthma. All patients had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 50-90% predicted normal and were inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (500-1600 microg/day) alone. Following a 2-week run-in, during which they received their usual medication, patients were randomised (two inhalations twice daily) to budesonide pMDI 200 microg, budesonide/formoterol DPI 160/4.5 microg or budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 microg. The primary efficacy end-point was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF)., Results: In total, 680 patients were randomised, of whom 668 were included in the primary analysis. Therapeutically equivalent increases in morning PEF were observed with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (29.3 l/min) and budesonide/formoterol DPI (32.0 l/min) (95% confidence interval: -10.4 to 4.9; p = 0.48). The increase in morning PEF with budesonide/formoterol pMDI was significantly higher than with budesonide pMDI (+28.7 l/min; p < 0.001). Similar improvements with budesonide/formoterol pMDI vs. budesonide pMDI were seen for all secondary efficacy end-points. Both combination treatments were similarly well tolerated., Conclusions: Budesonide/formoterol, administered via the HFA pMDI or DPI, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adult and adolescent patients with asthma, with both devices being therapeutically equivalent.

Combinations of inhaled glucocorticoids and long-acting beta2-agonists in the same inhaler device have become available in recent years. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study we have evaluated the onset of action of budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler) and that of the fixed combination of salmeterol and fluticasone (Seretide Diskus). Thirty patients with a mean FEV1 of 2.54 l (range: 1.48-4.28) and a mean inclusion reversibility in FEV1 of 19.1% were included. Single doses of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg and 2x (160/4.5) microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 microg, or placebo were given. Serial measurements of FEV1 were performed over 3 h. The combination of one or two inhalations of budesonide/formoterol showed a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone, both evaluated as mean FEV1 at 3 min (2.74, 2.75 and 2.56 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol), or as average FEV1 from 0 to 15 min (2.80, 2.83 and 2.67 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol). For placebo, mean FEV1 at 3 min was 2.46 l, and the average FEV1 at 0-15 min was 2.50 l. Furthermore, budesonide/formoterol at both doses resulted in higher FEV1 than salmeterol/fluticasone at 3 h. We conclude that the combination of budesonide/formoterol has a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone.