Search

Examines U.S. President George W. Bush's proposed budget and the deal making that will be needed to get it passed by Congress. Expectation that the fight over the $2.7 trillion budget for 2006 will be impassioned for many reasons including the fact he left out the costs for the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, and more; Questions over the validity of Bush's claim to reduce the deficit in light of increased costs; Expectation of massive cuts in education, veterans healthcare and environmental protection to pay for homeland security and defense; Conservatives who are concerned about the figures.

To weigh the full cost [of the war in Iraq], one must look not just at the war itself but away from it, at the progress of the larger policy it served, at things that have been done elsewhere--some far from Iraq or deep in the past--and, perhaps above all, at things that have been left undone. While American troops were dying in Baghdad and Falluja and Samarra, Buhary Syed Abu Tahir, a Sri Lankan businessman, was busy making centrifuge parts in Malaysia and selling them to Libya and Iran and possibly other countries. The centrifuges are used for producing bomb-grade uranium. Tahir's project was part of a network set up by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the "father" of the Pakistani atomic bomb. At least seven countries are already known to have been involved in the Pakistani effort, which Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the IAEA, called a "Wal-Mart" of nuclear technology and an American official called "one-stop shopping" for nuclear weapons. [N]ot only [George W.] Bush but also the man likely to be his Democratic challenger in this year's election justified war solely in the name of nonproliferation. Proliferation, however, is not, as the President seemed to think, just a rogue state or two seeking weapons of mass destruction; it is the entire half-century-long process of globalization that stretches from Klaus Fuchs's espionage to Tahir's nuclear arms bazaar and beyond. Does the world want to indict and prosecute crimes against humanity? First, it must decide whether the International Criminal Court will do the job or entrust it to unprosecutable American forces. Do we want to reverse global warming and head off the extinction of the one-third of the world's species that are at risk in the next fifty years? First, the world's largest polluter has to be drawn into the global talks.