1. Global longitudinal strain in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Prognostic relevance across disease severity as assessed by automated cluster analysis
- Author
-
Frank Lloyd Dini, Cinzia Zuchi, Paolo Biagioli, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese, Gian Giacomo Galeotti, Anna Mengoni, Rosanna Lauciello, Erberto Carluccio, Andreina D'Agostino, and Giuseppe Ambrosio
- Subjects
Global longitudinal strain ,Ejection fraction ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Longitudinal strain ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Disease cluster ,Risk Assessment ,Severity of Illness Index ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Left ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Disease severity ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Advanced disease ,medicine ,Cluster Analysis ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Heart Failure ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Pulmonary hypertension ,Heart failure ,Rv function ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Ejection fraction (EF) is still widely used to categorize heart failure (HF) patients but has limitations. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has emerged as a new prognosticator in HF, independent of EF.We investigated the incremental predictive benefit of GLS over different risk profiles as identified by automated cluster analysis of simple echocardiographic parameters.In 797 HFrEF patients (age 66 ± 12y; mean EF 30 ± 7%), unsupervised cluster analysis of 10 routine echocardiographic variables (without GLS) was performed. Median follow-up was 37 months. End-point was all-cause mortality. Association between risk profiles, GLS, and mortality was assessed by Cox proportional-hazard modeling with interaction term. Cluster analysis allocated patients to 3 different risk phenogroups (PG): PG-1 (mild diastolic dysfunction [DD], moderate systolic dysfunction, no pulmonary hypertension, normal right ventricular [RV] function); PG-2 (moderate DD, mild pulmonary hypertension, normal RV function); PG-3 (severe DD, advanced systolic dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, RV dysfunction). Compared to PG-1, PG-2 and PG-3 showed increased adjusted-hazard ratio (1.71; 95% CI:1.05-2.77, P = 0.30; and 2.58; 95% CI:1.50-4.44, P 0.001, respectively). GLS was independently associated with outcome in the whole population (adjusted-HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17, P = 0.001); however, profile membership modified the relationship between GLS and outcome which was no longer significant in PG-3 (P for interaction = 0.003).Within HFrEF populations, clustering of routine echocardiography parameters can automatically identify patients with different risk profiles; further assessment by GLS may be useful for patients with not advanced disease.
- Published
- 2021