1. Combination of two desensitizing protocols to control dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
- Author
-
Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Gabriela Monteiro Barbosa, Jesuína Lamartine Nogueira Araújo, Cecy Martins Silva, Alexandra Melo Pingarilho Carneiro, Danielle da Silva Pompeu, Cristiane de Melo Alencar, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), and Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
- Subjects
Quality of life ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Dentin Desensitizing Agents ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Dentin Sensitivity ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Double blind ,Fluorides ,Treatment Outcome ,Double-Blind Method ,Risk factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Quality of Life ,Dentin hypersensitivity ,Humans ,Therapy ,business ,General Dentistry ,Strontium acetate ,Toothpastes - Abstract
Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-28T19:42:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022-02-01 Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Universidade Federal do Pará Universidade Federal do Pará Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) combined with 8% strontium acetate (SA8%) in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in non-carious lesions and analyzed the risk factors with the patient’s quality of life. Methods: Eighty teeth with DH were randomly allocated into four treatment groups (n = 20): G1, PBM imitation + toothpaste with no active ingredient; G2, PBM imitation + toothpaste with SA8%; G3, PBM + toothpaste without the active ingredient; and G4, PBM + toothpaste with SA8%. Participants were provided with a questionnaire on the experience of dentin hypersensitivity (QEDH) to assess the impact of desensitizing treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for intra- and intergroup comparisons, and Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests were used to analyze HRQL. All analyses used significance levels of 5%. Results: Intergroup comparisons revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05); G4 had the best response in terms of HD reduction in G4 compared to the other groups on the 7th day of assessment (T3). Only G4 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the reduction of EDH for intragroup analysis. Conclusion: The combination of therapies was more effective in reducing DH than the isolated use of these strategies. Clinical relevance: The combination of therapies is effective in the treatment of DH. School of Dentistry Federal University of Pará, Pará Araraquara School of Dentistry Paulista State University, SP Dental Materials Laboratory of the Postgraduate Program in Dentistry Federal University of Pará, Pará Araraquara School of Dentistry Paulista State University, SP
- Published
- 2022