Search

Background MAP2K1 mutations, otherwise known as MEK mutations, are rare oncogenic alterations that have been implicated in MAPK pathway activation. The impact of MAP2K1 mutations in colorectal cancer on EGFR antibody response has not been characterized. Patients and Methods Antitumor activity was assessed in mouse xenograft models with SW48 cell lines harboring MAP2K1 mutation, and protein expression of the RAS signaling pathway was studied by Western blot analysis. We retrospectively identified patients with MAP2K1-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2015 and 2020 using next-generation sequencing. Patients’ tumor characteristics, treatment response, and outcome are described. Additional patients with the MAP2K1 mutation were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center oncogenomic databases. Results Antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models demonstrated efficacy with combination therapy with EGFR and MEK inhibition with either BRAF or ERK inhibitors. Five patients treated at City of Hope between 2015 and 2020 harbored a MAP2K1 mutation at a frequency of 1%. APC and TP53 were common coalterations. All disease was RAS and BRAF wild type, except 1 case that harbored a concurrent KRAS mutation. Four RAS/BRAF wild-type MAP2K1-mutated patients was treated with anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR + MEK and BRAF inhibitors, and anti-EGFR + ERK inhibitors. All 4 patients experienced disease progression. Conclusion MAP2K1 mutation in colorectal cancer is associated with poor response to EGFR inhibition. EGFR inhibition with or without MEK, BRAF, or ERK inhibitors did not result in any clinical benefit in our limited experience.

BackgroundAs receptor-ligand based strategies emerge for surgical imaging, the relative importance of receptor expression in different tumor types is unknown. Near-infrared (NIR) labeled epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, panitumumab-IRDye800, was evaluated across three cancers to demonstrate its clinical utilities and a holistic analysis framework.MethodsThirty-one patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma (HGG, n=5, NCT03510208), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC, n=23, NCT02415881) or lung adenocarcinoma (LAC, n=3, NCT03582124) received systemic administration of 50 mg panitumumab-IRDye800 days prior to surgery. Intraoperative NIR laparoscopic or open-field images of the surgical field were acquired and tissue mimicking phantoms were constructed to identify optimal imaging conditions. Margin distance was correlated to fluorescence on resected specimen surface. Panitumumab-IRDye800 distribution was registered to histology in fixed tissue sections. Immunohistochemistry characterized EGFR expression.ResultsIntraoperative NIR imaging enhanced tumor contrast against surrounding healthy tissue by 5.2-fold, 3.4-fold and 1.4-fold in HGG, HNSCC and LAC, respectively. Imaging quality was optimal at the lowest gain possible under ambient light. Ex vivo NIR fluorescence identified 78 – 97% of at-risk resection margins, with 72 – 92% sensitivity and 67 – 96% specificity for tumor in fixed tissue sections. Intratumoral panitumumab-IRDye800 concentration correlated with total tumoral EGFR expression (HGG > HNSCC > LAC) and delivery barrier. Cellular EGFR expression (80%) and tumor cell density (3000 cells/mm2) was highest in HGG.ConclusionsIn multiple tumor types, EGFR-targeting in fluorescence-guided surgery translated to enhanced macroscopic tumor contrast and successful margin assessment despite disparate tumor cell density and heterogeneous delivery of pantimumab-IRDye800.Translational relevanceAs receptor-ligand based strategies emerge for surgical imaging, the relative importance of receptor expression in different tumor types remains unexamined. Near-infrared labeled epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody was evaluated across three cancers to demonstrate its clinical utilities and a holistic analysis framework. Targeted fluorescence imaging was performed in patients infused with a consistent dose of panitumumab-IRDye800 using the same fluorescence imaging devices. In high-grade glioma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR-targeting in fluorescence-guided surgery translated to enhanced macroscopic tumor contrast and successful margin assessment. While total EGFR expression and delivery barrier corresponded to overall panitumumab-IRDye800 distribution in tissue, tumor depth and operating room lighting can have greater influence over the intraoperative fluorescence contrast at specific tissue surface locations of a certain patient. These factors can facilitate selecting appropriate molecular target and tumor qualities to streamline translation across institutions and regulatory approval of new imaging probes.

Purpose: While mutations in BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) most commonly occur at the V600 amino acid, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, non-V600 BRAF mutations are increasingly identified in clinical practice. It is unclear whether these mutants, like BRAF V600E, confer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Experimental Design: We conducted a multicenter pooled analysis of consecutive patients with non-V600 BRAF-mutated mCRCs identified between 2010 and 2017. Non-V600 BRAF mutations were divided into functional classes based on signaling mechanism and kinase activity: activating and RAS-independent (class 2) or kinase-impaired and RAS-dependent (class 3). Results: Forty patients with oncogenic non-V600 BRAF–mutant mCRC received anti-EGFR antibody treatment [n = 12 (30%) class 2 and n = 28 (70%) class 3]. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed by mutation class. In contrast, while only 1 of 12 patients with class 2 BRAF mCRC responded, 14 of 28 patients with class 3 BRAF responded to anti-EGFR therapy (response rate, 8% and 50%, respectively, P = 0.02). Specifically, in first- or second-line, 1 of 6 (17%) patients with class 2 and 7 of 9 (78%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.04). In third- or later-line, none of 6 patients with class 2 and 7 of 19 (37%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.14). Conclusions: Response to EGFR antibody treatment in mCRCs with class 2 BRAF mutants is rare, while a large portion of CRCs with class 3 BRAF mutants respond. Patients with colorectal cancer with class 3 BRAF mutations should be considered for anti-EGFR antibody treatment. See related commentary by Fontana and Valeri, p. 6896

The discovery of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) revealed the connection between EGF-like ligands, signaling from the EGFR family members and cancer. Over the next fifty years, analysis of EGFR expression and mutation led to the use of monoclonal antibodies to target EGFR in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and this treatment has improved outcomes for patients. The use of the RAS oncogene mutational status has helped to refine patient selection for EGFR antibody therapy, but an effective molecular predictor of likely responders is lacking. This review analyzes the potential utility of measuring the expression, levels and activation of EGF-like ligands and associated processes as prognostic or predictive markers for the identification of patient risk and more effective mCRC therapies.

Recent clinical data have linked KRAS/TP53 co-mutation (mut) to resistance to radiotherapy (RT), but supporting laboratory in vivo evidence is lacking. In addition, the ability of different radiation doses, with/without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed treatment, to achieve local tumour control as a function of KRAS status is unknown. Here, we assessed clonogenic radiation survival of a panel of annotated lung cancer cell lines. KRASmut/TP53mut was associated with the highest radioresistance in non-isogenic and isogenic comparisons. To validate these findings, isogenic TP53mut NCI-H1703 models, KRASmut or wild-type (wt), were grown as heterotopic xenografts in nude mice. A clinical RT schedule of 30 fractions over 6 weeks was employed. The dose that controlled 50% of tumours (TCD(50)) was calculated. The TCD(50) for KRASwt/TP53mut xenografts was 43.1 Gy whereas KRASmut/TP53mut tumours required a 1.9-fold higher TCD(50) of 81.4 Gy. The EGFR inhibitor erlotinib radiosensitized KRASmut but not KRASwt cells and xenografts. The TCD(50) associated with adding erlotinib to RT was 58.8 Gy for KRASmut, i.e., a ~1.4-fold dose enhancement. However, the EGFR antibody cetuximab did not have a radiosensitizing effect. In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that KRASmut in a TP53mut background confers radioresistance when studying a clinical RT schedule and local control rather than tumour growth delay. Despite the known unresponsiveness of KRASmut tumours to EGFR inhibitors, erlotinib radiosensitized KRASmut tumours. Our data highlight KRAS/TP53 co-mutation as a candidate biomarker of radioresistance that can be at least partially reversed by dose escalation or the addition of a targeted agent.

Background:The incidence and mortality associated with lung cancers are increasing at an alarming rate. Studies have shown that activation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) triggers the tumorigenesis in these cancers. The potential role of analyzing EGFR expression in these carcinomas could go a long way in devising screening tools for early detection of lung carcinoma. This study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with EGFR expression. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out among 75 paraffin block specimens of lung carcinoma received in our tertiary care center for a period of five years. Three micron thick paraffin sections were cut and Hemotoxylin & Eosin staining was done. All the adenocarcinoma cases were immunostained with EGFR antibody and the results were analyzed. Results: Majority of the tumors were moderately differentiated (46%) and were negative for lymph node metastasis (69%). With regards to EGFR positivity, majority of the tumors showed EGFR expression 3+ (57.3%) flowed by 2+ (16%). Among the EGFR negative cases, ALK expression was positive in 5% of the cases. Conclusion: The present study has reinforced the fact that Indian patients have high expression of EGFR and therefore can be benefitted by targeted therapy.IHC coupled with molecular analysis would be of maximum benefit to patients with EGFR & ALK mutations.

Objectives To establish a circulating tumor cell (CTC) enrichment system for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), using EGFR magnetic liposomes (EGFR-ML). Materials and methods An inverted evaporation method was used to develop antibody modified EGFR-ML. Peripheral blood was collected from NSCLC patients who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI treatment for CTC enumeration. Results Protein electrophoresis, magnetic saturation curve, and ultraviolet absorption spectrum showed successful incorporation of the EGFR antibody on the surface of the magnetic microspheres, and the development of EGFR-ML was ascertained based on cell morphology and particle size. Using EGFR-ML, CTC were successfully enriched from blood samples and were identified in 77.3% (99/128) of the cohort. When compared to the 21L858R variant, EGFR-19del showed lower CTC counts by EGFR-ML (CTCEGFR). At one month after EGFR-TKI, a lower CTCEGFR was associated with partial response (PR) during treatment (CTCEGFR Conclusion We showed that establishing a CTC enrichment system by antibody modified EGFR-ML in NSCLC is feasible. CTC enumeration by EGFR-ML may have the potential to supplement RECIST in dynamically monitoring the response of NSCLC patients’ to first-line EGFR-TKI.

Urothelial carcinomas represent 90% of all primary bladder cancers. Muscle invasion is a critical prognosticdeterminant in urothelial carcinoma. The overexpression of EMMPRIN and EGFR was found in urothelialcarcinoma. The association between the two markers has not been reported in urothelial carcinoma,therefore we aimed to analyze the expression of EMMPRIN and EGFR and investigate their association withurothelial carcinoma invasiveness. Paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained from 54 urothelial carcinomapatients which then underwent immunohistochemistry staining for EMMPRIN and EGFR antibody. Thecomparison of EMMPRIN and EGFR expression was tested using the Mann Whitney U test. The correlationwas analyzed using the Spearman test. Results showed a significant difference of EMMPRIN expressionbetween non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (p = 0.000), and EMMPRIN expressionwas significantly correlated with the muscle invasion (rs = 0.481, p = 0.000). A significant difference ofEGFR expression between the non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer was also found(p = 0.020), and EGFR expression was significantly correlated with the muscle invasion (rs = 0.319, p =0.019). The expression of EMMPRIN was positively correlated with EGFR in urothelial carcinoma (rs =0.322, p = 0.018). The expression of EMMPRIN and EGFR are two potential biomarkers for urothelialcarcinoma invasiveness which may be helpful to differentiate between muscle-invasive and non-muscleinvasive bladder cancer.

Background RAS short variant (SV) mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with lack of benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (EGFRmAb). However, the clinical implications for RAS amplification (RASa) as a biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in CRC remain ill defined. Methods Genomic analysis was performed using the Foundation Medicine (FM) comprehensive genomic profiling database of 37,233 CRC cases. Clinical outcomes were assessed using two independent cohorts: the City of Hope (COH) cohort of 338 patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) and the Flatiron Health–FM real-world clinicogenomic database (CGDB) of 3,904 patients with mCRC. Results RASa was detected in 1.6% (614/37,233) of primarily mCRC. RASa 6–9 (n = 241, 39%), 10–19 (n = 165, 27%), and ≥ 20 (n = 209, 34%) copy number subsets had co-RAS SV/BRAF V600E in 63%/3%, 31%/0.6%, and 4.8%/0% of cases, respectively. In the COH cohort, six patients with RASa (13–54 copies) received EGFRmAb, four of six had progressive disease, two had stable disease, and median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 2.5 months. Of the CGDB EGFRmAb-treated patients, those with RASa (n = 9) had median TTD of 4.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 11.4 months, those with RAS SV (n = 101) had median TTD and OS of 5.3 and 9.4 months, and those with RAS/BRAF wild-type (n = 608) had median TTD and OS of 7.6 and 13.7 months. Conclusion Patients with RASa without RAS mutations (1.1% of mCRC) may have poor outcomes on EGFRmAb, although numbers herein were small, and interpretation is confounded by combination chemotherapy. Larger independent studies are warranted to determine if RASa, including degree of amplification, may act similarly to RAS mutation as a resistance mechanism to EGFRmAb therapies. Implications for Practice Genomic data suggest that RAS amplification occurs as the sole RAS/RAF alteration in >1% of colorectal cancer cases and that degree of amplification inversely correlates with co-occurring MAPK pathway alterations. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that RAS amplification may function similarly to RAS mutation as a negative predictor of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies in colorectal cancer. More clinical data are needed, and comprehensive genomic profiling, including detection of RAS amplification, should be used in trial design to inform therapy selection.

Purpose To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2‑year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2‑year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesis = H0), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H0 was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable. Results Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55–87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36–71%); H0 was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (p = 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30–1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25–1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13–1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17–1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (p = 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (p = 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.044). Conclusion Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.

The benefit of EGFR–TKI in non–small cell lung cancer has been demonstrated in mutant EGFR tumors as first-line treatment but the benefit in wild-type EGFR tumors is marginal as well as restricted to maintenance therapy in pretreated patients. This work aimed at questioning the effects of cisplatin initial treatment on the EGFR pathway in non–small cell lung cancer and the functional consequences in vitro and in in vivo animal models of patient-derived xenografts (PDX). We establish here that cisplatin pretreatment specifically sensitizes wild-type EGFR-expressing cells to erlotinib, contrary to what happens in mutant EGFR cells and with a blocking EGFR antibody, both in vitro and in vivo. The sensitization entails the activation of the kinase Src upstream of EGFR, thereafter transactivating EGFR through a ligand-independent activation. We propose a combination of markers that enable to discriminate between the tumors sensitized to erlotinib or not in PDX models, which should be worth testing in patients. These markers might be useful for the selection of patients who would benefit from erlotinib as a maintenance therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(8); 1634–44. ©2017 AACR.

ABT-414 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) being developed for the treatment of tumors harboring amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This study evaluated the potential of ABT-414 to prolong the QT interval as part of the initial phase 1 study (NCT01741727). Data from patients who received ABT-414 monotherapy at a dose of 1–4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks or 1 or 1.5 mg/kg weekly for 2 out of every 3 weeks (alternate schedule) by intravenous infusion were included in the analysis of triplicate 12-lead ECGs obtained before dosing and through 168 h after dosing. Data from time-matched pharmacokinetic samples and QT interval assessments were evaluated using linear mixed-effects modeling to determine the effects of ABT-414, total ABT-806, and cysteine-maleimidocaproyl monomethyl auristatin F (Cys-mcMMAF) on the QT interval corrected using Fridericia’s formula (QTcF). Fifty-one patients were included in the analyses. ABT-414 had no clinically meaningful effect on QTcF. Using pooled data from doses ≥2 mg/kg, the estimated mean ∆QTcF reached a maximum of 4.30 ms after dosing, with a one-sided 95% upper confidence bound of 8.32 ms. The exposure–response analysis showed no statistically significant relationship between ΔQTcF and the concentration of any analyte (P > 0.05). No patient had a QTcF value >480 ms or a ∆QTcF value >30 ms. ABT-414 had no clinically meaningful effect on the QTcF interval at doses being evaluated for treatment of patients with solid tumors.

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and devastating primary brain tumor. The recurrence rate remains high with a median survival of 15 months. GBM’s infiltrative nature results in ill-defined margins that makes maximal tumor resection with minimal morbidity a challenge. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most frequently amplified gene in GBM (35-45% of tumors) and is associated with overexpression in about 40-98% of cases, a characteristic of more aggressive phenotypes. We hypothesize that fluorescence labeled anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAb), panitumumab-IRDye800 (pan800) and cetuximab-IRDye800 (cet800), could be leveraged to enhance tumor contrast during surgical resection and improve patient outcome. Methods: 50mg fluorescently labeled corresponding study drugs, pan800 and cet800 respectively, were administered 1-2 days in glioblastoma patients with contrast enhancing (CE) tumors prior to surgery following 100 mg loading dose of unlabeled cetuximab or panitumumab. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of tumor and histologically negative peri-tumoral tissue was performed intraoperatively and ex vivo. Fluorescence was measured as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated by comparing MFIs of tumor and histologically uninvolved tissue. Results: Despite heterogeneous drug uptake across all resected brain tissues, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) correlated strongly (R^2=0.97) with tumor volume among histologically confirmed tumor tissues. The smallest detectable tumor size in a closed-field setting was 4.2 x 2.7 mm^2 (8.2 mg) for pan800 and 8.5 x 6.6 mm^2 (70mg) for cet800. Tumor tissues from pan800 infusion had significantly higher mean TBR (8.1 ± 4.6) than cet800 infused ones in intraoperative imaging (3.3 ± 2.7; P = 0.004). NIR fluorescence from both test drugs provided high contrast to identify as few as a cluster of (5 ± 1) tumor cells in macroscopic imaging of whole sections of paraffin embedded tissues. Sensitivity and specificity of MFI for viable tumor detection was calculated and fluorescence was found to be highly sensitive (64.4% for pan800, 73.0% for cet800) and specific (98.0% for pan800, 66.3% for cet800) for viable tumor tissue while normal peri-tumoral tissue showed minimal fluorescence. No related grade-2 adverse events were observed 30 days beyond the infusion of either study drugs. Conclusion: EGFR antibody based imaging for contrast-enhanced glioblastomas proved safe in human patients and specific intratumoral delivery of NIR fluorescence provided high optical contrast and resolution for intraoperative image-guided resection. Fully humanized panitumumab-IRDye800 demonstrated superior detection sensitivity and tumor specificity over the chimeric cetuximab-IRDye800.

Background: Pediatric High-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are the No.1 cause of cancer-related deaths in children with median survival of less than a year. pHGGs tend to be infiltrative and appear irregularly shaped with ill-defined borders difficult to be distinguished from surrounding normal brain tissue. As the extent of surgical resection predicts survival, precise tumor removal with more accurate margin delineation means better treatment outcome and less loss of vital functions. While EGFR is one of the most commonly amplified genes in pHGGs, its protein-level expression is not as well characterized as in adult HGGs. Previously, near-infrared (NIR) dye labeled epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has served as contrast agent in fluorescence-guided surgery of head and neck cancer. However, it must overcome the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for effective intratumoral delivery in the case of brain cancer. Therefore, the latest advancement in reversible BBB opening with tight junction protein modulation has the potential to enable the molecular targeted imaging guidance of pHGG resection. Aims: The current study aimed to improve intratumoral delivery of NIR fluorescent EGFR antibody via reversible BBB permeability enhancement with siRNA modulation of tight junction protein in an orthotopic xenograft animal model of high-grade glioma with EGFR overexpression. Furthermore, resected pHGGs were examined for EGFR expression in order to stratify patient subpopulation most likely to benefit from intraoperative molecular imaging strategy that targets EGFR. Methods: An orthotopic high-grade glioma xenograft model was established in 6-15 week old mice (n=3) by intracranial injection of 10^6 EGFR-overexpressing high-grade glioma cells (D270, 10ul) 3mm below the surface of brain. Subsequently, the exposed brain was covered with a glass plate secured to the skull with cyanoacrylate glue. siRNA was selected from those targeting conserved regions of the mouse claudin-5 cDNA sequence. 20μg of claudin-5 siRNA was injected intravenously via the tail vein in an in vivo-Jet-PEI solution (Polyplus Transfection) at a rate of 0.2 ml/sec 10 days post tumor implant. 0.1mL tetramethylrhodamine (250kDa) and various sized FITC-dextran (4.4-150kDa) solutions were injected intravenously to visualize blood vessels and assess extravasation distance through cranial window via 2-photo microscopy. Enhanced permeability of BBB was characterized by increase in KTrans on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the tumor region. Mean fluorescence intensity at 800nm was measured through cranial window with an in vivo NIR imager (Pearl Impulse, LI-COR Biosciences) 0-72 hours following tail vein injection of 200ug panitumumab-IRDye800 (pan800). Immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR expression was performed on surgically resected de novo primary pHGG tumors, from seven GBM and three anaplastic ependymoma patients respectively. Results: The siRNA has shown a reversible 80% suppression of claudin-5 at 48-hrs post-injection that returned to normal levels at 72 hours. More than three-fold increase in penetration distance of 70kDa enhancing agent was observed in extravascular space and a 74% increase in intratumoral permeability was observed on DCE-MRI. Intratumoral delivery of fluorescent EGFR antibody (panitumumab-IRDye800) occurred at 6 hours and peaked at 48 hours post systemic injection following BBB opening. Positive EGFR expression was found in 70% of all surgically removed high-grade pediatric brain tumor samples. The median age of patients with positive EGFR expression was 15 (IQR = 12.75 to 16.50), significantly higher (P = 0.018) than that of EGFR negative patients (median = 0.75, IQR = 0.47 to 5.38). Conclusions: We provided proof-of-concept evidence that the enabling technology of transient BBB modulation and fluorescence-guided imaging with EGFR targeting antibody has great potential for clinical translation to improve surgery outcome by providing tumor-specific precision resection to a significant subpopulation of young patients with pHGGs

Background Laryngeal cancer is a common malignant tumor of the head and neck. Clinical treatment methods mainly include radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but the toxicity and side effects of these treatments seriously affect the quality of life of patients. Currently, there are no specific anti-laryngeal cancer drugs available. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new targeted drugs for laryngeal cancer. Methods We established a cell model of laryngeal cancer in vitro and a TU686 xenograft model in vivo. We then carried out the related research through a series of experiments [including laser confocal microscopy, enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot]. Results The results showed that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody antagonist 6E-C could not only specifically bind to EGFR, but also specifically inhibit the binding of EGF to EGFR. Further analysis indicated that 6E-C could inhibit the EGFR-mediated intracellular signaling pathway. Furthermore, 6E-C inhibited xenograft tumor growth in vivo. Conclusions In summary, we have successfully prepared a new anti-EGFR antibody antagonist, which exhibited anti-laryngeal cancer effects in vitro and in vivo. The current research demonstrates that the EGFR antibody antagonist 6E-C shows potential as an effective anti-laryngeal cancer agent, with potential clinical application value. This study therefore provides a solid foundation for related research in the future.

PURPOSE: Although EGFR exon20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations account for 4~12 % of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, there is no effective and selectable anticancer drugs targeting ex20ins mutations so far due to various variant mutations in ex20ins mutations. Moreover, most EGFR ex20ins mutants show primary resistance to EGFR TKIs. JNJ-61186372 (JNJ-372), a bispecific antibody that targets the EGFR and cMet receptors, is currently being explored in a first-in-human study in patients with NSCLC. To better understand the mechanism of JNJ-372 activity in this patient population, we conducted preclinical studies exploring the activity of JNJ-372 in different EGFR ex20ins models. METHODS: To elucidate whether JNJ-372 has antitumor effect in EGFR ex20ins mutants via EGFR and c-MET inhibition, cell viability, western blot, cell cycle, colony formation assay, FACS analysis were performed in JNJ-372 treated BaF3 cells, PDCs, PDOs, and PDX expressing EGFR ex20ins mutation. For mouse tumor models, JNJ-372 was administered i.p. twice a week at 10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg. Antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay was assessed to figure out whether JNJ-372 had ADCC effects. Referenced patients with ex20ins disease were administered 1050 mg JNJ-372 i.v. weekly for the first 4-week cycle, then biweekly for each subsequent cycle RESULTS: JNJ-372 inhibited the growth of BaF3 cells, PDCs, and a PDO harboring a range of ex20ins, which were resistant to osimertinib and gefitinib. Mechanistic assays revealed the reduction of EGFR and cMet receptor levels and decreases in phospho-EGFR and c-Met, as well as inhibition of their downstream signaling pathways. Cleaved caspase-3 and BIMEL were upregulated at anti-proliferative doses, suggesting caspase-mediated cell death. JNJ-372 demonstrated corresponding antitumor activity in PDC and PDX models harboring different ex20ins; inhibition of signaling and engagement of the apoptotic pathway was confirmed in tumors of JNJ-372-treated mice. In PDCs with EGFR ex20ins mutation, we verified that JNJ-372 had a significant ADCC effect compared to EGFR antibody drug cetuximab. In the first-in-human trial, CT scans from two patients treated with JNJ-372 revealed reductions in tumor burden. A 58-year patient harboring H773delinsNPY showed -63% tumor reduction with progression-free survival of > 20 months and a 48-year patient harboring S768_D770dup showed -38.9% tumor reduction. CONCLUSION: JNJ-372 drives antitumor activity in preclinical models of EGFR ex20ins, which have no therapeutic options in clinic, by decreasing EGFR and cMet receptor levels, inhibiting downstream signaling cascades, activating apoptotic signaling as well as ADCC. These results provide a promising therapeutic option to patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations and an understanding of the activity of JNJ-372 being observed in the first-in-human study. Citation Format: Jiyeon Yun, Han Na Kang, Soo-Hwan Lee, Seo-Yoon Jeong, Chae Won Park, Jae-Hwan Kim, Kyoung-Ho Pyo, Ji Min Lee, Seok-Young Kim, Min Hee Hong, Hye Ryun Kim, Meena Thayu, Joshua Curtin, Roland Knoblauch, Matthew Lorenzi, Byoung Chul Cho. JNJ-61186372, an EGFR-cMet bispecific antibody, in EGFR Exon 20 insertion-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5199.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a clinically validated target and often overexpressed in some solid tumors. Both EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and ligand-blocking antibodies have been approved for treatment of NSCLC, head and neck cancers and colorectal cancers. However, clinical response is limited and often accompanied by significant toxicities due to normal tissue expression. To improve the effectiveness of targeting EGFR while minimizing the toxicities on normal tissues, we developed a low-affinity anti-EGFR antibody drug conjugate (ADC), RN765C. Potent in vitro cytotoxicity of RN765C, with nanomolar to subnanomolar EC50, was observed on a panel of cancer cell lines expressing moderate to high level of EGFR. In contrast, RN765C was less effective in killing normal human keratinocytes, presumably due to its lower receptor expression. Mechanistically, RN765C has multiple modes of action: inducing payload mediated mitotic arrest and cell death, blocking EGFR pathway signal and mediating antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity. In preclinical studies, a single dose of RN765C at 1.5-3 mg/kg was generally sufficient to induce tumor regression in multiple cell line and patient-derived xenograft models, including those that are resistant to EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Our data support further investigation of RN765C in the clinic to treat EGFR expressing solid tumors.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy is used in EGFR expressing cancers including lung, colon, head and neck, and bladder cancers, however results have been modest. Near infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a highly selective tumor treatment that employs an antibody-photo-absorber conjugate which is activated by NIR light. NIR-PIT is in clinical trials in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers using cetuximab-IR700 as the conjugate. However, its use has otherwise been restricted to mouse models. This is an effort to explore larger animal models with NIR-PIT. We describe the use of a recombinant canine anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), can225IgG, conjugated to the photo-absorber, IR700DX, in three EGFR expressing canine transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) cell lines as a prelude to possible canine clinical studies. Can225-IR700 conjugate showed specific binding and cell-specific killing after NIR-PIT on EGFR expressing cells in vitro. In the in vivo study, can225-IR700 conjugate demonstrated accumulation of the fluorescent conjugate with high tumor-to-background ratio. Tumor-bearing mice were separated into 4 groups: (1) no treatment; (2) 100 µg of can225-IR700 i.v. only; (3) NIR light exposure only; (4) 100 µg of can225-IR700 i.v., NIR light exposure. Tumor growth was significantly inhibited by NIR-PIT treatment compared with the other groups (p < 0.001), and significantly prolonged survival was achieved (p < 0.001 vs. other groups) in the treatment groups. In conclusion, NIR-PIT with can225-IR700 is a promising treatment for canine EGFR-expressing cancers, including invasive transitional cell carcinoma in pet dogs, that could provide a pathway to translation to humans.

Background: The human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important target for cancer treatment. Currently, only the EGFR antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab are approved for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. However, a major clinical challenge is a short-term response owing to development of acquired resistance during the course of the treatment. Methods: In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying development of acquired resistance in DiFi colorectal cancer cells to the anti-EGFR mAb ICR62 (termed DiFi62) and to the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib (termed DiFiG) using a range of techniques. Results: Compared with the findings from parental DiFi and DiFiG cells, development of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR mAb ICR62 in DiFi62 cells was accompanied by an increase in cell surface EGFR and increased phosphorylation of HER-2 and HER-3. Interestingly, DiFi62 cells also acquired resistance to treatment with anti-EGFR mAbs cetuximab and ICR61, which bind to other distinct epitopes on the extracellular domain of EGFR, but these cells remained equally sensitive as the parental cells to treatment with pan-HER inhibitors such as afatinib. Conclusions: Our results provide a novel mechanistic insight into the development of acquired resistance to EGFR antibody-based therapy in colorectal cancer cells and justify further investigations on the therapeutic benefits of pan-HER family inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients once acquired resistance to EGFR antibody-based therapy is developed.

K-ras mutation status has remained elusive in the metastatic liver tumors of colorectal cancer (CRC) in contrast to the primary CRC tumors. In this study, K-ras mutational status of the primary and corresponding liver metastatic tumors was investigated in the 43 CRC patients. Codons 12 and 13 of K-ras were directly sequenced, and a K-ras mutation was evident in 17 cases (39.5%). In 6 cases, the K-ras mutation was evident only in the liver metastasis, but not in the primary CRC, where the mutation was found in codon 13. This discrepancy between primary and metastatic lesions with regard to codon 13 of the K-ras gene may explain the clinical discrepancy of EGFR antibody therapy. In conclusion, the current data may lead to the development of personalized medicine for recurrent CRC, although further validation study is still required.

// Friederike Braig 1 , Manuela Marz 1 , Aneta Schieferdecker 1 , Alexander Schulte 2 , Mareike Voigt 1 , Alexander Stein 1 , Tobias Grob 3 , Malik Alawi 4 , Daniela Indenbirken 5 , Malte Kriegs 6 , Erik Engel 7 , Udo Vanhoefer 8 , Adam Grundhoff 5 , Sonja Loges 1,9 , Kristoffer Riecken 10 , Boris Fehse 10 , Carsten Bokemeyer 1 and Mascha Binder 1 1 Department of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Laboratory for Brain Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 3 Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 4 Bioinformatics Service Facility, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 5 Heinrich-Pette-Institute, Leibniz-Institute for Experimental Virology (HPI), Hamburg, Germany 6 Radiation Biology and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 7 Hamatologisch-onkologische Praxis Altona (HOPA), Hamburg, Germany 8 Marienkrankenhaus, Zentrum fur Innere Medizin, Hamburg, Germany 9 Institute for Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 10 Research Department Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany Correspondence to: Mascha Binder, email: // Keywords : panitumumab, cetuximab, EGFR antibody resistance, mutation, circulating tumor DNA Received : January 30, 2015 Accepted : February 20, 2015 Published : March 14, 2015 Abstract Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted antibodies represents a clinical challenge in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors such as metastatic colorectal cancer, but its molecular mechanisms are incompletely understood. We scanned KRAS exon 2/3/4, NRAS exon 2/3/4 and the overlapping epitopes of the EGFR antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab for mutations in pre- and post-treatment tumor tissue of 21 patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with chemotherapy +/- EGFR antibodies by next-generation sequencing (“tumor tissue” cohort). We describe a novel EGFR exon 12 mutation acquired in tumors of 1 out of 3 patients treated with panitumumab. The EGFR G465R mutation introduces a positive charge within the overlap of the panitumumab and cetuximab epitopes. It abrogates antibody binding and mediates cross-resistance to both antibodies in EGFR G465R-transfected Ba/F3 cells. In circulating tumor DNA from an independent “liquid biopsy” cohort of 27 patients, we found this novel mutation in 1 out of 6 panitumumab-treated cases while about one third of patients show acquired RAS mutations. We show that acquired resistance by epitope-changing mutations also emerges during panitumumab treatment, which can be easily detected by a liquid biopsy approach even before clinical resistance occurs and this may help in tailoring EGFR-targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease and that tumours arising from different sides of the colon (left versus right) have different clinical outcomes. Furthermore, previous analyses comparing the activity of different classes of targeted agents in patients with KRAS wild-type (wt) or RAS wt mCRC suggest that primary tumour location (side), might be both prognostic and predictive for clinical outcome. METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic and predictive influence of the localization of the primary tumour in patients with unresectable RAS wt mCRC included in six randomized trials (CRYSTAL, FIRE-3, CALGB 80405, PRIME, PEAK and 20050181), comparing chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy (experimental arm) with chemotherapy or chemotherapy and bevacizumab (control arms). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with left-sided versus right-sided tumours, and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were estimated by pooling individual study HRs/ORs. The predictive value was evaluated by pooling study interaction between treatment effect and tumour side. RESULTS: Primary tumour location and RAS mutation status were available for 2159 of the 5760 patients (37.5%) randomized across the 6 trials, 515 right-sided and 1644 left-sided. A significantly worse prognosis was observed for patients with right-sided tumours compared with those with left-sided tumours in both the pooled control and experimental arms for OS [HRs = 2.03 (95% CI: 1.69-2.42) and 1.38 (1.17-1.63), respectively], PFS [HRs = 1.59 (1.34-1.88) and 1.25 (1.06-1.47)], and ORR [ORs = 0.38 (0.28-0.50) and 0.56 (0.43-0.73)]. In terms of a predictive effect, a significant benefit for chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy was observed in patients with left-sided tumours [HRs = 0.75 (0.67-0.84) and 0.78 (0.70-0.87) for OS and PFS, respectively] compared with no significant benefit for those with right-sided tumours [HRs = 1.12 (0.87-1.45) and 1.12 (0.87-1.44) for OS and PFS, respectively; P value for interaction

// Dominik Paul Modest 1, 2 , Sebastian Stintzing 1, 2 , Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal 3 , Thomas Decker 4 , Alexander Kiani 5 , Ursula Vehling-Kaiser 6 , Salah-Eddin Al-Batran 7 , Tobias Heintges 8 , Christoph Kahl 9 , Gernot Seipelt 10 , Frank Kullmann 11 , Werner Scheithauer 12 , Markus Moehler 13, 14 , Julian Walter Holch 1, 2 , Jobst Christian von Einem 1, 2 , Swantje Held 15 and Volker Heinemann 1, 2 1 Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany 2 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany 3 Gesundheitszentrum St. Marien, Amberg, Germany 4 Oncological Practice, Ravensburg, Germany 5 Medizinische Klinik IV, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany 6 Oncological Practice, Landshut, Germany 7 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Nordwest Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Germany 8 Department of Medicine II, Stadtisches Klinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany 9 Haematology and Oncology, Staedtisches Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany 10 Oncological Practice, Bad Soden, Germany 11 Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany 12 Department of Internal Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria 13 Medical Department 1, Johannes-Gutenberg Universitat Mainz, Mainz, Germany 14 University Cancer Center Frankfurt/Mainz and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany 15 ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany Correspondence to: Dominik Paul Modest, email: dominik.modest@med.uni-muenchen.de Keywords: colorectal cancer; tumor sidedness; EGFR antibody; bevacizumab; sequential therapy Received: July 31, 2017 Accepted: October 13, 2017 Published: November 11, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess the impact of primary tumor sidedness on outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) across treatment lines. Patients and Methods: Patients of the FIRE-3 trial (initial FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab) were separately evaluated according to primary tumor site differentiating left-sided (LPT) from right-sided primary tumors (RPT). Efficacy (i.e. progression-free survival (PFS2nd) and overall survival (OS2nd) of second-line therapy) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test as well as Cox regression analyses. All analyses were also reported according to drug sequences. Results: 411 of 592 patients (69%) with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors received 2nd-line therapy has and had available information on primary tumor location, of those 309 patients (75%) presented with LPT. In patients with LPT, PFS2nd was markedly longer than in patients with RPT (6.0 months [95% CI 5.5-6.5] versus 3.8 months [95% CI 2.5-5.2], hazard ratio: 0.61 [95% CI 0.47-0.78], P

Interaction between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) has been well established in many cancer types. We investigated the effects of cetuximab (EGFR antibody) and IMC-A12 (IGF-1R antibody) on the response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to radiation therapy (RT). The effects of cetuximab and IMC-A12 on cell viability and radiosensitivity were determined by clonogenic cell survival assay. Formation of nuclear γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci was monitored by immunofluorescence. Alterations in target signaling were analyzed by Western blots. In vivo tumor growth delay assay was performed to determine the efficacy of triple therapy with IMC-A12, cetuximab, and RT. In vitro data showed that cetuximab differentially affected the survival and the radiosensitivity of HNSCC cells. Cetuximab suppressed DNA repair that was evident by the prolonged presence of nuclear γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci. IMC-A12 did not have any effect on the cell survival. However, it increased the radiosensitivity of one of the cell lines. EGFR inhibition increased IGF-1R expression levels and also the association between EGFR and IGF-1R. Addition of IMC-A12 to cetuximab did not increase the radiosensitivity of these cells. Tumor xenografts exhibited enhanced response to RT in the presence of either cetuximab or IMC-A12. Concurrent treatment regimen failed to further enhance the tumor response to cetuximab and/or RT. Taken together our data suggest that concomitant inhibition of both EGFR and IGF-1R pathways did not yield additional therapeutic benefit in overcoming resistance to RT.

Preclinical studies demonstrate that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signals through both kinase-dependent and independent pathways and that combining a small-molecule EGFR inhibitor, EGFR antibody, and/or anti-angiogenic agent is synergistic. We conducted a dose-escalation, phase I study combining erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. The subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was analyzed for safety and antitumor activity. Forty-one patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer received treatment on a range of dose levels. The most common treatment-related grade ≥2 adverse events were rash (68%), hypomagnesemia (37%), and fatigue (15%). Thirty of 34 patients (88%) treated at the full FDA-approved doses of all three drugs tolerated treatment without drug-related dose-limiting effects. Eleven patients (27%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months and three (7%) achieved a partial response (PR) (total SD>6 months/PR= 14 (34%)). Of the 14 patients with SD≥6 months/PR, eight (57%) had received prior sequential bevacizumab and cetuximab, two (5%) had received bevacizumab and cetuximab concurrently, and four (29%) had received prior bevacizumab but not cetuximab or erlotinib (though three had received prior panitumumab). The combination of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and erlotinib was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death globally. Significant improvements in survival have been made in patients with metastasis by new therapies. For example, Cetuximab and Panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the epidermal growth receptor (EGFR). KRAS mutations in codon 12 and 13 are the recognized biomarkers that are analyzed in clinics before the administration of anti-EGFR therapy. Genetic analyses have revealed that mutations in KRAS predict a lack of response to Panitumumab and Cetuximab in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Notably, it is estimated that 35–45% of CRC patients harbor KRAS mutations. Therefore, KRAS mutation testing should be performed in all individuals with the advanced CRC in order to identify the patients who will not respond to the monoclonal EGFR antibody inhibitors. New techniques for KRAS testing have arisen rapidly, and each technique has advantages and disadvantages. Herein, we review the latest published literature specific to KRAS mutation testing techniques. Since reliability and feasibility are important issues in clinical analyses. Therefore, this review also summarizes the effectiveness and limitations of numerous KRAS mutation testing techniques.

Mutation status of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) may serve as a negative predictive marker of Cetuximab in treating colorectal cancer. The present study was to determine the role of KRAS status in EGFR antibody treatment for gastric cancer. KRAS status was clarified in SGC-7901 (wild type) and YCC-2 (G→A mutation) gastric cancer cell lines. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of Cetuximab were tested both in vitro and in vivo, the expression of phosphorylated (p) ERK, a downstream protein in EGFR-RAS-MEK pathway, was also analyzed. No significant in vitro anti-proliferative or pro-apoptotic effects of Cetuximab were observed in both cell lines. The growth of either SGC-7901 or YCC-2 gastric cancer xenograft was significantly inhibited by Cetuximab. Apoptosis was induced in SGC-7901 but not in YCC-2 xenografts after Cetuximab treatment. The expression of pERK was up-regulated in YCC-2 but not SGC-7901 xenografts after Cetuximab treatment. In conclusion, KRAS (G→A) mutation does not affect in vivo anti-cancer efficacy of Cetuximab.

Lessons LearnedGC1118 is a novel fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody with unique binding epitopes and different ligand-binding inhibitory activity compared with cetuximab or panitumumab. GC1118 showed promising antitumor activity, especially in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to prior EGFR antibody. Skin toxicities were more common and diarrhea was less frequent compared with other anti-EGFR antibodies.BackgroundGC1118 is a novel monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with more potent ligand inhibition than cetuximab or panitumumab. We conducted a first-in-human, phase I study of GC118 in patients with refractory solid tumors.MethodsIn the dose escalation part, GC1118 was administered on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, followed by a 2-week rest, during which dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated. In the expansion part, patients were enrolled into three cohorts (Cohort 1 [C1], patients with colorectal cancer [CRC] without prior anti-EGFR treatment; Cohort 2 [C2], patients with CRC with tumors resistant to anti-EGFR therapy; Cohort 3 [C3], EGFR-overexpressing gastric cancer).ResultsIn the dose escalation part, 24 patients were treated at five dose levels: 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. In the 5.0 mg/kg cohort, two patients experienced DLTs (skin toxicities). The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 4.0 mg/kg. Common adverse events were skin toxicities. In the expansion part, 39 patients were enrolled. In Cohort 1, stable disease (SD) was observed in 58%; in Cohort 2, partial response (PR) 17% and SD 8%; in Cohort 3, PR 8% and SD 17%.ConclusionGC1118 showed promising antitumor activity and was well tolerated. Infrequent diarrhea compared with other anti-EGFR antibodies might be advantageous for further development.

Induction of Selective Cell Death of Oral Squamous Carcinoma Ce lls by Integrin α 2 Antibody and EGFR Antibody Yeon-Sik Choi, Gyoo-Cheon Kim 1 , Sik Yoon 2 , Dae-Seok Hwang, Cheol-Hun Kim 3 , Young-Chan Jeon 4 , June-Ho Byun 5 , Sang-Hun Shin, Uk-Kyu Kim Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1 Oral Anatomy, 4 Prothodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, 2 Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Pusan National Unive rsity, 3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, 5 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicin e, Gyeongsang National UniversityPurpose: This study was to find efficacy of integrin alpha2 ( α 2 ) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as tumor marker of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and clarify the se lective cell death effect of anti-integrin α 2 and anti-EGFR on SCC cells, additionally testify conjugated gold nanoparticle s (GNP) with air plasma for selective cell death of oral SCC.Methods: Expression of integrin α

// Martin Pool 1 , Arjan Kol 1 , Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge 2, 3 , Christian A. Gerdes 4 , Steven de Jong 1 , Elisabeth G.E. de Vries 1 , Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga 2 1 Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands 4 Department of Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland Correspondence to: Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, email: a.g.t.terwisscha.van.scheltinga@umcg.nl Keywords: imgatuzumab, EGFR, 89 Zr, immunoPET, shedding Received: January 06, 2016 Accepted: August 27, 2016 Published: September 02, 2016 ABSTRACT Preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) imaging revealed a mismatch between in vivo epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and EGFR antibody tracer tumor uptake. Shed EGFR ectodomain (sEGFR), which is present in cancer patient sera, can potentially bind tracer and therefore influence tracer kinetics. To optimize EGFR-PET, we examined the influence of sEGFR levels on tracer kinetics and tumor uptake of EGFR monoclonal antibody 89 Zr-imgatuzumab in varying xenograft models. Human cancer cell lines A431 (EGFR overexpressing, epidermoid), A549 and H441 (both EGFR medium expressing, non-small cell lung cancer) were xenografted in mice. Xenografted mice received 10, 25 or 160 μg 89 Zr-imgatuzumab, co-injected with equal doses 111 In-IgG control. MicroPET scans were made 24, 72 and 144 h post injection, followed by biodistribution analysis. sEGFR levels in liver and plasma samples were determined by ELISA. 89 Zr-imgatuzumab uptake in A431 tumors was highest (29.8 ± 5.4 %ID/g) in the 160 μg dose group. Contrary, highest uptake in A549 and H441 tumors was found at the lowest (10 μg) 89 Zr-imgatuzumab dose. High 89 Zr-imgatuzumab liver accumulation was found in A431 xenografted mice, which decreased with antibody dose increments. 89 Zr-imgatuzumab liver uptake in A549 and H441 xenografted mice was low at all doses. sEGFR levels in liver and plasma of A431 bearing mice were up to 1000-fold higher than levels found in A549, H441 and non-tumor xenografted mice. 89 Zr-imgatuzumab effectively visualizes EGFR-expressing tumors. High sEGFR levels can redirect 89 Zr-imgatuzumab to the liver, in which case tumor visualization can be improved by increasing tracer antibody dose.

KRAS mutations are proved to confer dramatic resistance to EGFR target therapy of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to establish a convenient and accurate method to screen plasma KRAS mutations of cancer patients since tumor specimens were not always available in clinical practice. A modified PNA-PCR method was established and evaluated in plasma of 19 pancreatic cancer patients. Our results showed that the modified PNA-PCR assay was a sensitive (87.5%, 14/16) and accurate (92.9%, 13/14) method to screen plasma KRAS mutations of pancreatic cancer patients and there was a high consistency of KRAS mutation status between plasma samples and tumor specimens. The modified protocol could not only screen plasma KRAS mutations rapidly and accurately but also had potential to quantify KRAS mutant DNA to predict treatment response of cancer patients and monitor disease progression. It's should be indicated that this modified assay was only confirmed in the pancreatic cancer patients in this study and need to be verified in other cancer patients.

Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) is the most common neoplasm of the upper aerodigestive tract. In this paper, we attempt to summarize the role and applications of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) locally advanced as well as metastatic SCCHN. Targeted therapy in SCCHN is now incorporated in the first-line regimes for advanced disease. Novel targeted agents, including the EGFR antibody, cetuximab, have been approved for use as single agents or in combination with radiation therapy or chemotherapy in treatment of recurrent metastatic or locally advanced SCCHN. Refractory mechanisms that bypass the pathway of EGFR inhibitors activity are identified explaining resistance to targeted therapy. Strategies of cotargeting EGFR and other pathways are under investigation. Examples of targeted therapy being used include mammalian target of rapamycin (mtor) inhibitors, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) moAb, and other inhibitors. We will be focusing our paper on the preclinical and clinical aspects of EGFR inhibition in SCCHN and touch upon other targeted therapies in application.

Necitumumab (EGFR inhibitor) in combination with chemotherapy provides a modest, yet a significant improvement in overall survival over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, combination therapies targeting EGFR and PD-1 pathway blockers may represent a better way to extend clinical benefit to more cancer patients given that PD-(L)1 antibodies have emerged as a standard of care in NSCLC. Antibodies targeting EGFR have the potential to promote an inflamed tumor microenvironment through engagement of Fc-gamma receptors (FcγR) on innate immune cells resulting in an improved antigen presentation and T cell priming. Therefore, the present study was initiated to understand the combinatorial effect of immune checkpoint (PD-(L)1) inhibitors with necitumumab. Preclinical modeling of EGFR/PD-(L)1 mAb combination in mice is challenging due to the lack of cross-reactivity of necitumumab with mouse EGFR. Syngeneic mouse tumor models widely used to study effects of immunomodulatory agents express low or no EGFR. To overcome this limitation, we used two immunocompetent model systems to study the combination effect of EGFR mAb with PD-1 (RMP1-14) or PD-L1 (178G7) mAbs: 1) genetically engineered mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma (TD model) driven by mutant forms of human EGFR (exon 19 deletion and T790M mutation) and 2) CT26 syngeneic mouse tumor model with ectopic expression of human EGFR (CT26-hEGFR). To engage mouse immune cells more efficiently, a murinized version of necitumumab was generated through antibody engineering, with human EGFR binding Fabs and a mouse Fc backbone. Intratumor immune response was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and a custom-made immune profiling Quantigene Plex (QGP) gene expression panel. In both models, targeting EGFR and PD-1 pathway resulted in the combinatorial antitumor efficacy exemplified by decreased tumor burden compared to the monotherapy groups. QGP analysis of CT26-hEGFR tumor tissue revealed that the combination treatment enhanced intra-tumor immune response exemplified by an upregulation of immune-related genes indicative of T cell infiltration (Cd3e, Cd4, Cd8b1), T cell activation (Ifng, Cd274, Pdcd1lg2, Icos, Tnfrsf4, Tnfrsf18, Cd69, Ido1, Havcr2, Lag3), myeloid cell infiltration (Cd86, Timd4, Vista, Cd68, Mpo, Nos2). Histopathological analysis confirmed an increase in T cell infiltration indicating an improved immune response in the combination therapy group. Taken together, these results provide a rationale for further evaluation of EGFR and PD-(L)1 mAbs in clinical setting. Citation Format: Veena Kandaswamy, Amelie Forest, Marianne Deroose, David A. Schaer, Ting Chen, Shengwu Liu, David Surguladze, Yung-mae Yao, Thompson Doman, Gerald Hall, Kwok-Kin Wong, Michael Kalos, Ruslan D. Novosiadly. Combination of EGFR antibody with PD-1 pathway inhibitors improves anti-tumor efficacy and enhances intra-tumor immune response in preclinical mouse tumor models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3632.

(1) To determine the safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab with concurrent gemcitabine and abdominal radiation in the treatment of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. (2) To evaluate the feasibility of pancreatic cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) molecular profiling as a potential predictor of response to anti-EGFR treatment.Patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in this dose escalation study with gemcitabine (0-300 mg/m(2)/week) given concurrently with cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose, 250 mg/m(2) weekly maintenance dose) and abdominal irradiation (50.4 Gy). Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was assessed by immunohistochemistry in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens.Sixteen patients were enrolled in 4 treatment cohorts with escalating doses of gemcitabine. Incidence of grade 1-2 adverse events was 96%, and incidence of 3-4 adverse events was 9%. There were no treatment-related mortalities. Two patients who exhibited favorable treatment response underwent surgical exploration and were intraoperatively confirmed to have unresectable tumors. Median overall survival was 10.5 months. Pancreatic cancer cell expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was successfully determined in EUS-FNA specimens from 4 patients.Cetuximab can be safely administered with abdominal radiation and concurrent gemcitabine (up to 300 mg/m(2)/week) in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This combined therapy modality exhibited limited activity. Diagnostic EUS-FNA specimens could be analyzed for molecular markers of EMT in a minority of patients with pancreatic cancer.

3555Background: MET amp is a well described driver of acquired EGFR antibody (Ab) resistance. Blood-based genomic profiling of cell free (cf)DNA is a safe and efficient means to identify pts with a...

Background: The validation of KRAS mutations as a negative marker of response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies has meant a seminal advance towards treatment individualisation of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, as a KRAS wild-type status does not guarantee a response to anti-EGFR antibodies, a current challenge is the identification of other biomarkers of response. On the basis of pre-clinical evidence, we hypothesised that mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1), a phosphatase that inactivates MAPKs, could be a mediator of resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. Methods: Tumour specimens from 48 metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab-based chemotherapy were evaluated for KRAS and BRAF mutational status and MKP-1 expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: As expected, clinical benefit was confined to wild-type KRAS and BRAF patients. Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 was overexpressed in 16 patients (33%) and was not associated with patient baseline clinicopathological characteristics and KRAS mutational status. All patients with BRAF mutations (n=3) had MKP-1 overexpression. Among KRAS wild-type patients, MKP-1 overexpressors had a 7% response rate (RR), whereas patients not overexpressing MKP-1 had a 44% RR (P=0.03). Moreover, median time to progression was significantly longer in MKP-1 non-overexpressing patients (32 vs 13 weeks, P=0.009). Conclusion: These results support the concept of MKP-1 as a promising negative marker of response to cetuximab-based treatment in CRC patients with wild-type KRAS.

Immunohistochemistry is widely used to assess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression on colorectal carcinomas to select patients for treatment with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody. The data comparing different commercial EGFR antibodies is limited, and no cost comparisons have been made. We analyzed 65 advanced colorectal cancers from 36 patients using the EGFR pharmDx kit (DakoCytomation) and Clone 31G7 (Zymed Laboratories, Inc). EGFR expression was seen in 35 (53%) tumors (21 primary, 14 metastatic) with the Dako pharmDx kit. The Zymed antibody showed positive results in 41 (63%) tumors (25 primary, 16 metastatic). The cost per test was $40.00 with the pharmDx kit and $3.52 with the Zymed antibody. The Zymed antibody detects 10% more cases of colorectal cancer as EGFR positive, and is 10 times cheaper than the Dako pharmDx kit. There is little justification for the use of expensive kits for testing EGFR expression, when other available antibodies without the kit can give comparable or superior results.

Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) would seem to be the ideal malignancy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition either with antibodies or small molecule tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors. EGFR protein is overexpressed in more than 90% of tumors relative to normal tissue, and high expression is associated with poor disease control. Data from preclinical models show at least additive effects of the two classes of EGFR inhibitors when combined with cisplatin, providing rationale for combination therapy. To date, cetuximab has been studied in recurrent HNSCC in combination with cisplatin and platinum plus fluorouracil (FU) as first-line treatment for recurrence and in the setting of platinum refractory disease, whereas the small molecule TK inhibitors have been tested as single agents in the secondor third-line setting. The optimal timing of EGFR inhibitors in the palliation of patients with disease recurrence has not been well defined. HNSCC has the theoretical advantage of providing easily accessible tumor for biopsy, which could facilitate study of the putative effects of molecularly targeted therapies on the complex signaling pathways downstream of the EGFR. Such correlative tissue studies are needed to elucidate EGFR pathway tumor biology and identify predictive markers for better patient selection for these costly therapies. This issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology contains five articles that provide some insights into these questions and the results of an analysis of the impact of radiotherapy (RT) plus EGFR antibody therapy on quality of life (QoL). QoL is a complex measure, particularly for those not immersed in this field, seemingly with its own terminology, variety of tools, and myriad statistical tests. However, the importance of QoL cannot be underestimated for patients with head and neck cancer. As multimodality therapies are intensified, consideration of QoL in therapeutic decision-making, and in formulating standards of care, is of paramount importance. This issue of JCO contains a report of QoL assessments that were performed as part of the prospective comparison of RT alone to RT plus concurrent cetuximab in patients with locally advanced HNSCC published by Bonner et al. Significant improvements in overall survival and local-regional recurrence-free survival were observed for patients in the cetuximab treatment group without an apparent increase in toxicity. The current paper bolsters those findings through the use of two validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Module) that address symptom burden and its effect on physical and functional well-being, emotional, and social interactions. No significant differences were found between the two treatments in QoL at baseline or during the course of treatment out to 12 months. In both groups, QoL declined during treatment, with the greatest impact on function due to fatigue, loss of appetite, swallowing difficulty, and sensory problems, and then improved by 8 to 12 months. The authors interpreted this as a positive result. This pattern of decline and then return to baseline by about 12 months confirms data from other head and neck trials as does the observed correlation between global health/QoL and survival. Because a significant difference in local-regional control was reported in the primary paper, one might have postulated that the symptom burden of uncontrolled disease would result in a worse QOL for patients in the control group. In other words, the real goal and indication of a positive outcome should be an improvement in QOL for patients receiving the treatment that afforded them significantly longer survival and disease control, in this case RT plus cetuximab. It is not clear whether the occurrence of more dropouts over time among controls (RT alone) obscured this effect or the questionnaires used were not sensitive enough to detect differences between the treatment groups (not just within treatment groups). The conclusion that QOL was not worse for patients receiving RT plus cetuximab than for those treated with RT alone is, unfortunately, not very satisfying. As advances are made in multimodality therapies, we should seek improvements in QoL that parallel improvements in survival. Two therapeutic trials are reported in this issue. Vermorken et al tested single-agent cetuximab in a multicenter phase II trial enrolling 103 patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC that had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. In a two-part design, patients were first treated with cetuximab alone until disease progression, and then they were offered continuation of cetuximab with the addition of platinum. The objective response rate (complete plus partial response) for treatment with cetuximab alone was 13% (95% CI, 7 to 21), the disease control rate (complete plus partial plus stable response) was 46% (95% CI, 36 to 56), and the median time to progression (TTP) was 70 days. Of these 103 patients, 53 proceeded to the second part of the trial and received JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY E D I T O R I A L VOLUME 25 NUMBER 16 JUNE 1 2007

Purpose: To optimally integrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors into the clinical treatment of head and neck cancer, two important questions must be answered: (a) does EGFR inhibition add to the effects of radiochemotherapy, and (b) if so, which method of inhibiting EGFR is superior (an EGFR antibody versus a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor)? We designed an in vivo study to address these questions. Experimental Design: Nude mice with UMSCC-1 head and neck cancer xenografts received either single, double, or triple agent therapy with an EGFR inhibitor (either cetuximab or gefitinib), gemcitabine, and/or radiation for 3 weeks. Tumor volumes and animal weights were measured for up to 15 weeks. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were done on tumors treated with either cetuximab or gefitinib alone. Results: The addition of an EGFR inhibitor significantly delayed the tumor volume doubling time, from a median of 40 days with radiochemotherapy (gemcitabine and radiation) alone, to 106 days with cetuximab and 66 days with gefitinib (both P < 0.005). Cetuximab resulted in significantly less weight loss than gefitinib. Immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescent staining of tumors show that although levels of phosphorylated AKT and extracellular signal–regulated kinase were decreased similarly in response to cetuximab or gefitinib, cetuximab caused prolonged suppression of pEGFR, pSTAT3, and BclXL compared with gefitinib. Conclusions: EGFR inhibition, particularly with cetuximab, improves the effectiveness of radiochemotherapy in this model of head and neck cancer. The correlation of response with prolonged suppression of EGFR, STAT3, and BclXL offers the possibility that these may be candidate biomarkers for response.

Purpose: The EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib and afatinib, have transformed the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. However, almost all patients who respond develop acquired resistance on average approximately 1 year after starting therapy. Resistance is commonly due to a secondary mutation in EGFR (EGFRT790M). We previously found that the combination of the EGFR TKI afatinib and the EGFR antibody cetuximab could overcome EGFRT790M-mediated resistance in preclinical models. This combination has shown a 29% response rate in a clinical trial in patients with acquired resistance to first-generation TKIs. An outstanding question is whether this regimen is beneficial when used as first-line therapy. Experimental Design: Using mouse models of EGFR-mutant lung cancer, we tested whether the combination of afatinib plus cetuximab delivered upfront to mice with TKI-naïve EGFRL858R-induced lung adenocarcinomas delayed tumor relapse and drug-resistance compared with single-agent TKIs. Results: Afatinib plus cetuximab markedly delayed the time to relapse and incidence of drug-resistant tumors, which occurred in only 63.6% of the mice, in contrast to erlotinib or afatinib treatment where 100% of mice developed resistance. Mechanisms of tumor escape observed in afatinib plus cetuximab resistant tumors include the EGFRT790M mutation and Kras mutations. Experiments in cell lines and xenografts confirmed that the afatinib plus cetuximab combination does not suppress the emergence of EGFRT790M. Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of afatinib plus cetuximab as an effective treatment strategy for patients with TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant lung cancer and indicate that clinical trial development in this area is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(2); 426–35. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: The novel dual-action humanized IgG1 antibody MEHD7945A targeting HER3 and EGFR inhibits ligand-dependent HER dimer signaling. This phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of MEHD7945A. Experimental Design: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic epithelial tumors received escalating doses of MEHD7945A (1–30 mg/kg) every 2 weeks (q2w) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. An expansion cohort was enrolled at the recommended phase II dose (14 mg/kg, q2w). Plasma samples, tumor biopsies, FDG-PET were obtained for assessment of pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic modulation downstream of EGFR and HER3. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities or MEHD7945A-related grade ≥ 4 adverse events (AE) were reported in dose-escalation (n = 30) or expansion (n = 36) cohorts. Related grade 3 AEs were limited to diarrhea and nausea in the same patient (30 mg/kg). Related AEs in ≥20% of patients ≤24 hours after the first infusion included grade 1/2 headache, fever, and chills, which were managed with premedication and/or symptomatic treatment. Pharmacodynamic data indicated target inhibition in 25% of evaluable patients. Best response by RECIST included 2 confirmed partial responses in squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck (SCCHN) patients with high tumor tissue levels of the HER3 ligand heregulin; 14 patients had stable disease ≥8 weeks, including SCCHN (n = 3), colorectal cancer (n = 6), and non–small cell lung cancer (n = 3). Conclusions: MEHD7945A was well-tolerated as single agent with evidence of tumor pharmacodynamic modulation and antitumor activity in SCCHN. Phase II studies were initiated with flat (nonweight-based) dosing at 1,100 mg q2w in SCCHN and colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 21(11); 2462–70. ©2015 AACR.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 80%–90% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Matuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, blocks activation of EGFR. Paclitaxel and EGFR inhibitors have additive antitumour effects in vitro. This phase I study assessed the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the combination of matuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. Materials and methods Eighteen chemotherapy-naive (n = 9) or pretreated (n = 9) patients with stage IIIB or IV EGFR-positive NSCLC received weekly doses of matuzumab (100, 200, 400 or 800 mg) followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Toxicity was evaluated weekly and pharmacokinetics were measured during cycles 1 and 2. Results The maximum planned matuzumab dose of 800 mg was achieved without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one of three patients at 800 mg but resolved within 1 week; five additional patients treated with 800 mg had no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Grade 1/2 acneiform skin rash in 14 patients was the most frequent matuzumab-related side-effect. There were no higher-grade adverse events. Grade 2 toxicities included pruritus (n = 2), bronchospasm (n = 1), fissures (n = 1), abdominal pain (n = 1) and hot flushes (n = 1). Paclitaxel was discontinued in four patients due to allergic reactions. Coadministration of paclitaxel did not alter matuzumab pharmacokinetics. Responses occurred in four of 18 patients and included one complete response. Conclusions Matuzumab doses up to 800 mg weekly with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks are well tolerated, with no apparent drug interactions and with evidence of antitumor activity.

Purpose: Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpressed by many epithelial-derived cancer cells with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAb) inhibits their growth. A limited number of clinical responses in patients treated with the anti-EGFR mAb, (cetuximab), may reflect variability in EGFR type or signaling in neoplastic cells. This study combines EGFR-targeting with the non-MHC–restricted cytotoxicity of anti-CD3 activated T cells (ATC) to enhance receptor-directed cytotoxicity. Experimental Design: ATC from normal and patient donors were expanded ex vivo. Specific cytolytic activity of ATC armed with anti-CD3 × anti-EGFR (EGFRBi) against EGFR-expressing cancer cells derived from lung, pancreas, colon, prostate, brain, skin, or EGFR-negative breast cancer cells was evaluated in 51Cr release assays. In vivo studies comparing tumor growth delay induced by EGFRBi-armed ATCs or cetuximab were done in severe combined immunodeficient/Beige mice (SCID-Beige) bearing COLO 356/FG pancreatic and LS174T colorectal tumors. Results: At effector/target ratios from 3.125 to 50, both EGFRBi-armed normal and patient ATC were significantly more cytotoxic, by 23% to 79%, against EGFR-positive cells over ATC, cetuximab, anti-CD3 alone, or ATC armed with irrelevant BiAb directed at CD20. EGFRBi-armed ATC also secreted significantly higher levels of some TH1/TH2 cytokines compared with ATC alone. In mice, i.v. infusions of EGFRBi-armed ATC (0.001 mg equivalent/infusion) were equally effective as cetuximab (1 mg/infusion) alone for significantly delaying growth of established COLO 356/FG but not LS174T tumors compared with mice that received ATC alone or vehicle (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Combining EGFR antibody targeting with T cell–mediated cytotoxicity may overcome some limitations associated with EGFR-targeting when using cetuximab alone.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of many human malignancies and is therefore an attractive target against which anticancer therapy may be effective. At present, there are two ways in which this may be achieved clinically: antibodies against EGFR and inhibitors of the EGFR tyrosine kinase. This review describes presently approved agents cetuximab (monoclonal EGFR antibody), gefitinib and erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in detail. Efficacy data for these agents in various human malignancies is presented. Various other agents that are in the early stages of development at present have also been mentioned.

Contains fulltext : 152192.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Molecular imaging of specific biomarkers can have prognostic, predictive or monitoring value in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is involved in various radiation resistance mechanisms as it steers the pathways related to DNA damage repair, proliferation, hypoxia and apoptosis. Radiolabeled labeled F(ab')2 fragments of the EGFR antibody cetuximab can be applied for non-invasive imaging of this receptor. Preclinical studies have shown that radioresistant tumors had a higher tracer uptake after irradiation, probably due to upregulation of membranous EGFR, thereby increasing target availability possibly as a compensation mechanism. Tumors with increased EGFR availability were also more responsive to the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab. Potentially, radionuclide imaging of the EGFR can be applied for monitoring treatment regimens in clinical practice.

654 Background: Guidelines for managing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were updated in Denmark in 2013, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors were promoted from third-line to first-line treatment for KRAS wildtype mCRC patients. As a result, more patients became eligible for EGFR antibody therapy. Weexamined KRAS testing practice among patients with mCRC who received systemic cancer treatment in Denmark during 2009-2013. Methods: We linked data from several population registries with nationwide coverage - the Danish Cancer Registry, the Danish National Patient Registry, and the Danish National Pathology Registry - to identify patients diagnosed with mCRC (primary or recurrent) between 2009 and 2013, their systemic cancer treatment, and their KRAS testing status. We obtained all KRAS test results through 2014 and calculated proportions of KRAS-tested patients by year of mCRC diagnosis. Results: There were 7,245 mCRC patients, among whom 4,272 (59%) had a record of systemic cancer treatment within 6 months of mCRC diagnosis and were included in the analysis. The proportion of men was 57%; median age at mCRC diagnosis was 67 years (range 20-94 years). Overall, 2,099/4,272 (49%) of the treated mCRC patients had a recorded KRAS test result, with similar proportions for patients with primary and recurrent mCRC. Among patients diagnosed with mCRC in 2009, the proportion with a recorded KRAS test result was 374/900 (42%). Corresponding proportions for patients diagnosed in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 were 411/891 (46%), 457/870 (52%), 430/807 (53%), and 427/804 (53%). Conclusions: Among patients in Denmark diagnosed with mCRC who received systemic cancer treatment, the proportion of patients with a KRAS test result recorded in the Danish National Pathology Registry increased from 2009 to 2013. This may have resulted from increased testing or increased recording, or both.

Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a genetic disease with high prevalence and poor survival. Evaluation of recurrent tumor for a valid biomarker may serve as a predictive system for analyzing prognostic course of this disease. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the immunoscoring of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in recurrent cases with their matched regional/locoregional recurrence and non-recurrent cases of OSCC. Methodology A total of 64 cases of OSCC were studied and immunostained with polyclonal EGFR antibody. Of these, 33 cases recurred at the end of 5 years of follow-up. For positive evaluation of EGFR staining, immunscoring was performed by adding the extent score and intensity score. Results We observed significant increase in EGFR immunoscore in recurrent cases of OSCC (P-value 0.001). Immunoscoring of EGFR expression is an independent prognostic and/or predictive parameter for recurrence in OSCC (Odds Ratio: 6.52). Conclusion Immunoscore using EGFR can be incorporated into traditional classification, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool.

Despite clinical efficacy, current approved agents targeting EGFR are associated with on-target toxicities as a consequence of disrupting normal EGFR function. MAb 806 is a novel EGFR antibody that selectively targets a tumor-selective epitope suggesting that a mAb 806-based therapeutic would retain antitumor activity without the on-target toxicities associated with EGFR inhibition. To enable clinical development, a humanized variant of mAb 806 designated ABT-806 was generated and is currently in phase 1 trials. We describe the characterization of binding and functional properties of ABT-806 compared with the clinically validated anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. ABT-806 binds the mutant EGFRvIII with high affinity and, relative to cetuximab, exhibits increased potency against glioblastoma multiforme cell line and patient-derived xenografts expressing this form of the receptor. ABT-806 also inhibits the growth of squamous cell carcinoma xenograft models expressing high levels of wild-type EGFR, associated with inhibition of EGFR signaling, although higher doses of ABT-806 than cetuximab are required for similar activity. ABT-806 enhances in vivo potency of standard-of-care therapies used to treat glioblastoma multiforme and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. An indium-labeled version of ABT-806, [111In]-ABT-806, used to investigate the relationship between dose and receptor occupancy, revealed greater receptor occupancy at lowers doses in an EGFRvIII-expressing model and significant uptake in an orthotopic model. Collectively, these results suggest that ABT-806 may have antitumor activity superior to cetuximab in EGFRvIII-expressing tumors, and similar activity to cetuximab in tumors highly overexpressing wild-type EGFR with reduced toxicity. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(5); 1141–51. ©2015 AACR.