Search

Introduction: In 2014 the Consensus Document produced by the Spanish Paediatric Societies (SEIP-SERPE-SEOP) was published to help in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoarticular infections (OAI). In 2015 the RIOPed was considered as a multidisciplinary national network for the investigation into OAI. The aim of this study was to assess the level of adaption to the recommendations established in the Consensus during one year of follow-up. Material and methods: A prospective, national multicentre study was carried out in 37 hospitals between September 2015 and September 2016. The study included patients >16 years-old with a diagnosis of OAI, confirmed by microbiological isolation, or probable: septic arthritis (SA) with >40,000 white cells in synovial fluid, or osteomyelitis (OM)/spondylodiscitis (SD) with a compatible imaging test. The results were compared with those obtained in a retrospective study conducted between 2008 and 2012. Results: A total of 235 cases were included, of which 131 were OM, 79 SA, 30 OA, and 15 SD. As regards the complementary tests that the Consensus considered mandatory to perform, radiography was carried out on 87.8% of the cases, a blood culture on 91.6%, and culture of the synovial fluid in 99% of SA. A magnetic resonance (MR) was performed on 71% of the OM cases. The choice of intravenous empirical antibiotic treatment was adapted to the recommendations in 65.1% of cases, and in 62.3% for the oral treatment. Surgery was performed in 36.8% of SA cases (85.7% arthrotomy), with a significant decrease compared to the retrospective study (P = .014). Only 58.5% of cases followed the recommendations on the duration of the treatment; however, a lower duration of intravenous treatment was observed. Conclusions: In general, the level of adaptation to the recommendations that were set by the Expert Group, is good for the complementary tests, and acceptable as regards the choice of antibiotic treatment, although inadequate in almost 40% of cases. A decrease in hospital stay was achieved. Resumen: Introducción: En 2014 se publicó el Documento de Consenso desarrollado por SEIP-SERPE-SEOP para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de las infecciones osteoarticulares (IOA). En 2015 se constituyó RIOPed como red nacional multidisciplinar para la investigación en IOA. El objetivo del estudio ha sido valorar el grado de adecuación a las recomendaciones establecidas en el consenso durante un año de seguimiento. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo multicéntrico nacional realizado entre septiembre de 2015 y septiembre de 2016 en 37 hospitales con inclusión de pacientes menores de 16 años diagnosticados de IOA, confirmada mediante aislamiento microbiológico, o probable: artritis séptica (AS) con >40.000 leucocitos en líquido sinovial u osteomielitis (OM)/osteoartritis (OA)/espondilodiscitis (ED) con prueba de imagen compatible. Los resultados se compararon con los obtenidos en el estudio retrospectivo realizado entre 2008 y 2012. Resultados: Se incluyeron 255 casos: 131 OM, 79 AS, 30 OA y 15 ED. Respecto a las pruebas complementarias que el consenso consideró de obligada realización, la radiografía se llevó a cabo en el 87,8% de los casos, el hemocultivo en el 91,6% y el cultivo de líquido sinovial en el 99% de AS. Se realizó RM en el 71% de las OM. La elección del tratamiento antibiótico intravenoso empírico se adecuó a las recomendaciones en el 65,1% de los casos, y en el 62,3% para el tratamiento oral. Se llevó a cabo cirugía en el 36,8% de las AS (85,7% artrotomía), con un descenso significativo respecto al estudio retrospectivo (P = ,014). Solo el 58,5% de casos se ajustaron a las recomendaciones de duración del tratamiento; sin embargo, se comprobó una menor duración del tratamiento intravenoso. Conclusiones: En general, el grado de adecuación a las recomendaciones que marcaron el grupo de expertos es bueno para las pruebas complementarias y aceptable respecto a la elección del tratamiento antibiótico, aun detectándose casi un 40% de inadecuación. Se ha conseguido un descenso de la estancia hospitalaria.

[Objectives]: To describe the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized children in Spain and analyze the predictors of the etiology., [Hypothesis]: The different etiological groups of pediatric CAP are associated with different clinical, radiographic, and analytical data., [Design]: Observational, multicenter, and prospective study., [Patient selection]: This study included children aged 1 month to 17 years with CAP, who were hospitalized between April 2012 and May 2019., [Methods]: An extensive microbiological workup was performed. The clinical, radiographic, and analytical parameters were analyzed for three etiological groups., [Results]: Among the 495 children included, at least one causative pathogen was identified in 262 (52.9%): pathogenic viruses in 155/262 (59.2%); atypical bacteria (AB), mainly Mycoplasma pneumonia, in 84/262 (32.1%); and typical bacteria (TyB) in 40/262 (15.3%). Consolidation was observed in 89/138 (64.5%) patients with viral CAP, 74/84 (88.1%) with CAP caused by AB, and 40/40 (100%) with CAP caused by TyB. Para-pneumonic pleural effusion (PPE) was observed in 112/495 (22.6%) patients, of which 61/112 (54.5%) presented a likely causative pathogen: viruses in 12/61 (19.7%); AB in 23/61 (37.7%); and TyB in 26/61 (42.6%). Viral etiology was significantly frequent in young patients and in those with low oxygen saturation, wheezing, no consolidation, and high lymphocyte counts. CAP patients with AB as the etiological agent had a significantly longer and less serious course as compared to those with other causative pathogens., [Conclusions]: Viruses and M. pneumoniae are the main causes of pediatric CAP in Spain. Wheezing, young age, and no consolidation on radiographs are indicative of viral etiology. Viruses and AB can also cause PPE. Since only a few cases can be directly attributed to TyB, the indications for antibiotics must be carefully considered in each patient., Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Grant/Award Number: AY191212‐1; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness) and co‐funded by the European Regional Development Funds, Grant/Award Number: Project PI17/01458; Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Grant/Award Number: PCAPE 2011_0025 Register 320/11; Research Project of Universidad Europea de Madrid, Grant/Award Number: 2017/UEM03

Background: Establishing the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children at admission is challenging. Most of the admitted children with CAP receive antibiotics. We aimed to build and validate a diagnostic tool combining clinical, analytical and radiographic features to differentiate viral from bacterial CAP, and among bacterial CAP, typical from atypical bacteria. Methods: Design-observational, multi-center, prospective cohort study was conducted in 2 phases. Settings: 24 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Spain. Patients-A total of 495 consecutive hospitalized children between 1 month and 16 years of age with CAP were enrolled. Interventions-A score with 2 sequential steps was built (training set, 70% patients, and validation set 30%). Step 1 differentiates between viral and bacterial CAP and step 2 between typical and atypical bacterial CAP. Optimal cutoff points were selected to maximize specificity setting a high sensitivity (80%). Weights of each variable were calculated with a multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measures-Viral or bacterial etiology. Results: In total, 262 (53%) children (median age: 2 years, 52.3% male) had an etiologic diagnosis. In step 1, bacterial CAPs were classified with a sensitivity = 97%, a specificity = 48%, and a ROC's area under the curve = 0.81. If a patient with CAP was classified as bacterial, he/she was assessed with step 2. Typical bacteria were classified with a sensitivity = 100%, a specificity = 64% and area under the curve = 0.90. We implemented the score into a mobile app named Pneumonia Etiology Predictor, freely available at usual app stores, that provides the probability of each etiology. Conclusions: This 2-steps tool can facilitate the physician's decision to prescribe antibiotics without compromising patient safety. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness) Instituto de Investigacion Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) AY191212-1 Universidad Europea de Madrid 2017/UEM03 Instituto Ramon y Cajal de Investigacion Sanitaria (IRYCIS) Spanish Government Grant for emerging groups (PCAPE 2011_0025; 320/11) 3.806 JCR (2021) Q1, 31/130 Pediatrics 1.104 SJR (2021) Q1, 29/320 Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health No data IDR 2021 UEM

Objetives. To perform a description of the etiology of hospitalized children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Spain and analyze predictors related to etiology. Hypothesis. The different etiological groups of pediatric CAP are associated to different clinical, radiographic and analytical data. Design. Observational, multi-center, prospective study. Patient selection. Patients from 1 month to 17 years admitted because of CAP from April 2012 to May 2019. Methods. An extensive microbiological workup was done. Clinical, radiographic and analytical parameters were analyzed in order to differentiate viral, atypical bacteria (AB) and typical bacteria (TyB) pneumonia. Results. 495 children were enrolled. At least one likely causative pathogen was identified in 262 (52.9%). Pathogenic viruses in 155/262 (59.2%), AB in 84/262 (32.1%) and TyB in 40/262 (15.3%). Consolidation was found in 89/138 (64.5%) CAP attributed to virus only, in 74/84 (88.1%) of CAP attributed to AB and 40/40 (100%) of CAP attributed to TyB. Para-pneumonic pleural effusion (PPE) was found in 112/495 (22.6%) patients, 61/112 (54.5%) with a likely causative pathogen: virus 12/61 (19.7%), AB 23/61 (37.7%) and TyB 26/61 (42.6%). Viral etiology was significantly more frequent in younger patients and those with lower oxygen saturation, wheezing, no-consolidation and higher lymphocyte counts. Patients with AB were significantly more likely to have more days of fever at admission and a higher rate of use of antibiotics before admission. Conclusions. Viruses and AB are the main cause of pediatric CAP in Spain. Wheezing, younger age and no-consolidation on the X-ray support viral etiology. Viruses and AB can also cause PPE. The use of antibiotic in pediatric CAP can be restricted.

Introduction: There are only a limited number of studies on the impact of influenza in the Spanish child population. The present work intends to increase this knowledge by studying some key aspects, such as the incidence of hospital admissions, clinic variables, comorbidities, and the vaccination status in the hospitalised children. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of children under 15 years and hospitalised due to community acquired influenza confirmed microbiologically, during 2 ́flu seasons (2014–2015 and 2015–2016). The study was carried out in 10 hospitals of 6 cities, which represent approximately 12% of the Spanish child population. Results: A total of 907 children were admitted to hospital with main diagnosis of influenza infection (447 10 years. Admission to the PICU was required in 10% (92) of the cases, mainly due to acute respiratory failure. Conclusion: Influenza continues to be an important cause of hospitalization in the Spanish child population. Children 50%) of the cases. Many of the severe forms of childhood influenza that occur today could be avoided if current vaccination guidelines were met. Resumen: Introducción: La información existente sobre el impacto de la gripe en la población infantil española es escasa. El presente trabajo pretende aumentar este conocimiento estudiando aspectos clave como la incidencia de hospitalización, clínica, comorbilidades y el estado vacunal en los niños hospitalizados. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, por revisión de historias clínicas, en menores de 15 años hospitalizados por gripe adquirida en la comunidad, confirmada microbiológicamente, durante 2 temporadas gripales (2014-2015 y 2015-2016). El estudio se realizó en 10 hospitales de 6 ciudades, que atienden aproximadamente al 12% de la población infantil española. Resultados: Fueron hospitalizados 907 niños con diagnóstico principal de gripe (447 50%) de los casos. Una gran parte de las formas graves de gripe en población infantil podrían ser evitada si se cumplieran las indicaciones actuales de vacunación.

Background and ObjectivesEstablishing the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children at admission is challenging. As a result, most children receive antibiotics that do not need.This study aims to build and validate a diagnostic tool combining clinical, analytical and radiographical features to sequentially differentiate viral from bacterial CAP, and among bacterial CAP, typical from atypical bacteria, to improve choice of treatment.MethodsConsecutive hospitalized children between 1 month and 16 years of age with CAP were enrolled. An extensive microbiological workup was performed. A score was built with a training set of 70% patients, to first differentiate between viral and bacterial CAP and secondly, typical from atypical bacterial CAP. To select variables, a Ridge model was used. Optimal cut-off points were selected to maximize specificity setting a high sensitivity (80%). Weights of each variable were calculated with a multivariable logistic regression. The score was validated with the rest of the participants.ResultsIn total, 262 (53%) children (median age, 2 years, 52.3% male) had an etiological diagnosis.The step 1 discriminates viral from bacterial CAP. Bacterial CAPs were classified with a sensitivity=97%, a specificity=48%, and a ROC’s area under the curve (AUC)=0.81. If a CAP was classificated as bacterial, it was assessed with step 2. The step 2 differentiates typical vs. atypical bacterial CAP. Typical bacteria were classified with a sensitivity=100%, a specificity=64%, and AUC=0.90.ConclusionThis two-steps tool can facilitate the physician’s decision to prescribe antibiotics without compromising patient safety.Article summaryWe validated a clinical tool to predict the aetiology of CAP in children safely. This tool differentiates CAP into viral, atypical bacteria and typical bacteria.“What’s Known on This Subject”Establishing the aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children at admission is challenging. As a result, most admitted children with CAP receive antibiotics.“What This Study Adds”We validated a clinical tool to predict the aetiology of pneumonia in children safely, differentiating among viral, atypical bacteria and typical bacteria.

We conducted a multicenter clinical validity study of the Panbio coronavirus disease 2019 Antigen Rapid Test of nasopharyngeal samples in pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019-compatible symptoms of ≤5 days of evolution. Our study showed limited accuracy in nasopharyngeal antigen testing: overall sensitivity was 45.4%, and 99.8% of specificity, positive-predictive value was 92.5%.

The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for children resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence.The 2 + 1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate.A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2 + 1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks.Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants.Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2+1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar.In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups.Two-dose schedules for MMR (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine.Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, both for girls and boys, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders. Resumen: El CAV-AEP publica anualmente el calendario de vacunaciones que estima idóneo para los niños residentes en España, teniendo en cuenta la evidencia científica disponible.Se mantiene el esquema 2 + 1 (2, 4 y 11 meses) con vacunas hexavalentes (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) y con antineumocócica conjugada 13-valente.Se aconseja un refuerzo a los 6 años, preferentemente con DTPa (si está disponible), junto a una dosis de polio para aquellos que recibieron esquemas 2 + 1, así como vacunación con Tdpa en adolescentes y en cada embarazo, preferentemente entre las 27 y las 32 semanas.La vacuna del rotavirus debería ser sistemática para todos los lactantes.Se sigue proponiendo la incorporación en el calendario de la vacuna antimeningocócica B, con esquema 2 + 1 en lactantes.Además de la inclusión de la vacuna antimeningocócica conjugada tetravalente (MenACWY) a los 12 años con rescate hasta los 18 años, inclusive, el CAV recomienda que esta vacuna sea introducida también a los 12 meses de edad, sustituyendo a MenC. Igualmente, se recomienda en los mayores de 6 semanas de edad con factores de riesgo o que viajen a países de elevada incidencia de estos serogrupos.Se emplearán esquemas de 2 dosis para triple vírica (12 meses y 3-4 años) y varicela (15 meses y 3-4 años). La segunda dosis se podría aplicar como vacuna tetravírica.Se recomienda la vacunación sistemática universal frente al VPH, tanto a chicas como a chicos, preferentemente a los 12 años, debiendo realizar un mayor esfuerzo para mejorar las coberturas. La de 9 genotipos amplía la cobertura para ambos sexos.

Sin financiación 2.126 JCR (2019) Q4, 123/159 Immunology 1.139 SJR (2019) Q1, 39/311 Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health No data IDR 2019 UEM

The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for all children and adolescent resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence.The 2 + 1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate. A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2 + 1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks.Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants.Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2 + 1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar.In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups.Two-dose schedules for triple viral (12 months and 3–4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3–4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine.Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, regardless of gender, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders. Resumen: El CAV-AEP publica anualmente el calendario de vacunaciones que estima idóneo para los niños y adolescentes residentes en España, teniendo en cuenta la evidencia científica disponible.Se mantiene el esquema 2 + 1 (2, 4 y 11 meses) con vacunas hexavalentes (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) y con antineumocócica conjugada 13-valente.Se aconseja un refuerzo a los 6 años, preferentemente con DTPa (si está disponible), junto a una dosis de polio para aquellos que recibieron esquemas 2 + 1, así como vacunación con Tdpa en adolescentes y en cada embarazo, preferentemente entre las 27 y 32 semanas.La vacuna del rotavirus debería ser sistemática para todos los lactantes.Se insiste en la incorporación en el calendario de la vacuna antimeningocócica B, con esquema 2 + 1 en lactantes.Además de la inclusión de la vacuna antimeningocócica conjugada tetravalente (MenACWY) a los 12 años con rescate hasta 18 años, inclusive, el CAV-AEP recomienda que esta vacuna sea introducida también a los 12 meses de edad, sustituyendo a MenC. Igualmente, se recomienda en los mayores de 6 semanas de edad con factores de riesgo o que viajen a países de elevada incidencia de estos serogrupos.Se emplearán esquemas de dos dosis para triple vírica (12 meses y 3-4 años) y varicela (15 meses y 3-4 años). La segunda dosis se podría aplicar como vacuna tetravírica.Se recomienda la vacunación sistemática universal frente al VPH, con independencia del género, preferentemente a los 12 años, insistiendo en un mayor esfuerzo para mejorar las coberturas. La de 9 genotipos amplía la cobertura para ambos sexos.

Introduction: This study was undertaken to estimate the burden of morbidity associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza in children below 15 years of age. Patients and methods: Children presenting with acute respiratory infection and/or isolated fever at the Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain between November 2010 and May 2011 were included in this study (NCT01592799). Two nasopharyngeal secretion samples were taken from each; one for a rapid influenza diagnostic test in the emergency department, and the second for laboratory analysis using real-time polymerase chain reaction and viral culture. Results: A total of 501 children were recruited, of whom 91 were hospitalized. Influenza diagnosis was confirmed in 131 children (26.1%); 120 of 410 (29.3%) treated as outpatients and 11 of 91 (12.1%) hospitalized children. A total of 370 of 501 children (73.9%) had no laboratory test positive for influenza. The proportion of subjects with other respiratory viruses was 145/501 (28.9%) cases and co-infection with the influenza virus plus another respiratory virus was detected in 7/501 (1.4%) cases. Influenza virus types were: A (H1N1 and H3N2) 53.2% (67/126); B (Victoria and Yamagata) 46.0% (58/126); A + B 0.8% (1/126). The median direct medical costs associated with each case of laboratory-confirmed influenza was €177.00 (N = 131). No significant differences were observed between the medical costs associated with influenza A and B. Conclusion: Almost half of the cases were influenza virus B type. The administration of a vaccine containing influenza A and B types to children below 15 years of age might reduce the overall burden of the illness. Resumen: Introducción: El estudio se llevó a cabo para estimar la carga de enfermedad de la gripe confirmada por laboratorio en niños menores de 15 años. Pacientes y métodos: Los niños que acudieron al Hospital Universitario de Basurto con síntomas de infección respiratoria aguda y/o fiebre aislada entre noviembre de 2010 y mayo de 2011 fueron incluidos en el estudio (NCT01592799). Se tomaron 2 muestras de secreción nasofaríngea: una para un test de diagnóstico rápido en el Servicio de Urgencias y otra para análisis en laboratorio con reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real y cultivo viral. Resultados: Se seleccionó a un total de 501 niños, de los que 91 fueron hospitalizados. El diagnóstico de gripe se confirmó en 131 (26,1%); 120/410 (29,3%) fueron tratados ambulatoriamente y 11/91 (12,1%), hospitalizados. En 370/501 niños (73,9%) el resultado no fue positivo. La proporción de otros virus respiratorios fue 145/501 (28,9%) casos y de coinfección con otro virus respiratorio además de gripe de 7/501 (1,4%). Los tipos de virus de gripe fueron: A (H1N1 y H3N2) 53,2% (67/126); B (Victoria y Yamagata) 46,0% (58/126); A + B 0,8% (1/126). El coste médico directo medio asociado con cada caso de gripe confirmada fue de 177,00 € (N = 131). No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el coste asociado con gripe A o B. Conclusión: Casi la mitad de los casos fueron virus de gripe B. La administración de una vacuna que incluya tipos A y B de gripe debería reducir la carga de la enfermedad.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the immune response and reactogenicity of a combined hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell Bordetella pertussis (DTPw-HBV) vaccine administered to healthy infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. A total of 179 infants (6–12 weeks of age) received three doses of DTPw—HBV vaccine. Blood samples for antibody determinations were taken before vaccination, 2 months after the second dose and 1 month after the third dose. Solicited and unsolicited symptoms were recorded by parents in a diary card. All vaccinees had protective levels of anti-HBs [geometric mean titre (GMT): 1526 mIU ml −1 ], anti-diphtheria and antitetanus antibodies, 1 month after the third dose. Ninety-two percent of the subjects exhibited a response to the B. pertussis component. Most (99.4%) solicited reactions occurred within the first 48 h and the majority were mild or moderate. The safety, immunogenicity of this tetravalent vaccine was demonstrated when it was administered in infants following the 0, 2, 4-month dosing schedule.

This double-blind, randomised study was performed to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of three lots of a quadrivalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine (DTPa-HBV) co-administered with three lots of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate (Hib) vaccine in one injection, as a primary vaccination course in healthy infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. 269 infants (8-11 weeks of age) were randomly allocated to three groups to receive DTPa-HBV/Hib vaccines, concomitantly with oral polio vaccine. Blood samples for antibody determinations were taken before vaccination and 1 month after the third dose in 262 subjects. Local and general symptoms were recorded by parents on diary cards. All vaccinees had post-vaccination protective anti-D and anti-T (or = 0.1 IU ml-1) antibodies, and 98% had protective anti-HBs antibody titres (or = 10 mIU ml-1). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in post-vaccination anti-D, anti-T, anti-HBs antibody geometric mean titres (GMT), these being 3.49 IU ml-1, 5.92 IU ml-1 and 1109 mIU ml-1, respectively. All subjects responded to three pertussis components, i.e. pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN). Although statistically significant differences in GMTs of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN were found between groups, these were not believed to be of any clinical relevance as the minimum GMTs were 60, 193 and 230 EL.U ml-1 for anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in anti-PRP antibody GMT (4.05 micrograms ml-1) between groups, 100% and 85% of subjects having titresor = 0.15 and 1.0 microgram ml-1, respectively. No symptoms were reported for one third of the subjects. Fever (38 degrees C) was reported after 16% of doses, with1% having39.5 degrees C. Almost all local and general symptoms were mild or moderate, and lasted less than 48 h. No subject dropped out due to a severe adverse reaction. The administration of an experimental mix of DTPa-HBV and Hib vaccines in a single injection is safe, well-tolerated and immunogenic for all vaccine components.