1. Trends, Treatment Approaches, and In-Hospital Mortality for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Japan During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic
- Author
-
Jung-ho Shin, Tetsuji Morishita, Daisuke Takada, Takuya Higuchi, Yuichi Imanaka, and Susumu Kunisawa
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Acute coronary syndrome ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Acute myocardial infarction ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Fibrinolytic therapy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Japan ,Internal medicine ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Hospital Mortality ,Myocardial infarction ,Pandemics ,Retrospective Studies ,Coronavirus disease 2019 ,Unstable angina ,business.industry ,Primary percutaneous coronary intervention ,Biochemistry (medical) ,COVID-19 ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,Retrospective cohort study ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,In-hospital mortality ,Conventional PCI ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Aim: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has left negative spillover effects on the entire health care system. Previous studies have suggested significant declines in cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental, retrospective cohort study of ACS hospitalisations by using a multi-institutional administrative claims database in Japan. We used interrupted time series analyses to ascertain impacts on cases, treatment approaches, and in-hospital mortality before and after Japan’s state of emergency to respond to COVID-19. The primary outcome was the change in ACS cases per week. Results: A total of 30, 198 ACS cases (including 21, 612 acute myocardial infarction and 8, 586 unstable angina) were confirmed between 1st July 2018 and 30th June 2020. After the state of emergency, an immediate decrease was observed in ACS cases per week (-18.3%; 95% confidence interval, -13.1 to -23.5%). No significant differences were found in the severity of Killip classification (P=0.51) or cases of fibrinolytic therapy (P=0.74). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital mortality in ACS patients was no longer observed after adjustment for clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.12; P=0.49). Conclusions: We demonstrated the characteristics and trends of ACS cases in a Japanese population by applying interrupted time series analyses. Our findings provide significant insights into the association between COVID-19 and decreases in ACS hospitalisations during the pandemic.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF