Search

Background The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) groups has identified four molecular prognostic groups of endometrial cancer (EC): POLE-mutated (POLE-mt), mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-d), p53-abnormal (p53-abn), p53-wild-type (p53-wt). These groups might have different pathogenesis and risk factors, and might occur in different phenotypes of patients. However, these data are still lacking. Objective To provide a clinical characterization of the ProMisE groups of EC. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching seven electronic databases from their inception to December 2020, for all studies reporting clinical characteristics of EC patients in each ProMisE group. Pooled means of age and BMI and pooled prevalence of FIGO stage I and adjuvant treatment in each ProMisE group were calculated. Results Six studies with 1, 879 women were included in the systematic review. Pooled means (with standard error) and prevalence values were: in the MMR-d group, age = 66.5 ± 0.6; BMI = 30.6 ± 1.2; stage I = 72.6%; adjuvant treatment = 47.3%; in the POLE-mt group, age = 58.6 ± 2.7; BMI = 27.2 ± 0.9; stage I = 93.7%; adjuvant treatment = 53.6%; in the p53-wt group, age = 64.2 ± 1.9; BMI = 32.3 ± 1.4; stage I = 80.5%; adjuvant treatment = 45.3%; in the p53-abn group, age = 71.1 ± 0.5; BMI = 29.1 ± 0.5; stage I = 50.8%; adjuvant treatment = 64.4%. Conclusion The ProMisE groups identify different phenotypes of patients. The POLE-mt group included the youngest women, with the lower BMI and the highest prevalence of stage I. The p53-wt group included patients with the highest BMI. The p53-abn group included the oldest women, with the highest prevalence of adjuvant treatment and the lowest prevalence of stage I. The MMR-d group showed intermediate values among the ProMisE groups for all clinical features.

Objective to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the obstetrics and gynecology residency training program in Italy. Study design This was a cross-sectional survey study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the obstetrics and gynecology residency training program in Italy. An online survey with 45 questions was sent and completed anonymously by residents after accepting an informed consent. The invitation to the online survey was sent to all the Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Those on maternity leave at the time of the study were excluded. Residents were asked about their routinely activity before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to report the reduction in their clinical practice. They were also asked about psychological impact of COVID-19 on their clinical practice. Results 933 Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology, were invited for this survey study. Four-hundred and seventy-six (51 %) completed the survey and were included in the study. Three-hundred and eighty-seven (81.3 %) were female, and 89 (18.7 %) were male. Residents age ranged from 25 to 42. In 71,8 % (342/476) of the cases residents work in a COVID-19 reference Hospitals. One-hundred and eighty-four out of 76 residents (38.6 %) were tested on RT-PCR assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens, and of them 12/184 (6.5 %) were positive to SARS−COV-2. Regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), 267 (56.1 %) reported to receive adequate device, and 379 (79.6 %) felt to be well informed about prevention and management protocols. Three-hundred and thirty-one residents (69.5 %) reported to have managed COVID-19 positive patients. For 54,7 % of respondent residents, training activity in general decreased significantly during the COVID-19 epidemic. A one-third reduction was reported in 31,4 % of the cases, whereas a total suspension of the training in 9,9 % of the cases. In 89,3 % of cases the reduction was caused by the reorganization of work. Anxiety about the professional future was reported in 84 % of the residents, and 59 % of them had the perception that their training was irreversibly compromised. Conclusions Among Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology, COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant training impairment.

BACKGROUND CIN2 is considered a biologically equivocal lesion falling between low and high grade cervical dysplasia, but it is often managed with cervical conization as a high-grade lesion. However, since cervical conization can lead to an increased risk of adverse obstetric events, it might be interesting to identify, by colposcopy, a subgroup of women with a low risk of "occult" CIN3 who could be managed with a "wait and see" approach. METHODS All the women with CIN2 cervical biopsy from 1999 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Their colposcopic patterns at the time of biopsy and the histopathological findings on the final cone specimen were compared. RESULTS Among the 354 women with CIN2 biopsy included, the overall CIN3+ lesion rate on final cone specimen was 21.4%. The rate of CIN3 on final specimen was higher in women with G2 colposcopy compared to G1 (27,2% vs 15.9%, p= 0.01). Among women with G1 colposcopy, the rate of CIN3+ lesions was significantly higher in women with fine punctation (p=0.02) while no differences in women with thin acetowhite epithelium or fine mosaic emerged. CONCLUSIONS In women with CIN2 biopsy, when a G2 pattern or G1 with fine punctation on colposcopy is detected, there is an increased risk of CIN3+ on final histology, therefore an excisional treatment should be preferred. Otherwise, in women with CIN2 biopsy and other G1 patterns on colposcopy, a "wait and see" approach could be considered.

Objective To evaluate the true impact of endometriosis on oocytes’ competence defined as blastulation, euploidy and implantation rates. Design Retrospective multicenter case-control study involving infertile couples undergoing ICSI with qPCR and trophectoderm biopsy-based PGT-A. Patients affected from endometriosis (n = 210) were diagnosed through transvaginal sonography or surgical history with histological confirmation. Each case was matched to two controls (n = 420) according to IVF clinic, maternal age at retrieval (38.6 ± 2.7 yr), number of previous failed IVF treatments (0.5 ± 0.8) and number of metaphase-II oocytes retrieved (6.1 ± 3.7 per patient). The primary outcome was the mean euploid blastocyst rate per cohort of inseminated metaphase-II oocytes. Other embryological, clinical, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were also evaluated. Results The mean euploid blastocyst rate per cohort of inseminated metaphase-II oocytes was identical in the two groups (18 %±22 %) independently of maternal age. No difference was shown for all embryological outcomes investigated. The live birth rates per vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer were also similar (67/158, 42 % in patients affected from endometriosis versus 132/327, 40 % in matched-controls). No difference was reported in the gestational and neonatal outcomes. The cumulative live birth delivery rates among completed cycles were also identical (61/201, 30 % versus 117/391, 30 % in endometriosis and matched-control groups, respectively) independently of maternal age. Conclusions Endometriosis might not impair oocyte developmental and reproductive competence, although its potential impact on the number of metaphase-II oocytes retrieved cannot be ignored. This information is critical for clinicians during counseling to outline an effective strategy to treat infertile patients affected from this condition. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of endometriosis stage on euploidy rates.

Introduction: Uterine fibroids (UF) are benign tumors common in premenopausal women, with strong impact on the health-care systems. For many years, surgery represented the only therapy for symptomatic fibroids. However, clinicians are observing a switch from surgery to noninvasive methods; in particular, medical treatment has been shown to be efficacious in obtaining a bleeding reduction and in ameliorating patient conditions. Areas covered: The authors review the current options available for the treatment of women with UF, with a special focus on the newest one, relugolix. It is an orally active non-peptide Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist recently licensed for women with symptomatic fibroids. Relugolix is a well-tolerated safe drug; it is effective in inducing a dose-dependent decrease in menstrual blood loss, with faster reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and a greater shrinkage in fibroid volume compared to the current standard of GnRH agonist treatment. Expert opinion: Relugolix is a promising drug for the non-surgical treatment of women with UF. To date, the only published data come from a well-selected Japanese female population study while results from worldwide ongoing studies are ongoing in order to confirm the efficacy of this GnRH agonist receptor.

Introduction/Background Intra-operative frozen section (IFS) can provide an instinct guide for treatment of ovarian tumors intra-operatively, though limitations exist. We aimed to determine the value of IFS and US in the diagnosis of ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Methodology A retrospective review of granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) surgically treated at our Unit, between June 2006 and March 2019, was done. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) and malignant IFS diagnosis was evaluated. Data of 20 patients were reviewed. Intra-operative FS and US results were compared with the definitive surgical diagnosis. Surgical data were reviewed and analyzed. Results A total of 12 cases were correctly identified at the intraoperative FS as ovarian granulosa tumors. There were 8 (32%) false negative diagnoses. According to well defined parameters, all 20 cases were correctly suspected as ovarian GCTs at US. About surgical treatment, in 12 women with positive FS the appropriate surgical staging was performed. In 8 women with negative FS surgical treatment was variable: 4 women underwent laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy and the surgical staging was completed after definitive surgical diagnosis; hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 2 patients; the conservative surgery on the healthy ovary was performed in the remaining 2 patients. Conclusion This study concluded that FS appears to be an inadequate technique for the histopathological diagnosis of ovarian GCTs, while the US features are really suggestive allowing a right clinical suspicious. Perhaps, when an ovarian GCTs is suspected at the US, intraoperative FS could be misleading and could lead to an inappropriate surgical management. Disclosure Nothing to disclose.