1. Right ventricular substrate mapping using the Ensite Navx system: Accuracy of high-density voltage map obtained by automatic point acquisition during geometry reconstruction
- Author
-
Francesco Perna, Tommaso Sanna, Luigi Natale, Antonio Dello Russo, Annalisa Ricco, Andrea Natale, Giovanni Forleo, Fulvio Bellocci, Augusto Pappalardo, Paolo Zecchi, Stefano Bartoletti, Luigi Di Biase, Gemma Pelargonio, Claudio Tondo, Michela Casella, and Maurizio Pieroni
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Electroanatomic mapping ,Substrate mapping ,Heart Ventricles ,High density ,Geometry ,Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ,Physiology (medical) ,medicine ,Humans ,Point (geometry) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Body Surface Potential Mapping ,Arrhythmias, Cardiac ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Voltage - Abstract
Contact point-to-point electroanatomic mapping (Pt-Map) is a validated tool to evaluate right ventricular (RV) substrate. When using the EnSite NavX system (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, Minnesota), geometry reconstruction by dragging the mapping catheter (Geo-Map) allows for quicker acquisition of a large number of points and better definition of anatomy, but it is not validated for substrate mapping.This study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of Geo-Map.Thirteen patients (mean age 38 +/- 12 years) with RV arrhythmias and an apparently normal heart underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Pt-Map, and Geo-Map. The 2 maps were compared in terms of mapping procedural time, radiation time, and total number of points acquired. We finally compared the number and characteristics of low-potential areas on each patient's Pt-Map, Geo-Map, and cardiac MRI.Geo-Map required significantly shorter mapping and radiation times in comparison to Pt-Map (12.4 +/- 4.6 vs. 31.9 +/- 10.1 and 5.8 +/- 2.1 vs. 12.1 +/- 3.9, P.001). Furthermore, Geo-Map was based on a significantly higher density of points in comparison to Pt-Map (802 +/- 205 vs. 194 +/- 38, P.001). Taking into consideration the total number of RV regions analyzed, the Pt-Map and Geo-Map disagreed in 2 of 65 (3%) regions (P = NS), which only Geo-Map identified as low-potential areas and indeed corresponded to wall motion abnormalities on MRI.Voltage maps obtained through RV geometry acquisition have accuracy comparable to that of conventional point-by-point mapping in detecting low-voltage areas, have a good correlation with MRI wall motion abnormalities, and allow a significant reduction in procedural time and x-ray exposure.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF