Search

Összefoglaló. A Helicobacter pylori továbbra is a világ legelterjedtebb fertőzése: prevalenciája a fejlődő országokban 70–80%, a fejlett országokban csökkenő tendenciát mutat. A dél-magyarországi véradókban a prevalencia 32%-ra csökkent. A migráció a befogadó ország számára a fertőzés fokozott kockázatával jár. A szövettani diagnózisban az immunhisztokémiai vizsgálat pontosabb a hagyományos Giemsa-festésnél. A mesterséges intelligencia érzékenysége a hagyományos endoszkópiáéval összehasonlítva 87%, pontossága 86%. Az újgenerációs szekvenálással lehetséges egy biopsziás mintából több antibiotikumérzékenység meghatározása. A Helicobacter pylori kezelésének európai regisztere kimutatta, hogy 2013 és 2018 között a bizmutalapú négyes vagy a 14 napos egyidejű négyes kezelések hatásosabbak, mint a hagyományos hármas kezelés, de elterjedésük igen lassú folyamat, jelentős földrajzi különbségekkel. Az új típusú koronavírus (SARS-CoV-2) felléphet Helicobacter pylori fertőzésben is, egymás kóros hatását felerősítve. A diagnosztikai módszerek korlátozottak. Protonpumpagátlók szedése növeli a COVID–19-fertőzés kockázatát és annak súlyos kimenetelét. Előzetesen ismert peptikus fekély, vérzés, illetve antikoguláns kezelés előtt az eradikáció a vírusos fertőzés lezajlása után indokolt. A probiotikumoknak az eradikációra gyakorolt hatásáról 20, közepes minőségű metaanalízis született, így a konszenzusokban foglalt álláspontok sem egyértelműek: a jövőben ezt tisztázni kell. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(32): 1275–1282. Summary. Helicobacter pylori is still the most widespread infection in the world: its overall prevalence is 70–80% in developing regions, but fortunately it is decreasing in the Western world. The prevalence in blood donors from South-Eastern Hungary decreased from 63% in the 1990’s to 32% in 2019. Migration constitutes an increased risk of infection for the destination countries. Immunohistochemistry has proven to be more accurate in histological diagnosis than the conventional Giemsa stain. The sensitivity and accuracy of artificial intelligence as compared to videoendoscopy were 87% and 86%, respectively. The European Register on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection revealed that concomitant quadruple and 14-day bismuth-based therapies are more efficient than triple combinations, although their incorporation in practice is a long-lasting process, with large geographical variations. The novel type of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) can also occur in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients, mutually enhancing their pathogenetic effects. Diagnostic possibilities are limited in this setting. The use of proton pump inhibitors increases the risk of viral infection and the severity of the disease. Eradication treatment seems justified in patients with previously known peptic ulcers or gastrointestinal bleeding, or before starting anticoagulant treatment, but must be postponed after resolution of viral infection. The effect of probiotics on eradication was addressed by 20, medium-to-low quality meta-analyses and so, the recommendations of the guidelines are equivocal, which must be clarified in the future with higher quality studies. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(32): 1275–1282.

Abstract: Introduction: The Pan-European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management was conceived in 2013 to monitor eradication practices in Europe for 10 years. Aim: To assess the efficacy of different eradication regimens in a single outpatient clinic of gastroenterology. Method: Between 2013 and 2019, 247 patients were registered in a prospective non-interventional study. The infection was diagnosed either by endoscopy, histology, rapid urease test or 13C-urea breath test. As first-line treatment, the patients received either a 7-day triple regimen (any of PPI + amoxicillin + clarithromycin or tinidazole), 10-day modified sequential treatment (PPI + amoxicillin for 5 days + tinidazole and levofloxacin for 5 days), 10-day quadruple concomitant treatment (PPI + amoxicillin + tetracycline or doxycycline + metronidazole or tinidazole) or bismuth-based quadruple treatment. Bismuth or non-bismuth based quadruple or alternative regimens were given as second- or third-line treatment. Results: The eradication rates on per protocol basis were: 82.7% (95% confidence interval: 68.1–97.4) (first-line regimens), 85.2% (75.4–94.9) (sequential treatment), 95.1% (89.6–100) (concomitant treatment) and 82.6% (69.7–95.9) (bismuth-based quadruple regimen). Second-line regimens achieved 65.2% (48.2–83.0) and third-line therapy 54.5% (19.4–86.6), respectively. Conclusion: The first-line concomitant regimen was superior to triple and not significantly better than the sequential or bismuth-based treatment. Second- and third-line regimens achieved largely suboptimal results. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(47): 1856–1863.

The global rise in clarithromycin (Cla) resistance is considered to be the main contributor of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication failures. In nearly half of the Cla-resistant Hp infections, Cla-susceptible bacteria are simultaneously present with the Cla-resistant ones (Cla-heteroresistance). The proportion of resistant bacteria in the bacterial population (R-fraction) and its predictive role for the use of Cla-based therapies in Cla-heteroresistant infections has not yet been investigated. Our retrospective study analyzed gastric biopsy samples of 62 Hp-positive patients with Cla-heteroresistant infection. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization technique was used to visualize the coexistence of resistant and susceptible bacteria within one tissue sample. R-fraction was quantified on multichannel microimages by digital morphometry. Resistant bacteria had a patchy distribution within the whole bacterial population causing high diversity among the investigated areas. Patients were subdivided into two major groups according to whether a Cla-based eradication attempt was conducted before or after the biopsy sampling. R-fraction was significantly lower among cases having only one previous Cla-based eradication attempt vs. those that had multiple previous eradications, including at least one Cla-containing therapy (0.41 vs. 0.89, p = 0.0308). Majority of the patients without previous eradication attempt had successful eradication with Cla-containing regimen (59.26%), verified by a negative 13C-urea breath test or control biopsy. Multivariable model indicated that the therapeutic outcome using Cla-based regimens depended on the bacterial density rather than the R-fraction. Our study raises the potential use of Cla-containing eradication therapies in certain Cla-heteroresistant Hp infections, taking into account the possible predictive role of bacterial density.

INTRODUCTION: The safety of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments and to what extent adverse events (AEs) influence therapeutic compliance in clinical practice are hardly known. Our aim was to assess the frequency, type, intensity, and duration of AEs, and their impact on compliance, for the most frequently used treatments in the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management. METHODS: Systematic prospective non interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists (27 countries, 300 investigators) on the management of H. pylori infection in routine clinical practice. All prescribed eradication treatments and their corresponding safety profile were recorded. AEs were classified depending on the intensity of symptoms as mild/moderate/severe and as serious AEs. All data were subject to quality control. RESULTS: The different treatments prescribed to 22, 492 patients caused at least 1 AE in 23% of the cases ; the classic bismuth-based quadruple therapy was the worst tolerated (37% of AEs). Taste disturbance (7 %) , diarrhea (7 %) , nausea (6%), and abdominal pain (3%) were the most frequent AEs. The majority of AEs were mild (57%), 6% were severe, and only 0.08% were serious, with an average duration of 7 days. The treatment compliance rate was 97%. Only 1.3% of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Longer treatment durations were significantly associated with a higher incidence of AEs in standard triple, concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and levofloxacin triple or quadruple therapies. DISCUSSION: Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment frequently induces AEs, although they are usually mild and of limited duration. Their appearance does not interfere significantly with treatment compliance.

Helicobacter pylori is the most prevalent infection worldwide, while non-alcoholic fatty liver disease emerged as the most frequent liver disease. The common occurrence can be either by chance or due to certain pathogenetic factors. Epidemiologic studies revealed that the risk of non-alcoholic liver disease is increased in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. DNA fragments of Helicobacter pylori were rarely identified in human samples of liver carcinoma and fatty liver. Helicobacter pylori could influence the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver either by hormonal (ghrelin? gastrin? insulin?), or by effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1 and 8, tumor necrosis factor ɑ, interferon ɣ) and by changes of gut microbiome as well. Probiotic supplementation could improve some clinical parameters of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori. Regimens used for eradication can be safely administered, although non-alcoholic fatty liver increases the risk of drug-induced liver damage. Controlled studies of the effect of eradication on the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver are warranted.

BACKGROUND Clarithromycin (Cla) heteroresistance of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infections is commonly assessed by comparing the resistance status of antrum and corpus biopsy samples and by demonstrating the discrepancy between them (interniche heteroresistance). However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is capable of showing the synchronous presence of susceptible and resistant bacteria (intraniche heteroresistance), enabling the detection of heteroresistant H pylori populations within one biopsy sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS Antrum and corpus biopsy specimens of 305 H pylori-infected patients were investigated with an rRNA-targeted Cla-resistance FISH test. Anamnestic data were collected from the institutional electronic register. Prevalence rates of susceptible, homo- and heteroresistant cases were correlated with the anamnestic and clinicopathological data. RESULTS Overall Cla-resistance rate was 23.9% (73 cases), consisting of 35 (11.5%) homoresistant and 38 (12.5%) heteroresistant cases. Thirty-five patients had at least one biopsy site where susceptible and resistant bacteria were present simultaneously. From this subset, 20 cases demonstrated intraniche heteroresistance on both sites. Prior Cla-based eradication attempts were more frequent in homoresistant than in susceptible and heteroresistant cases (P

Some gastric cancers are Epstein-Barr virus associated.To assess the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and viral co-infection in benign upper digestive diseases.One hundred and four outpatients were included in a prospective endoscopic-serologic study. Epstein-Barr virus immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M and viral capsid antigen titres were assayed with an ELISA test. Helicobacter pylori was determined by the modified Giemsa stain and by IgG-chemiluminescence.The overall prevalence of Helicobacter pylori was 56.7%. Duodenal ulcer patients were infected in 72.5 % of the cases, with the prevalence being 33.3% in functional dyspepsia (p = 0.0008) and 25.8% in reflux patients (p = 0.0001). Epstein-Barr virus IgG was detected in 70.1% of the whole group, 75% of duodenal ulcer patients, 51.2% of functional dyspepsia patients (p = 0.04) and 51.6% of the reflux disease cases (p = 0.04). Co-infection with both agents was detected in 60% of duodenal ulcer patients, 18.1% of functional dyspepsia (p = 0.00014) and 12.9% of reflux disease patients (p = 0.00012). Anti-viral IgG titre displayed a 31.7 ± 3.0 cut-off index in duodenal ulcer, 20.5 ± 3.5 in functional dyspepsia (p = 0.01) and 21.4 ± 3.6 in reflux cases (p = 0.03).Both Helicobacter pylori and Epstein-Barr virus, and co-infection with these agents, were significantly more prevalent in duodenal ulcer patients than in dyspeptic/reflux patients.

nal [3] and Nature [4, 5] , and received 375 citations ( table 1 ). One could thus consider that the discovery of pancreatic elastase dates from 1949. These publications were forgotten/omitted for years and remained uncited by subsequent researchers. The reasons for this remains unknown. The articles were published in journals from the forefront of medical literature. The lack of adequate information and dedicated study of the forerunners might explain the omission, leading to the loss of priority. In the meantime, the literature on pancreatic elastase has increased tremendously to over 8,600 articles, a number high enough to dilute the original publications until they almost disappear from the literature. Dear Sir, The identification of pancreatic elastase (EC 3.4.21.36) is credited to Andreas Sziegoleit (Institute of Medical Microbiology, Giessen, Germany) who, in 1982, isolated a cholesterol-binding endoprotease [1] . Pancreatic elastase was, however, discovered three decades earlier by the highly acknowledged Hungarian pathologist Jozsef Balo (1895–1979). He observed firstly that histological sections prepared from elastic arteries are dissolved by animal and human pancreatic extracts. Using a methodology in line with the actual development of enzymology, he prepared a purified elastase and published his findings in the Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Pathologie und Bakteriologie [2] , the Biochemical JourPublished online: September 27, 2007