Search

Summary: Background & Aims: The prevalence of artificially administered nutrition and hydration (AANH) in different age groups among patients with advanced cancer remains unknown. The present study investigated the current utilization of AANH according to age groups in palliative care units. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. We obtained information on primary nutritional administration routes during the first week of admission and data on the averaged calorie sufficiency rate or total calorie intake on the 7th day of admission. Patients were divided into five age groups (18–39, 40–59, 60–74, 75–89, and 90- years). Among patients receiving AANH, the proportions of higher-calorie AANH were compared between the five age groups. Results: A total of 1453 patients were included. The proportion of patients categorized as receiving nutrition and hydration via the parenteral route was the highest in the 18–39 and 40–59 groups (52.4 and 41.1%, respectively). Among patients receiving AANH (n = 534), the proportions of patients categorized into the

Parenteral morphine is widely used for dyspnea of imminently dying cancer patients (terminal dyspnea). However, the efficacy of other opioids such as oxycodone remains largely unknown.To explore the efficacy of parenteral oxycodone vs. morphine by continuous infusion over 24 hours in cancer patients with terminal dyspnea.This was a pre-planned subgroup analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care units, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status = 3-4, and a dyspnea intensity ≥2 on the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for which oxycodone or morphine was initiated by continuous infusion. We measured dyspnea IPOS scores over 24 hours.We analyzed 164 patients who received oxycodone (n = 26) and morphine (n = 138) for dyspnea (median survival = 5 days). The mean age was 70 years, 58 patients (35%) had lung cancer, and 97 (59%) had lung metastases. Complete case analysis revealed that mean dyspnea IPOS scores decreased from 3.0 (standard deviation = 0.7) to 1.5 (0.7) in the oxycodone group (difference in means = 1.5; P 0.001), and from 2.9 (0.7) to 1.6 (1.0) in the morphine group (difference in means = 1.3; P 0.001). No significant between-group differences existed in the IPOS scores at 24 hours (P = 0.753). Adverse events were seen in no and 5 patients in the oxycodone and morphine groups, respectively.Parenteral oxycodone may be equally effective and safe as morphine in the treatment of terminal dyspnea in cancer patients. Future randomized controlled trials should confirm the efficacy and safety of opioids other than morphine for terminal dyspnea.

The Lyon Consensus was conducted in 2017, leading to a revision of the diagnostic criteria of GERD. Conclusive GERD was defined as cases in which the distal esophageal acid exposure time (AET) is greater than 6% and there exists either peptic esophagitis, constriction, or long-segment Barrett’s mucosa with a Los Angeles classification of grade C or D. Borderline GERD is defined as cases in which AET is between 4 and 6% and there exists peptic esophagitis with a Los Angeles classification of either grade A or B. All other cases were defined as Inconclusive GERD. We conducted a retrospective investigation of the treatment results of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for GERD according to the Lyon Consensus and evaluated whether or not it is an effective treatment predictor. From among the cases of primary LF conducted on patients with GERD-related illnesses at our university hospital from June 2008 to March 2020, the subjects included 215 individuals who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) testing prior to surgery. We compared the pathophysiology of the Conclusive GERD Group (Group A), Borderline GERD Group (Group B), and Inconclusive GERD Group (Group C), and then investigated the treatment results of each group. We used AFP classification for pathophysiological evaluation. For the acid reflux evaluation, we conducted MII-pH measurements using Sleuth, manufactured by Sandhill. The postoperative evaluation period was set to 3 months following surgery. The data are expressed using median values, with a statistical significance defined as p

Background: Although many Japanese patients wish to take a bath in their last days, the safety of bathing for patients with a prognosis of a few days is not known. Objective: To examine whether taking a bath affects the survival of advanced cancer patients with prognoses of a few days. Design: A single-center prospective cohort study. Setting/Subject: Advanced cancer patients in their last days of life in a palliative care unit of a Japanese hospital. We compared patients who took baths with those who did not. The primary endpoint was 24-hour survival rate. Result: Among 110 patients eligible for this prospective study, 89 (72%) met the inclusion criteria. Forty-eight patients (43%, 223 person-days) were eligible for analysis. A total of 28 patient-days were classified into the bathing group, and 192 patient-days were classified into the nonbathing group. After propensity score matching, the 24-hour death rate was 10.7% in the bathing group and 8.0% in the nonbathing group, respectively (mean difference 2.8% with 95% confidence interval of −11.2% to 16.8%, p = 0.65). Conclusion: Taking a bath does not appear to bear a significant association with shortening of life among advanced cancer patients in their last days of life.

Laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication (LHD) is the standard surgical treatment for achalasia; however, surgical outcomes over a period greater than 10 years have not been well-explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LHD for achalasia based on a single-center experience. Patients who underwent LHD between 1994 and 2019 were included. Of these, we excluded patients who had undergone foregut surgery or whose follow-up data were unavailable. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings and postoperative persistent and/or recurrent symptoms had been assessed annually. Disease-free rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 530 patients (mean age 45.0 years with 267 men) were included. The median follow-up period was 50.5 months. More than 10 years’ data were available in 78 patients (14.7%). The cumulative rates of freedom from dysphagia, vomiting, chest pain, and Eckardt score > 3 at 10 years after LHD were 80.1%, 97.5%, 96.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. Probability of esophagitis during 10 years after surgery was 34.4% of patients based on Kaplan–Meier estimation. Approximately 3/4th of patients who had post-LHD esophagitis showed mild esophagitis of Los Angeles classification grade A. Fifteen patients (2.8%) were required a revision of primary LHD. Six patients (1.2%) developed esophageal cancer with an incidence was as high as 219.8/100,000 person-year. All patients with esophageal cancer were found to have early stage tumors that were successfully resected. Symptomatic relief post-LHD lasted for over 10 years. The incidence rate of esophageal cancer was high. Regular EGD surveillance seems to be helpful for early detection of esophageal cancer early.

To compare the treatment results of needlescopic surgery with those of the conventional method for achalasia, using propensity score-matching. Propensity score-matching was performed based on five factors: age, gender, body mass index, extended form, and maximum expansion diameter, to extract 28 cases each for a needlescopic group and a conventional group. There were no significant differences between the needlescopic group and the conventional group, in operative time (165 min vs. 170 min, p = 0.682), estimated blood loss (both ≒ 0 ml, p = 0.426), or post-operative hospital stay (4 vs. 4 days, p = 0.248). Although the follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional group (6 vs. 105 months, respectively; p

It is anticipated that surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the elderly will increase. This time, using propensity score matching, we examined the results of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for GERD-related diseases in the elderly. Of 302 cases which underwent initial LF for GERD-related diseases during the period from June 2008 to February 2019, we classified them into elderly (65 years of age or older) and non-elderly groups (64 years of age or younger). 57 cases each were extracted upon performing propensity score matching regarding five factors including: gender; body mass index; esophageal hiatal hernia; extent of reflux esophagitis; and the use of mesh. With regard to the preoperative disease status, the pH

Summary Peptic esophagitis can occur as a complication of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) among patients with esophageal achalasia. The goal of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients who have developed peptic esophagitis following LHD surgery along with the risk factors associated with the occurrence of peptic esophagitis. Among the 447 cases consisting of esophageal achalasia patients who underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not peptic esophagitis occurred following surgery. We also attempted to use univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors for peptic esophagitis occurring following surgery. Esophagitis following surgery was confirmed in 67 cases (15.0%). With respect to the patient backgrounds for cases in which peptic esophagitis had occurred, a significantly higher number were male patients, with a significantly high occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery in terms of surgical outcomes, along with a high occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias in terms of postoperative course (P = 0.045, 0.041, and 0.022, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of age, BMI, disease duration, preoperative symptoms, esophageal manometric findings, esophageal barium findings, and esophageal clearance. A multivariate analysis indicated independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD as being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias. Peptic esophagitis occurred following LHD in 15% of cases. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD included being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias following surgery.

Background It is common knowledge that esophageal achalasia patients have a high risk of developing esophageal carcinoma. The present study assessed the characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients following laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia. Method Among 622 cases which were esophageal achalasia patients and underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not esophageal carcinoma occurred following surgery. Results Six cases (0.96%) of postoperative esophageal carcinoma were confirmed. The characteristics of the cases in which esophageal carcinoma occurred were older age, longer disease duration (p = 0.0362 and 0.0028, respectively), decreased sphincter pressure of the lower esophagus, a high rate of sigmoid esophagus, and a long esophagus lateral diameter (p = 0.0214, 0.001, and 0.0416, respectively). Moreover, no differences in surgical outcomes were confirmed and there were no differences in symptoms from before and following surgery. Conclusion The characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients with achalasia following laparoscopic myotomy were an older age, longer disease duration, and greater progression of disease pathophysiology.

To compare the surgical outcomes of redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure and rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with failed Heller myotomy. We identified patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure or rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy from August 1996 to September 2019 and assessed the patients’ characteristics, timed barium swallow results, symptom scores before/after surgery, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes. Eleven patients underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure, and 14 underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy. Blood loss (p = 0.001) and intraoperative complications rate (p = 0.003) were lower and the operative time (p > 0.001) and observation period (p = 0.009) shorter in patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy than in patients who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. Patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had a higher rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis (p = 0.033) than those who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. After the interventions, the dysphagia symptoms were improved for both groups. Furthermore, both groups expressed satisfaction with their respective procedures. Rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy was associated with better surgical outcomes than redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor for patients with failed Heller myotomy. However, rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis.

Background: Recently, in pursuit of minimal invasion, needlescopic surgery (NS) using forceps thinner than the previous standard has garnered attention as a surgical approach to various diseases. O...

Peroral endoscopic myotomy(POEM)has been reported as safe and effective treatment for achalasia. This procedure is proposed to be a less invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplicatin(LHD), previous studies have shown that POEM may result in a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)compared with LHD. However, certain predictors of GERD after POEM remain unstudied limiting current treatment strategy of achalasia. The aim of this study is to clarify the protective factors of GERD post-POEM. Methods Fifty-one patients who underwent POEM at our institution between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. We performed esophagogram and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) as a part of preoperative evaluation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has been assessed 3 months, 1 year, and then yearly after POEM. Patients were divided into two groups based on post-POEM endoscopic findings: GERD group (patients who had esophagitis [n = 28; median age 53 years with 18 male]) and non-GERD group (patients who did not have GERD [n = 23; median age 50 years with 14 male]). We compared preoperative foregut tests between the two groups. Results Twenty-eight out of 51 patients (54.9%) developed esophagitis. There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, and findings of esophagogram between the groups. Based on HRM test, greater overall lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length was noted in the non-GERD group compared with the GERD group (3.0 vs. 2.6 cm, p = 0.034). Length of gastric myotomy was comparable between the GERD and non-GERD groups (2.0 vs. 3.0 cm, p = 0.477). Similar incidence of esophagitis was evident in patients who had a history of prior LHD and those who underwent POEM as a primary intervention (60% [9/15 patients] vs. 52.8% [19/36 patients], p = 0.437). Conclusion Shorter overall LES length appears to be associated with esophagitis post-POEM. Length of gastric myotomy did not correlate to GERD in the study cohort. Prior Dor fundoplication may not avert development of GERD after POEM. Further study is warranted.

The Starlet high-resolution manometry (HRM) system is currently used in Japan. HRM provides integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) of which value represents adequacy of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. The upper limit of normal IRP for the Starlet was proposed as 26 mmHg using healthy subjects. However, few studies have addressed whether this cutoff may well-distinguish patients diagnosed with/without achalasia. We propose the optimal cutoff of IRP for detecting achalasia using the Starlet. Methods Patients who underwent HRM test using the Starlet system at our institution between July 2018 and December 2019 were included. Of these, we excluded patients who had a history of achalasia surgery and/or endoscopic intervention, or whose HRM testing of poor quality. Achalasia was diagnosed if impaired esophageal emptying was evident based on timed barium esophagogram, upper endoscopy, and/or computed tomography. The optimal cutoff value of IRP was estimated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We further investigate difference in IRP values between achalasia subtypes to identify characteristics of patients who are more likely to be misdiagnosed. Results In total, 145 patients met study criteria. The mean age in our cohort was 52.5 ± 15.5 years, 89 patients (61.4%) were men. Of these, 42 patients (29.0%) were diagnosed with achalasia. In achalasia patients, IRP values extended to a wide-range from minimal 18.7 to maximal 63.9 mmHg. The optimal cutoff value of IRP was 24.7 mmHg with sensitivity 90.5% and specificity 90.3% (AUC 0.96 [95% CI; 0.92¬ to 0.99]). Patients with achalasia type I based on Chicago classification were most likely to have IRP value below the threshold of 25 mmHg (4/19 patients [21.1%]). Conclusion The optimal cutoff value of IRP to distinguish achalasia was ≥25 mmHg using the Starlet HRM system. This value was nearly close to the upper limit of normal IRP value of 26 mmHg in healthy volunteers. Achalasia type I was more likely to have normal IRP value indicating that comprehensive foregut assessment (eg, timed barium esophagogram, upper endoscopy, and computed tomography) is still valuable for management of achalasia.

Background We encountered a case of marginal ulcer in the jejunum after distal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition. However, it has not been reported and not confirmed the treatment. We chose truncal vagotomy, considering reduced morbidity and postoperative complications. Case presentation A case was a 69-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with melena. She had received curative distal gastrectomy with a 15-cm jejunal pouch reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Marginal ulcer in the jejunal pouch was detected by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. She was given medication; however, she repeated hospitalization for melena and abdominal pain. Therefore, we decided to perform surgery, and truncal vagotomy was performed. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and was discharged on the 22nd postoperative day. Symptoms such as abdominal pain and melena were improved after truncal vagotomy. Conclusion We presented a case with a complicated peptic ulcer after distal gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal pouch interposition, which was successfully treated by truncal vagotomy, a surgical acid-reducing procedure which does not require resection of remnant stomach.

The benefits of artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate effects of enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition and hydration (PNH) on survival in palliative care units.This study involved a secondary analysis of a multicenter cohort study. Data of primary nutritional administration routes during the first week after admission (oral intake, enteral tube feeding, parenteral nutrition, parenteral hydration, poor oral intake) were obtained. Data of averaged calorie sufficiency rate/total calorie intake [high (75% ≤ or 750 kcal/day ≤), moderate (50-75% or 500-750 kcal/day), low (25-50% or 250-500 kcal/day), very low (25% or250 kcal/day)] were also obtained. After investigating the implementation of artificial nutrition and hydration, participants were divided into three groups according to the nutritional administration route and calorie sufficiency rate/total calorie intake: EN, PNH, and control. We conducted time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.Patients were divided into the EN group (n = 730), PNH group (n = 190), and control group (n = 533). Differences in survival rates among the three groups were significant (Log-rank P 0.001). Median survival times were 43.0 (95% CI 40-46), 33.0 (95% CI 29-37), and 15.0 (95% CI 14-16) days, respectively (P 0.001). In the multivariate-adjusted model, a significantly lower risk of mortality was observed in Cox's proportional hazard model in the EN group and PNH groups (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.37-0.49], P 0.001; and HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.44-0.62], P 0.001, respectively) than in the control group.This study indicated the clinical benefits of EN and PNH for patients with advanced cancer. Nevertheless, managing symptoms to improve oral intake is essential before initiation of PNH, because EN was superior to PNH.

Achalasia is a disease characterized by inadequate relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and impaired peristalsis, for which esophageal motor function testing is essential in making a definitive diagnosis. However, the diffusion rate of esophageal pressure testing in Japan is low. We, therefore, examined whether achalasia could be identified by esophageal clearance testing with low-density barium (Timed Barium Esophagogram: TBE). 126 cases (62 males, median age of 46 years), excluding those who had not undergone TBE during their initial laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery, were chosen as the subjects from among those who were diagnosed with achalasia from November 2012 when HRM was introduced. The type of dilation, maximum esophageal transverse diameter, and esophageal clearance measurements by TBE were retrospectively examined. With respect to TBE, 200 mL of 45 weight% low-density barium was ingested as quickly as possible, after which the barium column heights (H0, H1, H2, and H5) were measured 1 min, 2 min, and 5 min following ingestion. The types of dilation indicated included: straight type (105 cases, 83%); sigmoid type (20 cases, 16%); and advanced sigmoid type (1 case, 1%). The maximum transverse diameter of the esophagus was 45 (34–54) mm, with Grade I (d

Introduction Laparoscopic surgery is considered safe and effective for a gastric submucosal tumors, and reduced-port surgery (RPS) is being increasingly performed to treat these tumors. Herein, we present laparoscopic RPS with the cowboy technique for the removal of gastric submucosal tumors. Materials and surgical technique A single-port access device was inserted at the naval (three 5-mm trocars), and a 5-mm trocar was inserted in the left lateral abdominal wall. A ligature was placed at the neck of the tumor, the loop was then tightened, and the knot was finally secured-a process referred to as the cowboy technique. This technique enables complete surgical excision and can be used for exophytic submucosal tumors of the stomach. Four patients underwent RPS with this technique, and the outcomes were good. Discussion Our cowboy technique enables the safe full-thickness excision of gastric submucosal tumors with exophytic growth and is very useful in performing RPS.

Achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) are idiopathic esophageal motility disorders characterized by impaired deglutitive relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) which represents adequacy of LES relaxation. The Starlet HRM system is widely used in Japan; however, IRP values in achalasia/EGJOO patients assessed with the Starlet system have not been well studied. We propose the optimal cutoff of IRP for detecting achalasia/EGJOO using the Starlet system. Patients undergone HRM test using the Starlet system at our institution between July 2018 and September 2020 were included. Of these, we included patients with either achalasia or EGJOO and those who had normal esophageal motility without hiatal hernia. Abnormally impaired LES relaxation (i.e., achalasia and EGJOO) was diagnosed if prolonged esophageal emptying was evident based on timed barium esophagogram (TBE). A total of 111 patients met study criteria. Of these, 48 patients were diagnosed with achalasia (n = 45 [type I, n = 20; type II, n = 22; type III, n = 3]) or EGJOO (n = 3). In the 48 patients who had a prolonged esophageal clearance based on TBE, IRP values distributed along a wide-range of minimal 14.1 to a maximal of 72.2 mmHg. The optimal cutoff value of IRP was 24.7 mmHg with sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 84.1% (AUC 0.94). The optimal cutoff value of IRP to distinguish achalasia/EGJOO was ≥ 25 mmHg using the Starlet HRM system in our cohort. This indicates that the current proposed cutoff of 26 mmHg appears to be relevant.

Clinical role of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease is by far controversial. This can be attributed to the paucity of basic research detailing the mechanism of LDA-induced esophageal mucosal injury (EI) on underlying chronic acid reflux esophagitis (RE). The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of LDA on chronic RE in rats. Esophagitis was induced in 8-week-old male Wistar rats by ligating the border between forestomach and glandular portion with a 2–0 silk tie and covering the duodenum with a small piece of 18-Fr Nelaton catheter. Seventy-eight chronic RE rat models were divided into five treatment groups, consisting of orally administered vehicle (controls), and aspirin doses of 2, 5, 50 or 100 mg/kg once daily for 28 days. EI was assessed by gross area of macroscopic mucosal injury, severity grade of esophagitis and microscopic depth of infiltration by inflammatory cells. Area of esophagitis in animals with aspirin dose of 100 mg/kg/day showed a 36.5% increase compared with controls, although it failed to achieve statistical significance (p = 0.812). Additionally, the rate of severe EI was increased in animals with aspirin dose of 100 mg/kg/day as compared with controls (p

Esophageal achalasia can be roughly divided into non-sigmoid and sigmoid types. Laparoscopic surgery has been reported to be less than optimally effective for sigmoid type. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the esophageal flexion level on the clinical condition and surgical outcomes of patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia.The subjects were 36 patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia who had been observed for1 year after surgery. The subjects were divided into sigmoid type (Sg) and advanced sigmoid type (aSg) groups based on the flexion level of the lower esophagus to compare their clinical parameters and surgical outcomes.The Sg and aSg groups included 26 (72%) and 10 subjects, respectively. There were no marked differences in the clinical parameters or surgical outcomes between the two groups. However, the clearance rate calculated using the timed barium esophagogram was lower in the aSg group than in the Sg group. No differences were found in the postoperative symptom scores between the two groups, and both reported a high level of satisfaction.Although laparoscopic surgery for symptoms of sigmoid esophageal achalasia was highly successful regardless of the flexion level, the improvement in esophageal clearance was lower when the flexion level was higher.

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) has become a standard operative procedure for GERD-related diseases in Japan, although meta-analyses have mainly evaluated findings from Western countries. The propensity score matching method was used to compare and investigate the treatment outcomes of two fundoplication procedures (the Nissen and Toupet methods). Among 474 patients who underwent initial LF from December 1994 to April 2016, we extracted 401 cases (Nissen: 92 cases, Toupet: 309 cases), excluding 73 patients in whom follow-up was insufficient. We then matched 126 of these patients (63 per group). The esophageal acid reflux time (%) was 12.2:2.8, being higher in the Nissen group than in the Toupet group (p

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and sleep disturbance has recently been pointed out and is garnering substantial attention. Although there are reports that point out the effectiveness of medical treatment for sleep disturbance associated with GERD, examinations of the pathological condition, including reflux during sleep, are inadequate. In the present study, we evaluated the recumbent reflux in patients with GERD and sleep disturbance using multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH), and attempted to suppress recumbent reflux by surgical treatment to examine the pathophysiology of patients with GERD and sleep disturbance. Of the 47 patients with GERD-related diseases in whom laparoscopic fundoplication was performed at The Jikei University Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017, 31 patients (average age: 55.9 ± 13.8 years, male in 25), excluding 9 with surgical indications only for esophageal hiatal hernia and 7 without postoperative evaluation, were the subjects of this study. All surgical procedures were performed by the Toupet method. We used the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to evaluate sleep disturbance, setting 5.5 as the cut-off value, based on the report by Doi et al., with any conditions beyond this value deemed sleep disturbance. The evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux was carried based on the MII-pH using the Sleuth, manufactured by Sandhill Corporation, with an automatic analysis carried out by computer. Furthermore, recumbent abnormal reflux was defined as recumbent all reflux (times) > 7. All evaluations were performed preoperatively and at 3 months after the operation. The data were expressed in medians and interquartile ranges, with p

Chest pain reduces the quality of life of patients with achalasia. Although laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) is a standard surgical treatment for achalasia, its therapeutic efficacy for chest pain is not clear. The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of LHD for chest pain and tried to identify factors associated with the relief of chest pain. The study included 244 patients with preoperative chest pain who underwent LHD as the first surgical intervention. The questionnaire-based symptom frequency score was multiplied by the severity score, and the calculated metric was defined as the symptom score. The study population was stratified, by the change in the chest pain symptom score, into Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), and No Remission (NR) groups, which were compared for patient background and surgical outcome. Multivariate analysis was also performed to determine factors associated with the relief of chest pain. As for preoperative clinicopathological conditions, the CR subgroup was older (p = 0.0169) with fewer previous balloon dilatations (p = 0.009). Although no difference was detected in the surgical outcome, the NR group had higher postoperative symptom scores for both difficulty in swallowing and vomiting and a lower score for patient satisfaction with surgery (p = 0.0141). Multivariate analysis detected two factors associated with CR: disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations. LHD improved chest pain symptoms in 90% of patients with achalasia. The patients who achieved relief of chest pain were characterized by disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations.

IntroductionAbdominal pain and distention are common in ovarian tumours. When the ovarian tumour grows too large, the tumour can cause these symptoms. Percutaneous drainage from ovarian tumours, which can alleviate symptoms, is traditionally discouraged for its potential risk of peritoneal tumour seeding.CaseA 73-year-old woman with a multilocular ovarian tumour reporting abdominal fullness and pain was referred to the palliative care outpatient department. The multilocular tumour occupied most of the intra-abdominal space, which was determined to cause her symptoms. To alleviate her symptoms, we performed intermittent percutaneous drainage for 1.5 years. A clinical autopsy revealed the tumour was an ovarian mucinous carcinoma. Despite iterative tumour drainage, we observed no feature of peritoneal dissemination.ConclusionIntermittent percutaneous drainage of ovarian tumours could reduce tumour-related abdominal symptoms without pathological evidence of peritoneal dissemination. This procedure can be a new palliative treatment option for ovarian tumour-related abdominal symptoms.

Between December 1994 and December 2015, we performed 500 laparoscopic antireflux surgeries (LARS) in our clinic. Among them, we experienced 4 cases (0.8%) who had giant paraesophageal hiatal hernias (GPEH) with markedly enlarged esophageal hiatuses that made suturing of the right and left crus of the diaphragm difficult during crural repair. Therefore, we developed a procedure that allows crural repair without applying excessive tension after making a relaxing incision on the crus. This technique was applied in 5 cases in the current study. The mean surgical time and loss of bleeding volume were 280.2 ± 45.7 (227–339) min and 46.0 ± 87.1 (0–200) mL, respectively. No adverse events were observed during surgery, and no patients were converted to open surgery. No recurrent case has been observed after three sutures were added for fixation of the stomach and abdominal walls. This technique could be a safe and effective procedure for closure of the crural defect in GPEH.

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII–pH) is the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux (GER), but there are no concrete data for a Japanese population. The aim of this study is to determine the standard values of MII–pH for a Japanese population. Twenty healthy Japanese volunteers without symptoms of GER were recruited through the homepage of the Department of Surgery at The Jikei University School of Medicine. Their mean age was 29.0 ± 3.0 years (range 24–36) and three of the volunteers were women (15 % of the total number of volunteers). The volunteers underwent MII–pH measurements at 6 sites. These sites were centered at 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, and 17 cm higher than the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and a pH-monitoring device was placed 5 cm above the upper border of the LES. GER events were detected and divided into acid or non-acid reflux by pH and liquid acid or liquid non-acid reflux by impedance. The normal values of MII–pH for the Japanese population were as follows: a pH below 4 holding time of less than 2.5 %, less than 2.1 total number of reflux events longer than 5 min, duration of the longest reflux event less than 12.7, and DeMeester Score less than 11.0. The total number of liquid reflux events was less than 80. The total number of liquid acid reflux events and liquid non-acid reflux events was less than 49 and 58, respectively. We provided the standard values of MII–pH for a Japanese population.

As an increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reported in Japan, and public interest in GERD has been increasing, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology published the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009. Six years have passed since its publication, and there have been a large number of reports in Japan concerning the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and Barrett's esophagus during this period. By incorporating the contents of these reports, the guidelines were completely revised, and a new edition was published in October 2015. The revised edition consists of eight items: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, internal treatment, surgical treatment, esophagitis after surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract, extraesophageal symptoms, and Barrett's esophagus. This paper summarizes these guidelines, particularly the parts related to the treatment for GERD. In the present revision, aggressive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy is recommended for severe erosive GERD, and on-demand therapy or continuous maintenance therapy is recommended for mild erosive GERD or PPI-responsive non-erosive GERD. Moreover, PPI-resistant GERD (insufficient symptomatic improvement and/or esophageal mucosal break persisting despite the administration of PPI at a standard dose for 8 weeks) is defined, and a standard-dose PPI twice a day, change in PPI, change in the PPI timing of dosing, addition of a prokinetic drug, addition of rikkunshito (traditional Japanese herbal medicine), and addition of histamine H2-receptor antagonist are recommended for its treatment. If no improvement is observed even after these treatments, pathophysiological evaluation with esophageal impedance-pH monitoring or esophageal manometry at an expert facility for diseases of the esophagus is recommended.

The number of operations for laparoscopic antireflux surgery in Japan is much less than that in Western countries. This study’s aim was to evaluate outcome measures for redo antireflux surgery (redo-ARS) in Japanese patients. Subjects consisted of 11 patients (2.3 %) who required redo-ARS, from an original group of 474 patients who had a primary ARS between December 1994 and January 2015. The mean age of the subjects was 57.7 years, and six of 11 patients were women (55 %). Clinical data were collected in a prospective manner, and were then reviewed retrospectively. The most common cause of failed primary ARS was dislocation of the wrap (6/11 or 54 %). Of the 11 patients, 10 (91 %) were approached laparoscopically, with one requiring conversion to open surgery. Eight (73 %) underwent redo fundoplication, and the others had hiatal hernia repair alone. Mean operation time and blood loss were 202 min and 56 mL, respectively. A perioperative gastric wall injury occurred in three patients. The postoperative course was uneventful in majority patients. Three (27 %) were required to take proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and two (18 %) had a recurrence of hiatal hernia. A postoperative questionnaire was answered by seven of 11 (63 %), and these all reported a high level of satisfaction with their surgery. Redo-ARS can be performed safely under laparoscopy. There was no recurrence rate in almost 80 %, and more than 70 % of patients were withdrawn from PPI treatment postoperatively.

There is some debate about whether preoperative balloon dilation influences the outcomes of laparoscopic Heller–Dor surgery (LHD), with no consensus opinion as yet. Thus, we investigated if preoperative dilation influences the treatment outcomes of LHD for achalasia. The subjects of this study were 526 patients with achalasia who underwent LHD as an initial treatment between August 1994 and February 2017. The patients were roughly classified by the status of preoperative balloon dilation and matched with propensity scores for age, sex, BMI, morphologic type, and maximum esophageal transverse diameter. Consequently, 94 subjects each were assigned to the balloon dilation (BD) group and to the non-balloon dilation (non-BD) group. We evaluated patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis. No differences were found in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of intraoperative mucosal injury, or postoperative hospital stay between the BD and non-BD groups. The mean patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the non-BD group (4.9) than in the BD group (4.7) and the incidence of postoperative esophagitis was significantly lower in the non-BD group (1.1%) than in the BD group (7.4%). Preoperative balloon dilation had no effect on intraoperative complications but did increase the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LHD for achalasia.

High-resolution manometry (HRM), which is breakthrough testing equipment to evaluate esophageal motor function, was developed in Europe and United State and has garnered attention. Moreover, multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) testing has allowed us to grasp all liquid/gas reflux including not only acid but also non-acid reflux. We examined the impact of the presence of reflux esophagitis (RE) on esophageal motor function before and after laparoscopic fundoplication. The subjects included 100 patients (male: 63 patients, mean age: 54.1 ± 15.8) among 145 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD associated diseases during a 4-year period from October 2012 to September 2016, excluding 6 patients who underwent further surgery, 32 patients on whom HRM was not performed, 3 patients who had technical errors during testing, and 4 patients for whom the status of RE was unknown. Regarding HRM, Mano Scan from Given Imaging Ltd. was used, and for the analysis, Mano View version 3.0 from the same company was used, after which data was calculated based on the Chicago Classification advocated by Pandolfino et al. Moreover, for the MII-pH testing, Sleuth manufactured by Sandhill Scientific. Inc. was used and automatic analysis was conducted by a computer. Postoperative assessments were conducted 3 months following surgery for all. Data was described in the median value and inter-quartile range, with a statistically significant difference defined as p

Surgical results of GERD have mainly been reported from the Western countries, with a few reports found in Japan. We examined the surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication and clarify the characteristics of recurrent cases. The subjects included 375 patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication from June 1997 to December 2016 as the initial surgery. Patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and surgical results were examined. In addition, we compared the patient characteristics and pathophysiology of recurrent cases in comparison with non-recurrent cases. Age 59 (43–70) and male 211 (56.3%). The operation time was 141 min (113–180) and intraoperative complications were found to have onset in 13 subjects (3.5%). Dysphagia after surgery was found in 18 cases (4.8%). The A factor (the degree of hiatal hernia), P factor (the degree of esophagitis), and pH

Mucosal injury during myotomy is the most frequent complication seen with the Heller–Dor procedure for achalasia. The present study aimed to examine risk factors for such mucosal injury during this procedure. This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent the laparoscopic Heller–Dor procedure for achalasia at a single facility. Variables for evaluation included patient characteristics, preoperative pathophysiological findings, and surgeon’s operative experience. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. We also examined surgical outcomes and the degree of patient satisfaction in relation to intraoperative mucosal injury. Four hundred thirty-five patients satisfied study criteria. Intraoperative mucosal injury occurred in 67 patients (15.4 %). In univariate analysis, mucosal injury was significantly associated with the patient age ≥60 years, disease history ≥10 years, prior history of cardiac diseases, preoperative esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon’s operative experience with fewer than five cases. In multivariate analysis involving these factors, the following variables were identified as risk factors: age ≥60 years, esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon’s operative experience with fewer than five cases. The mucosal injury group had significant extension of the operative time and increased blood loss. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of reflux esophagitis or the degree of symptom alleviation postoperatively. The fragile esophagus caused by advanced patient age and/or dilatation were risk factor for mucosal injury during laparoscopic Heller–Dor procedure. And novice surgeon was also identified as an isolated risk factor for mucosal injury.

To clarify the feasibility and utility of reduced port surgery (RPS) for achalasia. Between September 2005 and June 2013, 359 patients with esophageal achalasia, excluding cases of reoperation, underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) according to our clinical pathway. Three-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent LHD with five incisions (conventional approach), while the other 32 patients underwent RPS, including eight via SILS. The clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed. We selected 24 patients matched for gender, age and morphologic type with patients in the RPS group from among the 327 patients (C group). The surgical outcomes were compared between the C and RPS groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of symptoms, dysphagia score, chest pain score, shape of the distal esophagus and esophageal clearance. The operative time was significantly longer in the RPS group than in the C group (p

In the present study, we examined how the body mass index (BMI) affected the outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD in patients, whose backgrounds were matched in a propensity score-matched analysis. We divided the patients into two groups (BMI

Balloon dilatation is reportedly less effective for young patients with esophageal achalasia than for older patients. However, there is no consensus on the impact of prior balloon dilatation on outcomes of surgical treatment. This study investigated the significance of preoperative balloon dilatation on surgical outcomes in young patients with esophageal achalasia. Of patients aged less than 40 years who had undergone a laparoscopic Heller–Dor operation for esophageal achalasia, 201 with a postoperative follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. They were divided into two groups with and without a history of balloon dilatation, and compared preoperative pathological conditions and surgical outcomes. This study included 100 men and 101 women with a median age of 31 years, of whom 158 patients without a history of pneumatic dilatation (79%, non-PD group) and 43 with a history of pneumatic dilatation (21%, PD group) The preoperative symptom scores for dysphagia and regurgitation were significantly higher in the non-PD group. Although no differences were observed in surgical outcomes or postoperative course, the esophageal clearance rates calculated on preoperative and postoperative timed barium esophagograms were lower in terms of both height and width of the barium column in the PD group than in the non-PD group. Subjectively, both groups expressed equally high satisfaction. In patients aged less than 40 years with esophageal achalasia, although preoperative balloon dilatation did not affect subjective levels of satisfaction with surgery, postoperative improvement in esophageal clearance in the lower esophagus was inhibited.

The modalities for evaluating acid reflux in medical care for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include conventional pH (C-pH), wireless pH (Bravo®) and multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH), which have been reported to vary with respect to the duration of acid reflux. In this study, we examined the difference between the acid reflux in C-pH and MII-pH among patients with GERD. Prior to initial laparoscopic fundoplication carried out on 297 cases from December 1994 to April 2016, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and C-pH or MII-pH were conducted. A propensity score-matched analysis was carried out about five factors including age, sex, BMI, the extent of reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles classification), and the presence of hiatal hernia (HH), ultimately leading to the creation of a C-pH group (81 cases) and MII-pH group (81 cases) as the subjects. Concerning pH

Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) is the most common form of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for NERD by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII–pH) monitoring. Twenty-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for NERD had MII–pH monitoring before surgery. Among them, 11 patients accepted to undergo MII–pH monitoring both before and after surgery. Their clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics, the esophageal function of time pH below 4, DeMeester score, the numbers of acid and nonacid reflux episodes and symptom index (SI) were evaluated. Pre- and postoperative time pH below 4 were 5.8 ± 7.1 and 0.7 ± 1.3, respectively, and DeMeester score was 19.7 ± 23.3 and 2.8 ± 3.8, respectively, both of which were significantly different (p = 0.022 and 0.019). Pre- and postoperative numbers of all reflux episodes were 84.3 ± 52.5 and 36.2 ± 22.8, respectively. Pre- and postoperative acid reflux episodes were 39.5 ± 35.2 and 9.9 ± 19.2, respectively. There were significant differences in the number of both all and acid reflux episodes (p = 0.001 and 0.012). Those of nonacid reflux episodes were 44.8 ± 37.4 and 26.3 ± 13.9, respectively, which did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.068). Six patients (54.5 %) had positive SI preoperatively, but no one had positive SI after surgery. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication can control gastroesophageal reflux events in patients with NERD.

Upside-down stomach, an atypical form of esophageal hiatal hernia, is a rare pathology. Due to its anomalous anatomical characteristics, the level of difficulty of laparoscopic surgery is considered to be high. However, as the number of patients is very small in Japan, surgical results have not been fully investigated. We examined the results of surgical treatment for Japanese patients with upside-down stomach. The subjects were 11 patients given a diagnosis of upside-down stomach based on upper gastrointestinal tract radiographic imaging and who had undergone laparoscopic surgery at least 6 months prior to this study. Surgical results, postoperative recurrence, and postoperative oral intake of gastric acid-suppressive medications were examined. The subjects consisted of one man and ten women (91 %). The mean age was 73.0 ± 9.2 years and the mean disease period was 38.7 months. The operation time was 175.5 ± 49.1 min (range 110–280) and the intraoperative blood loss was 122.7 ± 214.9 mL (range 0–550). None of the patients had required conversion to laparotomy. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.9 ± 3.4 days (range 7–18) and two patients had persistent dysphagia after surgery, which improved with endoscopic dilatation. While two patients (18 %) had a postoperative recurrence of hiatal hernia, none required reoperation. Two patients (18 %) needed oral gastric acid-suppressive medications postoperatively. Laparoscopic surgery could be performed in all patients with upside-down stomach. Because of the significant recurrence rate of postoperative esophageal hiatal hernia, the use of a mesh may be required.